Skip to main content
Log in

Improved Lung Concentration of Levofloxacin by Targeted Gelatin Microspheres: In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Intake Rate, Targeting Efficacy Parameters and Peak Concentration Ratio in Albino Mice

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

High dosage and repeated ingestion of antibiotics in the treatment of pneumonia lead to inappropriate disposition of the drug and thus increase undesirable effects. Hence, this study was intended to achieve high levofloxacin concentration in lungs by targeted levofloxacin gelatin microspheres (LGMs).

Methods

The optimized LGM prepared by emulsion method was characterized for particle size, drug encapsulation efficiency, in vitro study, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and stability studies. The in vivo lung targeting efficiency parameters such as intake rate (r e), targeting efficacy (t e), overall drug targeting efficacy (T e), percentage of drug distributed to lungs (j), and ratio of peak concentration (C e) were investigated.

Results

The mean particle size ranged from 6.28 to 19.72 μm, which can get deposited in lungs by mechanical entrapment. The curve fitting analysis showed significance for Koresmeyer–Peppas model (R-square = 0.9959). The levofloxacin area under the curve (AUC; 899.62 μg h mL−1) and r e (5.74) for lung were higher and statistically significant in LGM group. Compared with spleen and liver, the t e in mice lung increased by a factor of 33.45 and ∼12.74, respectively. The targeting ratio of LGM increased by a factor of 26.22 (compared to spleen) and ∼10.58 (compared to liver). Subsequently by a factor of 4.63, C e in lung was higher in LGM-treated mice. An overall 87.14 % of the drug was distributed to lungs when administrated as LGM formulation. The histopathology confirmed tissue tolerability.

Conclusions

The gelatin microsphere allows for surface modification, and mechanically entrapped in endothelial capillary of the lung further increases affinity leading to higher levofloxacin concentration in lungs, which helps in optimizing the therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of pneumonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Giordano RJ, Edwards JK, Tuder RM, Arap W, Pasqualini R. Combinatorial ligand-directed lung targeting. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009;6:411–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hittinger M, et al. Preclinical safety and efficacy models for pulmonary drug delivery of antimicrobials with focus on in vitro models. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.10.011

