Skip to main content
Log in

Energy management and design optimization for a series-parallel PHEV city bus

  • Published:
International Journal of Automotive Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Series-parallel PHEV city buses combine the advantages of series and parallel configurations and have been used in China. However, the design and energy management of series-parallel PHEV city buses based on Chinese driving conditions still need to be investigated. In this paper, an equivalent consumption minimization strategy is provided to optimize energy management for series-parallel PHEV city buses, and the process of the equivalent consumption minimization strategy for series-parallel is presented in this paper. Compared with the validated rule-based energy control strategy, ECMS shows a fuel economy improvement of 8.2 % in the CBCD (Chinese Bus Driving Cycle). Based on the optimal energy management, a design for a generator motor in the series-parallel configuration has been processed. The fuel consumption has been shown to decrease, with an increase in generator power, because the system with the higher generator power can work at a higher efficiency in the series mode and operate the engine in the high efficiency area in the parallel mode. Besides, in terms of costof- ownership for a PHEV bus for lifetime of 8 years, although the high generator power will lead to high purchase cost for series-parallel PHEV bus, a series-parallel PHEV city bus with a generator of 100 kW maximum power will still show small advantage in cost-of-ownership, based on current motor price and natural gas price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

P ele :

electric power (kW)

P Gen :

generator power (kW)

P Tra :

traction motor power (kW)

η Gen :

efficiency of generator

η Tra :

efficiency of the traction motor

P bat :

battery power (kW)

η dis :

efficiency of the discharge

η chg :

efficiency of the charge

SOC O :

initial SOC

C b :

rated capacity

I b :

battery current (A)

P ICE(t):

ICE instantaneous power (kW)

ICE :

instantaneous fuel consumption (g)

EMeq :

equivalent fuel consumption (g)

H LHV :

low heating value of engine

m v :

vehicle mass (kg)

F t :

tractive force (N)

F r :

resistance force (N)

C r :

rolling resistance coefficient

γ :

road angle (%)

ρ :

air density

C d :

aerodynamic drag coefficient

A v :

vehicle frontal area (A)

g :

acceleration due to gravity

η EM :

average efficiency of the electrical drive

η bat :

average efficiency of battery

η ICE :

average efficiency of engine

P total :

cost-of-ownership over the lifetime (CNY)

P Pur :

vehicle purchase cost (CNY)

P Usage :

usage cost (CNY)

