Skip to main content

Beyond Residence Time: Quantifying Factors that Drive the Spatially Explicit Filtration Services of an Abundant Native Oyster Population

Estuaries and Coasts volume 45, pages 1343–1360 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

The Guana-Tolomato-Matanzas (GTM) system is a well-flushed estuary in Northeastern Florida, USA, and characterized as having an extraordinarily high abundance of oysters that resembles the populations described by Euro-American settlers. Historically, dense populations of oysters, such as those found in GTM, are believed to play an important role in water filtration; however, most research teams seeking to simulate this role have not had access to such robust populations to parametrize their models. To quantify the filtration service (FS) of Eastern oysters (Crassostrea virginica) in GTM at several spatial scales (i.e., reef, watershed, estuary), we implemented a model that solves for the hydrodynamics and depletion of particulate matter passing over model oyster populations, the latter of which were derived from detailed bay-wide surveys. The model results suggested that oyster reefs populating the GTM play an important role in water quality by filtering ~60% of the estuary’s volume within its residence time. Our approach teases apart the role of reef size, residence time, particle concentration, and other physical factors on the generation of FS at different spatial scales. Downstream effects were found to be very important for estuary FS, which depend on the spatial distribution of the reefs in the GTM and local and estuarine-scale hydrodynamics. Therefore, the difference between “realized” FS and the “potential” FS of a given reef may be substantial when considering the complex hydrodynamic and connectivity among populations at several scales. Our model results provide clear and actionable information for management of these oyster populations and conservation of their ecosystem services.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References 

  • Akaike, Hirotugu. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In Second international symposium on information theory 267–281. Budepest.

  • Allen, Steve, A. C. Carpenter, M. W. Luckenbach, Kennedy T. Paynter Jr, Angela Sowers, Eric Weissberger, James A. Wesson, and Stephanie Westby. 2011. Restoration Goals, Quantitative Metrics and Assessment Protocols. Report of the Oyster Metrics Workgroup. Chesapeake Bay Program.

  • Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission. 2007. The importance of Habitat Created by Shellfish and Shell Beds Along the Atlantic Coast of the US Washington. DC.

  • Bacopoulos, Peter, Amanda S. Tritinger, and Nicole G. Dix. 2019. Sea-level rise impact on salt marsh sustainability and migration for a subtropical estuary: GTMNERR (Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve). Environmental Modeling & Assessment 24: 163–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-018-9622-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Michael W., Robert D. Brumbaugh, Laura Airoldi, Alvar Carranza, Loren D. Coen, Christine Crawford, Omar Defeo, et al. 2011. Oyster reefs at risk and recommendations for conservation, restoration, and management. BioScience 61: 107–116. https://doi.org/10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerco, C., and Mark R. Noel. 2005. Assessing a ten-fold increase in the Chesapeake Bay native oyster population. Report to EPA Chesapeake Bay Program. Annapolis, Maryland, USA: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Vicksburg MS.

  • Coen, Loren D., and Austin T. Humphries. 2017. Their services, enhancement, restoration and monitoring. In Routledge handbook of ecological and environmental restoration, ed. Stuart K. Allison and Stephen D. Murphy, 274–294. Taylor & Francis.

  • Coen, Loren D., Robert D. Brumbaugh, David Bushek, Ray Grizzle, Mark W. Luckenbach, Martin H. Posey, Sean P. Powers, and S. Gregory Tolley. 2007. Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 341: 303–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranford, Peter J. 2019. Magnitude and extent of water clarification services provided by bivalve suspension feeding. In Goods and Services of Marine Bivalves, ed. Aad C. Smaal, Joao G. Ferreira, Jon Grant, Jens K. Petersen, and Øivind Strand, 119–141. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96776-9_8.

  • Cranford, Peter J., J. Evan Ward, and Sandra E. Shumway. 2011. Bivalve filter feeding: variability and limits of the aquaculture biofilter. In Shellfish Aquaculture and the Environment, ed. Sandra E. Shumway, 81–124. Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Dix, Nicole G., A. Noel, H. J. Brockmeyer, H. J. Cho, S. R. Allen, and K. R. Radabaugh. 2017. Northeast Florida. In Coastal Habitat Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida, ed. K. R. Radabaugh, C. E. Powell, and R. P. Moyer. 21. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute.

  • Dix, Nicole, Edward Phlips, and Peter Suscy. 2013. Factors controlling phytoplankton biomass in a subtropical coastal lagoon: relative scales of influence. Estuaries and Coasts 36. Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation: 981–996.

  • Dix, Nicole G., L. Walters, E. Hernandez, A. Roddenberry, S. Garvis, M, and Anderson, K. R. Radabaugh. 2019. Northeast Florida. In Oyster Integrated Mapping and Monitoring Program Report for the State of Florida, ed. K.R. Radabaugh, R.P. Moyer, S.P. Geiger. 22. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Fish and Wildlife Research Institute.

  • Filgueira, Ramón, Thomas Guyondet, Luc A. Comeau, and Réjean. Tremblay. 2016. Bivalve aquaculture-environment interactions in the context of climate change. Global Change Biology 22: 3901–3913. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, Richard S., Denise L. Breitburg, Mark Luckenbach, and Roger I. E. Newell. 2010. Evaluating ecosystem response to oyster restoration and nutrient load reduction with a multispecies bioenergetics model. Ecological Applications 20: 915–934. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1796.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, Richard S., Denise L. Breitburg, Roger IE. Newell, and WMichael Kemp, and Mark Luckenbach. 2007. Effects of oyster population restoration strategies on phytoplankton biomass in Chesapeake Bay: A flexible modeling approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series 336: 43–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerritsen, Jeroen, A. Frederick Holland, and David E. Irvine. 1994. Suspension-feeding bivalves and the fate of primary production: An estuarine model applied to Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 17: 403–416. https://doi.org/10.2307/1352673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Matthew W., and Chris J. Langdon. 2018. Ecophysiology of the Olympia Oyster, Ostrea lurida, and Pacific Oyster, Crassostrea gigas. Estuaries and Coasts 41: 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0273-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, M., and Philine zu Ermgassen, Jonathan Gair, Chris Langdon, Emily Lemagie, and Jim Lerczak. 2019. Spatially explicit estimates of in situ filtration by native oysters to augment ecosystem services during restoration. Estuaries and Coasts 42: 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00515-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grizzle, R.E., J.K. Greene, and L.D. Coen. 2008. Seston removal by natural and constructed intertidal eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) reefs: A comparison with previous laboratory studies, and the value of in situ methods. Estuaries and Coasts 31: 1208–1220.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández, Ada Bersoza, Robert D. Brumbaugh, Peter Frederick, Raymond Grizzle, Mark W. Luckenbach, Charles H. Peterson, and Christine Angelini. 2018. Restoring the eastern oyster: How much progress has been made in 53 years? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 16: 463–471. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, P., K. Troost, R. Riegman, and J. van der Meer. 2015. Length- and weight-dependent clearance rates of juvenile mussels ( Mytilus edulis ) on various planktonic prey items. Helgoland Marine Research 69. BioMed Central: 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1-152-014-0419-y

  • Kellog, M. Lisa., Jeffrey C. Cornwell, Michael S. Owens, and Kennedy T. Paynter. 2013. Denitrification and nutrient assimilation on a restored oyster reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series 480: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10331.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurlansky, Mark. 2007. The big oyster: History on the half shell. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemagie, Emily P., and James A. Lerczak. 2015. A comparison of bulk estuarine turnover timescales to particle tracking timescales using a model of the Yaquina Bay estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 38: 1797–1814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madár, János, János Abonyi, and Ferenc Szeifert. 2005. Genetic programming for the identification of nonlinear input- output models. Industrial & engineering chemistry research 44. ACS Publications: 3178–3186.

  • Mann, Roger, and Eric N. Powell. 2007. Why oyster restoration goals in the Chesapeake Bay are not and probably cannot be achieved. Journal of Shellfish Research 26: 905–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, Roger, Juliana M. Harding, and Melissa J. Southworth. 2009. Reconstructing pre-colonial oyster demographics in the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 85: 217–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2009.08.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcum, Dix P., and M. Monroe. 2018. Oyster Monitoring Summary. Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve.

  • Milbrandt, E.C., M. Thompson, L.D. Coen, R.E. Grizzle, and K. Ward. 2015. A multiple habitat restoration strategy in a semi-enclosed Florida embayment, combining hydrologic restoration, mangrove propagule plantings and oyster substrate additions. Ecological Engineering 83: 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NERRS. 2021. NOAA National Estuarine Research Reserve System (NERRS). System-wide Monitoring Program. Centralized Data Management Office.

  • Newell, R.I.E. 1988. Ecological changes in Chesapeake Bay: Are they the result of overharvesting the American oyster, Crassostrea virginica. Understanding the Estuary: Advances in Chesapeake Bay Research 129: 536–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, R. I. E., and C. J. Langdon. 1996. Mechanisms and physiology of larval and adult feeding. In The Eastern Oyster Crassostrea virginica, ed. V. S. Kennedy, R. I. E. Newell, and A. F. Eble, 185–229. College Park, Maryland: Maryland Seagrant.

  • Newell R.I.E., Fisher T.R., Holyoke R.R., Cornwell J.C. (2005) Influence of Eastern Oysters on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Regeneration in Chesapeake Bay, USA. In: Dame R.F., Olenin S. (eds) The Comparative Roles of Suspension-Feeders in Ecosystems. NATO Science Series IV: Earth and Environmental Series, vol 47. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3030-4_6

  • Phlips, E. J., N. Love, S. Badylak, P. Hansen, J. Lockwood, C. V. John, and R. Gleeson. 2004. A Comparison of Water Quality and Hydrodynamic Characteristics of the Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve and the Indian River Lagoon of Florida*. Journal of Coastal Research SI. Fort Lauderdale, United Kingdom: Allen Press Inc.: 93–109.

  • Pinton, D., A. Canestrelli, S. Yurek, and J. Martin. 2021. Growth and collapse of oyster reefs in intertidal flats under different wave climates. New Orleans.

  • Pomeroy, Lawrence R., Christopher F. D’Elia, and Linda C. Schaffner. 2006. Limits to top-down control of phytoplankton by oysters in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 325: 301–309. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps325301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, Lawrence R., Christopher F. D’Elia, and Linda C. Schaffner, et al. 2007. Top-down control of phytoplankton by oysters in Chesapeake Bay, USA: Reply to Newell et al. (2007). Marine Ecology Progress Series 341: 299–301. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps341299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roelvink, Dano J.A.., and Dirk-Jan. Walstra. 2005. Keeping it simple by using complex models. Advances in Hydroscience and Engineering 6: 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraiva, S., L. Fernandes, J. van der Meer, R. Neves, and S.A.L.M. Kooijman. 2017. The role of bivalves in the Balgzand: First steps on an integrated modelling approach. Ecological Modelling 359: 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.04.018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheng, Y. Peter, Bilge Tutak, Justin R. Davis, and Vladimir Paramygin. 2008. Circulation and flushing in the lagoonal system of the Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve (GTMNERR), Florida. Journal of Coastal Research. Coastal Education & Research Foundation, Inc.: 9–25.

  • Yang, C., H. Li, Y. Rezgui, I. Petri, B. Yuce, B. Chen, and B. Jayan. 2014. High throughput computing based distributed genetic algorithm for building energy consumption optimization. Energy and Buildings 76: 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2014.02.053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurek, S., M. Eaton, R. Lavaud, R.W. Laney, D. DeAngelis, W.E. Pine III., M.K. LaPeyre, et al. 2021. Modeling structural mechanics of oyster reef self-organization including environmental constraints and community interactions. Ecological Modelling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • zu Ermgassen, P., M. D. Spalding, R. E. Grizzle, and R. D. Brumbaugh. 2013a. Quantifying the loss of a marine ecosystem service: Filtration by the eastern oyster in US estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 36: 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • zu Ermgassen, P., M. W. Gray, C. J. Langdon, M. D. Spalding, and R. D. Brumbaugh. 2013b. Quantifying the historic contribution of Olympia oysters to filtration in Pacific Coast (USA) estuaries and the implications for restoration objectives. Aquatic Ecology 47: 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-013-9431-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was partially funded by NSF BIO-OCE Award 1736943 to DLK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UMCES Horn Point Laboratory, Horns Point Rd, Cambridge, MD, 21601, USA

    M. W. Gray

  2. Dept. of Civil and Coastal Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    D. Pinton & A. Canestrelli

  3. Guana Tolomato Matanzas National Estuarine Research Reserve, 505 Guana River Road, Ponte Vedra Beach, FL, 32082, USA

    N. Dix & P. Marcum

  4. Dept. of Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    D. Kimbro

  5. Dept. of Biological Science, University of New Hampshire, 46 College Road, Durham, NH, 03824, USA

    R. Grizzle

Authors
  1. M. W. Gray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. Pinton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Canestrelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. N. Dix
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Marcum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. D. Kimbro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R. Grizzle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. W. Gray.

Additional information

Communicated by Nathan Geraldi

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 29 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gray, M.W., Pinton, D., Canestrelli, A. et al. Beyond Residence Time: Quantifying Factors that Drive the Spatially Explicit Filtration Services of an Abundant Native Oyster Population. Estuaries and Coasts 45, 1343–1360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-021-01017-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-021-01017-x

Keywords

  • Oysters
  • Reefs
  • Crassostrea virginica
  • Ecosystem services
  • Modeling
  • Delft3D