  3. Zhang Z, Zhu Y, Yang X, Li C. Preparation of azithromycin microcapsules by a layer-by-layer self-assembly approach and release behaviors of azithromycin. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp. 2010;362:135–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blasi F, Aliberti S, Tarsia P. Clinical applications of azithromycin microspheres in respiratory tract infections. Int J Nanomed. 2007;2:551–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ball P. Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in the context of other contemporary fluoroquinolones: a review. Curr Ther Res. 2003;64:646–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao X, Wu J, Xiu Q, Wang C, Zhang D, Huang J, et al. A randomized controlled clinical trial of levofloxacin 750 mg versus 500 mg intravenous infusion in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;80:141–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wimer SM, Schoonover L, Garrison MW. Levofloxacin: a therapeutic review. Clin Thera. 1998;20:1049–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ball P. Efficacy and safety of levofloxacin in the context of other contemporary fluoroquinolones: a review. Curr Thera Res. 2003;64:646–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Xiong et al. Delivery of antibiotics with polymeric particles. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2014.02.002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang Y, Wang X, Lin X, Liu X, Tian B, Tang X. High azithromycin loading powders for inhalation and their in vivo evaluation in rats. Int J Pharm. 2010;395:205–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang F, Kang J, Yang F, Zhao Z, Kong T, Zeng Z. Preparation and evaluation of enrofloxacin microspheres and tissue distribution in rats. J Vet Sci. 2015;16:157–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Lu B, Zhang JQ, Yang H. Lung-targeting microspheres of carboplatin. Int J Pharm. 2003;265:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poyner EA, Alpar HO, Almeida AJ, Gamble MD, Brown MRW. A comparative study on the pulmonary delivery of tobramycin encapsulated into liposomes and PLA microspheres following intravenous and endotracheal delivery. J Control Release. 1995;35:41–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tseng C, Wang T, Dong G, Wu SY, Young T, Shieh M, et al. Development of gelatin nanoparticles with biotinylated EGF conjugation for lung cancer targeting. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3996–4005.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozkan Y, Dikmen N, Isimer A, Gunhan O, Aboul-Enien HY. Clarithromycin targeting to lung: characterization, size distribution and in vivo evaluation of the human serum albumin microspheres. II Farmaco. 2000;55:303–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Li X, Chang S, Du G, Li Y, Gong J. Encapsulation of azithromycin into polymeric microspheres by reduced pressure-solvent evaporation method. Int J Pharm. 2012;433:79–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar G, Sharma S, Shafiq N, Khuller GK, Malhotra S. Optimization, in vitro-in vivo evaluation: short-term tolerability of novel levofloxacin-loaded PLGA nanoparticle formulation. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:2165–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Long J, Cheang T, Zhuo S, Zeng R, Dai Q, Li H, et al. Anticancer drug-loaded multifunctional nanoparticles to enhance the chemotherapeutic efficacy in lung cancer metastasis. J Nanobio. 2014;12(37):1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu X, Wang J, Miao L, Zhang X, Huang G. Prolonged systemic delivery of antibacterial agent levofloxacin using liposomes. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2011;6:259–66.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harsha NS, Rani RHS. Drug targeting to lungs by way of microspheres. Arch Pharm Res. 2006;29:598–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Franz J, Pokorova D, Hampi J, Dittrich M. Adjuvant efficacy of gelatin particles and microparticles. Int J Pharm. 1998;168:153–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dillen K, Vandervoort J, Mooter GV, Ludwig A. Evaluation of ciprofloxacin-loaded Eudragit® RS100 or RL100/PLGA nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2006;314:72–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gibaud S, Al Awwadi NJ, Ducki C, Astier A. Poly(caprolactone) and eudragit microparticles containing fludracortisones acetate. Int J Pharm. 2004;269:491–508.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang J, Wigent RJ, Bentzley CM, Schwartz JB. Nifedipine solid dispersion in microparticles of ammonio methacrylate copolymer and ethylcellulose binary blend for controlled drug delivery effect of drug loading on release kinetics. Int J Pharm. 2006;319:44–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yamamoto H, Koizumi T, Hirota M, Kaneki T, Ogasawara H, Yamazaki Y, et al. Lung tissue distribution after intravenous administration of grapefloxacin: comparative study with levofloxacin. Jpn J Pharmacol. 2002;88:63–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Glenny RW, Bernard SL, Lamm WJ. Hemodynamic effects of 15-μm-diameter microspheres on the rat pulmonary circulation. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:499–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saroglou M, Ismailos G, Tryfon S, Liapakis I, Papalois A, Bouros D. Penetration of azithromycin in experimental pleural empyema fluid. Eur J Pharmacol. 2010;626:271–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Tasso L, Andrade CD, Costa TD. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of the bactericidial activity of free lung concentration of levofloxacin and gatifloxacin against Streptococcus pneumoniae. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2011;38:307–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Solorio L, Zwolinski C, Lund AW, Farrell MJ, Stegemann JP. Gelatin microspheres crosslinked with genipin for local delivery of growth factors. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2010;4:514–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Kutscher HL, et al. Enhanced passive pulmonary targeting and retention of PEGylated rigid microparticles in rats. Int J Pharm. 2010. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.09.020

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are thankful to Dr. Ramesh K, Director, Karnataka College of Pharmacy, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India and Mr. Lokesh Prasad, DTL, Bengaluru Karnataka, India for valuable contribution to make this research work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Balakeshwa Ramaiah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedures performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ramaiah, B., Nagaraja, S.H., Kapanigowda, U.G. et al. Improved Lung Concentration of Levofloxacin by Targeted Gelatin Microspheres: In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Intake Rate, Targeting Efficacy Parameters and Peak Concentration Ratio in Albino Mice. J Pharm Innov 11, 289–299 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-016-9252-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-016-9252-y

Keywords

Navigation