Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tide–Surge Interactions in Lingdingyang Bay, Pearl River Estuary, China: a Case Study from Typhoon Mangkhut, 2018

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a need for accurate estimates of extreme sea levels for use in coastal engineering during typhoon seasons. Therefore, a numerical study was carried out to investigate tide–surge interactions induced by Typhoon Mangkhut in the Pearl River Estuary. A nested model was first validated and then used to study the spatial and temporal behavior of the storm surge and tide–surge interactions in the Pearl River Estuary during Typhoon Mangkhut (2018). The numerical results showed that the typhoon could induce nonlinear oscillations with amplitudes of approximately 0.3 m in the bay, which were caused by tide–surge interactions. Thus, we investigated the temporal and spatial features of the nonlinear oscillations and tracked their origin. First, for most stations inside Lingdingyang Bay, the peak of the nonlinear oscillations did not coincide with the highest stage of the surge and instead occurred afterward. Spatially, much larger nonlinear oscillations occurred at the top of the bay than near the mouth. Second, through a series of sensitivity experiments that involved translating the original typhoon landfall process forward and backward relative to the tide within a limited timeframe, the nonlinear oscillations showed tidally influenced characteristics. Specifically, there tend to be positive oscillations at low tide and negative oscillations at high tide, which explains the fact that surge is always enhanced (or weakened) under low (or high) tide. In addition to the phase difference between tide and surge, we also tested the influence of tidal range on the nonlinear oscillations. The results showed that the strength of the nonlinear oscillations in the bay was proportional to the tidal range under the same meteorological conditions. Finally, we conducted additional experiments by altering terms in primitive movement equations to weigh the importance of the origins that produce the nonlinear oscillations in terms of hydrodynamic mechanisms. The results indicated that nonlinear bottom friction was the major factor causing significant nonlinear oscillations, accounting for nearly three-fourths of the total. The next most influential factor was the shallow water effect, accounting for the other one-fourth of the total. The advective term showed little effect on the nonlinear oscillations in the open bay of the Pearl River Estuary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The authors do not have permission to share data according the local law.

References

  • Antony, C., and A.S. Unnikrishnan. 2013. Observed characteristics of tide-surge interaction along the east coast of India and the head of Bay of Bengal. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 131: 6–11.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • As-Salek, J.A., and T. Yasuda. 2001. Tide-surge interaction in the Meghna Estuary: Most severe conditions. Journal of Physical Oceanography 31: 3059–3072.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernier, N.B., and K.R. Thompson. 2007. Tide-surge interaction off the east coast of Canada and northeastern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: C06008.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., H. Liu, and R.C. Beardsley. 2003. An unstructured grid, finite-volume, three-dimensional, primitive equations ocean model: Application to coastal ocean and estuaries. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology 20 (1): 159–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., R.C. Beardsley, and G. Cowles. 2006. An unstructured grid, finite-volume coastal ocean model (FVCOM) system. Oceanography 19: 78–89. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2006.92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J., W. Jiang, D. Li, Q. Liu, H. Wang, and K. Liu. 2019. Characteristics of tide-surge interaction and its roles in the distribution of surge residuals along the coast of China. Journal of Oceanography 75: 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, H.E., and D.E. Nunn. 1959. Meteorological conditions pertinent to standard project hurricane. Atlantic and Gulf Coasts of United States, National Hurricane Research Project, Report No. 3, US Weather Service.

  • Heaps, N.S. 1983. Storm surges, 1967–1982. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society 74: 331–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, G.J. 1980. An analytic model of the wind and pressure profiles in hurricanes. Monthly Weather Review 108 (8): 1212–1218.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Hope, M.E., J.J. Westerink, A.B. Kennedy, P.C. Kerr, J.C. Dietrich, C. Dawson, C. Bender, J.M. Smith, R.E. Jensen, M. Zijlema, L.H. Holthuijsen, R.A. Luettich, M.D. Powell, V.J. Cardone, A.T. Cox, H. Pourtahen, H.J. Roberts, J.H. Atkinson, S. Tanaka, H.J. Westerink, and L.G. Westerink. 2013. Hindcast and validation of Hurricane Ike (2008): Waves, forerunner, and storm surge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 118: 4424–4460.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Horsburgh, K.J., and C. Wilson. 2007. Tide-surge interaction and its role in the distribution of surge residuals in the North Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: C08003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2022. In: Portner, ¨ H.-O., Roberts, D.C., Tignor, M., Poloczanska, E.S., Mintenbeck, K., Alegría, A., Craig, M., Langsdorf, S., Loschke, ¨ S., Moller, ¨ V., Okem, A., Rama, B. (Eds.), Intergovernmental panel on climate change, climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. November 2022). https://www.ipcc.ch/assessment-report/ar6/.

  • Irish, J.L., D.T. Resio, and J.J. Ratcliff. 2008. The influence of storm size on hurricane surge. Journal of Physical Oceanography 38: 2003–2013.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Irish, J.L., D.T. Resio, and M.A. Cialone. 2009. A surge response function approach to coastal hazard assessment. Part 2: Quantification of spatial attributes of response functions. Natural Hazards 51: 183–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, F., and H. Madsen. 2004. Comparison and further development of parametric tropical cyclone models for storm surge modeling. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 92: 375–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, B., A.D. Rao, S.K. Dube, and P.C. Sinha. 1985. Numerical modeling of tide-surge interaction in the Bay of Bengal. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A Mathematical and Physical Sciences 313: 507–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., M. Lorenz, K. Klingbeil, E. Chrysagi, and U. Gr¨awe, J. Wu, and H. Burchard,. 2022. salinity mixing and diahaline exchange flow in a large multi-outlet estuary with islands. Journal of Physical Oceanography. https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO-D-21-0292.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T.S., S.J. Liu, X. Yang, J. Chen, and C. Zhang. 2018. Statistical analysis of the typhoon influencing Guangdong Province during 1951–2015. Marine Forecast 35 (4): 68–74 (in Chinese).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Water Resources of the People’s Republic of China. Hydrological yearbook. 2018, Vol. 8.

