Skip to main content
Log in

Performance evaluation of co-located IEEE 802.15.4-based wireless body sensor networks

  • Published:
Annals of Telecommunications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless body sensor networks (WBSNs) are expected to play a pivotal role in health-related and well-being applications. In this paper, we consider a situation in which a large number of people wearing body sensor networks are gathered in very close vicinity (as can happen in sport events or emergency hospitals). Clearly, BSNs compete with each other to gain access to the same frequency which results in experiencing mutual (internal) interference. Therefore, we investigate the “internal interference” and its destructive impacts on the overall performance gain of WBSNs using IEEE 802.15.4 standard protocol. As the number of WBSNs increases in the channel, it becomes highly likely for active periods of neighbouring WBSNs to overlap with each other. The increase in overlapping active periods would increase the probability of packet collisions leading to performance degradation. In this paper, two types of interference mitigation strategies are proposed, namely passive schemes and active scheme. The terms passive and active refer to the absence and presence of the capability of communication between WBSNs to efficiently utilise the same frequency spectrum. According to the passive schemes, WBSNs are enabled to change their operating frequencies whenever required to mitigate the impacts of internal interference, whereas active scheme offers collaborative utilisation of the channel. The simulation results show that the proposed active scheme represents the highest performance gains compared to the proposed practical passive schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ieee standard for local and metropolitan area networks - part 15.6 Wireless body area networks. IEEE Std 802.15.6-2012 pp 1–271 (2012)

  2. Alrajeh NA, Lloret J, Canovas A (2014) A framework for obesity control using a wireless body sensor network

  3. Bian K, Park JM, Gao B (2014). In: Cognitive radio networks Springer, pp 101–116

  4. Bian K, Park JM, Gao B (2014) Coexistence-aware spectrum sharing for homogeneous cognitive radio networks Cognitive radio networks, Springer, pp 61–75

  5. Boulis A (2010) Castalia A simulator for wireless sensor networks and body area networks User’s Manual https://forge.nicta.com.au/docman/view.php/301/592/Castalia+-+User+Manual.pdf (Last accessed July 2014)

  6. Cao H, Leung V, Chow C, Chan H (2009) Enabling technologies for wireless body area networks: a survey and outlook. IEEE Commun Mag 47(12):84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. (2004) Chipcon 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver. Chipcon Products from Texas Instruments

  8. Deylami M, Jovanov E (2013) An implementation of a distributed scheme for managing the dynamic coexistence of wireless body area networks. FL, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Deylami M, Jovanov E (2014) A distributed scheme to manage the dynamic coexistence of IEEE 802.15.4-based health-monitoring wbans. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics 18(1):327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deylami M, Jovanov E (2012) A distributed and collaborative scheme for mitigating coexistence in IEEE 802.15.4 based wbans Proceedings of the 50th annual southeast regional conference. ACM-SE ’12, ACM, Alabama, USA, pp 1–6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall PS, Hao Y, Nechayev YI, Alomainy A, Constantinou CC, Parini C, Kamarudin MR, Salim TZ, Hee DT, Dubrovka R, etal (2007) Antennas and propagation for on-body communication systems. IEEE Antennas Propag Mag 49(3):41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim S, Kim S, Kim JW, Eom DS (2012) Flexible beacon scheduling scheme for interference mitigation in body sensor networks. In: 9Th annual IEEE communications society conference on sensor, mesh and ad hoc communications and networks SECON. IEEE, Seoul, pp 157–164

  13. Kim Y, Shin H, Cha H (2008) Y-mac an energy-efficient multi-channel mac protocol for dense wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of the 7th international conference on information processing in sensor networks IPSN ’08. IEEE computer society, washington DC, USA, pp 53–63

  14. LAN/MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society IEEE Standard For Local and metropolitan area networks Part 15.4: Low Rate Wireless Personal Area Networks (LR-WPANs) (2011) revision of 2011

  15. Lloret J, Garcia M, Catala A, Rodrigues J (2016) A group-based wireless body sensors network using energy harvesting for soccer team monitoring, vol 21

