Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Bed Stress Minimum in Tidal Rivers

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bed stress patterns control erosion and deposition in tidal rivers and thereby govern changes in geomorphology. Management of river discharge and shipping channel geometry perturbs rivers from their natural state, leading to hotspots of sand deposition and erosion. Here, we investigate the along-channel variability in bed stress for a tidal river of constant depth with semidiurnal tides and convergent geometry using a Fourier decomposition of the quadratic bed stress and analytical approximations of tidal and river velocity. Under some river discharge and tidal conditions, bed stress profiles exhibit a local bed stress minimum, xmin, within a region marked by strong gradients in cross-sectionally averaged velocity. These gradients can lead to convergent sediment fluxes and shoaling near xmin. Factors decreasing river velocity (flow management, channel deepening, and weak channel convergence) move xmin and depositional areas upstream. Analytical estimates of xmin were validated using fifty-two two-dimensional Adaptive Hydraulics (AdH) numerical model simulations and agree well with the sediment transport behavior of three prototype systems (Columbia River, Hudson River, and Delaware Estuary). Climate changes in seasonal flow cycles and mean river discharge, and the reservoir management response to these changes, may significantly alter the dynamics of xmin, affecting ecosystem dynamics and the stability of wetlands and coastal beaches as sea level rises. The analytical formulation of xmin developed herein will make it easier to understand how climate and human-induced changes to a river can impact long-term erosion/accretion patterns and can help guide future investments for managing sediment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-bahadily, A. 2020. Long term changes to the Lower Columbia River Estuary (LCRE) hydrodynamics and salinity patterns. Portland State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G.P., et al. 1980. Effects of tides on mixing and suspended sediment transport in macrotidal estuaries. Sedimentary Geology 26 (1–3): 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, D.G., and P.E. Speer. 1985. A study of non-linear tidal propagation in shallow inlet/estuarine systems Part 1: Observations. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 21: 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolla Pittaluga, M., N. Tambroni, A. Canestrelli, R. Slingerland, S. Lanzoni, and G. Seminara. 2015. Where river and tide meet: The morphodynamic equilibrium of alluvial estuaries. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 120 (1): 75–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch, R.A., et al. 2021. Surface turbulence reveals riverbed drag coefficient. Geophysical Research Letters 48 (10): e2020GL092326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, H., and H. Baumert. 1998. The formation of estuarine turbidity maxima due to density effects in the salt wedge. A hydrodynamic process study. Journal of Physical Oceanography 28 (2): 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burchard, H., H.M. Schuttelaars, and D.K. Ralston. 2018. Sediment trapping in estuaries. Annual Review of Marine Science 10: 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buschman, F.A., A.J.F. Hoitink, M. Van Der Vegt, and P. Hoekstra. 2009. Subtidal water level variation controlled by river flow and tides. Water Resources Research 45: 10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chant, R.J., D. Fugate, and E. Garvey. 2011. The shaping of an estuarine superfund site: Roles of evolving dynamics and geomorphology. Estuaries and Coasts 34 (1): 90–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chatanantavet, P., M.P. Lamb, and J.A. Nittrouer. 2012. Backwater controls of avulsion location on deltas. Geophysical Research Letters 39: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernetsky, A.S., H.M. Schuttelaars, and S.A. Talke. 2010. The effect of tidal asymmetry and temporal settling lag on sediment trapping in tidal estuaries. Ocean Dynamics 60 (5): 1219–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, R.W., B.A. Zaitlin, and R. Boyd. 1992. Estuarine facies models; conceptual basis and stratigraphic implications. Journal of Sedimentary Research 62 (6): 1130–1146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jonge, V.N., H.M. Schuttelaars, J.E. van Beusekom, S.A. Talke, and H.E. de Swart. 2014a. The influence of channel deepening on estuarine turbidity levels and dynamics, as exemplified by the Ems estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 139: 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, Y.M., H.M. Schuttelaars, and H. Burchard. 2017. Generation of exchange flows in estuaries by tidal and gravitational eddy viscosity-shear covariance (ESCO). Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans 122 (5): 4217–4237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, Y.M., H.M. Schuttelaars, G.P. Schramkowski, and R.L. Brouwer. 2019. Modeling the transition to high sediment concentrations as a response to channel deepening in the Ems River Estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research, Oceans 124 (3): 1578–1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiLorenzo, J.L., P. Huang, M.L. Thatcher, and T.O. Najarian. 1993. Dredging impacts on Delaware Estuary tides, 86–104. Estuarine and Coastal Modeling: ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dronkers, J.J. 1964. Tidal computations in rivers and coastal waters. North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, K. 1986. Coastal and estuarine sediment dynamics. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, Keith R. 1995. Sediment transport processes in estuaries. Developments in Sedimentology 53: 423–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, E.P., G. Gelfenbaum, and A.J. Van der Westhuysen. 2012. Validation of a coupled wave-flow model in a high-energy setting: the mouth of the Columbia River. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans 117 (C9).

