Advertisement

Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 53–64 | Cite as

Population Balance Model Development, Validation, and Prediction of CQAs of a High-Shear Wet Granulation Process: Towards QbD in Drug Product Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

  • Anwesha Chaudhury
  • Dana Barrasso
  • Preetanshu Pandey
  • Huiquan Wu
  • Rohit RamachandranEmail author
Research Article

Abstract

This paper focuses on the predictive model development for a pharmaceutically relevant model granulation process. A population balance modeling (PBM) framework has been employed for modeling purposes which is then utilized to obtain accurate predictions of the process. The model is aligned to adequately describe the high-shear mode of granulation operation in a batch process. The model is calibrated using the particle swarm algorithm (PSA) in the form of a multiobjective optimization problem. The multiobjective optimization problem was implemented based on the ε-constraint method which involves the handling of multiple cost functions in the form of constraints with the minimization of one primary objective function from the entire set of cost functions. The resultant solutions obtained from the model are Pareto optimal. The effects of the impeller speed, liquid-to-solid ratio, and wet massing time on the particle size distributions were characterized, and predicted size distributions were in agreement with experimental results. The predictive model framework lends itself to the quality by design (QbD) initiative undertaken by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA).

Keywords

Granulation Multidimensional population balance model QbD Predictive modeling Multiobjective optimization Particle size distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the National Institute for Pharmaceutical Technology and Education (NIPTE) and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for providing funds for this research. This study was funded by the FDA-sponsored Grant “Critical Path Manufacturing Sector Research Initiative (5U01FD004275-02).” This work was also supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center on Structured Organic Particulate Systems, via Grant NSF-ECC 0540855. The authors also thank Dilbir Bindra and Jing Tao from Bristol-Myers Squibb for their contributions to this work. The support from various FDA managers including Dr. Mansoor Khan, Dr. Richard Lostritto, Dr. Vincent Vilker, and Mr. Jon E. Clark, and insightful FDA internal review by Dr. Cindy Buhse are acknowledged.