  16. McLean RK, Silvius MD, Hopkinson KM, Flatley BN, Hennessey ES, Medve CC, Thompson JJ, Tolson MR, Dalton CV (2014) An architecture for coexistence with multiple users in frequency hopping cognitive radio networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 32(3):563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moravejosharieh A, Tabatabaei Yazdi E, Willig A (2013) Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part ii: Greedy channel utilization. IEEE, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moravejosharieh A, Willig A, Pawlikowski K (2015) Frequency-adaptive approach in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: continuous-assessment or periodic-assessment? Australasian Journal of Information. Communication Technology and Applications 1(1). doi:10.17972/ajicta2015113

  19. Moravejosharieh A, Yazdi E, Pawlikowski K, Sirisena H (2015) Adaptive channel utilisation in ieee 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: adaptive phase-shifting approach. In: International telecommunication networks and applications conference (ITNAC). Australia

  20. Moravejosharieh A, Yazdi E, Willig A, Pawlikowski K (2014) Adaptive channel utilisation in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor networks: continuous hopping approach. In: Australasian telecommunication networks and applications conference (ATNAC) Australia, pp 93–98

  21. Moravejosharieh AH, Yazdi ET (2013) Study of resource utilization in IEEE 802.15.4 wireless body sensor network, part i: the need for enhancement. IEEE Computer Society CA, USA, pp 1226–1231

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moravejosharieh A, Lloret J (2015) A survey of ieee 802.15.4 effective system parameters for wireless body sensor networks. International Journal of Communication Systems pp n/a–n/a. doi:10.1002/dac.3098

  23. Neugebauer M, Plonnigs J, Kabitzsch K (2005) A new beacon order adaptation algorithm for IEEE 802.15. 4 networks Proceeedings of the second european workshop on wireless sensor networks IEEE, pp 302–311

  24. Penders J, van de Molengraft J, Brown L, Grundlehner B, Gyselinckx B, Van Hoof C (2009) Potential and challenges of body area networks for personal health annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC) IEEE, pp 6569–6572

  25. Qiang L, Jun T (2011) Minimum-energy-cost algorithm based on superframe adaptation control communications (ICC), 2011 IEEE international conference on, pp 1–5

  26. Ranjit JS, Shin S (2013) A modified IEEE 802.15. 4 superframe structure for guaranteed emergency handling in wireless body area network. Network Protocols and Algorithms 5(2):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sari R et al (2012) Analysis of the effect of beacon order and superframe order value to the performance of multihop wireless networks on IEEE 802.15. 4 protocol. IEEE, Depok

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tavakoli H, Mišic J, Naderi M, MIŠIĆ VB (2015) Evaluation of single dimensional sensor network implemented using slave-slave bridging in ieee 802.15. 4 technology. Ad Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks 24(3-4):179–197

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ullah S, Higgins H, Braem B, Latre B, Blondia C, Moerman I, Saleem S, Rahman Z, Kwak KS (2012) A comprehensive survey of wireless body area networks. J Med Syst 36(3):1065–1094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wu C, Yan H, Huo H (2012) A multi-channel MAC protocol design based on IEEE 802.15.4 standard in industry Industrial informatics (INDIN), 2012 10th IEEE international conference on Beijing, pp 1206–1211

  31. Yazdi ET, Moravejosharieh A, Ray SK (2014) Study of target tracking and handover in mobile wireless sensor network 28Th IEEE international conference on information networking (ICOIN) Phuket, pp 120–125

  32. Yazdi ET, Willig A, Pawlikowski K (2014) Frequency adaptation for interference mitigation in IEEE 802.15.4-based mobile body sensor networks. Elsevier Computer Communications 53:102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zheng J, Lee M (2004) Will IEEE 802.15.4 make ubiquitous networking a reality. IEEE Commun Mag 42(6):140–146. a discussion on a potential low power, low bit rate standard

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of BlueFern ® high-performance computing facility to provide the opportunity of obtaining results of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Amirhossein Moravejosharieh or Jaime Lloret.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moravejosharieh, A., Lloret, J. Performance evaluation of co-located IEEE 802.15.4-based wireless body sensor networks. Ann. Telecommun. 71, 425–440 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0497-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-016-0497-8

Keywords

Navigation