  • EPA. 2014. Record of decision, Lower Duwamish Waterway Superfund Site.

  • EPA. 2016. Record of decision, Lower 8.3 Miles of the Lower Passaic River Part of the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site Essex and Hudson Counties, New Jersey.

  • EPA. 2017. Record of decision, Portland Harbor Superfund Site Portland, Oregon.

  • Familkhalili, R., S.A. Talke, and D.A. Jay. 2022. Compound flooding in convergent estuaries: insights from an analytical model. Ocean Science Discussions 18 (4): 1203–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festa, J.F., and D.V. Hansen. 1978. Turbidity maxima in partially mixed estuaries: A two-dimensional numerical model. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 7 (4): 347–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, C.T. 1995. Stability shear stress and equilibrium cross-sectional geometry of sheltered tidal channels. Journal of Coastal Research 11: 1062–1074.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, C.T., and D.G. Aubrey. 1994. Tidal propagation in strongly convergent channels. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 99 (C2): 3321–3336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, C.T., B.A. Armbrust, and H.E. deSwart. 1998. Hydrodynamics and equilibrium sediment dynamics of shallow, funnel-shaped tidal estuaries. VIMS Books and Book Chapters 38.

  • Gelfenbaum, G. 1983. Suspended-sediment response to semidiurnal and fortnightly tidal variations in a mesotidal estuary: Columbia River, USA. Marine Geology 52 (1–2): 39–57.

  • Geyer, W.R. 1993. The importance of suppression of turbulence by stratification on the estuarine turbidity maximum. Estuaries 16 (1): 113–125.

  • Giese, B.S., and D.A. Jay. 1989. Modelling tidal energetics of the Columbia River estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 29 (6): 549–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godin, G. 1991. Compact approximations to the bottom friction term, for the study of tides propagating in channels. Continental Shelf Research 11 (7): 579–589.

  • Godin, G., et al. 1991. Frictional effects in river tides. Tidal hydrodynamics 379–402.

