Abstract
Driving simulators are useful tools that can be used not only to test the components of future cars, but also to evaluate the telematics service and HMI (Human-Machine Interface). However, driving simulators that are currently available cannot be implemented to test and evaluate a real commercial telematics service system because the GPS (Global Positioning System), which contains basic functional support for the telematics module, does not work in the VR (virtual reality) environment. A driving simulator, together with the GPS simulator, can be used to study the HMI to evaluate commercial CNS (Car Navigation Systems). In this paper, Sungkyunkwan University Driving Simulator (SKUD) is developed with a GPS simulator that is able to emulate GPS satellite signals and includes the NMEA-0183 protocol and RS232C communication standards. Furthermore, using the SKUD, the HMI of the real commercial CNS could be investigated with driver workload assessment methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belur, V. D. (2005). Information fusion in the context of human-machine interfaces. Information Fusion, 6, 117–118.
Carr, K. (1995). Introduction in K. Carr & R. England, Simulated and Virtual Realities: Elements of Perception. Taylor & Francis. London. 1–9.
Cho, K. Y., Bae, C. H., Chu, Y. and Suh, M. W. (2004). An overview of telematics: A system architecture approach. Int. J. Automotive Technology 7,4, 509–517.
Choi, Y.-I., Suk, J., Kim, K.-H., Kwon, S.-J. and Suh, M.-W. (2004). A study on the improving the rendering performanse of the 3D road model for the vehicle simulator. Trans. Korean Sociery of Automotive Engineers 12,5, 162–170.
Draper, M. (1998). The Adaptive Effects of Virtual Inter-Faces: Vestibulo-ocular Reflex and Simulator Sickness. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle, 58.
Ehrlich, J. A. and Kolasinski, E. M. (1998). A comparison of sickness symptoms between dropout and finishing participants in virtual environment studies. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42th Annual Meeting, 1466–1470.
Ehrlich, J. A., Singer, M. J. and Allen, R. C. (1998). Relationships between head-shoulder divergences and sickness in a virtual environment. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 42th Annual Meeting. 1471–1475.
Friedhelm, N., Peter, N. and Inga, M. (2006). Human factors in process control system: The design of humanmachine interfaces. Safety Science, 44, 5–26.
Harper, J. G., Fuller, R., Sweeney, D. and Waldmann, T. (1998). Human factors in technology replacement: A case study in interface design for a public transport monitoring system. Applied Ergonomics 29,2, 133–146.
Henry, D. and Furness, T. (1993). Spatial perception in virtual environments. Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality Annual Int. Symp.(VRAIS). 33–40.
Hoskins, A. H. and El-Gindy, M. (2006). Technical report: Literature survey on driving simulator validation studies. Int. J. Heavy Vehicle System 13,3, 241–252.
Kennedy, R. S., Berbaum, K. S., Dunlap, W. P. and Hettinger, L. J. (1996). Developing automated methods to quantify the visual stimulus for cybersickness. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 40th Annual Meeting. 1126–1130.
Kim, H.-K. and Lee, S.-Y. (2003). Trend of telematics technology. J. Korea Institute of Communication Science 20,12, 14–31.
Lee, W.-S. and Cho, J.-H. (2001). Introduction of driving simulator and applications. J. KSME 41,4, 34–39.
McGreevy, M. W. and Ellis, S. R. (1986). The effect of perspective geometry on judged direction in spatial information instruments. Human Factors, 28, 439–456.
Moody, G. B. (2002). RR interval time series modeling: The phsioNet/Computers in cardiology challenge 2002. Computers in Cardiology, 125–128.
Nicolas, A. P. and Clement, M. G. (1998). Motion simulation capabilities of three-degree-of-freedom flight simulators. J. Aircraft 35,1, 9–17.
Park, P. and Cha, D.-W. (1998). Development of humanmachine interface evaluation system and simulator for car navigation system. Proc. ESK Conf., 13–18.
Snow, M. P. and Williges, R. C. (1997). Empirical modeling of perceived presence in virtual environments using sequential exploratory techniques. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 41st Annual Meeting, 1224–1228.
Stanton, N. A., Salmon, P. M., Walker, G. H., Baber, C. and Jenkins, D. P. (2005). Human factors methods; A practical guide for engineering and design. Ashgate Publishing Limited, 301–305.
Suh, M.-W., Koo, T.-Y., Kwon, S.-J., Shin, Y.-S., Cho, K.-Y. and Park, D.-Y. (2002). Development of SVPG. Trans. Korean Society of Automotive Engineers 10,1, 195–202.
Tracy, R. and Gary, B. (2001). Evaluating the humanmachine interface to vehicle navigation systems as an example of ubiquitous computing. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 55, 661–674.
Wang, Z., He, W. P., Zhang, D. H., Cai, H. M. and Yu, S. H. (2002). Creative design research of product appearance based on human-machine interaction and interface. J. Materials Processing Technology, 129, 545–550.
Wierwille, W. W. and Eggemeier, F. T. (1993). Recommendations for mental workload measurements in a test and evaluation environment. Human Factors 35,2, 263–282.
Yi, K. (2004). Human-in-the-loop evaluation of advanced safety vehicles using a vehicle simulator. Auto J. 26,4, 6–10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koo, T.Y., Kim, B.Y., Shin, H.J. et al. Development of the Sungkyunkwan University Driving Simulator (SKUD) for Human-Machine Interface studies of Car Navigation Systems. Int.J Automot. Technol. 11, 743–749 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-010-0088-z
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-010-0088-z