References

  • Antti, L. (2014). Energy consumption and cost-benefit analysis of hybrid and electric city buses. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 38, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ao, G. Q., Qiang, J. X., Zhong, H., Yang, L. and Zhuo, B. (2008). Exploring the fuel economy potential of generator Hybrid electric vehicles through dynamic programming. Int. J. Automotive Technology 8, 6, 781–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasse, A. and Sciarretta, A. (2011). Supervisory control of hybrid powertrains: An experimental benchmark of offline optimization and online energy management. Control Engineering Practice 19, 11, 1253–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, C. T. and Hung, Y. H. (2015). Energy improvement and performance evaluation of a novel full hybrid electric motorcycle with power split e-CVT. Energy Conversion and Management, 86, 216–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, N., Zhen, F., Wayne, W. and Lyons, D. (2008). Additional Transit Bus Life Cycle Cost Scenarios Based on Current and Future Fuel Prices. US DOT Federal Transit Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delprat, S., Lauber, J., Guerra, T. M. and Rimaux, J. (2004). Control of a parallel hybrid powertrain: Optimal control. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 53, 3, 872–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, B., Mills, J. K. and Sun, D. (2014). Combined power management/design optimization for a fuel cell/battery plug-in hybrid electric vehicle using multi-objective particle swarm optimization. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 4, 645–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan, D., Hubacek, K., Weber, C. L., Peters, G. P. and Reiner, D. M. (2008). The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Global Environ. Change 18, 4, 626–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzella, L. and Sciarretta, A. (2005). Vehicle Propulsion Systems -Introduction to Modeling and Optimization. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao, H., Ou, X., Du, J., Wang, H. and Ouyang, M. (2014). China’s electric vehicle subsidy scheme: Rationale and impacts. Energy Policy, 73, 722–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He, X., Parten, M. and Maxwell, T. (2005). Energy management strategies for a hybrid electricvehicle. IEEE VPPC Conf., 536–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Chowdhury, M., Pisu, P. and Ma, Y. (2012). An energy optimization strategy for power-split drivetrain plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 22, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabasoglu, O. and Michalek, J. (2013). Influence of driving pattern on lifecycle cost and emissions of hybrid and plug-in hybrid electric vehicle powertrains. Energy Policy, 60, 445–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karbowski, D., Haliburton, C. and Rousseau, A. (2007). Impact of component size on PHEV energy consumption using global optimization. EVS23, Anaheim, California, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katrašnik, T., Trenc, F. and Oprešnik, S. R. (2007). Analysis of energy conversion efficiency in parallel and series hybrid powertrains. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 56, 6, 3649–3659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., Cha, S. and Peng, H. (2011). Optimal control of hybrid electric vehicles based on Pontryagin's minimum principle. IEEE Trans. Control Systems Technology 19, 5, 1279–1287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koponen, K. and Nylund, N. O. (2012). IEA technology network cooperation: Fuel and technology alternatives for buses: Overall energy efficiency and emissions. SAE Paper No. 2012-01-1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukic, S. M., Wirasingha, S. G., Rodriguez, F., Cao, J. and Emadi, A. (2006). Power management of an ultracapacitor/ battery hybrid energy storage system in an HEV. Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf., IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, C., Ko, S. Y., Jeong, K. Y. and Kim, H. S. (2013). Design methodology of component design environment for PHEV. Int. J. Automotive Technology 14, 5, 785–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marano, V., Tulpule, P., Stockar, S. and Rizzoni, G. (2009). Comparative study of different control strategies for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. SAE Paper No. 2009-24-0071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang, M., Zhang, W. and Wang, E. (2015). Performance analysis of a novel coaxial power-split hybrid powertrain using a CNG engine and super-capacitors. Applied Energy, 157, 595–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paganelli, G., Ercole, G., Brahma, A., Guezennec, Y. and Rizzoni, G. (2001). General supervisory control policy for the energy optimization of charge-sustaining hybrid electric vehicles. JSAE Review 22, 4, 511–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. and Park, J.-H. (2012). Development of equivalent fuel consumption minimization strategy for hybrid electric vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13, 5, 835–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Park, Y. and Park, J.-H. (2007). Real-time powertrain control strategy for series-parallel hybrid electric vehicles. SAE Paper No. 2007-01-3472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Park, Y. and Park, J.-H. (2008). Optimal power distribution strategy for series-parallel hybrid electric vehicles. Proc. Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 222, 6, 989–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil, R., Adornato, B. and Filipi, Z. (2010). Design optimization of a series plug-in hybrid electric vehicle for real-world driving conditions. SAE Paper No. 2010-01-0840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, J., He, H. and Xiong, R. (2015). Study on energy management strategies for series-parallel plug-in hybrid electric buses. Energy Procedia, 75, 1926–1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisu, P., Koprubasi, K. and Rizzoni, G. (2005). Energy management and drivability control problems for hybrid electric vehicles. 44th IEEE Conf. Decision and Control, 2005 and 2005 European Control Conf. CDC-ECC '05, 1824–1830.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pu, J. H., Yin, C. L. and Zhang, J. W. (2005). Fuzzy torque control strategy for hybrid electric vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 6, 5, 529–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizoulis, D., Burl, J. and Beard, J. (2001). Control strategies for a series-parallel hybrid electric vehicle. SAE Paper No. 2001-01-1354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmasi, F. R. (2007). Control strategies for hybrid electric vehicles: Evolution, classification, comparison, and future trends. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 56, 5, 2393–2404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., Manzie, C., Bessede, M., Brear, M. J. and Crawford, R. H. (2012). Conventional, hybrid and electric vehicles for Australian driving conditions–Part 1: Technical and financial analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 25, 238–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiau, C. S. N., Kaushal, N., Hendrickson, C. T. and Peterson, S. B. (2011). Optimal plug-in hybrid electric vehicle design and allocation for minimum life cycle cost, petroleum consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions. J. Mechanical Design 132, 9, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva, C., Ross, M. and Farias, T. (2009). Evaluation of energy consumption, emission and cost of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energy Conversion and Management 50, 7, 1635–1643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suh, B., Chang, Y. H., Han, S. B. and Chung, Y. J. (2012). Simulation of a powertrain system for the diesel hybrid electric bus. Int. J. Automotive Technology 13, 5, 701–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulpule, P., Marano, V. and Rizzoni, G. (2009). Effects of different PHEV control strategies on vehicle performance. Proc. American Control Conf. (ACC’ 09), 3950–3955.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vliet, O. P. R., Kruithof, T., Turkenburg, W. C. and Faaij, A. P. C. (2010). Techno-economic comparison of series hybrid, plug-in hybrid, fuel cell and regular cars. J. Power Sources 195, 19, 6570–6585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, B. H. and Luo, Y. G. (2011). Application study on a control strategy for a hybrid electric public bus. Int. J. Automotive Technology 12, 1, 141–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Zhang, Y., Yin, C. L., Zhang, H. and Wang, C. (2012). Hardware-in-the-loop simulation for the design and verification of the control system of a series–parallel hybrid electric city-bus. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 25, 148–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, S. S., Wirasingha, S. G. and Emadi, A. (2006). Comparative investigation of series and parallel hybrid electric drive trains for heavy-duty transit bus applications. IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conf., Windsor, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong, W., Zhang, Y. and Yin, C. (2009). Optimal energy management for a series-parallel hybrid electric bus. Energy Conversion and Management, 50, 1730–1738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Yang, F., Li, J., Ouyang, M. and Hua, J. (2012). Real time optimal energy management strategy targeting at minimizing daily operation cost for a plug-in fuel cell city bus. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 20, 15380–15392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, X., Chen, W., Eom, J., Clarke, L. E., Kim, S. H., Patel, P. L., Yu, S. and Kyle, G. P. (2015). China's transportation energy consumption and CO2 emissions from a global perspective. Energy Policy, 82, 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C. H., Xu, G. Q., Cha, S. W. and Liang, Q. (2014). Numerical comparison of ECMS and PMP-based optimal control strategy in hybrid vehicles. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 7, 1189–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng, C., Kim, N. and Cha, S. (2012). Optimal control in the power management of fuel cell hybrid vehicles. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37, 1, 655–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, H., Wang, F., Ao, G. Q. and Qiang, J. X. (2008). An optimal torque distribution strategy for an interated starter-generator parallel hyrid electric vehicle based on fuzzy logic control. Proc. Institution Mechanical Engineers, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 222, 1, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fuyuan Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cai, Y., Ouyang, M. & Yang, F. Energy management and design optimization for a series-parallel PHEV city bus. Int.J Automot. Technol. 18, 473–487 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0047-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-017-0047-z

Key words

Navigation