Annals of Telecommunications

, Volume 72, Issue 3–4, pp 173–188 | Cite as

On energy efficiency in underwater wireless sensor networks with cooperative routing

  • Ashfaq Ahmad
  • Sheeraz Ahmed
  • Muhammad Imran
  • Masoom Alam
  • Iftikhar Azim Niaz
  • Nadeem Javaid
Article
  • 377 Downloads

Abstract

In this paper, we exploit cooperative communication for designing an energy-efficient routing algorithm in underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs). Each network node is equipped with a single omnidirectional antenna and multiple node coordinates while taking advantage of spatial diversity. This research work is limited in scope to amplify-and-forward (AF) scheme at the relay node and fixed ratio combining (FRC) strategy at the receiver node. Cooperative diversity at the physical layer and multi-hop routing at the network layer enable us to formulate minimum energy routing as a joint optimization of the transmission power at physical layer and link selection at the network layer. Simulations results show that our proposed cooperative energy-efficient routing for UWSN (Co-EEUWSN) performs better than the selected non-cooperative routing protocols (depth-based routing (DBR) and energy-efficient DBR (EEDBR)) and cooperative DBR (Co-DBR) in terms of packet delivery ratio, end-to-end delay, and energy efficiency.

Keywords

Cooperative communication Relay sensor node Routing protocol Multi-hop Single-hop Diversity Energy consumption Packet delivery ratio 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to extend their sincere appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this research through Research Group Project (RG no. 1435-051).

References

  1. 1.
    Yan H, Shi ZJ, Cui J-H (2008) DBR: Depth-based routing for underwater sensor networks. Networking 2008 ad hoc and sensor networks, wireless networks, next generation internet. Springer , Berlin Heidelberg, pp 72–86Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wahid A, Kim D (2012) An energy efficient localization-free routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw:2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amarasuriya G, Ardakani M, Tellambura C (2010) Adaptive multiple relay selection scheme for cooperative wireless networks. In: 2010 IEEE Wireless communication and networking conference. IEEE, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rossetto F, Zorzi M (2011) Mixing network coding and cooperation for reliable wireless communications. IEEE Wirel Commun 18(1):15–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nasir H, Javaid N, Sher M, Qasim U, Khan ZA, Alrajeh N, Niaz IA (2016) Exploiting outage and error probability of cooperative incremental relaying in underwater wireless sensor networks. Sensors 16:1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ayaz M, Abdullah A, Faye I, Batira Y (2012) An efficient dynamic addressing based routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. Comput Commun 35(4):475–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wahid A, Lee S, Kim D (2012) A reliable and energy efficient routing protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks International Journal of Communication SystemsGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Li Z, Yao N, Gao Q (2014) RDBF: Relative distance-based forwarding protocol for underwater wireless networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw:2014Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hosseini M, Chizari H, Poston T, Salleh MB, Abdullah AH (2014) Efficient underwater RSS value to distance inversion using the lambert function. Math Probl Eng:2014Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wang X, Xu M, Wang H, Wu Y, Shi H (2012) Combination of interacting multiple models with the particle filter for three-dimensional target tracking in underwater wireless sensor networks. Math Probl Eng:2012Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Maalej M, Cherif S, Besbes H (2013) QoS and energy aware cooperative routing protocol for wildfire monitoring wireless sensor networks. Sci World J:2013Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu H, Chen X, Shi C, Xiao Y, Xu M (2012) An ACOA-AFSA fusion routing algorithm for underwater wireless sensor network. Int J Distrib Sens Netw:2012Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bereketli A, Bilgen S (2012) Remotely powered underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Sensors J 12(12):3467–3472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chen Y-S, Lin Y-W (2013) Mobicast routing protocol for underwater sensor networks. IEEE Sensors J 13(2):737–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Song Z, Deshi L, Chen J (2013) A link-state based adaptive feedback routing for underwater acoustic sensor networks. 1-1Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chong P K, Kim D (2013) Surface-level path loss modeling for sensor networks in flat and irregular terrain. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 9(2):15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Poncela J, Aguayo MC, Otero P (2012) Wireless underwater communications. Wirel Pers Commun 64(3):547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shin W-Y, Lucani DE, Medard M, Stojanovic M, Tarokh V (2013) On the effects of frequency scaling over capacity scaling in underwater networks part II: dense network model. Wirel Pers Commun 71(3):1701–1719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang S, Chen L, Hu H, Xue Z, Pan W (2013) Underwater localization and environment mapping using wireless robots. Wirel Pers Commun 70(3):1147–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Javaid N, Jafri M R, Khan Z A, Qasim U, Alghamdi T A, Ali M (2014) iAMCTD: improved adaptive mobility of courier nodes in threshold-optimized DBR protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks Hindawi IJDSNGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xu M, Liu G, Wu H (2014) An energy-efficient routing algorithm for underwater wireless sensor networks inspired by ultrasonic frogs International Journal of Distributed Sensor NetworksGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cao J, Dou J, Dong S (2015) Balance transmission mechanism in underwater acoustic sensor networks. Int J Distrib Sens Netw:2015Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    El-Darymli K (2010) Amplify-and-forward cooperative relaying for a linear wireless sensor network. In: IEEE International conference on systems man and cybernetics (SMC), 2010, pp 106–112. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Qureshi UM, Shaikh FK, Aziz Z, Zafi SM, Shah S, Sheikh AA, Felemban E, Qaisar SB (2016) RF path and absorption loss estimation for underwater wireless sensor networks in different water environments. MDPI Sensors Journal 890:16Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cheng X (2008) Silent positioning in underwater acoustic sensor networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 57(3):1756–1766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheng W (2009) Time-synchronization free localization in large scale underwater acoustic sensor networks. In: 29Th IEEE international conference on distributed computing systems workshops, 2009. ICDCS workshops’ 09. IEEEGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wang T, Cano A, Giannakis GB, Laneman JN (2007) High-performance cooperative demodulation with decode-and-forward relays. IEEE Trans Commun 55(7):1427–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Borowski B, Duchamp D (2010) Measurement-based underwater acoustic physical layer simulation. In: OCEANS 2010, pp 1–8, IEEEGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jafri M, Ahmed S, Javaid N, Ahmad Z, Qureshi R (2013) Amctd: adaptive mobility of courier nodes in thresholdoptimized dbr protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks. In: Eighth international conference on broadband and wireless computing, communication and applications (BWCCA), 2013, pp 93–99, IEEEGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut Mines-Télécom and Springer-Verlag France 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.King Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations