Influence of Different UV Exposure Time on the CFRP/Aluminum Single Lap Joints Strength and Fracture Modes

  • Salah Mahdi Khaleel
  • Bernard Rolfe
  • Riyadh Al-AmeriEmail author
  • Tim Hiliditch


The urging need to reduce the harmful emissions required a thorough investigations into the methods of utilizing the dissimilar lightweight materials in modern automobile, aviation and marine industries. With the exception use of dissimilar materials, traditional joining methods become limited or incapable to maintain safety standards. The adhesive bonding, therefore, seems an ideal choice to overcome this limitation due to uniform stress distribution, fatigue resistance and sound isolation. However, the role of environmental degradation become vital in the areas where the joints exposed directly or indirectly to the sunlight, humidity and extreme change in the temperature. With such key industries, intensive work to comply with safety standards are crucial. The current work devoted to examining the influence of Ultra-Violet (UV) exposure on three different Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) setup of Aluminum-CFRP single lap joint with respect to strength and fracture mode. The samples exposed to the specified UV dosage of three exposure duration then tested mechanically based on ASTM standards. The outcomes indicate that the fracture modes are highly affected by the CFRP orientation as well as the UV exposure time. Moreover, the joint strength decreases with increases of the UV exposure time.

Key words

Carbon fiber laminates Adhesive joint Single lap joint Fracture modes Strength 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdel Wahab, M. M. (2012). Fatigue in adhesively bonded joints: A review. ISRN Materials Science, 2012, Article ID 746308, 1–25.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, R. D., Comyn, J. and Wake, W. C. (1997). Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering. Springer Science & Business Media. Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  3. Ameli, A., Papini, M. and Spelt, J. K. (2011). Hygrothermal degradation of two rubber-toughened epoxy adhesives: Application of open-faced fracture tests. Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives 31, 1, 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM D3165 - 07 (2014). Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Adhesives in Shear by Tension Loading of Single-Lap-Joint Laminated Assemblies, 1–4.Google Scholar
  5. ASTM STP1294 (1996). Comparison between Natural Weathering and Fluorescent UV Exposures: UVA-340 Lamp Test Results. ASTM International, USA, 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. ASTM-D5573-99 (2012). Standard Practice for Classifying Failure Modes in Fiber-Reinforced-Plastic (FRP) Joints. ASTM International, USA, 1–3.Google Scholar
  7. Baldan, A. (2004). Review adhesively-bonded joints in metallic alloys, polymers and composite materials: Mechanical and environmental durability performance. J. Materials Science, 39, 4729–4797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banea, M. D., Sousa, F. S. M. D., Silva, L. F. M. D., Campilho, R. D. S. G. and Pereira, A. M. D. B. (2011). Effects of temperature and loading rate on the mechanical properties of a high temperature epoxy adhesive. J. Adhesion Science and Technology 25, 18, 2461–2474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunner, A. J. (2015). Investigating the performance of adhesively-bonded composite joints: Standards, test protocols, and experimental design. Fatigue and Fracture of Adhesively-Bonded Composite Joints, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Budhe, S., Banea, M. D., De Barros, S. and Da Silva, L. F. M. (2017). An updated review of adhesively bonded joints in composite materials. Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 72, 30–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Budhe, S., Rodríguez-Bellido, A., Renart, J., Mayugo, J. A. and Costa, J. (2014). Influence of pre-bond moisture in the adherents on the fracture toughness of bonded joints for composite repairs. Int. J. Adhesion and Adhesives, 49, 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cognard, J. (2006). Some recent progress in adhesion technology and science. Comptes Rendus Chimie 9, 1, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dilthey, U. and Stein, L. (2006). Multimaterial car body design: Challenge for welding and joining. Science and Technology of Welding and Joining 11, 2, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feldman, D. (2002). Polymer weathering: Photo-oxidation. J. Polymers and the Environment 10, 4, 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jacques, L. F. E. (2000). Accelerated and outdoor/natural exposure testing of coatings. Progress in Polymer Science 25, 9, 1337–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khaleel, S. M., Al-Ameri, R., Rolfe, B. and Hilditch, T. (2017a). The influence of UV level and exposure time on the performance of the epoxy based adhesive material. The First MoHESR and HCED Iraqi Scholars Conf. in Australiasia ISCA2017, Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
  17. Khaleel, S. M., Rolfe, B., Al-Ameri, R. and De Susa, T. (2017b). Surface pre-treatment effect on the adhesively single lap joint of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy and carbon fiber T-700/epoxy composites. SAE Paper No. 2017-26-0167.Google Scholar
  18. Khaleel, S. M., Rolfe, B., Al-Ameri, R. and Hilditch, T. (2017c). Investigating the impact of laser treatment on fracture modes and strength of CFRP/AL 6061 single lap joint. APFIS2017 - 6th Asia-Pacific Conf. FRP in Structures, Singapore.Google Scholar
  19. Kopp, G. and Beeh, E. (2010). New multi-material design concepts and high integration light metal applications for lightweight body structures. Materials Science Forum, 638–642, 437–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Markatos, D., Tserpes, K., Rau, E., Brune, K. and Pantelakis, S. (2014). Degradation of mode-I fracture toughness of CFRP bonded joints due to release agent and moisture pre-bond contamination. J. Adhesion 90, 2, 156–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Markovièová, L., Zatkalíková, V. and Garbacz, T. (2015). Effect of UV radiation to change the properties of the composite PA+ GF. Int. J. Chemical Molecular, Nuclear, Materials and Metallurgical Engineering, 9, 1159–1162.Google Scholar
  22. Meneghetti, G., Quaresimin, M. and Ricotta, M. (2010). Influence of the interface ply orientation on the fatigue behaviour of bonded joints in composite materials. Int. J. Fatigue 32, 1, 82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen, T.-C., Bai, Y., Zhao, X.-L. and Al-Mahaidi, R. (2012). Effects of ultraviolet radiation and associated elevated temperature on mechanical performance of steel/CFRP double strap joints. Composite Structures 94, 12, 3563–3573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nordmark, G. E., Miller, J. M. and Banthia, V. K. (1993). Joint design for aluminum automotive structures. SAE Int. Cong. and Exposition, Detroit, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Peck, J. A., Li, G., Pang, S.-S. and Stubblefield, M. A. (2004). Light intensity effect on UV cured FRP coupled composite pipe joints. Composite Structures 64, 3–4, 539–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ray, S. and Cooney, R. P. (2012). 7 - Thermal Degradation of Polymer and Polymer Composites A2 - Kutz, Myer. Handbook of Environmental Degradation of Materials. 2nd edn. William Andrew Publishing. New York, USA.Google Scholar
  27. Searle, N. D. (2003). Environmental Effects on Polymeric Materials. John Wiley and Sons. New York, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stein, N., Weißgraeber, P. and Becker, W. (2015). A model for brittle failure in adhesive lap joints of arbitrary joint configuration. Composite Structures, 133, 707–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhao, X.-L., Bai, Y., Al-Mahaidi, R. and Rizkalla, S. (2013). Effect of dynamic loading and environmental conditions on the bond between CFRP and steel: State-of-the-art review. J. Composites for Construction 18, 3, A4013005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© KSAE 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Salah Mahdi Khaleel
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bernard Rolfe
    • 1
  • Riyadh Al-Ameri
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tim Hiliditch
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.Technical Instructors Training InstituteMiddle Technical UniversityBaghdadIraq

Personalised recommendations