Annals of Telecommunications

, Volume 72, Issue 3–4, pp 145–155 | Cite as

Signals of opportunity geolocation methods for urban and indoor environments

  • T. O. MansfieldEmail author
  • B. V. Ghita
  • M. A. Ambroze


Motivated by the geolocation requirements of future mobile network applications such as portable internet of things (IoT) devices and automated airborne drone systems, this paper aims to provide techniques for improving device geolocation estimates in urban and indoor locations. In these applications low size, weight and power are vital design constraints. This paper proposes methods for improving the geolocation estimate available to a system in indoor and urban environments without the need for addition sensing or transmitting hardware. This paper proposes novel system application techniques that enable the integration of signals of opportunity, providing a robust geolocation estimate without any additional hardware. The proposed method utilises a sinusoidal Kalman filter architecture to analyse raw radio frequency (RF) signals that surround a system in urban and indoor environments. The introduced techniques efficiently analyse the raw RF data from any signal of opportunity and combine it with higher level geolocation sensors to provide an improved geolocation estimate. The improvements achieved by the system in a range of environments have been simulated, analysed and compared to the results obtained using the prior art. These improvements have been further validated and benchmarked by hardware test. The results obtained provide evidence that the efficient use of signals of opportunity coupled with common navigation sensors can provide a robust and reliable geolocation system in indoor and urban environments.


Signals of opportunity Kalman filtering Radio navigation and geolocation 


  1. 1.
    Klepeis NE et al. (2001), The National Human Activity Pattern Survey (NHAPS): a resource for assessing exposure to environmental pollutants. US National Library of MedicineGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Air Commodore Norman Bonnor (2012) A brief history of global navigation satellite systems,” Royal Institute of Navigation Journal of Navigation vol. 65Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Novatel, IMU Errors and Their Effects 2014. Novatel bulletin, 21st February 2015. Accessed 17th December 2015
  4. 4.
    Kalman R (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Transactions of the ASME Journal of Basic Engineering 82:35–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Salmon DC, Bevly DM (2014) An exploration of low-cost sensor and vehicle model Solutions for ground vehicle navigation Published in IEEE PLANS 2014, 5–8 May 2014Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li T et al. 2010 Ultra-tight Coupled GPS/Vehicle Sensor Integration for Land Vehicle Navigation. University of Calgary. Navigation 57, 4:248–259Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Negenborn R (2003) Robot Localization and Kalman Filters–On finding your position in an noisy world. Thesis, Utrecht University, 1st September 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kong F, Chen Y, Xie J and Zhang G (2006) Mobile robot localization based on extended Kalman filter 2006. 2006 6th World Congress in Intelligent Control and Automation (Volume 2)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Papapostolou A and Chaouchi H (2011) Scene analysis indoor positioning enhancements. Ann. Telecommun. 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roxin A, Gaber J, Wack M, Nait-Sidi-Moh A (2007) Survey of wireless geolocation techniques 2007. UTBM, France. IEEE Globecom WorkshopGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N. A Alsindi Performance of TOA estimation algorithms in different indoor multipath conditions PhD Thesis, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, April 2004Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Selmi I and Samama N (2014) Indoor positioning with GPS and GLONASS-like signals use of new codes and a repealite-based infrastructure in a typical museum building Ann. Telecommun. 2014Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Faragher RM, Duffett-Smith PJ (2010) Measurements of the effects of multipath interference on timing accuracy in a radio positioning system. IET Radar, Sonar and Navigation 4(6):818–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faragher RM (2007) Effects of multipath interference on radio positioning systems Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Physics., University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reed JH, Krizman KJ, Woerner BD, and Rappaport TS (1998) An overview of the challenges and progress in meeting the E-911 requirement for location service. Virginia Tech, 1998. Published in the IEEE Communications MagazineGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arnitz D, Witrisal K and Muehlmann U (2009) Multifrequency continuous-wave radar approach to ranging in passive UHF RFID. IEEE transactions on microwave theory and techniques Vol. 57 No 5Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pelka M, Bollmeyer C and Hellbruck H (2014) Accurate radio distance estimation by phase measurements with multipole frequencies. International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigations, 27th October 2014Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Arnold WF, Laub AJ (1984) Generalized Eigenproblem algorithms and software for algebraic Riccati equations. Proc IEEE 72:1746–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut Mines-Télécom and Springer-Verlag France 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. O. Mansfield
    • 1
    Email author
  • B. V. Ghita
    • 1
  • M. A. Ambroze
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computing and MathematicsPlymouth UniversityPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations