Advertisement

Annals of Telecommunications

, Volume 73, Issue 7–8, pp 475–486 | Cite as

A QoS-aware hybrid data aggregation scheme for Internet of Things

  • H. RahmanEmail author
  • N. Ahmed
  • Md. I. Hussain
Article
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Quality of service provisioning for real-time data such as audio and video in large Internet of Things networks is considered to be a challenging issue. In order to maintain desirable service quality of the sensed data from the environment, data aggregation-based schemes are highly used. Such schemes gather and aggregate data packets in an efficient manner so as to reduce power consumption, network overhead, and traffic congestion, and to increase network lifetime, data accuracy, etc. In this paper, a hybrid Quality of service-Aware Data Aggregation (QADA) scheme is proposed. The proposed scheme combines some of the interesting features of the cluster and tree-based data aggregation schemes while addressing some of their important limitations. Simulation results show that QADA outperforms cluster and tree-based aggregation schemes in terms of power consumption, network lifetime, available bandwidth utilization, and transmission latency.

Keywords

Data aggregation Internet of Things Quality of service Power consumption Network lifetime 

Notes

Funding information

This work is supported by the project titled “QoS Provisioning in Internet of Things (IoT)” (Ref. No. 13(7)/2015-CC&BT dated:28/09/2015) funded by Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology (MeitY)(CC & BT), Govt. of India.

References

  1. 1.
    Azharuddin M, Kuila P, Jana PK (2015) Energy efficient fault tolerant clustering and routing algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Comput Electr Eng 41:177–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bahi JM, Makhoul A, Medlej M (2014) A two tiers data aggregation scheme for periodic sensor networks. Ad-hoc & Sensor Wireless Networks 21(1-2):77–100Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Geetha V, Kallapur PV, Tellajeera S (2012) Clustering in wireless sensor networks: performance comparison of LEACH & LEACH-C protocols using NS2. Procedia Technol 4:163–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan AP, Balakrishnan H (2002) An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 1(4):660–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: 33rd annual Hawaii international conference on System sciences, IEEE, pp 10–19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karthikeyan B, Velumani M, Kumar R, Inabathini S (2015) Analysis of data aggregation in wireless sensor network. In: 2nd international conference on electronics and communication systems (ICECS), pp 1435–1439Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaur S, Gangwar R (2016) A study of tree based data aggregation techniques for WSNs. International Journal of Database Theory and Application 9(1):109–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keswani K, Bhaskar A (2016) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Futuristic Trends in Engineering, Science, Humanities, and Technology (FTESHT) pp 1–7Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mantri D, Prasad NR, Prasad R, Ohmori S (2012) Two tier cluster based data aggregation (TTCDA) in wireless sensor network. In: International conference on advanced networks and telecommuncations systems (ANTS), IEEE, pp 117–122Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meng L, Zhang H, Zou Y (2011) Data aggregation transfer protocol based on clustering and data prediction in wireless sensor networks. In: 7th international conference on wireless communications, networking and mobile computing (WiCOM), IEEE, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Misra G, Kumar V, Agarwal A, Agarwal K (2016) Internet of things (IoT) technological analysis and survey on vision, concepts, challenges, innovation directions, technologies, and applications. American Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering 4(1):23–32Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    NS (2009) Network simulator-NS2. http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns
  13. 13.
    Pandey V (2010) A review on data aggregation techniques in wireless sensor network. J Electron Electr Eng 1(2):1–8MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pantazis N, Nikolidakis S, Vergados D (2013) Energy-efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 15(2):551–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rahman H, Ahmed N, Hussain MI (2016) A hybrid data aggregation scheme for provisioning Quality of Service (QoS) in Internet of Things (IoT). In: 2016 cloudification of the internet of things (CIoT), pp 1–5Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rajasekaran A, Nagarajan V (2016) Improved cluster head selection for energy efficient data aggregation in sensor networks. Int J Appl Eng Res 11(2):1379–1385Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ray A, De D (2012) Data aggregation techniques in wireless sensor network: a survey. International Journal of Engineering Innovation and Research 1(2):81–92Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saini S, Singh RS, Gupta V (2010) Analysis of energy efficient routing protocols in wireless sensor networks. International Journal of Computer Science and Communications 1(1):113–118Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Satapathy SS, Sarma N (2006) TREEPSI: tree based energy efficient protocol for sensor information. In: International conference on wireless and optical communications networks, IFIP, pp 4–7Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sirsikar S, Anavatti S (2015) Issues of data aggregation methods in wireless sensor network: a survey. Procedia Computer Science 49:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Solis I, Obraczka K (2004) The impact of timing in data aggregation for sensor networks. In: International conference on communications, IEEE, vol 6, pp 3640–3645Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 3(4):366–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zeng D, Guo S, Cheng Z (2011) The web of things: a survey. J Commun 6(6):424–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut Mines-Télécom and Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information TechnologyNorth-Eastern Hill UniversityShillongIndia

Personalised recommendations