Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of Centralized and Multi-Layer Architectures for Nonlinear Model Predictive Torque-Vectoring and Traction Control

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A significant body of literature discusses direct yaw moment controllers for vehicle stability control and torque-vectoring (TV), based on model predictive control. However, the available references lack an analysis of the effect of including or excluding the wheel dynamics in the prediction model in combined longitudinal and lateral acceleration conditions, which is related to the control system architecture. In fact, in the first case, the controller can also fulfill the wheel slip control function, according to a centralized architecture, while in the second case, the tire slip limitation has to be implemented externally, in a multi-layer approach. This study addresses the identified gap by proposing and comparing–through simulations with a high-fidelity vehicle model–centralized and multilayer real-time implementable architectures using nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) for the TV and traction control (TC) of an electric vehicle with front in-wheel motors. An optimization routine calibrates the main controller parameters, to ensure fairness in the comparison during extreme accelerating-while-cornering maneuvers with transient steering inputs. The results show that the real-time implementable multi-layer architecture with wheel dynamics in the NMPC prediction model, and considering the externally generated TC torque reduction in the TV layer, provides equivalent performance to a centralized set-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amodeo, M., Ferrara, A., Terzaghi, R. and Vecchio, C. (2009). Wheel slip control via second-order sliding-mode generation. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 11, 1, 122–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariens, D., Houska, B., Ferreau, H. and Logist, F. (2010). Acado for Matlab User’s Manual. Optimization in Engineering Center (OPTEC).

  • Ataei, M., Khajepour, A. and Jeon, S. (2020). Model predictive control for integrated lateral stability, traction/braking control, and rollover prevention of electric vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 58, 1, 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, E., Nyborg, L. and Pacejka, H. B. (1987). Tyre modelling for use in vehicle dynamics studies. SAE Trans., 190–204.

  • Barbarisi, O., Palmieri, G., Scala, S. and Glielmo, L. (2009). LTV-MPC for yaw rate control and side slip control with dynamically constrained differential braking. European J. Control 15, 3–4, 468–479.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Basrah, M. S., Siampis, E., Velenis, E., Cao, D. and Longo, S. (2016). Integration of torque blending and slip control using nonlinear model predictive control. 13th Int. Symp. Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC), Munich, Germany.

  • Basrah, M. S., Siampis, E., Velenis, E., Cao, D. and Longo. S. (2017). Wheel slip control with torque blending using linear and nonlinear model predictive control. Vehicle System Dynamics 55, 11, 1665–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, C. E. and Gerdes, J. C. (2012). Model predictive control for vehicle stabilization at the limits of handling. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 21, 4, 1258–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrelli, F., Falcone, P., Keviczky, T., Asgari, J. and Hrovat, D. (2005). MPC-based approach to active steering for autonomous vehicle systems. Int. J. Vehicle Autonomous Systems 3, 2–4, 265–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canale, M. and Fagiano, L. (2008). Vehicle yaw control using a fast NMPC approach. 47th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control (CDC), Cancún, México.

  • Dalboni, M., Tavernini, D., Montanaro, U., Soldati, A., Concari, C., Dhaens, M. and Sorniotti, A. (2021). Nonlinear model predictive control for integrated energy-efficient torque-vectoring and anti-roll moment distribution. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 26, 3, 1212–1224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Novellis, L., Sorniotti, A. and Gruber, P. (2015). Driving modes for designing the cornering response of fully electric vehicles with multiple motors. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 64–65, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Cairano, S., Tseng, H. E., Bernardini, D. and Bemporad, A. (2013). Vehicle yaw stability control by coordinated active front steering and differential braking in the tire sideslip angles domain. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 21, 4, 1236–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone, P., Borrelli, F., Asgari, J., Tseng, H. E. and Hrovat, D. (2007). Predictive active steering control for autonomous vehicle systems. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 15, 3, 556–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone, P., Tseng, H. E., Borrelli, F., Asgari, J. and Hrovat, D. (2008). MPC-based yaw and lateral stabilisation via active front steering and braking. Vehicle System Dynamics, 46, 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genta, G. and Morello, L. (2009). The Automotive Chassis: Volume 2: System Design. Springer. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grüne, L. and Pannek, J. (2011). Nonlinear Model Predictive Control–Theory and Algorithms. Springer-Verlag. London, UK.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, V., Savitski, D., Augsburg, K. and Barber, P. (2015). Electric vehicles with individually controlled on-board motors: Revisiting the ABS design. IEEE Int. Conf. Mechatronics (ICM), Nagoya, Japan.

