Skip to main content
Log in

Coordinated collision avoidance for connected vehicles using relative kinetic energy density

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vehicular collision often leads to serious casualties and traffic congestion, and the consequences are worse for multiple-vehicle collision. Many previous works on collision avoidance have only focused on the case for two consecutive vehicles using on-board sensors, which ignored the influence on upstream traffic flow. This paper proposes a novel coordinated collision avoidance (CCA) strategy for connected vehicles, which has potential to avoid collision and smooth the braking behaviors of multiple vehicles, leading to an improvement of traffic smoothness. Specifically, model predictive control (MPC) framework is used to formulate the CCA into an optimization problem, where the objective is to minimize the total relative kinetic energy density (RKED) among connected vehicles. Monte Carlo simulations are used to demonstrate the effectiveness of proposed CCA strategy by comparison with other two strategies. Among all the three control strategies, the RKED based control strategy shows the best performance of collision avoidance, including the best crash prevention rates (99.2 % on dry asphalt road and 90.5 % on wet asphalt road) and the best control of distance headways between vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auto Home (2016). http://www.autohome.com.cn

  • Choi, W. and Swaroop, D. (2001). Assessing the safety benefits due to coordination amongst vehicles during an emergency braking maneuver. Proc. American Control Conf., 2099–2104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang, N., Zhang, F., Yasuhiko, T., Chu, W. and Li, K. (2013). Braking characteristics of Chinese driver in highway and urban road. IFAC Proc. 46, 21, 322–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, W., Lusco, T., Perry, F., Marousek, J., Hamilton, B. A., Krueger, G. and McNamara, D. (2014). Southeast michigan 2014 test bed project for connected vehicles: The next step toward deploying ITS. Proc. Int. Conf., Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE)., 66–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehrig, S. and Stein, F. (2007). Collision avoidance for vehicle-following systems. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 8, 2, 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horst, R. and Hogema, J. (1993). Time-to-collision and collision avoidance systems. Proc. 6th ICTCT Workshop — Safety Evaluation of Traffic Systems: Traffic Conflicts and Other Measures, 109–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, J., Johansson, J. and Gustafsson, F. (2002). Decision making for collision avoidance systems. SAE World Cong. and Exhibition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, S., Tsugawa, S., Tokuda, K., Matsui, T. and Fujii, H. (2002). Vehicle control algorithms for cooperative driving with automated vehicles and intervehicle communications. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 3, 3, 155–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, S. E., Deng, K., Zheng, Y. and Peng, H. (2015). Effect of pulse-and-glide strategy on traffic flow for a platoon of mixed automated and manually driven vehicles. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30, 11, 892–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, N., Cheng, N., Zhang, N., Shen, X. and Mark, J. W. (2014). Connected vehicles: Solutions and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things J. 1, 4, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanés, V., Villagrá, J., Godoy, J., Simó, J., Pérez, J. and Onieva, E. (2012). An intelligent V2I-based traffic management system. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 13, 1, 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. and Huang, Q. (2002). An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system. Proc. IEEE Vehicular Technology Conf., 317–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Seda, E. J., Troy, J. J., Erignac, C. A., Murray, P., Stipanovic, D. M. and Spong, M. W. (2010). Bilateral teleoperation of multiple mobile agents: Coordinated motion and collision avoidance. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 18, 4, 984–992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiler, P., Song, B. and Hedrick, J. K. (1998). Development of a collision avoidance system. SAE Conf., 98PC-417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengupta, R., Rezaei, S., Shladover, S. E., Misener, J. A., Dickey, S. and Krishnan, H. (2007). Cooperative collision warning systems: Concept definition and experimental implementation. J. Intelligent Transportation Systems 11, 3, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sotelo, M., Van Lint, J. W. C., Nunes, U., Vlacic, L. and Chowdhury, M. (2012). Introduction to the special issue on emergent cooperative technologies in intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 13, 1, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taleb, T., Benslimane, A. and Letaief, K. B. (2010). Toward an effective risk-conscious and collaborative vehicular collision avoidance system. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 59, 3, 1474–1486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, H.-S. and Huang, J. (2006). DGPS-based vehicle-tovehicle cooperative collision warning: Engineering feasibility viewpoints. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 7, 4, 415–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo-Moreo, R. and Zamora-Izquierdo, M. A. (2010). Collision avoidance support in roads with lateral and longitudinal maneuver prediction by fusing GPS/IMU and digital maps. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 18, 4, 611–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Bureau of the Ministry of Public Security of the PRC (2013). Annals of Road Traffic Accidents Statistics of the People's Republic of China. Beijing.

  • Truck Home (2016). http://www.360che.com

  • Vahidi, A. and Eskandarian, A. (2003). Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 4, 3, 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, K. (2003). A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention 35, 3, 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Li, S., Zheng, Y. and Lu, X. (2015d). Longitudinal collision mitigation via coordinated braking of multiple vehicles using model predictive control. Integrated Computer Aided Engineering 22, 2, 171–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wang, H. and Zhang, L. (2012). Vehicle collision warning and avoidance system based on electronic hydraulic brake device. J. Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition) 42, 4, 816–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wu, J. and Li, Y. (2015a). The driving safety field based on driver-vehicle-road interactions. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 16, 14, 2203–2214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Wu, J., Qin, H. and Li, K. (2015b). Modified driving safety field theory and its application to collision warning algorithm in complex traffic environments. 22nd ITS World Cong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Zhang, L., Zhang, D. and Li, K. (2013). An adaptive longitudinal driving assistance system based on driver characteristics. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 14, 1, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, P. W., Wang, L., Li, Y. H. and Guo, W. W. (2015c). Improved cooperative collision avoidance (CCA) model considering driver comfort. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 6, 989–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, I. B., Na, S. G. and Heo, H. (2017). Intelligent algorithm based on support vector data description for automotive collision avoidance system. Int. J. Automotive Technology 18, 1, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Z. (2009). Automobile Theory. 3rd edn. Beijing China Machine Press. Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Li, S. E., Li, K. and Wang, L. Y. (2016b). Stability margin improvement of vehicular platoon considering undirected topology and asymmetric control. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 24, 4, 1253–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Li, S. E., Wang, J., Cao, D. and Li, K. (2016a). Stability and scalability of homogeneous vehicular platoon: Study on the influence of information flow topologies. IEEE Trans. Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 1, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Li, X., Yu, C., Kodaka, K. and Li, K. (2014). Driving risk assessment using cluster analysis based on naturalistic driving data. IEEE 17th Int. Conf., Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2584–2589.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianqiang Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, M., Wu, J., Qin, H. et al. Coordinated collision avoidance for connected vehicles using relative kinetic energy density. Int.J Automot. Technol. 18, 923–932 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0090-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0090-9

Keywords

Navigation