Skip to main content
Log in

Particle Number in Small SI Engine Using Gasoline and LPG as Fuel for Non-road Vehicle

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study measured the particle number (PN) emissions from spark ignition (SI) engines according to the use of gasoline fuel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) fuel for particles greater than 23 nm or 5 nm. A 0.8-L two-cylinder gasoline engine, which has variable valve timing system and electronic control unit, was used in the experiment. The engine was operated at 1500 rpm, 3000 rpm, low load, and high load, and the fuel injection timing, intake valve opening timing, exhaust valve closing timing, and valve overlap period were used as variables in the experiment. According to the experimental results, the gasoline engine emitted particulate matter (PM) is in the range of 1 × 109 to 3 × 1013 #/kWh, whereas that of the LPG engine is in the range of 1 × 109 to 1 × 1011 #/kWh. For the LPG engine, the operating conditions and experimental variables had minimal influence on the PN, whereas for the gasoline engine, the experimental conditions and experimental variables had a significant influence on the PN. For this test engine, the ratio of PM smaller than 23 nm increased as the emissions of PM larger than 23 nm decreased, which were observed for values between 1 × 1010 #/kWh and 1 × 1011 #/kWh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ATDC:

after top dead center

CAD:

crank angle degree

CNG:

compressed natural gas

CPC:

condensation particle counter

DPFs:

diesel particulate filters

EC:

eddy current

ECU:

engine control unit

EOI:

end of injection

EVC:

exhaust valve close

GDI:

gasoline direct injection

GPF:

gasoline particulate filter

IVO:

intake valve open

LPG:

liquefied petroleum gas

MBT:

minimum advanced for best torque

MPI:

multi-point injection

SI:

spark ignition

PM:

particulate matter

PFI:

port fuel injection

PN:

particle number

VO:

valve overlap

VPR:

volatile particle removal

VVT:

variable valve timing

References

  • Andersson, J., Demuynck, J. and Hamje, H. (2017). AECC/Concawe 2016 GPF RDE PN test programme: PN measurement above and below 23nm. 21st ETH-Conf. Combustion Generated Nanoparticles. Zürich, Switzerland.

  • Badshah, H., Kittelson, D. and Northrop, W. (2016). Particle emissions from light-duty vehicles during cold-cold start. SAE Int. J. Engines 9, 3, 1775–1785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baek, S., Cho, J., Kim, K., Ahn, S., Myung, C. L. and Park, S. (2020). Effect of the metal-foam gasoline particulate filter (GPF) on the vehicle performance in a turbocharged gasoline direct injection vehicle over FTP-75. Int. J. Automotive Technology 21, 5, 1139–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bahreini, R., Xue, J., Johnson, K., Durbin, T., Quiros, D., Hu, S., Huai, T., Ayala, A. and Jung, H. (2015). Characterizing emissions and optical properties of particulate matter from PFI and GDI light-duty gasoline vehicles. J. Aerosol Science, 90, 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcote, H. F. and Manos, D. M. (1983). Effect of molecular structure on incipient soot formation. Combustion and Flame 49, 1–3, 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceviz, M. A. and Yüksel, F. (2006). Cyclic variations on LPG and gasoline-fuelled lean burn SI engine. Renewable Energy 31, 12, 1950–1960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çinar, C., Şahin, F., Can, Ö. and Uyumaz, A. (2016). A comparison of performance and exhaust emissions with different valve lift profiles between gasoline and LPG fuels in a SI engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 107, 1261–1268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanzo, V. S. and Heywood, J. B. (2012). Effect of in-cylinder liquid fuel films on engine-out unburned hydrocarbon emissions for an SI engine. SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-1712.

  • Czerwinski, J., Comte, P., Heeb, N., Mayer, A. and Hensel, V. (2017). Nanoparticle emissions of DI gasoline cars with/without GPF. SAE Technical Paper No. 2017-01-1004.

