Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity: Do Positive, Neutral, and Negative Estuaries Respond Differently to Salinity Variation?

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Salinity is known to be a driving factor in defining habitat suitability for estuarine-dependent species. With increased demands placed on freshwater resources and extreme drought conditions becoming prevalent for many coastal regions, it is important to understand how these changes may impact the extent and distribution of suitable habitat for species that rely on the passage of freshwater to the coastal region. Here, habitat suitability models were constructed for three estuarine species (Farfantepenaeus aztecus, Micropogonias undulatus, and Cynoscion nebulosus) across three estuary classes (based on freshwater balance: positive, neutral, and negative estuaries) and for three simulated salinity regimes (low, moderate, and high salinities). The impact of changing salinity regimes on habitat suitability varied most notably at the species level but also varied significantly across the three estuary types examined. Of the three species examined, F. aztecus showed relatively little salinity-related variation in habitat extent or distribution. Variation in M. undulatus and C. nebulosus salinity impact was especially clear in relatively neutral and positive estuaries where distribution of habitat within the estuary under the varying salinity regimes followed intra-estuarine salinity gradients to match salinity preference for each species and typically resulted in a gradual shrinking of highly suitable habitat area into the far upper estuary as salinities increased. While salinity was not found to be the only or even the most impactful of variables regarding habitat suitability, model outputs show that at the estuary scale, salinity can have substantial influence on the spatial extent and distribution of suitable habitat and this influence is not constant across estuary types. Modeling exercises such as this are the first step in communicating such impacts and focusing the vigilance of resource managers towards vulnerable species and habitat regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Alber, M. 2002. A conceptual model of estuarine freshwater inflow management. Estuaries 25 (6): 1246–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J., Z. Olsen, T. Wagner, G. Sutton, C. Gelpi, and D. Topping. 2017. Environmental drivers of the spatial and temporal distribution of spawning female blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus, in the western Gulf of Mexico. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 37 (4): 920–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, M.W., K.L. Heck Jr., K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan, and M.P. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries of fish and invertebrates. BioScience 51 (8): 633–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushon, A. 2006. Recruitment, spatial distribution, and fine-scale movement patterns of estuarine dependent species through tidal inlets in Texas. Master’s Thesis. Texas A&M University- Corpus Christi.

  • Dance, M.A., and J.R. Rooker. 2016. Stage-specific variability in habitat associations of juvenile red drum across a latitudinal gradient. Marine Ecology Progress Series 557: 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Mutsert, K., K. Lewis, S. Milroy, J. Buszowski, and J. Steenbeek. 2017. Using ecosystem modeling to evaluate trade-offs in coastal management: Effects of large-scale river divisions on fish and fisheries. Ecological Modelling 360: 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doerr, J.C., H. Liu, and T.J. Minello. 2016. Salinity selection by juvenile brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) and white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) in a gradient tank. Estuaries and Coasts 39 (3): 829–838.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dore, M.H.I. 2005. Climate change and changes in global precipitation patterns: What do we know. Environmental International 31 (8): 1167–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elith, J., J.R. Leathwick, and T. Hastie. 2008. A working guide to boosted regression trees. Journal of Animal Ecology 77 (4): 802–813.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, C. 1927. Animal Ecology. London: Sedgwick and Jackson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkbeiner, M., J.D. Simons, C. Robinson, J. Wood, A. Summers, and C. Lopez. 2009. Atlas of shallow-water benthic habitats of Coastal Texas: Espiritu Santo Bay to Lower Laguna Madre, 2004 and 2007. Charleston: NOAA Coastal Services Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, J.H., and J.J. Meulman. 2003. Multiple additive regression trees with applications in epidemiology. Statistics in Medicine 22 (9): 1365–1381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froeschke, J.T., and B.F. Froeschke. 2011. Spatio-temporal predictive model based on environmental factors for juvenile spotted seatrout in Texas estuaries using boosted regression trees. Fisheries Research 111 (3): 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froeschke, J.T., and B.F. Froeschke. 2016. Two-stage boosted regression tree model to characterize southern flounder distribution in Texas estuaries at varying population sizes. Marine and Coastal Fisheries 8 (1): 222–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froeschke, B.F., M.M. Reese Robillard, and G.W. Stunz. 2016. Spatial biodiversity patterns of fish within the Aransas Bay complex, Texas. Gulf and Caribbean Research 27: 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell, J. 1917. The niche-relationship of the California thrasher. Auk 34 (4): 427–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, G. 1961. Some relations of estuarine organisms to salinity. Limnology and Oceanography 6 (2): 182–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, G.J., and S.A. Holt. 2002. Effects of variable salinity on reproductive and early life stages of spotted seatrout. In Biology of the Spotted Seatrout, eds. S.A. Bortone. CRC Press.

