Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Bumper Thickness with Collision Simulation of Passenger Vehicles

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The finite element method is the most common method used to solve engineering and mathematical model problems. Related solution areas include structural analysis, heat transfer, mass transport and electromagnetic potential. FEM is a specific numerical method used to solve partial differential equations in two or three space variables. To solve a problem, FEM breaks up a large system into smaller, simpler parts called finite elements. First, a three-dimensional model of the system to be analyzed is produced. While defining the model, the materials and connection types found in the model are also deter-mined. Afterwards, the model is divided into small parts and analyzed under specified conditions. A crash test will be conducted in this study. For this, the conditions of the vehicle parts will be examined by hitting a wall under the conditions of which the model design of the vehicle is determined. Crash tests were carried out for two different bumper thicknesses on the same vehicle and the test results were examined. The vehicle speed is modeled as 20 m/s in the simulation carried out from the moment of impact until 0.14 seconds later. The effect of buffer thickness on axial displacements at impact and energy changes are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abedini, M. and Zhang, C. (2021). Performance assessment of concrete and steel material models in ls-dyna for enhanced numerical simulation, a state of the art review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 28, 4, 2921–2942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Euro, N. (2020). Euro NCAP 2022.

  • Forsberg, J. (2013). Short introduction to LS-DYNA and LS-PrePost. DYNAMORE Nordic.

  • Fish, J. and Belytschko, T. (2007). A First Course in Finite Elements. 1st edn. John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY, USA.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gadagi, B. and Lekurwale, R. (2021). A review on advances in 3D metal printing. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 277–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznecovs, A., Schreuder, M. and Ringsberg, J. W. (2021). Methodology for the simulation of a ship’s damage stability and ultimate strength conditions following a collision. Marine Structures, 79, 103027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, G., Ma, H., Guan, T. and Gao, G. (2020). Predicting safer vehicle font-end shapes for pedestrian lower limb protection via a numerical optimization framework. Int. J. Automotive Technology 21, 3, 749–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y. and Glass, G. (2013). Effects of mesh density on finite element analysis. SAE Paper No. 2013-01-1375.

  • Long, C. R., Yuen, S. C. K. and Nurick, G. N. (2019). Analysis of a car door subjected to side pole impact. Latin American J. Solids and Structures 16, 8, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikam, S. K. and Jaiswal, S. (2021). Experimental and finite element analysis of nonaxisymmetric stretch flanging process using AA 5052. Int. Conf. Innovations in Product, Process and System Design (ICIPPSD), Indore, India.

  • Pan, C., Li, X., Li, J. and Zhao, J. (2021). Numerical investigation of blast-induced fractures in granite: insights from a hybrid LS-DYNA and UDEC grain-based discrete element method. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources 7, 2, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, D. W. and Heinrich, J. C. (2017). The Finite Element Method: Basic Concepts and Applications with MATLAB®, MAPLE, and COMSOL. CRC press. Boca Raton, Florida, USA.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. K. (2014). Bumper optimum design using the dynamically equivalent beam under various impact conditions. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 6, 937–943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, J. N. (2004). An Introduction to the Finite Element Method. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill. New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, R. H. and Schilling, P. J. (2020). Parametric Modeling with SOLID WORKS 2020. SDC Publications. Mission, Kansas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. J. (2017). Using finite element analysis to assess and prevent the failure of safety critical structures. J. Failure Analysis and Prevention 17, 1, 1–3.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Vangi, D., Begani, F., Gulino, M. S. and Spitzhüttl, F. (2018). A vehicle model for crash stage simulation. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51, 2, 837–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sezgin Ersoy.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özcan, F., Gullu, A. & Ersoy, S. Effect of Bumper Thickness with Collision Simulation of Passenger Vehicles. Int.J Automot. Technol. 24, 241–246 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-023-0021-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-023-0021-x

Key Words

Navigation