A funding and governing model for achieving sustainable growth of computing e-infrastructures

Abstract

The current access policies and funding schemes of computing e-infrastructures represent a huge challenge for the sustainable growth of computing e-infrastructures and a serious jeopardy for investments made into these e-infrastructures. In order to be able to address these issues, the economics of computing e-infrastructures has to be understood thoroughly. As a first step in this direction, this paper conducts a set of computing e-infrastructure case studies and discusses the economic issues of different global computing e-infrastructure efforts. The analyses results show that the major shortcomings that need to be resolved are the insufficient involvement of the private sector in the development of computing e-infrastructures, the restricted user access to e-infrastructure resources, and the lack of sustainable funding. As a solution to these shortcomings, we propose a new funding and governing model for computing e-infrastructures. It follows a token-based market mechanism that allows a business-oriented operation of the computing e-infrastructure. We argue that this new model fosters the transition towards a sustainable computing e-infrastructure, being another requirement for successfully implementing the cloud computing vision. Our arguments are supported by an analytical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Reference

  1. 1.

    Rao I, Huh EN (2008) A probabilistic and adaptive scheduling algorithm using system-generated predictions for inter-grid resource sharing. J Supercomput 45:185–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wang Y, Scardaci D, Yan B, Huang Y (2007) Interconnect EGEE and CNGRID e-infrastructures through interoperability between gLite and GOS middlewares. International Grid Interoperability and Interoperation Workshop (IGIIW 2007), e-Science conference, Bangalore, India

  3. 3.

    Ranjan R, Harwood A, Buyya R (2006) SLA-based coordinated superscheduling scheme for computational grids. IEEE International Conference on Cluster Computing, Barcelona, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang L, Jie W (2009) Towards supporting multiple virtual private computing environments on computational grids. Adv Eng Softw 40:239–245

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Hwang J, Altmann J, Bany Mohammed A (2009) Determinants of participation in global volunteer grids: a cross-country analysis. GECON 2009, Workshop on Grid Economics and Business Models. Springer LNCS, Delft, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Voss A, Procter R, Hewitt T, Asgari-Targhi M, Daw M, Baun C, Gentzsch W (2007) Sustainability of e-infrastructures (for the social sciences). Third International Conference on e-Social Science. Ann Arbor, MI, USA

  7. 7.

    European Community (2006) e-Infrastructure: building blocks for the European research area. Official Publications of the European Communities, IST projects in the area of research networking and the members of the research infrastructure team of the European Commission

  8. 8.

    Hey T, De Roure D, Trefethen AE (2006) e-Infrastructure and e-Science. In: True visions: the emergence of ambient intelligence. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    NSF Office of Cyberinfrastructure (2007) (Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/dir/index.jsp?org=OCI. Accessed on: 24/October/2007)

  10. 10.

    Hey T, Fox G (2005) Grids and Web services for e-Science. Concurrency Comput: Pract Ex 7(2–4):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Reid A (2007) The new holy grail: An Australian e-infrastructure. EDUCAUSE Australasia. Melbourne, Australia. (Available at: http://www.caudit.edu.au/educauseaustralasia07/authors_papers/Reid-238.pdf)

  12. 12.

    Ford, R. (2007) Connection between cyberinfrastructure, bandwidth, and SCAUIDs. PowerPoint presentation, a briefing to the College of Health Professions and Biomedical Science (Available at: http://www.umt.edu/it/itorg/CIO/CyberInfrastructure.ppt)

  13. 13.

    Eichengreen B (1994) Financing infrastructure in developing countries: lessons from the railway age. Policy Research Working Paper 1379, background paper for world development report, The World Bank Office of the Vice President, Development Economics

  14. 14.

    Jones S (2004) Contribution of infrastructure to growth and poverty reduction in east Asia and the Pacific. Background paper, Oxford Policy Management

  15. 15.

    Kwon E (2000) A link between infrastructure, growth, and poverty in Indonesia. Stage 1 report, economics and development resource center, Asian Development Bank

  16. 16.

    Estache A (2004) Emerging infrastructure policy issues in developing countries: a survey of the recent economic literature. Background paper for October 2004 meeting of the POVNET Infrastructure Working Group

  17. 17.

    Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev Econ Stat 36(4):387–389

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bezanson KA, Sagasti F (2001) Financing and providing global public goods: expectations and prospects. Development Financing 2000, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Study 2001:2

  19. 19.

    Thorsteinsdóttir H, Daar AS, Smith R, Singer P (2003) Genomics—a global public good? Lancet 361(9361):891–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Krishnan R, Smith MD, Telang R (2004) The economics of peer-to-peer networks. J Inform Tech Theor Appl 5(3):31–44

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Calvo CM (1998) Options for managing and financing rural transport infrastructure. World Bank Technical Paper 411. Washington, DC, USA

  22. 22.

    Elkington J (1994) Towards the sustainable corporation: win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif Manage Rev 36(3):90–100

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Scheirer MA (2005) Is sustainability possible? A review and commentary on empirical studies of program sustainability. Ame J Eval 26:320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Stambrook D (2006) Governance and funding of land transport infrastructure. Virtuosity Productions Inc. (Available at: http://www.uofaweb.ualberta.ca/ipe//pdfs/TransportPaper-Stambrook.pdf)

  25. 25.

    eIRG Group (2007) A sustainable grid infrastructure for Europe. Executive summary of the open workshop on e-Infrastructures, Heidelberg, Germany (download http://www.roadmaptgi.fr/Documents/Sustainable%20GRID%20infrastructure.pdf)

  26. 26.

    Frechtling J, Lockwood J, Silverstein G, Somers L, Tuss P (1999) Evaluation of the telecommunications and information infrastructure assistance program for the 1994 and 1995 Grant Years. Report prepared by US Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration. Washington, DC, USA

  27. 27.

    Iosup A, Epema DHJ, Tannenbaum T, Farrellee M, Livny M (2008) Inter-operating grids through delegated matchmaking. Sci Program 16:233–253

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    de Assunção MD, Buyya R (2009) Performance analysis of allocation policies for interGrid resource provisioning. Inf Softw Technol 51:42–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    de Assunção MD, Buyya R, Venugopal S (2008) InterGrid: a case for internetworking islands of Grids. Concurrency Comput: PractEx 20(8):997–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Riedel M (2009) Interoperation of world-wide production e-Science infrastructures. Concurrency Comput: Pract Ex 21:961–990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Grid Interoperability Now Community Group (GN-CG) (2009); Available at: http://forge.gridforum.org/sf/projects/gin, Accessed on: December

  32. 32.

    Quan DM, Altmann J (2009) Resource allocation algorithm for the light communication Grid-based workflows within an SLA context. Int J Parallel, Emergent and Distrib Syst 24(1)

  33. 33.

    Quan DM, Altmann J (2007) Business model and the policy of mapping light communication grid-based workflow within the SLA Context. HPCC 2007, High Performance Computation Conference, Houston, USA

  34. 34.

    Quan DM, Altmann J (2009) Grid business models for brokers executing SLA-based workflows. In: Rajkumar Buyya, Kris Bubendorfer (eds) Market-oriented grid and utility computing. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Rienstra SA, Nijkamp P (1996) Lessons from private financing of transport infrastructure: Dutch infrastructure in the 19th century and European projects in the 20th century. Serie Research Memoranda 0013. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics

  36. 36.

    Chanzdavarkar A (1994) Infrastructure finance: issues, institutions, and policies. Policy Research Working Paper 1374. Background paper for World Development Report. The World Bank Office of the Vice President, Development Economics

  37. 37.

    Mor N, Sehrawat S (2006) Sources of infrastructure finance. Working Paper Series, Centre for Development Finance Institute for Financial Management and Research

  38. 38.

    Dailami M, Leipziger D (1998) Infrastructure project finance and capital flows: a new perspective. World Dev 26(7):1283–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Barmouta A, Buyya R (2003) GridBank: A Grid accounting services architecture (GASA) for distributed systems sharing and integration. Workshop on Internet Computing and E-Commerce, International Parallel & Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS 2003), France

  40. 40.

    Liebau N, Darlagiannis V, Mauthe A, Steinmetz R (2005) Token-based accounting for P2P-Systems. Kommunikation in Verteilten Systemen KiVS

  41. 41.

    Hausheer D (2003) Towards a market managed peer-to-peer file sharing system using token-based accounting and distributed pricing. Institut für Technische Informatik und Kommunikationsnetze, ETH Zurich, TIK-Report 179, Version 1, Zurich, Switzerland

  42. 42.

    Anandasivam A, Neumann D, Weinhardt C (2007) Rightsizing of incentives for collaborative e-Science grid applications with TES. Bled eConference, Merging and Emerging Technologies, Processes, and Institutions, Bled, Slovenia

  43. 43.

    Wongrujira K, Seneviratne A (2005) Monetary incentives with reputation for virtual marketplace based P2P. CoNEXT 2005, Toulouse, France

  44. 44.

    Cohen J, Darlington J, Lee W (2008) Payment and negotiation for the next generation grid and Web. Concurrency Comput: Pract Ex 20:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Vishnumurthy V, Chandrakumar S, Sirer E (2003) KARMA: a secure economic framework for peer-to-peer resource sharing. Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems

  46. 46.

    MMAPPS Consortium (2004) Market management of peer-to-peer services: introduction and overview. Version 2.5, EC FP5 Project IST-2001-34201

  47. 47.

    Altmann J, Courcoubetis C, Stamoulis GD, Dramitinos M, Rayna T, Risch M, Bannink C (2008) GridEcon—a market place for computing resources. GECON 2008, Workshop on Grid Economics and Business Models. Springer LNCS, Las Palmas, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wolski R, Plank JS, Brevik J, Bryan T (2001) Analyzing market-based resource allocation strategies for the computational Grid. Int J High Perform Comput Appl 15(3):258–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Neumann, D (2007) Towards an open Grid market. Economic models and algorithms for grid systems, Kumulative Habilitationsschrift, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, University of Karlsruhe

  50. 50.

    Buyya R, Abramson D, Giddy J, Stockinger H (2002) Economic models for resource management and scheduling in grid computing. J Concurrency Comput: Pract Ex 14(13–15):1507–1542

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fokkema T, Nijkamp P (1994) The changing role of governments: the end of planning history? Int J Transport Econ 21(2):127–145

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    World Bank (2005) Financing information and communication infrastructure needs in the developing world. World Bank Working Paper 65. Washington, DC, USA

  53. 53.

    EGEE (2009) Website, http://www.eu-egee.org, Accessed on: November 2009

  54. 54.

    DEISA (2009) Website, available at: http://www.deisa.eu, Accessed on: November 2009

  55. 55.

    GEANT (2009) Website, http://www.geant.net, Accessed on: November 2009

  56. 56.

    DFN (2009) Website, http://www.dfn.de, Accessed on: November 2009

  57. 57.

    TeraGrid (2009) Website, http://www.Teragrid.org, Accessed on: November 2009

  58. 58.

    NAREGI (2009) Website, http://www.naregi.org, Accessed on: November 2009

  59. 59.

    K*Grid (2009) Website, http://www.gridcenter.or.kr, Accessed on: November 2009

  60. 60.

    CANARIE (2009) Website, http://www.canarie.ca”, Accessed on: November 2009

  61. 61.

    EELA (2009) Website, http://www.eu-eela.org, Accessed on: November 2009

  62. 62.

    BALTICGRID (2009) Website, http://www.balticgrid.org, Accessed on: November 2009

  63. 63.

    SEE-GRID (2009) Website, http://www.see-grid.org, Accessed on: November 2009

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörn Altmann.

Appendix

Appendix

Table 5 Funding and governance models of existing e-Infrastructure Projects

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bany Mohammed, A.A., Altmann, J. A funding and governing model for achieving sustainable growth of computing e-infrastructures. Ann. Telecommun. 65, 739–756 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-010-0188-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Grid and cloud economics
  • Business models
  • Funding
  • Governance
  • Case study analysis
  • Sustainability
  • Grid computing
  • High-performance computing
  • Token-based market mechanism
  • Computing services
  • Analytical modeling