Abstract
At conceptual design stage, beam element is extensively used to create the frame structure of automobile body, which can not only archive the accurate stiffness but also reduce much computational cost. However, the stress definition of beam element is very complex so that the stress sensitivity and optimization are difficult to analytically derive and numerically program. This paper presents an solution to this problem and an application in the lightweight optimization design of automobile frame. Firstly, maximal Von Mises stress of rectangular tube is calculated by using the superposition of stress, which is together induced by the axial force, bending moments, torsional moment and shear force. Secondly, the sensitivity of Von Mises Stress with respect to size design variables: breadth, height and thickness are derived, respectively. Thirdly, an optimal criterion is constructed by Lagrangian multiplier method to solve the frame optimization with stress constraints. Lastly, numerical example of car frame proves that the proposed method can guarantee the stress of each beam element almost fully reaches at the yielding stress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bruggi, M. and Duysinx, P. (2012). Topology optimization for minimum weight with compliance and stress constraints. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 46, 3, 369–384.
Cetin, O. L. and Saitou, K. (2004). Decomposition-based assembly synthesis for maximum structural strength and modularity. J. Mech. Design 126, 2, 244–253.
Chen, W. and Zuo, W. (2014). Component sensitivity analysis of conceptual vehicle body for lightweight design under static and dynamic stiffness demands. Int. J. Vehicle Design 66, 2, 107–123.
Donders, S., Takahashi, Y., Hadjit, R., Langenhove, T. V., Brughmans, M., Genechten, B. V. and Desmet, W. (2009). A reduced beam and joint concept modeling approach to optimize global vehicle body dynamics. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 45, 6, 439–455.
Gauchia, A., Diaz, V., Boada, M. J. L. and Boada, B. L. (2010). Torsional stiffness and weight optimization of a real bus structure. Int. J. Automotive Technology 11, 1, 41–47.
He, G., Wang, H., Li, E., Huang, G. and Li, G. (2015). A multiple-GPU based parallel independent coefficient reanalysis method and applications for vehicle design. Adv. Eng. Softw., 85, 108–124.
Lyu, N., Lee, B. and Saitou, K. (2006). Optimal subassembly partitioning of space frame structures for in-process dimensional adjustability and stiffness. J. Mech. Design 128, 3, 527–535.
Lyu, N. and Saitou, K. (2003). Decomposition-based assembly synthesis for structural stiffness. J. Mech. Design 125, 3, 452–463.
Lyu, N. and Saitou, K. (2006). Decomposition-based assembly synthesis of space frame structures using joint library. J. Mech. Design 128, 1, 57–65.
Mundo, D., Donders, S., Stigliano, G. and Auweraer, H. V. D. (2011). Concept design of vehicle bodies using reduced models of beams, joints and panels. Int. J. Vehicle Design 57, 1, 71–83.
Nguyen, P. T. L., Lee, J. Y., Yim, H. J., Lee, S. B. and Heo, S. J. (2015). Analysis of vehicle structural performance during small-overlap frontal impact. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 5, 799–805.
Park, J. H., Kim, K. J., Lee, J. W. and Yoon, J. K. (2015). Light-weight design of automotive suspension link based on design of experiment. Int. J. Automotive Technology 16, 1, 67–71.
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Kodiyalam, S. and Yang, R. Y. (2001). Optimization of car body under constraints of noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH), and crash. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 22, 4, 295–306.
Sun, R., Liu, D., Xu, T., Zhang, H. and Zuo, W. (2014). New adaptive technique of kirsch method for structural reanalysis. AIAA J. 52, 3, 486–495.
Takezawa, A., Nishiwaki, S., Izui, K. and Yoshimura, M. (2007). Structural optimization based on topology optimization techniques using frame elements considering cross-sectional properties. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 34, 1, 41–60.
Takezawa, A., Nishiwaki, S., Izui, K., Yoshimura, M., Nishigaki, H. and Tsurumi, Y. (2005). Concurrent design and evaluation based on structural optimization using structural and function-oriented elements at the conceptual design phase. Concurrent Eng.-Res. A 13, 1, 29–42.
Torstenfelt, B. and Klarbring, A. (2006). Structural optimization of modular product families with application to car space frame structures. Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 32, 2, 133–140.
Torstenfelt, B. and Klarbring, A. (2007). Conceptual optimal design of modular car product families using simultaneous size, shape and topology optimization. Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 43, 14, 1050–1061.
Wang, H., Li, E. and Li, G. Y. (2011). Probability-based least square support vector regression metamodeling technique for crashworthiness optimization problems. Comput. Mech. 47, 3, 251–263.
Wang, H., Li, G. Y. and Li, E. (2010). Time-based metamodeling technique for vehicle crashworthiness optimization. Comput. Method. Appl. M. 199, 37, 2497–2509.
Zhao, L. H., Zheng, S. L., Feng, J. Z., Zhou, H. F. and Xing, Y. F. (2014). Fatigue assessment of rear axle under service loading histories considering the strengthening and damaging effects of loads below fatigue limit. Int. J. Automotive Technology 15, 5, 843–852.
Zuo, W. (2013). An object-oriented graphics interface design and optimization software for cross-sectional shape of automobile body. Adv. Eng. Softw., 64, 1–10.
Zuo, W. (2015). Bi-level optimization for cross-sectional shape of thin-walled car body frame constrained with static and dynamic stiffness. P. I. Mech. Eng. D-J. Aut. 229, 8, 1046–1059.
Zuo, W., Li, W., Xu, T., Xuan, S. and Na, J. (2012). A complete development process of finite element software for body-in-white structure with semi-rigid beam in.NET framework. Adv. Eng. Softw. 45, 1, 261–271.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zuo, W., Yu, J. & Saitou, K. Stress sensitivity analysis and optimization of automobile body frame consisting of rectangular tubes. Int.J Automot. Technol. 17, 843–851 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-016-0082-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-016-0082-1