  • Hutchinson, G.E. 1957. Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 22 (0): 415–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, W.J. 2002. Physical, biological, and management responses to variable freshwater flow into the San Francisco estuary. Estuaries 25 (6): 1275–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudby, A., A. Brenning, and E. LeDrew. 2010. New approaches to modelling fish-habitat relationships. Ecological Modelling 221 (3): 503–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, P.S., and G.W. Stunz. 2005. Habitat triage for exploited fishes: Can we identify essential “essential fish habitat”. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64 (1): 70–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longley, W.L., ed. 1994. Freshwater inflow to Texas bays and estuaries: Ecological relationships and methods for determination of needs. Austin: Texas Water Development Board and Texas Parks and Wildlife Department 386 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Andrade, F. 2015. Marine resource monitoring operations manual. Austin: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Andrade, F., P. Campbell, and B. Fuls. 2005. Trends in relative abundance and size of selected finfishes and shellfishes along the Texas coast: November 1975–December 2003. Austin: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department- Coastal Fisheries Division Management Data Series No. 232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, R.A. 2002. A resource-based framework for establishing freshwater inflow requirements for Suwannee River estuary. Estuaries 25 (6): 1333–1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miglarese, J.V., C.W. McMillian, and M.H. Shealy. 1982. Seasonal abundance of Atlantic croaker (Migropogonias undulatus) in relation to bottom salinity and temperature in South Carolina estuaries. Estuaries 5 (3): 216–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P.A., and R.D. Kalke. 1995. Ecology of infaunal Mollusca in South Texas estuaries. American Malacological Bulletin 11: 163–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P.A., R.D. Kalke, and Christine Ritter. 2002. Effects of restored freshwater inflow on macrofauna and meiofauna in Upper Rincon Bayou, Texas, USA. Estuaries 25 (6): 1436–1447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P.A., E.D. Estevez, T.A. Palmer, and M.S. Flannery. 2008. Meta-analysis of the relationship between salinity and molluscs in tidal river estuaries of Southwest Florida, USA. American Malacological Journal 24 (1): 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montagna, P.A., T.A. Palmer, and J. Beseres Pollack. 2013. Hydrological changes and estuarine dynamics. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neahr, T.A., G.W. Stunz, and T.J. Minello. 2010. Habitat use patterns of newly settled spotted seatrout in estuaries of the North-Western Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Management and Ecology 17 (5): 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, B.C., D. Balk, M. Brickman, and M. Ezra. 2001. A guide to global population projections. Demographic Research 4: 203–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Z. 2014. Potential impact of extreme salinity and surface temperature events on population dynamics of black drum, Pogonias cromis, in the Upper Laguna Madre, Texas. Gulf of Mexico Science 2014: 60–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, Z., D. McDonald, and B. Bumguardner. 2018. Intraspecific variation in life history strategies and implications for management: A case study of black drum (Pogonias cromis) in Baffin Bay, Texas USA. Fisheries Research 207: 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J.C. 1971. The biology of the Spot, Leiostomus xanthurus Lacepede, and Atlantic Croaker, Micropogon undulatus (Linnaeus) in two Gulf of Mexico nursery areas. PhD Thesis, Texas A&M University.

  • Pearce, J., and S. Ferrier. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression. Ecological Modelling 133 (3): 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S. 2003. A conceptual view of environment-habitat-production linkages in tidal river estuaries. Reviews in Fisheries Science 11 (4): 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M.S., B.H. Comyns, C.F. Rakocinski, and G.L. Fulling. 1999. Does salinity affect somatic growth in early juvenile Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus (L.)? Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 238 (2): 199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrik, R., P.S. Levin, G.W. Stunz, and J. Malone. 1999. Recruitment of Atlantic croaker, Micropogonias undulatus: Do postsettlement processes disrupt or reinforce initial patterns of settlement? Fishery Bulletin 97: 954–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D.W. 1952. Estuarine hydrography. Advances in Geophysics 1: 243–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing http://www.R-project.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reese, M.M., G.W. Stunz, and A.M. Bushon. 2008. Recruitment of estuarine-dependent nekton through a new tidal inlet: The opening of Packery Channel in Corpus Christi, TX, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 31 (6): 1143–1157.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, G. 2013. gbm: Generalized Boosted Regression Models. R package version 2.1. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gbm.

  • Rooker, J.R., S.A. Holt, G.J. Holt, and L.A. Fuiman. 1999. Spatial and temporal variability in growth, mortality, and recruitment potential of postsettlement red drum, Sciaenops ocellatus, in a subtropical estuary. Fishery Bulletin 97: 581–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, J.M. 2007. El Niño-southern oscillation impacts translated to the watershed scale: Estuarine salinity patterns along the Texas gulf coast, 1982 to 2004. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 72 (1-2): 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolan, J.M. 2013. Estuarine Fisheries Community-Level Response to Freshwater Inflows. In Water Resources Planning, Development, and Management. ed. Ralph Wurbs. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/52313.

  • Tunnell, J.W., Jr., and F.W. Judd, eds. 2002. The Laguna Madre of Texas and the Tamaulipas. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Diggelen, A.D., and P.A. Montagna. 2016. Is salinity variability a benthic disturbance in estuaries? Estuaries and Coasts 39 (4): 967–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the many TPWD-Coastal Fisheries Division staff members who came before me and had the foresight to implement and maintain one of the most comprehensive and longest running fisheries-independent monitoring programs in the world. Without such long-term monitoring, analyses such as this would never be possible. I would like to thank M. Fisher, G. Sutton, and several anonymous reviewers who provided useful discussion and feedback that greatly improved the quality of this manuscript. Finally, I would like to thank my graduate committee at Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi: G. Stunz, J. Tolan, J. Pollack, and P. Montagna.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Texas Parks and Wildlife Department–Coastal Fisheries Division, 6300 Ocean Drive, Corpus Christi, TX, 78412, USA

    Zachary Olsen

Authors
  1. Zachary Olsen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary Olsen.

Additional information

Communicated by Mark S. Peterson

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 2340 kb)

ESM 2

(TXT 33 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Olsen, Z. Quantifying the Spatial Extent and Distribution of Estuarine Habitat with Changing Salinity: Do Positive, Neutral, and Negative Estuaries Respond Differently to Salinity Variation?. Estuaries and Coasts 42, 1169–1184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00528-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-019-00528-y

Keywords