Disclaimer

The views and opinions expressed in this work are only of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policy or statement of the US FDA.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrasso D, Ramachandran R. A comparison of model order reduction techniques for a four-dimensional population balance model describing multi-component wet granulation processes. Chem Eng Sci. 2012;80:380–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barrasso D, Walia S, Ramachandran R. Multi-component population balance modeling of continuous granulation processes: a parametric study and comparison with experimental trends. Powder Technol. 2013;241:85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boukouvala F, Chaudhury A, Sen M, Zhou R, Mioduszewski L, Ierapetritou M, Ramachandran R. Computer-aided flowsheet simulation of a continuous tablet manufacturing process incorporating wet granulation. J Pharm Innov. 2013;8(1):11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braumann A, Kraft M, Wagner W. Numerical study of a stochastic particle algorithm solving a multidimensional population balance model for high shear granulation. J Comput Phys. 2010;229:7672–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaudhury A, Kapadia A, Prakash AV, Barrasso D, Ramachandran R. An extended cell-average technique for a multi-dimensional population balance of granulation describing aggregation and breakage. Adv Powder Technol. 2013a;24(6):962–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chaudhury A, Niziolek A, Ramachandran R. Multi-dimensional mechanistic modeling of fluid bed granulation processes: an integrated approach. Adv Powder Technol. 2013b;24(1):113–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chaudhury A, Ramachandran R. Integrated population balance model development and validation of a granulation process. Part Sci Technol. 2013;31(4):407–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chaudhury A, Wu H, Khan M, Ramachandran R. A mechanistic population balance model for granulation processes: effect of process and formulation parameters. Chem Eng Sci. 2014;107:76–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Christofides PD. Control of nonlinear distributed process systems: recent developments and challenges. AIChE J. 2001;47(3):514–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    FDA. 2004. Guidance for industry. pat-a framework for innovative pharmaceutical development, manufacturing, and quality assurance. http://www.fda.giv/cder/guidance/6419fnl.pdf. accessed on 30 May 2013.
  11. 11.
    Gantt JA, Gatzke EP. A stochastic technique for multidimensional granulation modeling. AIChE J. 2006;52(9):3067–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gernaey KV, Gani R. A model-based systems approach to pharmaceutical product-process design and analysis. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65(21):5757–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giry K, Genty M, Viana M, Wuthrich P, Chulia D. Multiphase versus single pot granulation process: influence of process and granulation parameters on granules properties. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2006;32(5):509–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hapgood KP, Litster JD, Smith R. Nucleation regime map for liquid bound granules. AIChE J. 2003;49(2):350–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Immanuel CD, Doyle FJ III. Computationally efficient solution of population balance models incorporating nucleation, growth and coagulation: application to emulsion polymerization. Chem Eng Sci. 2003;58(16):3681–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Immanuel CD, Doyle FJ III. Solution technique for a multi-dimensional population balance model describing granulation processes. Powder Technol. 2005;156(2–3):213–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Iveson S, Litster J. Fundamental studies of granule consolidation part 2: quantifying the effects of particle and binder properties. Powder Technol. 1998a;99(3):243–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iveson SM, Litster JD. Growth regime map for liquid-bound granules. AIChE J. 1998b;44(7):1510–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Iveson SM, Litster JD, Hapgood K, Ennis BJ. Nucleation, growth and breakage phenomena in agitated wet granulation processes: a review. Powder Technol. 2001;117(1–2):3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kayrak-Talay D, Litster JD. A priori performance prediction in pharmaceutical wet granulation: testing the applicability of the nucleation regime map to a formulation with a broad size distribution and dry binder addition. Int J Pharm. 2011;418(2):254–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on neural networks, 1995. Proceedings. vol 4. 1995 p. 1942–1948.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Klatt KU, Marquardt W. Perspectives of process systems engineering-personal views from academia and industry. Comput Chem Eng. 2009;33:536–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knight P, Instone T, Pearson JM, Hounslow M. An investigation into the kinetics of granulation using a high shear mixer. Powder Technol. 1993;77:159–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kristensen HG. Particle agglomeration in high shear mixers. Powder Technol. 1996;88(3):197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Li L, Yu X, Li X, Guo W. 2009. A modified pso algorithm for constrained multi-objective optimization. In: Third international conference on network and system security, 2009. NSS ’09. p. 462–467.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Linninger AA, Chowdhry S, Bahl V, Krendl H, Pinger H. A systems approach to mathematical modeling of industrial processes. Comput Chem Eng. 2000;24:591–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Madec L, Falk L, Plasari E. Modelling of the agglomeration in suspension process with multidimensional kernels. Powder Technol. 2003;130(1–3):147–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pandey P, Tao J, Chaudhury A, Ramachandran R, Gao JZ, Bindra DS. A combined experimental and modeling approach to study the effects of high-shear wet granulation process parameters on granule characteristics. Pharm Dev Technol. 2013;18(1):210–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pandey P, Tao J, Gao JZ, Bindra D, Narang A, Ramachandran R, Chaudhury A. 2011. A combined experimental and computational approach to the scale-up of high-shear wet granulation. In: Proc. 2011 AIChE annual meeting (Minneapolis, USA, October 2011).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ramachandran R, Barton PI. Effective parameter estimation within a multi-dimensional population balance model framework. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65(16):4884–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ramachandran R, Poon JMH, Sanders CFW, Glaser T, Immanuel CD, Doyle FJ III, Litster JD, Stepanek F, Wang FY, Cameron IT. Experimental studies on distributions on granule size, binder content and porosity in batch drum granulation: inferences on process modelling requirements and process sensitivities. Powder Technol. 2008;188:89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Salman AD, Hounslow MJ, Seville JPK. Granulation. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shi Y, Eberhart R. A modified particle swarm optimizer. In: Evolutionary computation proceedings, 1998. IEEE world congress on computational intelligence. (1998) p. 69–73.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Soos M, Sefcik J, Morbidelli M. Investigation of aggregation, breakage and restructuring kinetics of colloidal dispersions in turbulent flows by population balance modeling and static light scattering. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61(8):2349–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Stepanek F, Rajniak P. Droplet morphologies on particles with macroscopic surface roughness. Langmuir. 2006;22(3):917–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Verkoeijen D, Pouw GA, Meesters GMH, Scarlett B. Population balances for particulate processes—a volume approach. Chem Eng Sci. 2002;57(12):2287–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    žižek K, Hraste M, Gomzi Z. High shear granulation of dolomite—I: effect of shear regime on process kinetics. Chem Eng Res Des. 2013;91(1):70–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anwesha Chaudhury
    • 1
  • Dana Barrasso
    • 1
  • Preetanshu Pandey
    • 2
  • Huiquan Wu
    • 3
  • Rohit Ramachandran
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, RutgersThe State University of New JerseyPiscatawayUSA
  2. 2.Drug Product Science and TechnologyBristol-Myers SquibbNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.Division of Product Quality Research (HFD-940), Office of Testing and Research, Office of Pharmaceutical Science, CDERFDASilver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations