Abstract
This study measured the particle number (PN) emissions from spark ignition (SI) engines according to the use of gasoline fuel and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) fuel for particles greater than 23 nm or 5 nm. A 0.8-L two-cylinder gasoline engine, which has variable valve timing system and electronic control unit, was used in the experiment. The engine was operated at 1500 rpm, 3000 rpm, low load, and high load, and the fuel injection timing, intake valve opening timing, exhaust valve closing timing, and valve overlap period were used as variables in the experiment. According to the experimental results, the gasoline engine emitted particulate matter (PM) is in the range of 1 × 109 to 3 × 1013 #/kWh, whereas that of the LPG engine is in the range of 1 × 109 to 1 × 1011 #/kWh. For the LPG engine, the operating conditions and experimental variables had minimal influence on the PN, whereas for the gasoline engine, the experimental conditions and experimental variables had a significant influence on the PN. For this test engine, the ratio of PM smaller than 23 nm increased as the emissions of PM larger than 23 nm decreased, which were observed for values between 1 × 1010 #/kWh and 1 × 1011 #/kWh.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ATDC:
-
after top dead center
- CAD:
-
crank angle degree
- CNG:
-
compressed natural gas
- CPC:
-
condensation particle counter
- DPFs:
-
diesel particulate filters
- EC:
-
eddy current
- ECU:
-
engine control unit
- EOI:
-
end of injection
- EVC:
-
exhaust valve close
- GDI:
-
gasoline direct injection
- GPF:
-
gasoline particulate filter
- IVO:
-
intake valve open
- LPG:
-
liquefied petroleum gas
- MBT:
-
minimum advanced for best torque
- MPI:
-
multi-point injection
- SI:
-
spark ignition
- PM:
-
particulate matter
- PFI:
-
port fuel injection
- PN:
-
particle number
- VO:
-
valve overlap
- VPR:
-
volatile particle removal
- VVT:
-
variable valve timing
References
Andersson, J., Demuynck, J. and Hamje, H. (2017). AECC/Concawe 2016 GPF RDE PN test programme: PN measurement above and below 23nm. 21st ETH-Conf. Combustion Generated Nanoparticles. Zürich, Switzerland.
Badshah, H., Kittelson, D. and Northrop, W. (2016). Particle emissions from light-duty vehicles during cold-cold start. SAE Int. J. Engines 9, 3, 1775–1785.
Baek, S., Cho, J., Kim, K., Ahn, S., Myung, C. L. and Park, S. (2020). Effect of the metal-foam gasoline particulate filter (GPF) on the vehicle performance in a turbocharged gasoline direct injection vehicle over FTP-75. Int. J. Automotive Technology 21, 5, 1139–1147.
Bahreini, R., Xue, J., Johnson, K., Durbin, T., Quiros, D., Hu, S., Huai, T., Ayala, A. and Jung, H. (2015). Characterizing emissions and optical properties of particulate matter from PFI and GDI light-duty gasoline vehicles. J. Aerosol Science, 90, 144–153.
Calcote, H. F. and Manos, D. M. (1983). Effect of molecular structure on incipient soot formation. Combustion and Flame 49, 1–3, 289–304.
Ceviz, M. A. and Yüksel, F. (2006). Cyclic variations on LPG and gasoline-fuelled lean burn SI engine. Renewable Energy 31, 12, 1950–1960.
Çinar, C., Şahin, F., Can, Ö. and Uyumaz, A. (2016). A comparison of performance and exhaust emissions with different valve lift profiles between gasoline and LPG fuels in a SI engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 107, 1261–1268.
Costanzo, V. S. and Heywood, J. B. (2012). Effect of in-cylinder liquid fuel films on engine-out unburned hydrocarbon emissions for an SI engine. SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-1712.
Czerwinski, J., Comte, P., Heeb, N., Mayer, A. and Hensel, V. (2017). Nanoparticle emissions of DI gasoline cars with/without GPF. SAE Technical Paper No. 2017-01-1004.
Desouza, C. D., Marsh, D. J., Beevers, S. D., Molden, N. and Green, D. C. (2020). Real-world emissions from non-road mobile machinery in London. Atmospheric Environment, 223, 117301.
Giechaskiel, B., Dilara, P., Sandbach, E. and Andersson, J. (2008). Particle measurement programme (PMP) light-duty inter-laboratory exercise: Comparison of different particle number measurement systems. Measurement Science and Technology 9, 19, 095401.