  • Desouza, C. D., Marsh, D. J., Beevers, S. D., Molden, N. and Green, D. C. (2020). Real-world emissions from non-road mobile machinery in London. Atmospheric Environment, 223, 117301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giechaskiel, B., Dilara, P., Sandbach, E. and Andersson, J. (2008). Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory exercise: Comparison of different particle number measurement systems. Measurement Science and Technology 9, 19, 095401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giechaskiel, B., Joshi, A., Ntziachristos, L. and Dilara, P. (2019). European regulatory framework and particulate matter emissions of gasoline light-duty vehicles: A review. Catalysts 9, 7, 586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giechaskiel, B., Mamakos, A., Andersson, J., Dilara, P., Martini, G., Schindler, W. and Bergmann, A. (2012). Measurement of automotive nonvolatile particle number emissions within the European legislative framework: A review. Aerosol Science and Technology 46, 7, 719–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A. and Johnson, T. V. (2018). Gasoline particulate filters — A review. Emission Control Science and Technology 4, 4, 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. Y., Lee, Y., Kim, C. and Shin, M. (2014). Effects of shape and surface roughness on icing and condensation characteristics of an injector in a liquid phase LPG injection system. Fuel, 132, 82–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kittelson, D. B. (1998). Engines and nanoparticles: A review. J. Aerosol Science 29, 5–6, 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontses, A., Triantafyllopoulos, G., Ntziachristos, L. and Samaras, Z. (2020). Particle number (PN) emissions from gasoline, diesel, LPG, CNG and hybrid-electric light-duty vehicles under real-world driving conditions. Atmospheric Environment, 222, 117126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosowski, M. G. (1985). Soot formation in a multipointfuel-injected sprak-ignited engine. SAE Trans., 786–796.

  • McGee, J., Curtis, E., Russ, S. and Lavoie, G. (2000). The effects of port fuel injection timing and targeting on fuel preparation relative to a pre-vaporized system. SAE Trans., 2438–2449.

  • Myung, C. L., Choi, K., Kim, J., Lim, Y., Lee, J. and Park, S. (2012). Comparative study of regulated and unregulated toxic emissions characteristics from a spark ignition direct injection light-duty vehicle fueled with gasoline and liquid phase LPG (liquefied petroleum gas). Energy 44, 1, 189–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myung, C. L., Ko, A., Lim, Y., Kim, S., Lee, J., Choi, K. and Park, S. (2014). Mobile source air toxic emissions from direct injection spark ignition gasoline and LPG passenger car under various in-use vehicle driving modes in Korea. Fuel Processing Technology, 119, 19–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napolitano, P., Alfè, M., Guido, C., Gargiulo, V., Fraioli, V. And Beatrice, C. (2020). Particle emissions from a HD SI gas engine fueled with LPG and CNG. Fuel, 269, 117439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quader, A. A. (1989). How injector, engine, and fuel variables impact smoke and hydrocarbon emissions with port fuel injection. SAE Trans., 327–349.

  • Rossomando, B., Meloni, E., De Falco, G., Sirignano, M., Arsie, I. and Palma, V. (2021). Experimental characterization of ultrafine particle emissions from a light-duty diesel engine equipped with a standard DPF. Proc. Combustion Institute 38, 4, 5695–5702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, J. M., Park, W. S. and Lee, M. J. (2012). The best choice of gasoline/diesel particulate filter to meet future particulate matter regulation. SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-1255.

  • Somers, C. M., McCarry, B. E., Malek, F. and Quinn, J. S. (2004). Reduction of particulate air pollution lowers the risk of heritable mutations in mice. Science 304, 5673, 1008–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, C., Xu, H., Ma, H. and Ghafourian, A. (2014). Investigation of VVT and spark timing on combustion and particle emission from a GDI Engine during transient operation. SAE Technical Paper No. 2014-01-1370.

  • Wichmann, H. E. and Peters, A. (2003). Epidemiological evidence of the effects of ultrafine particle exposure. Ultrafine Particles in the Atmosphere. Imperial College Press. London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, F. Q., Lai, M. C. and Harrington, D. L. (1995). The spray characteristics of automotive port fuel injection-a critical review. SAE Trans., 399–432.

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Center for Environmentally Friendly Vehicle (CEFV) as a Global-Top Project of the Ministry of Environment, Korea (KMOE).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyoung Jang.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jang, J., Shin, Y., Ko, A. et al. Particle Number in Small SI Engine Using Gasoline and LPG as Fuel for Non-road Vehicle. Int.J Automot. Technol. 23, 1547–1554 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-022-0135-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-022-0135-6

Key Words

Navigation