  • Jalali, M., Khajepour, A., Chen, S. and Litkouhi, B. (2016). Integrated stability and traction control for electric vehicles using model predictive control. Control Engineering Practice, 54, 256–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keviczky, T., Falcone, P., Borrelli, F., Asgari, J. and Hrovat, D. (2006). Predictive control approach to autonomous vehicle steering. American Control Conf. (ACC), Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

  • Metzler, M., Tavernini, D., Gruber, P. and Sorniotti, A. (2020). On prediction model fidelity in explicit nonlinear model predictive vehicle stability control. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 29, 5, 1964–1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murata, S. (2012). Innovation by in-wheel-motor drive unit. Vehicle System Dynamics 50, 6, 807–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahidi, A., Kasaiezadeh, A., Khosravani, S., Khajepour, A., Chen, S. and Litkouhi, B. (2017). Modular integrated longitudinal and lateral vehicle stability control for electric vehicles. Mechatronics, 44, 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra, A., Tavernini, D., Gruber, P., Sorniotti, A., Zubizarreta, A. and Pérez J. (2020). On nonlinear model predictive control for energy-efficient torque-vectoring. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 70, 1, 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satzger, C. and De Castro, R. (2014). Combined wheel-slip control and torque blending using MPC. Int. Conf. Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE), Vienna, Austria.

  • Siampis, E., Velenis, E. and Longo, S. (2015). Rear wheel torque vectoring model predictive control with velocity regulation for electric vehicles. Vehicle System Dynamics 53, 11, 1555–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siampis, E., Velenis, E., Gariuolo, S. and Longo, S. (2018). A real-time nonlinear model predictive control strategy for stabilization of an electric vehicle at the limits of handling. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 26, 6, 1982–1994.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavernini, D., Metzler, M., Gruber, P. and Sorniotti, A. (2018). Explicit nonlinear model predictive control for electric vehicle traction control. IEEE Trans. Control Systems and Technology 27, 4, 1438–1451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Zanten, A. T. (2000). Bosch ESP systems: 5 years of experience. SAE Trans., 428–436.

  • Van Zanten, A. T., Erhardt, R. and Pfaff, G. (1995). VDC, the vehicle dynamics control system of Bosch. SAE Trans., 1419–1436.

  • Wang, J. and Longoria, R. G. (2009). Coordinated and reconfigurable vehicle dynamics control. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 17, 3, 723–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, D., Oh, S. and Hori, Y. (2009). A novel traction control for EV based on maximum transmissible torque estimation. IEEE Trans. Industrial Electronics 56, 6, 2086–2094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y. and Shyrokau, B. (2019). A real-time nonlinear MPC for extreme lateral stabilization of passenger vehicles. IEEE Int. Conf. Mechatronics (ICM), Ilmenau, Germany.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research leading to the results of this study was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements no. 824244 (SYS2WHEEL project) and no. 101006953 (Multi-Moby project). This work was also supported by the Italian Ministry of University and Research under the Programme “Department of Excellence” Legge 232/2016 (grants CUP - D93C23000100001 and CUP-D95F21001810008).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aldo Sorniotti.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rini, G., De Bernardis, M., Bottiglione, F. et al. Comparison of Centralized and Multi-Layer Architectures for Nonlinear Model Predictive Torque-Vectoring and Traction Control. Int.J Automot. Technol. 24, 1101–1116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-023-0090-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-023-0090-x

Key Words

Navigation