Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantifying Tradeoffs in Ecosystem Services Under Various Oyster Reef Restoration Designs

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Oyster populations within the coastal bays of Virginia have greatly declined, mainly due to overharvesting and disease, and past restoration efforts have largely focused on increasing their populations. Current restoration goals have now expanded to simultaneously procure the wider ecosystem services oysters can offer, including shoreline protection and ecosystem diversification. However, tradeoffs exist in designing artificial reefs because it is unlikely one design will optimize all services. This study compares the services provided by reef designs varying in elevation and width located adjacent to an intertidal marsh within a coastal bay of VA, USA. We quantified wave attenuation to determine potential coastal protection of the adjacent marsh, and changes to sediment composition and infaunal communities before and after reef construction for 3 years. After construction, we also quantified oyster size and population density to compare high and low elevation reef designs. High elevation reefs were more effective at attenuating waves and fostering oyster growth compared to low elevation reefs. Oysters atop high elevation reefs were on average approximately twice as dense and 20% larger than those on low elevation designs. Reef width had a minimal effect on oyster population density; densities on high and low reefs were similar for designs with one or three rows. The presence of oyster reefs also increased infaunal diversity and sediment organic matter. Our results indicate that artificial reef design can differentially affect the services provided through restoration, and elevation is especially important to consider when designing for oyster population enhancement and coastal protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bartol, I.K., R. Mann, and M. Luckenbach. 1999. Growth and mortality of oysters (Crassostrea virginica) on constructed intertidal reefs: Effects of tidal height and substrate level. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 237: 157–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilkovic, D.M., and M.M. Mitchell. 2013. Ecological tradeoffs of stabilized salt marshes as a shoreline protection strategy: Effects of artificial structures on microbenthic assemblages. Ecological Engineering 61: 469–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsje, B.W., B.K. van Wesenbeeck, F. Dekker, P. Paalvast, T.J. Bouma, M.M. van Katwijk, and M.B. De Vries. 2010. How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection. Ecological Engineering 37: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulleri, F., and M.G. Chapman. 2010. The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments. Journal of Applied Ecology 47: 26–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byers, J.E., J.H. Grabowski, M.F. Piehler, A.R. Hughes, H.W. Weiskel, J.C. Malek, and D.L. Kimbro. 2015. Geographic variation in intertidal oyster reef properties and the influence of tidal prism. Limnology and Oceanography 60: 1051–1063.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, J., P.J. Labourg, V. Escaravage, I. Auby, and M.E. Garcia. 1989. Influence of seagrass beds and oyster parks on the abundance and biomass patterns of meio- and macrobenthos in tidal flats. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 28: 71–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, L.D., and M.W. Luckenbach. 2000. Developing success criteria and goals for evaluating oyster reef restoration: Ecological function or resource exploitation? Ecological Engineering 15: 323–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coen, L.D., R.D. Brumbaugh, D. Bushek, R. Grizzle, M.W. Luckenbach, M.H. Posey, S.P. Powers, and G. Tolley. 2007. Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration. Marine Ecology Progress Series 341: 303–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J.L.D., R.L. Takacs, and R. Schnabel. 2006. Evaluating ecological impacts of living shorelines and shoreline habitat elements: an example from the upper western Chesapeake Bay, p. 55–61. In Management, policy, science, and engineering of nonstructural erosional control in the Chesapeake Bay, CRC Publ. No. 08 – 164, Chesapeake Bay, eds. S.Y. Erdle, J.L.D Davis, K.G. Sellner.

  • Dernie, K.M., M.J. KaiserJ, and R.M. Warwick. 2003. Recovery rates of benthic communities following physical disturbance. Journal of Animal Ecology 72: 1043–1056.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donadi, S., J. Westra, E.J. Weerman, T. Van der Heide, E.M. Van der Zee, J. Van de Koppel, H. Olff, T. Piersma, H.W. Van der Veer, and B.K. Eriksson. 2013. Nontrophic interactions control benthic producers on intertidal flats. Ecosystems 16: 1325–1335.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, J.G. 2000. Defining the limits of restoration: The need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology 8: 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagherazzi, S., and P.L. Wiberg. 2009. Importance of wind conditions, fetch, and water levels on wave-generated shear stresses in shallow intertidal basins. Journal of Geophyscial Research 114: F03022. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JF001139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fodrie, F.J., A.B. Rodriguez, C.J. Baillie, M.C. Brodeur, S.E. Coleman, R.K. Gittman, D.A. Keller, M.D. Kenworthy, A.K. Poray, J.T. Ridge, E.J. Theurkauf, and N.L. Lindquist. 2014. Classic paradigms in a novel environment: Inserting food web and productivity lessons from rocky shores and saltmarshes into biogenic reef restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 1314–1325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. and S. Weisberg. 2019. An {R} companion to applied regression. Third editions. Thousand Oaks CA https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/.

