Investigating quality routing link metrics in Wireless Multi-hop Networks

  • N. Javaid
  • A. Bibi
  • A. Javaid
  • Z. A. Khan
  • K. Latif
  • M. Ishfaq
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new Quality Link Metric (QLM), “Inverse Expected Transmission Count (InvETX),” in Optimized Link State Routing (OLSR) protocol. Then, we compare performance of three existing QLMs which are based on loss probability measurements: Expected Transmission Count (ETX), Minimum Delay (MD), and Minimum Loss (ML) in Static Wireless Multi-hop Networks (SWMhNs). A novel contribution of this paper is enhancement in conventional OLSR to achieve high efficiency in terms of optimized routing load and routing latency. For this purpose, first we present a mathematical framework, and then to validate this frame work, we select three performance parameters to simulate default and enhanced versions of OLSR. The three chosen performance parameters are throughput, Normalized Routing Load, and End-to-End Delay. From the simulation results, we conclude that adjusting the frequencies of topological information exchange results in high efficiency.

Keywords

Routing link metric ETX Inverse ETX Minimum Delay Minimum Loss Wireless Multi-hop Networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Javaid N, Ullah M, Djouani K (2011) Identifying design requirements for wireless routing link metrics. In: Global telecommunications conference (GLOBECOM 2011), IEEE, Houston, 5–9 Dec 2011, pp 1–5Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Couto DSJ (2004) High-throughput routing for multi-hop wireless networks. Ph.D. dissertation, MITGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moreira W, Aguiar E, Abelm A, Stanton M (2008) Using multiple metrics with the optimized link state routing protocol for wireless mesh networks. Simpsio Brasileiro de Redes de Computadorese Sistemas Distribudos, MaioGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Passos D, Teixeira DV, Muchaluat-Saade DC, Magalhaes LCS, Albuquerque C (2006) Mesh network performance measurements. In: International information and telecommunications technologies symposium (I2TS), pp 48–55Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Clausen T, Jacquet P, Adjih C, Laouiti A, Minet P, Muhlethaler P, Qayyum A, Viennot L (eds) (2003) Optimized link state routing protocol (OLSR)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang Y, Wang J, Kravets R (2005) Designing routing metrics for mesh networks. In: IEEE workshop on wireless mesh networks (WiMesh)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Perkins CE, Bhagwat P (1994) Highly dynamic Destination-Sequenced Distance-Vector routing (DSDV) for mobile computers. SIGCOMM Comput Commun Rev 24:234–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Das SM,Wu Y, Chandra R, Hu YC (2008) Context-based routing: technique, applications, and experience. In: NSDI, vol 8, pp 379–392Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    De Couto DSJ, Aguayo D, Bicket J, Morris R (2004) A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. WirelessCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Draves R, Zill B (2004) Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In: ACM international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom), pp 114–128Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Draves R, Padhye J, Zill B (2004) Comparison of routing metrics for static multi-hop wireless networks. Comput Comm Rev 34(4):133–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang Y, Wang J, Kravets R (2005) Interference-aware load balancing for multihop wireless networks. Tech. rep. UIUCDCS-R-2005-2526, Department of Computer Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Javaid N et al (2011) Modeling routing overhead generated by wireless proactive routing protocols. In: 54th IEEE Globecom2011 (SaCoNAS workshop)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Javaid N, Javaid A, Khan IA, Djouani K (2009) Performance study of ETX based wireless routing metrics. In: 2nd international conference on computer, control and communication, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhai H, Fang Y (2006) Impact of routing metrics on path capacity in multirate and multihop wireless ad hoc networks. Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on network protocolsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Faheem Y, Rougier JL (2009) Loop avoidance for fish-eye OLSR in sparse wireless mesh networks. In: 6th international conference on wireless on-demand network systems and services, WONS 2009. IEEE, pp 231–234Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kyasanur P, Vaidya NH (2006) Routing and link-layer protocols for multi-channel multi-interface ad hoc wireless networks. Mob Comput Commun Rev 10(1):31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tsai J, Moors T (2006) A review of multipath routing protocols: from wireless ad hoc to mesh networks. In: ACoRN early career researcher workshop on wireless multihop networkingGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chipara O, He Z, Xing G, Chen Q, Wang X, Lu C, Stankovic J, Abdelzaher T (2006) Real-time power-aware routing in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th IEEE international workshop on quality of serviceGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Boughanmi N, Song YQ (2008) A new routing metric for satisfying both energy and delay constraints in wireless sensor networks. J Signal Process Syst 51:137–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yoo Y, Ahn S (2004) A simple load-balancing approach in secure ad hoc networks. In: ICOIN, Busan, Korea, 18–20 Feb 2004Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Paul AB, Nandi S (2008) Modified Optimized Link State Routing (M-OLSR) for wireless mesh networks. In: International conference on information technology 2008 (ICIT’08)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pei G, Gerla M, Chen TW (2000) Fisheye state routing: a routing scheme for ad hoc wireless networks. In: 2000 IEEE international conference on communications, ICC 2000, vol 1. IEEE, pp 70–74Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institut Mines-Télécom and Springer-Verlag France 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Javaid
    • 1
  • A. Bibi
    • 1
  • A. Javaid
    • 2
  • Z. A. Khan
    • 3
  • K. Latif
    • 1
  • M. Ishfaq
    • 4
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Studies in Telecommunications (CAST)COMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyIslamabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsCOMSATS Institute of Information TechnologyWah CantPakistan
  3. 3.Internetworking Program, Faculty of EngineeringDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  4. 4.King Abdulaziz UniversityRabighSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations