This study is concerned with enhanced model-based control of a continuous direct compression pharmaceutical process. The control-loop performance is assessed in silico and results obtained will be incorporated into the pilot plant facility of the continuous direct compaction process at the NSF Engineering Research Center of Rutgers University. The models used in the study are obtained via system identification from a combination of first principles-based dynamic models, experimental data, and/or literature data. The main objective of the paper is to formulate an effective control strategy at the basic/regulatory level, for the integrated continuous operation of the direct compaction process, and to maintain the process at the desired set-points, taking into account the multivariable process interactions and disturbances. Simulations show that that at very mild interactions, the proposed regulatory control strategy is able to maintain set-points at desired values. However, at moderate to high process interactions, oscillatory behavior of controlled variables is seen. The presence of disturbances also resulted in poor control-loop performance. Results also lend credence to the development of advanced control strategies in such scenarios and will be addressed in future work. Optimal control tuning parameters are obtained from a derivative-free optimization algorithm.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Gorsek A, Glavic P. Design of batch versus continuous processes: Part 1: single-purpose equipment. Chem Eng Res Des. 1997;75:709–17.
Leuenberger H. New trends in the production of pharmaceutical granules: batch versus continuous processing. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2001;52:289–98.
Plumb K. Continous processing in the pharmaceutical industry: changing the mindset. Chem Eng Res Des. 2005;83:730–8.
Leuenberger H, Betz G. Granulation process control—production of pharmaceutical granules: the classical batch concept and the problem of scale-up. Granulation. 2007;98:705–33.
Leuenberger H. Scale-up in the 4th dimension in the field of granulation and drying or how to avoid classical scale-up. Powder Technol. 2003;130:225–30.
Werani J, Grunberg M, Ober C, Leuenberger H. Semicontinuous granulation—the process of choice for the production of pharmaceutical granules. Powder Technol. 2004;140:163–8.
Betz G, Junker-Purgin P, Leuenberger H. Batch and continuous procesing in the production of pharmaceutical granules. Pharm Dev Technol. 2003;8:289–97.
Gernaey KV, Gani R. A model-based systems approach to pharmaceutical product-process design and analysis. Chemical Engineering Science. 2010;65:5757–69.
Reklaitis GV, Khinast J, Muzzio FJ. Pharmaceutical engineering science—new approaches to pharmaceutical development and manufacturing. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:iv–vii.
Klatt KU, Marquardt W. Perspectives of process systems engineering—personal views from academia and industry. Comp Chem Eng. 2009;33:536–50.
Huang J, Kaul G, Cai C, Chatlapalli R, Hernandez-Abad P, Ghosh K, Nagi A. Quality by design case study: an integrated multi-variate approach to drug product and process development. Int J Pharm. 2009;382(1–2):23–32.
Mckenzie P, Kiang S, Tom J, Rubin E, Futran M. Can pharmaceutical process development become high tech? AIChE J. 2006;52(12):3990–4.
Hamad ML, Bowman K, Smith N, Sheng X, Morris KR. Multi-scale pharmaceutical process understanding: from particle to powder dosage form. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:5625–38.
Wang XZ, Liu L, Li R, Tweedie RJ, Primrose K, Corbett J, McNeil-Watson F. Online monitoring of nanoparticle suspensions using dynamic light scattering, ultrasound spectroscopy and process tomagraphy. Comp Aided Chem Eng. 2009;26:351–6.
Lee M-J, Seo D-Y, Lee HE, Wang IC, Kim WS, Jeong MY, Choi GJ. In line NIR quantification of film thickness on pharmaceutical pellets during a fluid bed coating process. Int J Pharm. 2010;403:66–72.
Chen ZP, Lovett D, Morris J. Process analytical technologies (PAT)—the impact for process systems engineering. Comp Aided Chem Eng. 2008;25:967–72.
Ramachandran R, Rangaiah GP, Lakshminrayanan S. Data analysis, modeling and control performance enhancement of an industrial fluid catalytic cracking unit. Chem Eng Sci. 2007;62:1958–73.
Heinrich S, Peglow M, Morl L. Unsteady and steady-state particle size distributions in batch and continuous fluidized bed granulation systems. Chem Eng J. 2002;86:223–31.
Heinrich S, Peglow M, Ihlow M, Morl L. Particle population modeling in fluidized bed-spray granulation—analysis of the steady state and unsteady behaviour. Powder Technol. 2003;130:154–61.
Wang FY, Ge XY, Balliu N, Cameron IT. Optimal control and operation of drum granulation processes. Chem Eng Sci. 2006;61:257–67.
Wang FY, Cameron IT. A multi-form modelling approach to the dynamics and control of drum granulation processes. Powder Technol. 2007;179:2–11.
Glaser T, Sanders CFW, Wang FY, Cameron IT, Ramachandran R, Litster JD, Poon JMH, Immanuel CD, Doyle III FJ. Model predictive control of drum granulation. J Process Contr. 2009;19(4):615–22.
Hsu SH, Reklaitis GV, Venkatasubramanian V. Modeling and control of roller compaction for pharmaceutical manufacturing. part I: Process dynamics and control framework. J Pharam Innov. 2010;5:14–23.
Hsu SH, Reklaitis GV, Venkatasubramanian V. Modeling and control of roller compaction for pharmaceutical manufacturing. Part II: Control system design. J Pharam Innov. 2010;5:24–36.
Christofides PD. Model-based control of particulate processes. Heidelberg: Springer; 2008.