  • Guo, L., et al. 2014. The role of river flow and tidal asymmetry on 1-D estuarine morphodynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research, Earth Surface 119 (11): 2315–2334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, R. 2004. Applied partial differential equations with Fourier series and boundary value problems. Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helaire, L.T., S.A. Talke, D.A. Jay, and D. Mahedy. 2019. Historical changes in Lower Columbia River and estuary floods: A numerical study. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 124 (11): 7926–7946. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, R.E. 1930. Shoaling on the lower Columbia River. The Military Engineer 22 (123): 217–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickson, R.E. 1961. Columbia River ship channel improvement and maintenance. Journal of the Waterways and Harbors Division 87 (3): 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoitink, A.J.F., and D.A. Jay. 2016. Tidal river dynamics: Implications for deltas. Reviews of Geophysics 54 (1): 240–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoitink, A.J.F., P. Hoekstra, and D.S. van Maren. 2003. Flow asymmetry associated with astronomical tides: Implications for the residual transport of sediment. Journal of Geophysical Research 108: C10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijts, K.M.H., H.M. Schuttelaars, H.E. De Swart, and C.T. Friedrichs. 2009. Analytical study of the transverse distribution of along-channel and transverse residual flows in tidal estuaries. Continental Shelf Research 29 (1): 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ianniello, J.P. 1979. Tidally induced residual currents in estuaries of variable breadth and depth. Journal of Physical Oceanography 9 (5): 962–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A. 1991. Green’s law revisited: Tidal long-wave propagation in channels with strong topography. Journal of Geophysical Research 96 (C11): 20585–20598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., and J.D. Musiak. 1994. Particle trapping in estuarine tidal flows. Journal of Geophysical Research 99 (C10): 20445–20461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., and P. Naik. 2011. Distinguishing human and climate influences on hydrological disturbance processes in the Columbia River, USA. Hydrological Sciences Journal 56: 1186–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., and C.A. Simenstad. 1996. Downstream effects of water withdrawal in a small, high-gradient basin: Erosion and deposition on the Skokomish River Delta. Estuaries 19: 501–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., and J.D. Smith. 1990. Circulation, density distribution and neap-spring transitions in the Columbia River Estuary. Progress in Oceanography 25: 81–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., B.S. Giese, and C.R. Sherwood. 1990. Energetics and sedimentary processes in the Columbia River Estuary. Progress in Oceanography 25: 157–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., P.M. Orton, T. Chisholm, D.J. Wilson, and A.M.V. Fain. 2007. Particle trapping in stratified estuaries – I Consequences of mass conservation and explorations of a parameter space. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 1095–1105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., S.A. Talke, A. Hudson, and M. Twardowski. 2015. Estuarine turbidity maxima revisited: Instrumental approaches, remote sensing, modeling studies, and new directions. In Fluvial-Tidal Sedimentology, Developments in Sedimentology, vol. 68, ed. P.J. Ashworth, J.L. Best, and D.R. Parsons, 49–109. Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, D.A., A. Borde, and H. Diefenderfer. 2016. Tidal-fluvial and estuarine processes in the Lower Columbia River: II: Water level models, inundation, reach classification and vegetation. Estuaries and Coasts 39: 1299–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-016-0082-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaminsky, G.M., et al. 2010. Historical evolution of the Columbia River littoral cell. Marine Geology 273 (1–4): 96–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanzoni, S., and G. Seminara. 2002. Long-term evolution and morphodynamic equilibrium of tidal channels. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 107 (C1): 1–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade, R.H. 1969. Landward transport of bottom sediments in estuaries of the Atlantic coastal plain. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 39 (1): 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naik, P., and D.A. Jay. 2010. Human and climate impacts on Columbia River hydrology and salmonids, River Res. Applic. 27: 1270–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naik, P.K., and D.A. Jay. 2011. Distinguishing human and climate influences on the Columbia River: Changes in mean flow and sediment transport. Journal of Hydrology 404 (3): 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidzieko, N.J. 2010. Tidal asymmetry in estuaries with mixed semidiurnal/diurnal tides. Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans 115 (C8).

  • Nitsche, F.O., et al. 2007. Regional patterns and local variations of sediment distribution in the Hudson River Estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 71 (1–2): 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nittrouer, J.A., J. Shaw, M.P. Lamb, and D. Mohrig. 2012. Spatial and temporal trends for water-flow velocity and bed-material sediment transport in the lower Mississippi River. Bulletin 124 (3): 400–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • NOAA tide and current predictions. https://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/map/index.html. Accessed 1 Sept 2021.