Giechaskiel, B., Joshi, A., Ntziachristos, L. and Dilara, P. (2019). European regulatory framework and particulate matter emissions of gasoline light-duty vehicles: A review. Catalysts 9, 7, 586.
Giechaskiel, B., Mamakos, A., Andersson, J., Dilara, P., Martini, G., Schindler, W. and Bergmann, A. (2012). Measurement of automotive nonvolatile particle number emissions within the European legislative framework: A review. Aerosol Science and Technology 46, 7, 719–749.
Joshi, A. and Johnson, T. V. (2018). Gasoline particulate filters — A review. Emission Control Science and Technology 4, 4, 219–239.
Kim, T. Y., Lee, Y., Kim, C. and Shin, M. (2014). Effects of shape and surface roughness on icing and condensation characteristics of an injector in a liquid phase LPG injection system. Fuel, 132, 82–92.
Kittelson, D. B. (1998). Engines and nanoparticles: A review. J. Aerosol Science 29, 5–6, 575–588.
Kontses, A., Triantafyllopoulos, G., Ntziachristos, L. and Samaras, Z. (2020). Particle number (PN) emissions from gasoline, diesel, LPG, CNG and hybrid-electric light-duty vehicles under real-world driving conditions. Atmospheric Environment, 222, 117126.
Kosowski, M. G. (1985). Soot formation in a multipointfuel-injected sprak-ignited engine. SAE Trans., 786–796.
McGee, J., Curtis, E., Russ, S. and Lavoie, G. (2000). The effects of port fuel injection timing and targeting on fuel preparation relative to a pre-vaporized system. SAE Trans., 2438–2449.
Myung, C. L., Choi, K., Kim, J., Lim, Y., Lee, J. and Park, S. (2012). Comparative study of regulated and unregulated toxic emissions characteristics from a spark ignition direct injection light-duty vehicle fueled with gasoline and liquid phase LPG (liquefied petroleum gas). Energy 44, 1, 189–196.
Myung, C. L., Ko, A., Lim, Y., Kim, S., Lee, J., Choi, K. and Park, S. (2014). Mobile source air toxic emissions from direct injection spark ignition gasoline and LPG passenger car under various in-use vehicle driving modes in Korea. Fuel Processing Technology, 119, 19–31.
Napolitano, P., Alfè, M., Guido, C., Gargiulo, V., Fraioli, V. And Beatrice, C. (2020). Particle emissions from a HD SI gas engine fueled with LPG and CNG. Fuel, 269, 117439.
Quader, A. A. (1989). How injector, engine, and fuel variables impact smoke and hydrocarbon emissions with port fuel injection. SAE Trans., 327–349.
Rossomando, B., Meloni, E., De Falco, G., Sirignano, M., Arsie, I. and Palma, V. (2021). Experimental characterization of ultrafine particle emissions from a light-duty diesel engine equipped with a standard DPF. Proc. Combustion Institute 38, 4, 5695–5702.
Seo, J. M., Park, W. S. and Lee, M. J. (2012). The best choice of gasoline/diesel particulate filter to meet future particulate matter regulation. SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-1255.
Somers, C. M., McCarry, B. E., Malek, F. and Quinn, J. S. (2004). Reduction of particulate air pollution lowers the risk of heritable mutations in mice. Science 304, 5673, 1008–1010.
Tan, C., Xu, H., Ma, H. and Ghafourian, A. (2014). Investigation of VVT and spark timing on combustion and particle emission from a GDI Engine during transient operation. SAE Technical Paper No. 2014-01-1370.
Wichmann, H. E. and Peters, A. (2003). Epidemiological evidence of the effects of ultrafine particle exposure. Ultrafine Particles in the Atmosphere. Imperial College Press. London, UK.
Zhao, F. Q., Lai, M. C. and Harrington, D. L. (1995). The spray characteristics of automotive port fuel injection-a critical review. SAE Trans., 399–432.
Acknowledgement
This research was supported by the Center for Environmentally Friendly Vehicle (CEFV) as a Global-Top Project of the Ministry of Environment, Korea (KMOE).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jang, J., Shin, Y., Ko, A. et al. Particle Number in Small SI Engine Using Gasoline and LPG as Fuel for Non-road Vehicle. Int.J Automot. Technol. 23, 1547–1554 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-022-0135-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-022-0135-6