Christofides PD. Control of nonlinear distributed process systems: recent development and challenges. AICHE J. 2001;47:514–8.
Christofides PD. Control of nonlinear distributed parameter systems: an overview and new research directions. AICHE J. 2002;54:341–6.
Ward JD, Yu C-C, Doherty MF. Plantwide dynamics and control of processes with crystallization. Comp Chem Eng. 2010;34:781–91.
Patience DB, Rawlings JB. Particle-shape monitoring and control of crystallization processes. AIChE J. 2001;47:2125–30.
M. Ashobi. Modeling and control of a continuous crystallization process using neural networks and model predictive control. PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan, 1995.
Paengjuntuek W, Kittisupakorn P, Arpornwichanop A. Optimization and nonlinear control of a batch crystallization process. J Chin Inst Chem Eng. 2008;39:249–56.
Xu S, Bao J. Distributed control of plantwide chemical processes. J Process Control. 2009;19:1671–87.
Huang J, Goolcharran C, Ghosh K. A quality by design approach to investigate tablet dissolution shift upon accelerated stability by multivariate methods. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011;78:141–50.
Boukouvala F, Ramachandran R, Vanarase A, Muzzio FJ, Ierapetritou MG. Computer aided design and analysis of continuous pharmaceutical manufacturing processes. Comp Aided Chem Eng. 2011;29:216–20.
Portillio PM, Ierapetritou MG, Tomassone S, Mc Dade C, Clancy D, Avontuur PPC, Muzzio FJ. Using compartment modeling to investigate mixing behavior of a continuous mixer. J Pharm Innov. 2008;3:161–75.
W. Engisch, M. Ierapetritou, and F. J. Muzzio. Hopper refill of loss-in-weight feeding equipment. In Proceedings of the 2010 AIChE Annual Meeting, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 2010.
Vanarase A, Muzzio FJ. Effect of operating conditions and design parameters in a continuous powder mixer. Powder Technol. 2011;208:26–36.
Ramachandran R, Immanuel CD, Stepanek F, Litster JD, Doyle III FJ. A mechanistic model for granule breakage in population balances of granulation: theoretical kernel development and experimental validation. Chem Eng Res Des. 2009;87:598–614.
Ramachandran R, Barton PI. Effective parameter estimation within a multi-dimensional population balance model framework. Chem Eng Sci. 2010;65:4884–93.
Poon JMH, Ramachandran R, Sanders CFW, Glaser T, Immanuel CD, Doyle III FJ, Litster JD, Stepanek F, Wang FY, Cameron IT. Experimental validation studies on a multi-scale and mult-dimensional population balance model of batch granulation. Chem Eng Sci. 2009;64:775–86.
Boukouvala F, Ramachandran R, Ierapetritou M, Muzzio FJ. Computational approaches for studying granular dynamics of continuous blending processes—ii. Macromol Mater Eng. 2011. doi:10.1002/mame.201100054.
Portillio PM, Ierapetritou MG, Tomassone S, Mc Dade C, Clancy D, Avontuur PPC, Muzzio FJ. Quality by design methodology for development and scale-up of batch mixing processes. J Pharm Innov. 2008;3:258–70.
Gao Y, Vanarase A, Muzzio F, Ierapetritou M. Characterizing continuous powder mixing using residence time distribution. Chem Eng Sci. 2011;66:417–25.
Nokhodchi A, Ford JL, Rowe PH, Rubenstein MH. The effects of compression rate and force on the compaction properties of different viscosity grades of hydroxypropylmethyl-cellulose 2208. Int J Pharm. 1996;129:21–31.
Zeng PC, Lovett D, Morris J. Process analytical technologies (PAT)—the impact for process systems engineering. Comp Aided Chem Eng. 2010;25:967–72.
Wu H, Heilweil EJ, Hussain AS, Khan MA. Process analytical technologies (pat)—effects of instrumental and compositional variables in terahertz spectral data quality to characterize pharmaceutical materials and tablets. Comp Aided Chem Eng. 2007;343:148–58.
Xiong ZH, Huang GH, Shao HH. Soft sensor modeling based on Gaussian processes. J Cent South Univ Technol. 2005;12:469–71.
Velasco MV, Ford JL, Rowe P, Rajabi-Siahboomi AR. Influence of drug: hydroxypropylmethylcellulose ratio, drug and polymer particle size and compression force on the release of diclofenac sodium from hpmc tablets. J Control Release. 1999;57:75–85.
Jouili K, Jerbi H, Braiek NB. An advanced fuzzy logic gain scheduling trajectory control for nonlinear systems. J Process Control. 2010;20:426–40.
Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH. Process dynamics, modeling and control. London: Oxford University Press; 1994.
Desborough LD, Harris TJ. Performance assessment measures for univariate feedback control. Can J Chem Eng. 1992;1992:1186–97.
Salsbury TI. Continuous-time model identification for closed loop control performance assessment. Control Eng Pract. 2007;2007:109–21.
Huang B, Ding SX, Thornhill N. Alternative solutions to multi-variate control performance assessment problems. J Process Control. 2006;2006:457–71.
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Engineering Research Center on Structured Organic Particulate Systems, through Grant NSF-ECC 0540855
About this article
Cite this article
Ramachandran, R., Arjunan, J., Chaudhury, A. et al. Model-Based Control-Loop Performance of a Continuous Direct Compaction Process. J Pharm Innov 6, 249–263 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-011-9118-2
- Model-based control
- Continuous processing
- Direct compaction
- Control-loop performance
- Pharmaceutical manufacturing