  • Pareja-Roman, L.F., R.J. Chant, and C.K. Sommerfield. 2020. Impact of historical channel deepening on tidal hydraulics in the Delaware Estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 125 (12): e2020JC016256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postma, H. 1961. Transport and accumulation of suspended matter in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 1 (1): 148–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proudman, J. 1952. Dynamical oceanography. Dover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D.K., and W.R. Geyer. 2017. Sediment transport time scales and trapping efficiency in a tidal river. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 122 (11): 2042–2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralston, D.K., S.A. Talke, W.R. Geyer, H.A.M. Al-Zubaidi, and C.K. Sommerfield. 2019. Bigger tides, less flooding: Effects of dredging on barotropic dynamics in a highly modified estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 124 (1): 196–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savant, G., C. Berger, T.O. McAlpin, and J.N. Tate. 2011. Efficient implicit finite-element hydrodynamic model for dam and levee breach. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 137 (9): 1005–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savenije, H.H. 2005. Salinity and tides in alluvial estuaries. Gulf Professional Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherwood, C.R., D.A. Jay, R.B. Harvey, P. Hamilton, and C.A. Simenstad. 1990. Historical changes in the Columbia River estuary. Progress in Oceanography 25 (1): 299–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommerfield, C.K., and K. Wong. 2011. Mechanisms of sediment flux and turbidity maintenance in the Delaware Estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 116 (C1).

  • Sommerfield, C.K., J.A. Madsen, and P. Hall. 2003. Sedimentological and geophysical survey of the upper Delaware estuary. Delaware River Basin Commission Final report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speer, P.E., and D.G. Aubrey. 1985. A study of non-linear tidal propagation in shallow in- let/estuarine systems part 2: Theory. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 21: 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talke, S.A., and D.A. Jay. 2020. Changing tides: The role of natural and anthropogenic factors. Annual Review of Marine Science 12: 121–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talke, S.A., H.E. de Swart, and H.M. Schuttelaars. 2009a. Feedback between residual circulations and sediment distribution in highly turbid estuaries: An analytical model. Continental Shelf Research 29 (1): 119–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talke, S.A., H.E. de Swart, and V. de Jonge. 2009b. An idealized model and systematic process study of oxygen depletion in highly turbid estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 32 (4): 602–620.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talke, S.A., R. Familkhalili, and D.A. Jay. 2021. The influence of channel deepening on tides, river discharge effects, and storm surge. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 126 (5): e2020JC016328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton, W.J., and D.A. Jay. 2012. Lower Columbia River sand supply and removal: Estimates of two sand budget components. Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 139 (5): 383–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USACE. 2020. USACE RSM Program Update. https://rsm.usace.army.mil/techtransfer/FY20/RSM-IPR-Aug2020/briefs/1_01_2020_RSM_ERDC_ProgramUpdate.pdf. Accessed 4 Aug 2021.

  • Winterwerp, J.C., Z.B. Wang, A. Van Braeckel, G. Van Holland, and F. Kösters. 2013. Man-induced regime shifts in small estuaries–II: A comparison of rivers. Ocean Dynamics 63 (11): 1293–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Upon acceptance of this paper, water level and flow data used in this study will be archived by the Portland State University Library (https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cengin_data/).

Funding

Stefan Talke’s work on this paper was supported by NSF Grant 2013280.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Austin Hudson.

Additional information

Communicated by Eduardo Siegle

Key Points

• Channel convergence and tidal attenuation in rivers may together produce a local minimum in the along-channel distribution of bed stress and a sediment convergence zone.

• The bed stress minimum contributes to channel shoaling, down-river fining of bed material, and seasonal sediment storage and limits littoral sediment supply.

• Channel deepening and flow reduction move the bed stress minimum upriver, which alters shoaling volume/composition and may also affect wetland stability.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hudson, A., Jay, D. & Talke, S. The Bed Stress Minimum in Tidal Rivers. Estuaries and Coasts 46, 336–355 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-022-01156-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-022-01156-9

Keywords

Navigation