Numerical evaluation of human exposure to 3.5-GHz electromagnetic field by considering the 3GPP-like channel features
Human exposure to 3.4–3.6-GHz radiofrequency (RF) electromagnetic field (EMF), which is the frequency band utilized by trial test of the fifth-generation mobile communication systems (5G), has been numerically analyzed in the study. The study evaluated the EMF exposure of this frequency band by taking into account of the channel features. Two exposure scenarios were reconstructed according to the technical specification on channel modeling from the 3rd Generation Partnership Project. The channel features of the reconstructed EMF were numerically validated. The equivalent source principle and the finite-difference time-domain method were applied to calculate the RF energy specific absorption (SA) using three human models. The results revealed that the exposure scenarios with various channel features affected whole-body SA (WBSA) by about 50–70%. The variation was mainly introduced by the configuration of the incident waves defined by the channel models. Dosimetric difference between the two exposure scenarios for some tissues has been presented and discussed. The results demonstrated that the anatomy of the model was also a factor influencing SA.
KeywordsFifth-generation mobile communication systems (5G) Human model Channel modeling Specific absorption Radiofrequency exposure
The work is supported by grants from National Natural Science Foundation Project (Grant Nos. 61371187 and 61671158) and National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2018ZX100301).
- 1.Ahlbom, A., Bergqvist, U., Bernhardt, J. H., Cesarini, J. P., Grandolfo, M., Hietanen, M., Mckinlay, A. F.et al. (1998). Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic and electromagnetic fields (up to 300GHz). Health Phys, 74, 494–522Google Scholar
- 3.Krayni A, Hadjem A, Vermeeren G, Sibille A, Roblin C, Joseph W et al (2017) Modeling and characterization of the uplink and downlink exposure in wireless networks. Int J Antennas Propag. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8243490
- 7.Sharma S, Chakraborty M, Singhal M, Jha M (2014) A review of 4G and 5G in context of future of wireless communication. Int J Comput Appl 95(22):1–4Google Scholar
- 8.Farhang A, Marchetti N, Figueiredo F, Miranda JP (2014) Massive MIMO and waveform design for 5th generation wireless communication systems. In: 1st international conference on 5G for ubiquitous connectivity, pp 70–75Google Scholar
- 12.Rappaport TS, Sun S, Shafi M (2017) 5G channel model with improved accuracy and efficiency in mmWave bands. IEEE 5G Tech Focus 1(1):1–6Google Scholar
- 13.Medbo J, Börner K, Haneda K, Hovinen V, Imai T, Järvelainen J, et al. (2014). Channel modelling for the fifth generation mobile communications. In 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 219–223Google Scholar
- 14.Qualcomm. (2017). Qualcomm, ZTE and China mobile announce collaboration on 5G NR trials at 3.5 GHz to accelerate wide-scale 5G deployments in China. Qualcomm press release. https://www.qualcomm.com/news/releases/2017/02/21/qualcomm-zte-and-china-mobile-announce-collaboration-5g-nr-trials-35-ghz. Accessed 24 Nov 2018
- 15.Sue M. Why the 3.5 GHz CBRS band could be a breakthrough for 5G. sdxcentral. https://www.sdxcentral.com/articles/news/3-5-ghz-cbrs-band-breakthrough-5g/2017/03/. Accessed 24 Nov 2018
- 16.Study on 3D channel model for LTE. (2017). 3GPP TR 37.977 V14.1, 2017. 3rd Generation Partnership Project Google Scholar
- 22.Taflove A, & Hagness SC (2005) Computational electrodynamics: the finite-difference time-domain method. Artech house Google Scholar
- 30.Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2013). Provisions of the People’s Republic of China on radio spectrum allocationsGoogle Scholar
- 33.Fan, W., De Lisbona, X. C., Sun, F., Nielsen, J. O., Knudsen, M., & Pedersen, G. (2013). Emulating spatial characteristics of MIMO channels for OTA testing. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag, 61(8), 4306–4314Google Scholar