Understanding the effect of habitat edges on species interactions (e.g. predation) is critical for determining landscape-scale patterns in productivity and the structuring of communities in an ever-changing environment. Both abiotic cycles and habitat structure can mediate faunal movements across habitat edges and determine predators’ ability to access prey across both space and time. To quantify the effects of cyclical abiotic factors and habitat structure on consumer-resource dynamics across habitat boundaries at the land-sea interface, four complementary studies were conducted. Marsh periwinkles Littoraria irrorata were tethered within salt marshes of varying tidal amplitude, at 3 distances from the marsh edge, and assessed for predation after 24 h. Nekton catch rate was assessed with fyke net sampling as a proxy for predator utilization of the marsh platform. Consumption rates were positively correlated with tidal amplitude and proximity to the seaward marsh edge, and there was also a slight positive relationship between tidal amplitude and nekton access to the marsh. Tidal amplitude was positively correlated with Spartina alterniflora shoot density and negatively correlated with shoot height. Therefore, to separate the effects of habitat structure from tidal forcing, independent manipulations of shoot density and shoot height were conducted. We found that the signal of local habitat structure on consumption rates appears to be secondary to the effects of abiotic cycles on consumption. Disentangling the interactions between abiotic cycles and biotic structure of ecosystems across ecological boundaries is key to understanding both the strengths of species interactions and the mediation of cross-boundary energy flow.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Aguilar, F.J., J.P. Mills, J. Delgado, M.A. Aguilar, J.G. Negreiros, and J.L. Pérez. 2010. Modelling vertical error in LiDAR-derived digital elevation models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 65 (1): 103–110.
Baker, R., B. Fry, L.P. Rozas, and T.J. Minello. 2013. Hydrodynamic regulation of salt marsh contributions to aquatic food webs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 490: 37–52.
Baker, H.K., J.A. Nelson, and H.M. Leslie. 2016. Quantifying striped bass (Morone saxatilis) dependence on saltmarsh-derived productivity using stable isotope analysis. Estuaries and Coasts 39 (5): 1537–1542.
Carroll, J.M., L.J. Jackson, and B.J. Peterson. 2015. The effect of increasing habitat complexity on bay scallop survival in the presence of different decapod crustacean predators. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (5): 1569–1579.
Deegan, L.A., J.E. Hughes, and R.A. Rountree. 2000. Salt marsh ecosystem support of marine transient species. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 333–365. Dordrecht: Springer.
Duffy, J.E., S.L. Ziegler, J.E. Campbell, P.M. Bippus, and J.S. Lefcheck. 2015. Squidpops: a simple tool to crowdsource a global map of marine predation intensity. PLoS One 10 (11): e0142994.
Edwards, M., and A.J. Richardson. 2004. Impact of climate change on marine pelagic phenology and trophic mismatch. Nature 430 (7002): 881–884.
Fagan, W.F., R.S. Cantrell, and C. Cosner. 1999. How habitat edges change species interactions. The American Naturalist 153 (2): 165–182.
Gorman, D., and S.D. Connell. 2009. Recovering subtidal forests in human-dominated landscapes. Journal of Applied Ecology 46 (6): 1258–1265.
Grover, M.C., and H.M. Wilbur. 2002. Ecology of ecotones: interactions between salamanders on a complex environmental gradient. Ecology 83 (8): 2112–2123.
Kirwan, M.L., G.R. Guntenspergen, A. D’Alpaos, J.T. Morris, S.M. Mudd, and S. Temmerman. 2010. Limits on the adaptability of coastal marshes to rising sea level. Geophysical Research Letters 37 (23): L23401.
Kneib, R.T. 1997. Early life stages of resident nekton in intertidal marshes. Estuaries 20 (1): 214–230.
Kneib, R.T. 2000. Salt marsh ecoscapes and production transfers by estuarine nekton in the southeastern United States. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 267–291. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kotler, Burt P., Joel S. Brown, and Hasson Oren. 1991. Factors affecting gerbil foraging behavior and rates of owl predation. Ecology 72 (6): 2249–2260.
Lewis, D.B., and L.A. Eby. 2002. Spatially heterogeneous refugia and predation risk in intertidal salt marshes. Oikos 96 (1): 119–129.
Mattila, J., K. Heck, E. Millstein, E. Miller, C. Gustafsson, S. Williams, and D. Byron. 2008. Increased habitat structure does not always provide increased refuge from predation. Marine Ecology Progress Series 361: 15–20.
Menge, B.A., and J.P. Sutherland. 1987. Community regulation: variation in disturbance, competition, and predation in relation to environmental stress and recruitment. The American Naturalist 130 (5): 730–757.
Minello, T.J., and L.P. Rozas. 2002. Nekton in gulf coast wetlands: fine-scale distributions, landscape patterns, and restoration implications. Ecological Applications 12 (2): 441–455.
Minello, T.J., L.P. Rozas, and R. Baker. 2012. Geographic variability in salt marsh flooding patterns may affect nursery value for fishery species. Estuaries and Coasts 35 (2): 501–514.
Nakano, S., and M. Murakami. 2001. Reciprocal subsidies: dynamic interdependence between terrestrial and aquatic food webs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (1): 166–170.
Nelson, J., R. Wilson, F. Coleman, C. Koenig, D. DeVries, C. Gardner, and J. Chanton. 2012. Flux by fin: fish-mediated carbon and nutrient flux in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Marine Biology 159 (2): 365–372.
Polis, G.A., and S.D. Hurd. 1996. Linking marine and terrestrial food webs: allochthonous input from the ocean supports high secondary productivity on small islands and coastal land communities. The American Naturalist 147 (3): 396–423.
Polis, G.A., and D.R. Strong. 1996. Food web complexity and community dynamics. The American Naturalist 147 (5): 813–846.
Potthoff, M.T., and D.M. Allen. 2003. Site fidelity, home range, and tidal migrations of juvenile pinfish, Lagodon rhomboides, in salt marsh creeks. Environmental Biology of Fishes 67 (3): 231–240.
Renner, S.S., and C.M. Zohner. 2018. Climate change and phenological mismatch in trophic interactions among plants, insects, and vertebrates. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 49 (1): 165–182.
Rozas, L.P. 1995. Hydroperiod and its influence on nekton use of the salt marsh: a pulsing ecosystem. Estuaries 18 (4): 579–590.
Shervette, V.R., and F. Gelwick. 2008. Relative nursery function of oyster, vegetated marsh edge, and nonvegetated bottom habitats for juvenile white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus. Wetlands Ecology and Management 16 (5): 405–419.
Turner, R.E. 1977. Intertidal vegetation and commercial yields of penaeid shrimp. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 106: 411–416 Taylor & Francis.
Wolter, K.M. 2007. The jackknife method. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. In Introduction to variance estimation, ed. K.M. Wolter, 151–193. New York: Springer.
Yahner, R.H. 1988. Changes in wildlife communities near edges. Conservation Biology 2 (4): 333–339.
Yeager, L.A., E.W. Stoner, J.R. Peters, and C.A. Layman. 2016. A terrestrial-aquatic food web subsidy is potentially mediated by multiple predator effects on an arboreal crab. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 475: 73–79.
Zimmerman, R.J., T.J. Minello, and L.P. Rozas. 2000. Salt marsh linkages to productivity of penaeid shrimps and blue crabs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 293–314. Dordrecht: Springer.
We would like to thank L. Clance, J. Geyer, C. Miller, M. Tice-Lewis, I. Neylan, D. Kochan, T. Pfeifer, A. Brodmerkel, K. McQuillan, A. Henderson, and S. Tulevech for valuable assistance in the field. Thanks to the North Carolina Coastal Federation for granting access to Hoop Pole Creek and T. Alphin at UNCW for access to the Wilmington site.
This study was supported by funding from the NC DMF Coastal Recreational Fish License (CRFL) Marine Resources Fund, a North Carolina Sea Grant Coastal Policy Fellowship to C.S. Smith and a grant from The Gulf of Mexico Research Initiative to the Coastal Waters Consortium.
All applicable institutional and/or national guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed (IACUC 15-194.0).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Communicated by Matthew D. Taylor
About this article
Cite this article
Ziegler, S.L., Miller, M.D., Smith, C.S. et al. Abiotic Cycles Mediate the Strength of Cross-Boundary Consumption Within Coastal Food Webs. Estuaries and Coasts 44, 1147–1156 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00829-7
- Consumer-resource interactions
- Salt marsh
- Tidal inundation
- Habitat structure