Skip to main content
Log in

Development of an Operability Evaluation Framework for Remotely Controlled Ground Combat Vehicles in a Simulated Environment

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes a systematic framework for operability evaluation of remotely controlled ground combat systems (RGCS) in a simulated environment. The popular human-robot interaction metric used in unmanned vehicle systems is called fan-out (FO) and represents the maximum number of robots/vehicles that could be controlled by a single human operator. However, FO is inappropriate for systems with a lower level of automation where vehicles are remotely controlled by a human, such as RGCS. The theoretical background of the suggested framework is based on McRuer’s crossover model that was initially developed in the aviation domain for explaining pilot handling issues. In this study, an evaluation/analysis software prototype was developed, known as the RGCS operability evaluation tool in a simulated environment (ROPES). The ROPES was designed to be a simple tool for use by officers or researchers who only have intuitive understanding on the human adaptability. The ROPES includes two sub-modules; 1) an interactive interface for the configuration of the RGCS dynamic parameters and user interfaces and 2) a time-varying graphical display of system and human performance. Examples case studies demonstrate the advantage of the ROPES, and improvement points were identified for future development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

FO:

fan-out

IT:

interaction time

LAM:

lethal aerial matrix

NHTSA:

national highway traffic safety administration

NT:

neglect time

RGCS:

remotely controlled ground combat system

ROPES:

RGCS operability evaluation tool in a simulated environment

UV:

unmanned vehicle

WT:

wait time

References

  • Crandall, J. W. and Cummings, M. L. (2007a). Developing performance metrics for the supervisory control of multiple robot. Proc. ACM/IEEE Int. Conf. Human-Robot Interaction, Virginia, USA, 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. W. and Cummings, M. L. (2007b). Identifying predictive metrics for supervisory control of multiple robots. IEEE Trans. Robotics 23, 5, 942–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M. L. and Mitchell, P. J. (2008). Predicting controller capacity in supervisory control of multiple UAVs. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans 38, 2, 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M. L., Nehme, C. E., Crandall, J. W. and Mitchell, P. (2007). Innovations in Intelligent Machines-1. Springer. Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense Agency for Technology and Quality (2013). Defense Agency for Technology and Quality Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driels, M. R. (2004). Weaponeering: Conventional Weapon System Effectiveness (AIAA Education Series). 1st edn. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. Reston, Virginia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelund, N. (1982). Spectral analysis of heart rate variability as an indicator of driver fatigue. Ergonomics 25, 7, 663–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRuer, D. T. and Jex, H. R. (1967). A review of quasilinear pilot models. IEEE Trans. Human Factors in Electronics 8, 3, 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. and Shields, J. (2012). The Role of Autonomy in DoD Systems. Defense Science Board Task Force Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • NHTSA (2013). Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Report. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/documents/automated_vehicles_policy.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nehme, C. E. (2009). Modeling Human Supervisory Control in Heterogeneous Unmanned Vehicle Systems. Ph. D. Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, D. R. and Woods, S. B. (2004). Fan-out: Measuring human control of multiple robots. Proc. SIGCHI Conf., Vienna, Austria, 231–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, M., Lal, S. K., Kavanagh, D. and Rossiter, P. (2011). Applying neural network analysis on heart rate variability data to assess driver fatigue. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 6, 7235–7242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qing, W., BingXi, S., Bin, X. and Junjie, Z. (2010). A PERCLOS-based driver fatigue recognition application for smart vehicle space. Proc. IEEE Int. Symp. Information Processing (ISIP), Qingdao, China, 437–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalm, M., Keinath, A. and Zimmer, H. D. (2008). Pupillometry as a method for measuring mental workload within a simulated driving task. Human Factors for Assistance and Automation, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, D. H. and McRuer, D. T. (1972). A Computer Simulation of Headlamp Variables and Drivers Sight Distances: Operating Instructions. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Report. CR-2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens, C. D. and Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. 3rd edn. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Hyun Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J.H., Choi, S.Y. & Park, K. Development of an Operability Evaluation Framework for Remotely Controlled Ground Combat Vehicles in a Simulated Environment. Int.J Automot. Technol. 19, 915–922 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0088-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-018-0088-y

Key words

Navigation