  • Murty, T. S., R. A. Flather, and R. F. Henry. 1986: The storm surge problem in the Bay of Bengal. Progress in Oceanography, Vol. 16, Pergamon 195–233.

  • Padman, L. Tide model driver (TMD) manual, Ver. 1.2, 2005.

  • Park, Y.H., and K.D. Suh. 2012. Variations of storm surge caused by shallow water depths and extreme tidal ranges. Ocean Engineering 55: 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G.C., A.I.M. Ismail, A. Rahman, M.F. Karim, and A. Hoque. 2016. Development of tide-surge interaction model for the coastal region of Bangladesh. Estuaries and Coasts 39 (6): 1582–1599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prandle, D., and J. Wolf. 1978. The interaction of surge and tide in the North Sea and River Thames. Geophy J R Soc 55 (1): 203–216.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Proudman, J. 1957. Oscillations of tide and surge in an estuary of finite length. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 2: 371–383.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, L., and C. Li. 2010. Nonlinear terms in storm surge predictions: effect of tide and shelf geometry with case study from Hurricane Rita. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 115, C06020.

  • Savenije, H.H.G., and E.J.M. Veling. 2005. Relation between tidal damping and wave celerity in estuaries. Journal of Geophysical Research 110: C04007. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JC002278.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sebastian, A., J. Proft, J.C. Dietrich, W. Du, P.B. Bedient, and C.N. Dawson. 2014. Characterizing hurricane storm surge behavior in Galveston Bay using the SWAN + ADCIRC model. Coastal Engineering 88: 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z., S. Huang, H. Nie, J. Jiao, S. Huang, L. Zhu, and L. Xu. 2015. Risk analysis of seawall overflowed by storm surge during super typhoon. Ocean Engineering 107: 178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Y.M., R. Grimshaw, B. Sanderson, and G. Holland. 1996. A numerical study of storm surges and tides, with application to the North Queensland coast. Journal of Physical Oceanography 26: 2700–2711.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, P.J., G.J. Holland, J.A. Curry, et al. 2005. Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309 (5742): 1844–1846.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. 2009. Coastal flooding: Impacts of coupled wave–surge–tide models. Natural Hazards 49 (2): 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-008-9316-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J.L., Y.H. Zhang, A.Z. Cao, Q. Liu, and X.Q. Lv. 2016. Effects of tide-surge interactions on storm surges along the coast of the Bohai Sea, Yellow Sea, and East China Sea. Science China Earth Sciences 59: 1308–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5251-y.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, J., L. Li, K. Zhao, P. Wang, D. Wang, et al. 2019. A comparative study of Typhoon Hata (2017) and Typhoon Mangkhut (2018) — their impacts on coastal inundation in Macau. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 124. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015249.

  • Yin, K., S.D. Xu, W.R. Huang, and Y. Xie. 2017. Effects of sea level rise and typhoon intensity on storm surge and waves in Pearl River Estuary. Ocean Engineering 136: 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., W. Cheng, X. Qiu, X. Feng, and W. Gong. 2017. Tide-surge interaction along the east coast of the Leizhou Peninsula, South China Sea. Continental Shelf Research 142: 32–39.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, W.Z., F.Y. Shi, H.S. Hong, et al. 2010. Tide-surge Interaction Intensified by the Taiwan Strait. Journal of Geophysical Research 115 (C06012): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Y. Zhao, and Y. Wang. 1993. Analysis of disaster caused by typhoon surges and study of the numerical prediction methods for the disastrous sea level. In Tropical cyclone disasters, ed. J. Lighthill, et al., 452–459. Peking Univ: Press, Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., C. Chen, R.C. Beardsley, S. Li, Q. Xu, Z. Song, D. Zhang, D. Hu, and F. Guo. 2020. A FVCOM study of the potential coastal flooding in Apponagansett Bay and Clarks Cove, Dartmouth Town (MA). Natural Hazards 103 (3): 2787–2809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., F. Guo, Z. Song, P. Chen, F. Liu, and D. Zhang. 2021. A numerical study of storm surge behavior in and around Lingdingyang Bay. Pearl River, China, Natural Hazards 111 (2022): 1507–1532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Z., Z. Song, and F. Lu. 2013. A numerical study on storm surge and sediment resuspending in Modaomen Estuary during Typhoon Hagupit. Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, OMAE2013, June 9–14, 2013, Nantes, France.

Download references

Funding

This work was funded by the Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Coastal Disaster and Protection, Hohai University, China (Grant No. 202218), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42171465), the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42230406), and the Jiangsu Province Marine Science and Technology Innovation Project (Grant No. JSZRHYKJ202307).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuo Zhang.

Additional information

Communicated by David K. Ralston

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Song, Z., Zhang, D. et al. Tide–Surge Interactions in Lingdingyang Bay, Pearl River Estuary, China: a Case Study from Typhoon Mangkhut, 2018. Estuaries and Coasts 47, 330–351 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-023-01297-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-023-01297-5

Keywords

Navigation