Processing and fiber content effects on the machinability of compression moulded random direction short GFRP composites
- 190 Downloads
The random direction short Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastics (GFRP) have been prepared by two compression moulding processes, namely the Preform and Sheet Moulding Compound (SMC) processes. Cutting force analysis and surface characterization are conducted on the random direction short GFRPs with varying fiber contents (25∼40%). Edge trimming experiments are preformed using carbide inserts with varing the depth of cut and cutting speed. Machining characteristics of the Preform and SMC processed random direction short GFRPs are evaluated in terms of cutting forces, surface quality, and tool wear. It is found that composite primary processing and fiber contents are major contributing factors influencing the cutting force magnitudes and surface textures. The SMC composites show better surface finish over the Preform composites due to less delamination and fiber pullouts. Moreover, matrix damage and fiber protrusions at the machined edge are reduced by increasing fiber content in the random direction short GFRP composites.
Key WordsRandom direction short Glass Fiber Reinforced Plastics (GFRPs) Compression moulding Machinability Fiber contents Cutting force analysis Surface texture
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Im, K.-H., Park, N. S., Kim, Y. N. and Yang, I.-Y. (2003). A study on impact characteristics of the stacking sequences in CFRP composites subjected to falling-weight impact loading. Int. J. Automotive Technology 4,4, 203–211.Google Scholar
- Kim, H. (2007). Investigation of a stress field evaluated by elasticplastic analysis in discontinuous composites. Int. J. Automotive Technology 8,4, 483–491.Google Scholar
- Okoli, O. I. and Smith, G. F. (1999). Aspects of the tensile response of random continuous glass epoxy composites. J. Reinforced Plastics and Composites 18,7, 606–613.Google Scholar
- Patel, J., Parfitt, L. S. and Ramulu, M. (2001). Surface texture effects on fatigue performance of SMC composites used in heavy truck industry. Advancing Affordable Material Technology, Proc. 33rd Annual SAMPE Technical Conf., 1438–1448.Google Scholar
- Ramulu, M., Kuo, S. Y., Chen, Y. M., Kim, D. and Spitsen, R. (2004). Cutting characteristics of preform and SMC composites. Trans. NAMRI/SME, 32, 239–246.Google Scholar
- Ramulu, M., Parfitt, L. S. and Patrick, B. S. (2005). Influence of manufacturing process and fiber volume in edge finishing characteristics and surface integrity of GFRP composites. Proc. 37th Annual SAMPE Technical Conf., Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
- Srivastava, V. K. and Wahne, S. (2007). Wear and friction behaviour of soft particles filled random direction short GFRP composites. Materials Science and Engineeirng A-Structural Materials Properties Microstructure and Processing 458,1–2, 25–33.Google Scholar
- Wang, D. H., Ramulu, M. and Arola, D. (1995a). Orthogonal cutting mechanisms of graphite/epoxy composite. Part I: Unidirectional laminate. Int. J. Machine Tools and Manufacturing 35,12, 1628–1638.Google Scholar