  • Fuchs, H.L., and M.A. Reidenbach. 2013. Biophysical constraints on optimal patch lengths for settlement of a reef-building bivalve. PLoS ONE 8: e71506.

  • Fulford, R.S., D.L. Breitburg, M. Luckenbach, and R.I.E. Newell. 2010. Evaluating ecosystem response to oyster restoration and nutrient load reduction with a multispecies bioenergetics model. Ecological Applications 20: 915–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, J.H., A.R. Hughes, D.L. Kimbro, and M.A. Dolan. 2005. How habitat setting influences restored oyster reef communities. Ecology 86: 1926–1935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski, J.H., and Peterson CH. 2007. Restoring oyster reefs to recover ecosystem services. In Ecosystem engineers: concepts, theory and applications, eds. K. Cuddington, J.E. Byers JE, W.G. Wilson, and A. Hastings, 281–298. Amsterdam: Elsevier-Academics Press.

  • Grabowski, J.H., R.D. Brumbaugh, R.F. Conrad, A.G. Keeler, J.J. Opaluch, C.H. Peterson, M.F. Piehler, S.P. Powers, and A.R. Smyth. 2012. Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by oyster reefs. BioScience 621: 900–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregalis, K.C., M.W. Johnson, and S.P. Powers. 2009. Restored oyster reef location and design affect responses of resident and transient fish, crab, and shellfish species in Mobile Bay, Alabama. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 138: 314–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorska, B., S. Gromisz, and M. Wlodarska-Kowalczuk. 2019. Size assessment in polychaete worms – application of morphometric correlations for common North Atlantic taxa. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 17: 254–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselin, L.A., and P. Qian. 1997. Juvenile mortality in benthic marine invertebrates. Marine Ecology Progress Series 146: 265–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, J.L., C.G. Jones, D.L. Strayer, and O.O. Iribarne. 2003. Mollusks as ecosystem engineers: The role of shell production in aquatic habitats. Oikos 101: 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J.C., and M.A. Reidenbach. 2013. Seasonal growth and senescence of a Zostera marina seagrass meadow alters wave-dominated flow and sediment suspension within a coastal bay. Estuaries and Coasts 36: 1099–1114.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harwell, H.D., M.H. Posey, and T.D. Alphic. 2011. Landscape aspects of oyster reefs: Effects of fragmentation on habitat utilization. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 409: 30–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, J.M., and M.J. Weissburg. 2013. Habitat complexity and predator size mediate interactions between intraguild blue crab predators and mud crab prey in oyster reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 488: 209–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, S., and M.A. Reidenbach. 2019. Quantifying and mapping intertidal oyster reefs utilizing LiDAR-based remote sensing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 630: 83–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howmiller, R.P. 1972. Effects of preservatives on weights of some common microbenthic invertebrates. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 4: 743–746.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, A.B., and M.A. Reidenbach. 2015. Effects of larval swimming behavior on the dispersal and settlement of the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. Marine Ecology Progress Series 535: 161–176.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.D., and D. Smee. 2014. Predators influence the tidal distribution of oyster (Crassostrea virginica). Marine Biology 161: 1557–1564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, W.M., W.R. Boynton, J.E. Adolf, D.F. Boesch, W.C. Boicourt, G. Brush, J.C. Cornwell, T.R. Fisher, P.M. Glibert, J.D. Hagy, L.W. Harding, E.D. Houde, D.G. Kimmel, W.D. Miller, R.I.E. Newell, M.R. Roman, E.M. Smith, and J.C. Stevenson. 2005. Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: Historical trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Peyre, M.K., A.T. Humphries, S.M. Casas, and J.F.L. Peyre. 2014. Temporal variation in development of ecosystem services from oyster reef restoration. Ecological Engineering 64: 34–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, T.J., M.J. Anderson, and R.C. Babcock. 2006. Inconsistent effects of reefs on different size classes of macrofauna in adjacent sand habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 334: 269–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenihan, H.S. 1999. Physical-biological coupling on oyster reefs: How habitat structure influences individual performance. Ecological Monographs 69: 251–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Length, R.V. 2020. emmeans: estimated marginal means,aka least-squares means. R package version 1.5.3. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans.

  • Liu, Z.Q., P. Yu, M. Chen, M. Cai, B. Fan, W. Lv, H. Youhui, Y. Li, and Y. Zhao. 2018. Macrobenthic community characteristics and ecological health of a constructed intertidal oyster reef in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Marine Pollution Bulletin 135: 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.07.019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R., and E.N. Powell. 2007. Why oyster restoration goals in the Chesapeake Bay are not and probably cannot be achieved. Journal of Shellfish Research 26: 905–917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, G., and S. Fagherazzi. 2013. Critical width of tidal flats triggers marsh collapse in the absence of sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 5353–5336.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D.L., E.C. Townsend, and G.W. Thayer. 1997. Stabilization and erosion control value of oyster cultch for intertidal marsh. Restoration Ecology 5: 93–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium ecosystem assessment (MEA) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. 2005. Washington DC: Island Press.

  • Murphy, E.A.K., and M.P. Volaric. 2021. Benthic invertebrates from intertidal mudflats at the on the coast of Virginia, 2016 ver 1. Environmental Data Initiative. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/7deadc96ff337c3a30a82df0bb39ae3b. (Accessed 2021-08-31)

  • Nelson, E., G. Mendoza, J. Regetz, S. Polasky, H. Tallis, D.R. Cameron, K.M.A. Chan, G.C. Daily, J. Goldstein, P.M. Kareiva, E. Lonsdorf, R. Naidoo, T.H. Ricketts, and M.R. Shaw. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, E.W., D.M. King, J. Xu, R.R. Hood, R.I.E. Newell, K. Paynter, M.L. Kellog, M.K. Liddel, and D.F. Boesch. 2010. Linking optimization and ecological models in a decision support tool for oyster restoration and management. Ecological Applications 23:851–866. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1733.1

  • O’Beirn, F.X., M. Luckenbach, R.L. Mann, J. Harding, and J. Nestlerode. 1999. Ecological functions of constructed oyster reefs along an environmental gradient in Chesapeake Bay. Final Report, Aquatic Reef Habitat Program, Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, MD.

  • O’Beirn, F.X., M. Luckenbach, J.A. Nestlerode, and G.M. Coates. 2000. Toward designing criteria in constructed oyster reefs: Oyster recruitment as a function of substrate type and tidal height. Journal of Shellfish Research 19: 387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piazza, B.P., P.D. Banks, M.K. Peyre, and M.K. La. 2005. The potential for created oyster shell reefs as a sustainable shoreline protection strategy in Louisiana. Restoration Ecology 13: 499–506.

  • Reidenbach M.A., P. Berg, A. Hume, J.C. Hansen, and E.R. Whitman. 2013. Hydrodynamics of intertidal oyster reefs: The influence of boundary layer flow processes on sediment and oxygen exchange. Limnology & Oceanography: Fluids & Environments 3: 225–239.

  • Rodney W.S., and K.T. Paynter. 2006. Comparisons of macrofaunal assemblages on restored and non-restored oyster reefs in mesohaline regions of the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 335: 39–51.

  • Rumohr, H. 2009. Soft-bottom macrofauna: collection, treatment, and quality assurance of samples. ICES Techniques in marine environmental. Science 43. https://doi.org/10.25607/OBP-238

  • Rothschild, B.J., J.S. Ault, P. Goulletquer, W.P. Jensen, and M. Heral. 1994. Decline of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population: A century of habitat destruction and overfishing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 111: 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Safak, I., P.L. Wiberg, D.L. Richardson, and M.O. Kurum. 2015. Controls on residence time and exchange in a system of shallow coastal bays. Continental Shelf Research 97: 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, D.M., R.P. Burke, and R.N. Lipcius. 2009. Unprecedented restoration of a native oyster metapopulation. Science 325: 1124–1128.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smaal, A.C., and T.C. Prins. 1993. The uptake of organic matter and release of inorganic nutrients by bivalve suspension feeder beds. In Bivalve filter feeders in estuarine and coastal ecosystem processes, ed. R.F. Dame, 271–298. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, A.R., N.R. Geraldi, S.P. Thompson, and M.F. Piehler. 2016. Biological activity exceeds biogenic structure in influencing sediment nitrogen cycling in experimental oyster reefs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 560: 173–183. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11922.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soniat, T.M., C.M. Finelli, and J.T. Ruiz. 2004. Vertical structure and predator refuge mediate oyster reef development and community dynamics. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 310: 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwell, M.W., J.J. Veenstra, C.D. Adams, E.V. Scarlett, and K.B. Payne. 2017. Changes in sediment characteristics upon oyster reef restoration, NE Florida, USA. Journal of Coastal Zone Management 20: 442. https://doi.org/10.4172/2473-3350.1000442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, M., J.M. Harding, J.A. Wesson, and R. Mann. 2010. Oyster (Crassostrea virginica, Gmelin 1791) population dynamics on public reefs in the Great Wicomico River, Virginia, USA. Journal of Shellfish Research 29: 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Theuerkauf, S.J., R.P. Burke, and R.N. Lipcius. 2015. Settlement, growth, and survival of eastern oysters on alternative reef substrates. Journal of Shellfish Research 34: 241–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, M.S., and K. McGlathery. 2006. Effects of accumulations of sediments and drift algae on recruitment of sessile organisms associated with oyster reefs. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 328: 22–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee, E.M., T. Van der Heide, S. Donadi, J.S. Eklof, B.K. Eriksson, H. Olff, H.W. Van der Veer, and T. Piersma. 2012. Spatially extended habitat modification by intertidal reef-building bivalves has implications for consumer-resource interactions. Ecosystems 15: 664–673.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Zee, E.M., E. Tielens, S. Holthuijsen, S. Donadi, B.K. Eriksson, H.W. Van der Veer, T. Piersma, H. Olff, and T. Van der Heide. 2015. Habitat modification drives benthic trophic diversity in an intertidal soft-bottom ecosystem. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 465: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables, W.N., and B.D. Ripley. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S, 4th ed. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volaric, M.P., P. Berg, and M.A. Reidenbach. 2018. Oxygen metabolism of intertidal oyster reefs measured by aquatic eddy covariance. Marine Ecology Progress Series 599: 75–91.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volaric, M.P., P. Berg, and M.A. Reidenbach. 2019. An invasive macroalga alters ecosystem metabolism and hydrodynamics on a tidal flat. Marine Ecology Progress Series 628: 1–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Volaric, M.P., P. Berg, and M.A. Reidenbach. 2020. Drivers of oyster reef ecosystem metabolism measured across multiple timescales. Estuaries and Coasts 1–12.

  • Wetzel, M.A., H. Leuchs, and J.H.E. Koop. 2005. Preservation effects on wet weight, dry weight, and ash-free dry weight biomass estimates of four common estuarine macro-invertebrates: No difference between ethanol and formalin. Helgoland Marine Research 59: 206–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitman, E.R., and M.A. Reidenbach. 2012. Benthic flow environments affect recruitment of Crassostrea virginica larvae to an intertidal oyster reef. Marine Ecology Progress Series 463: 177–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiberg, P., S.R. Taube, A.E. Ferguson, M.R. Kremer, and M.A. Reidenbach. 2019. Wave attenuation by oyster reefs in shallow coastal bays. Estuaries and Coasts 42: 331–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-018-0463-y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, S., Y. Liu, and H. Yang. 2014. Biologically induced deposition of fine suspended particles by filter-feeding bivalves in land-based industrial marine aquaculture wastewater. PLoS ONE 9(9): e107798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107798.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, S.L., J.H. Grabowski, C.J. Baillie, and F.J. Fodrie. 2017. Effects of landscape setting on oyster reef structure and function largely persist more than a decade post-restoration. Restoration Ecology 26: 933–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuur, A.F., E.N. Ieno, N.J. Walker, A.A. Saveliev, and G.M. Smith. 2009. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. In Statistics for Biology and Health, eds. Gail, M., K. Krickeberg, J.M. Samet, A. Tsiatis, and W. Wong. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank The Nature Conservancy at the Virginia Coast Reserve for constructing the oyster restoration site and partnering with us on this restoration study. We would also like to thank the staff at the Anheuser-Busch Coastal Research Center for assistance in field studies.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Foundation grant 1832221 to the Virginia Coast Reserve Long Term Ecological Research project. M. Reidenbach was supported by the National Science Foundation grant OCE-1151314.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 22904, USA

    S. Hogan, S. Hogan & M.A. Reidenbach

Authors
  1. S. Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M.A. Reidenbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Hogan.

Additional information

Communicated by Eric N. Powell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hogan, S., Reidenbach, M. Quantifying Tradeoffs in Ecosystem Services Under Various Oyster Reef Restoration Designs. Estuaries and Coasts 45, 677–690 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-021-01010-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-021-01010-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation