Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 765–778 | Cite as

Reconstructing Historical Marine Populations Reveals Major Decline of a Kelp Forest Ecosystem in Australia

  • Paul E. CarnellEmail author
  • Michael J. Keough
Article

Abstract

Managing changing ecosystems requires an understanding both of how the system is currently performing and of how current performance relates to long-term, often variable, natural dynamics. However, making such assessments usually relies on having long-term ecological datasets, leaving managers often reliant on assumptions because such information is relatively rare. This is particularly an issue in kelp forests, as these ecosystems are difficult to survey, and many monitoring programs are relatively recent (last 10–20 years). A historical time series was constructed of kelp (Ecklonia radiata) and sea urchin (Heliocidaris erythrogramma) populations using various field-collected datasets, beginning in the 1960s, for the large shallow embayment of Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Additionally, aerial photographs were sourced to calculate the extent of these algal beds, going back to the 1930s. Both surveys and aerial images confirm that between the 1930s and the 1980s, kelp once occurred as dense (21–58% cover) beds over large sections of reef at all surveyed sites. However, by the early 2000s, kelp cover had declined by between 59 and 98%. From 2005 to 2012, sea urchins became 250–420% more abundant and were observed to be directly consuming large areas of macroalgae, creating the so-called sea urchin barrens. Analysis of reef algal cover between the 1930s and 2014 indicates that increases in temperature and declines in rainfall—which, in Port Phillip Bay, influences salinity, nutrient inputs and algal productivity—are correlated with the declines in kelp abundance. While it is difficult to tease apart all possible drivers, the years 1997–2009 coincided with a 1 °C increase in average air temperature and the longest drought period (137 mm less rainfall than the annual long-term average) in this region in recent record.

Keywords

Shifting baselines Habitat loss Historical ecology Ecosystem shift 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank P. Crockett, J. Ford, D. Chamberlain and C. Taylor for their field assistance. SRMP data used with the permission of Parks Victoria and Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning. Water quality data were supplied by A. Longmore from the Port Phillip Bay Environmental Monitoring Plan Nitrogen Monitoring Program. We also thank K. Mossop, J. Ford, P. Addison and the anonymous reviewers for the comments that greatly improved the manuscript. This study was funded by an Australian Research Council grant to M.J.K, a Holsworth Wildlife Research Endowment to P.E.C, the Jasper Loftus-Hills award to P.E.C and an Australian Postgraduate Award to P.E.C.

Supplementary material

12237_2019_525_MOESM1_ESM.doc (848 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 848 kb)

References

  1. Abramoff, M.D., P.J. Magelhaes, and S.J. Ram. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Journal of Biophotonics 11: 36–42.Google Scholar
  2. Alleway, H.K., and S.D. Connell. 2015. Loss of an ecological baseline through the eradication of oyster reefs from coastal ecosystems and human memory. Conservation Biology 29 (3): 795–804.  https://doi.org/10.1111/COBI.12452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrew, N.L., and A.J. Underwood. 1993. Density dependent foraging in the sea urchin Centrostephanus rodgersii on shallow subtidal reefs in New South Wales, Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series 99: 89–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bjorkman, A.D., and M. Vellend. 2010. Defining historical baselines for conservation: Ecological changes since european settlement on Vancouver Island, Canada. Conservation Biology 24 (6): 1559–1568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bulleri, F., B.D. Russell, and S.D. Connell. 2012. Context-dependency in the effects of nutrient loading and consumers on the availability of space in marine rocky environments. PLoS One 7 (3): e33825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A.H., E.M. Marzinelli, A. Verges, M.A. Coleman, and P.D. Steinberg. 2014. Towards restoration of missing underwater forests. PLoS One 9 (1): e84106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carnell, P.E. 2014. Resilience of kelp dominated reefs of south-eastern Australia. PhD dissertation. In The University of Melbourne. Melbourne: VIC.Google Scholar
  8. Carnell, P.E., and M.J. Keough. 2014. Spatially variable synergistic effects of disturbance and additional nutrients on kelp recruitment and recovery. Oecologia 175 (1): 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carnell, P.E., and M.J. Keough. 2016. The influence of herbivores on primary producers can vary spatially and interact with disturbance. Oikos 125 (9): 1273–1283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connell, J.H., T.P. Hughes, and C.C. Wallace. 1997. A 30-year study of coral abundance, recruitment and disturbance at several scales in space and time. Ecological Monographs 67 (4): 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connell, S.D., and A.D. Irving. 2008. Integrating ecology with biogeography using landscape characteristics: A case study of subtidal habitat across continental Australia. Journal of Biogeography 5: 1608–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Connell, S.D., B.D. Russell, D.J. Turner, S.A. Shepherd, T. Kildea, D. Miller, L. Airoldi, and A. Cheshire. 2008. Recovering a lost baseline: Missing kelp forests from a metropolitan coast. Marine Ecology Progress Series 360: 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Constable, A.J. 1990. An investigation of resource allocation in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma (Valenciennes). PhD dissertation. In The University of Melbourne. Melbourne: VIC.Google Scholar
  14. Crain, C.M., K. Kroeker, and B.S. Halpern. 2008. Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecology Letters 11 (12): 1304–1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dayton, P.K., and M.J. Tegner. 1984. Catastrophic storms, El Niño and patch stability in a Southern California kelp community. Science 224 (4646): 283–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dayton, P.K., M.J. Tegner, P.B. Edwards, and K.L. Riser. 1998. Sliding baselines, ghosts, and reduced expectations in kelp forest communities. Ecological Applications 8 (2): 309–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dayton, P.J., M.J. Tegner, P.B. Edwards, and K.L. Riser. 1999. Temporal and spatial scales of kelp demography: The role of oceanographic climate. Ecological Monographs 69 (2): 219–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. De'ath, G., K.E. Fabricius, H. Sweatman, and M. Puotinen. 2012. The 27-year decline of coral cover on the Great Barrier Reef and its causes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109 (44): 17995–17999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eckman, J.E., D.O. Duggins, and A.T. Sewell. 1989. Ecology of understory kelp environments I. Effects of kelps on flow and particle transport near the bottom. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 129 (2): 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edmunds, M., K. Stewart, and K. Pritchard (2009) Victorian subtidal reef monitoring program: the reef biota in the Port Phillip Bay Marine Sanctuaries. Parks Victoria Technical Series No. 67, Parks Victoria, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  21. Edwards, M.S. 2004. Estimating scale-dependency in disturbance impacts: El Niños and giant kelp forests in the northeast Pacific. Oecologia 138 (3): 436–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. EPA Victoria (2012) Baywide water quality monitoring program: milestone report No. 9. EPA Victoria, Melbourne, Australia. http://www.oem.vic.gov.au/WaterQuality (accessed June 2014).
  23. Estes, J.A., J. Terborgh, J.S. Brashares, M.E. Power, J. Berger, W.J. Bond, S.R. Carpenter, T.E. Essington, R.D. Holt, J.B.C. Jackson, R.J. Marquis, L. Oksanen, T. Oksanen, R.T. Paine, E.K. Pikitch, W.J. Ripple, S.A. Sandin, M. Scheffer, T.W. Schoener, J.B. Shurin, A.R.E. Sinclair, M.E. Soule, R. Virtanen, and D.A. Wardle. 2011. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333 (6040): 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Falkenberg, L.J., B.D. Russell, and S.D. Connell. 2013. Disrupting the effects of synergies between stressors: Improved water quality dampens the effects of future CO2 on a marine habitat. Journal of Applied Ecology 50 (1): 51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Foster, M.S., and D.R. Schiel. 2010. Loss of predators and the collapse of southern California kelp forests (?): Alternatives explanations and generalizations. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 393 (1-2): 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fulton, B. and T. Smith (2002) Ecosim case study: Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Fisheries Centre Research Reports 10, 83–93. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.Google Scholar
  27. Harrold, C., and D.C. Reed. 1985. Food availability, sea urchin grazing, and kelp forest community structure. Ecology 66 (4): 1160–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, J.B.C., M.X. Kirby, W.H. Berger, K.A. Bjorndal, L.W. Botsford, B.J. Bourque, R.H. Bradbury, R. Cooke, J. Erlandson, J.E. Estes, T.P. Hughes, S. Kidwell, C.B. Lange, H.S. Lenihan, J.M. Pandolfi, C.H. Peterson, R.S. Steneck, M.J. Tegner, and R.R. Warner. 2001. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293 (5530): 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, C.R., and K.H. Mann. 1988. Diversity, patterns of adaptation, and stability of Nova Scotian kelp beds. Ecological Monographs 58 (2): 129–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnson, C.R., S.C. Banks, N.S. Barrett, F. Cazassus, P.K. Dunstan, G.J. Edgar, S.D. Frusher, C. Gardner, M. Haddon, F. Helidoniotis, K.L. Hill, N.J. Holbrook, G.W. Hosie, P.R. Last, S.D. Ling, J. Melbourne-Thomas, K. Miller, G.T. Pecl, A.J. Richardson, K.R. Ridgway, S.R. Rintoul, D.A. Ritz, D.J. Ross, J.C. Sanderson, S.A. Shepherd, A. Slotwinski, K.M. Swadling, and N. Taw. 2011. Climate change cascades: Shifts in oceanography, species’ ranges and subtidal marine community dynamics in eastern Tasmania. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 400 (1-2): 17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jones, C.G., J.H. Lawton, and M. Shachak. 1994. Organisms as Ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69 (3): 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jung, C.A., P.D. Dwyer, M. Minnegal, and S.E. Swearer. 2011. Perceptions of environmental change over more than six decades in two groups of people interacting with the environment of Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Ocean and Coastal Management 54 (1): 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lee, R.S., K.P. Black, C. Bosserel, and D. Greer. 2012. Present and future prolonged drought impacts on a large temperate embayment: Port Phillip Bay Australia. Ocean Dynamics 62 (6): 907–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lester, S.E., B.S. Halpern, K. Grorud-Colvert, J. Lubchenco, B.I. Ruttenberg, S.D. Gaines, S. Airame, and R.R. Warner. 2009. Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: A global synthesis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 384: 33–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lindenmayer, D.B., G.E. Likens, A. Andersen, B. Bowman, C.M. Bull, E. Burns, C.R. Dickman, A.A. Hoffman, D.A. Keith, M.J. Liddell, A.J. Lowe, D.J. Metcalfe, S.R. Phinn, J. Russell-Smith, N. Thurgate, and G.M. Wardle. 2012. Value of long-term ecological studies. Austral Ecology 37 (7): 745–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ling, S.D. 2008. Range expansion of a habitat-modifying species leads to loss of taxonomic diversity: A new and impoverished reef state. Oecologia 156 (4): 883–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ling, S.D., C.R. Johnson, S.D. Frusher, and K.R. Ridgway. 2009. Overfishing reduces resilience of kelp beds to climate-driven catastrophic phase shift. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106 (52): 22341–22345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ling, S.D., S. Ibbott, and J.C. Sanderson. 2010. Recovery of canopy-forming macroalgae following removal of the enigmatic grazing sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 395 (1-2): 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Livore, J.P., and S.D. Connell. 2012. Reducing per capita food supply alters urchin condition and habitat. Marine Biology 159 (5): 967–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Longmore A. (2014). Port Phillip Bay Environmental Management Plan. Monitoring the State of Bay Nutrient Cycling 2013–2014. CAPIM Technical Report No. 49, Centre for Aquatic Pollution Identification and Management, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
  41. Lotze, H.K., H.S. Lenihan, B.J. Bourque, R.H. Bradbury, R.G. Cooke, M.C. Kay, S.M. Kidwell, M.X. Kirby, C.H. Peterson, and J.B.C. Jackson. 2006. Depletion, degradation and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312 (5781): 1806–1809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magurran, A.E., S.R. Baillie, S.T. Buckland, J.M. Dick, D.A. Elston, E.M. Scott, R.I. Smith, P.J. Somerfield, and A.D. Watt. 2010. Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: Assessing change in ecological communities through time. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25 (10): 574–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Martin, T.G., M.A. Burgman, F. Fidler, P.M. Kuhnert, S. Low-Choy, M. McBride, and K. Mengersen. 2012. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science. Conservation Biology 26 (1): 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McClenachan, L. 2009. Documenting loss of large trophy fish from the Florida keys with historical photographs. Conservation Biology 23 (3): 636–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McClenachan, L., F. Ferretti, and J.K. Baum. 2012. From archives to conservation: Why historical data are needed to set baselines for marine animals and ecosystems. Conservation Letters 5 (5): 349–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Brien, C.E. 1981. The subtidal ecology of the Gloucester Reserve Reef, Northern Port Phillip Bay. MSc thesis. In School of botany. Australia: University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  47. Osenberg, C.W., B.M. Bolker, J.S. White, C.M.St. Mary, and J.S. Shima. 2006. Statistical issues and study design in ecological restorations: Lessons learned from Marine Reserves. In Foundations of restoration ecology. Society for ecological restoration international, ed. D.A. Falk, M.A. Palmer, and J.B. Zedler, 280–302.Google Scholar
  48. Pauly, D. 1995. Anecdotes and the shifting baseline syndrome of fisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10 (10): 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reed, D.C., A. Rassweiler, M.H. Carr, K.C. Cavanaugh, D.P. Malone, and D.R. Siegel. 2011. Wave disturbance overwhelms top-down and bottom-up control of primary production in California kelp forests. Ecology 92 (11): 2108–2116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Russell, B.D., and S.D. Connell. 2005. A novel interaction between nutrients and grazers alters relative dominance of marine habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 289: 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Spencer, R.D. 1970. An ecological study of the sub-tidal macrophytic vegetation of three selected areas of Port Phillip Bay: Werribee, Altona and Carrum. MSc Thesis. In The University of Melbourne. Melbourne: VIC.Google Scholar
  52. Tait, L.W., and D.R. Schiel. 2011. Legacy effects of canopy disturbance on ecosystem functioning in macroalgal assemblages. PLoS One 6 (10): e26986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tegner, M.J., and P.K. Dayton. 1991. Sea urchins, El Niños, and the long-term stability of Southern California kelp forests. Marine Ecology Progress Series 77: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tegner, M.J., P.K. Dayton, P.B. Edwards, and K.L. Riser. 1996. Is there evidence for long-term climatic change in southern California kelp forests? California Cooperative Oceanic Fisheries Investigations 37: 111–126.Google Scholar
  55. Tegner, M.J., P.K. Dayton, P.B. Edwards, and K.L. Riser. 1997. Large-scale, low-frequency oceanographic effects on kelp forest succession: A tale of two cohorts. Marine Ecology Progress Series 146: 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Thurstan, R.H., L. McClenachan, L.B. Crowder, J.A. Drew, J.N. Kittinger, P.S. Levin, C.M. Roberts, and J.M. Pandolfi. 2015. Filling historical data gaps to foster solutions in marine conservation. Ocean and Coastal Management 115: 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Valentine, J.P., and C.R. Johnson. 2005. Persistence of sea urchin (Heliocidaris erythrogramma) barrens on the east coast of Tasmania: Inhibition of macroalgal recovery in the absence of high densities of sea urchins. Botanica Marina 48: 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wernberg, T., G.A. Kendrick, and B.D. Toohey. 2005. Modification of physical environment by an Ecklonia radiata (Laminariales) canopy and its implications for associated foliose algae. Aquatic Ecology 39 (4): 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wernberg, T., D.A. Smale, F. Tuya, M.S. Thomsen, T.J. Langlois, T. de Bettignies, S. Bennett, and C.S. Rousseaux (2013) An extreme climatic event alters marine ecosystem structure in a global biodiversity hotspot. Nature Climate Change 3 (1): 78–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Worm, B., E.B. Barbier, N. Beaumont, J.E. Duffy, C. Folke, B.S. Halpern, J.B.C. Jackson, H.K. Lotze, F. Micheli, S.R. Palumbi, E. Sala, K.A. Selcoe, J.J. Stachowicz, and R. Watson. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314 (5800): 787–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Worthington, D.G. and C. Blount (2003) Research to develop and manage the sea urchin fisheries of NSW and eastern Victoria. Final report to the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation for Project 1999/128.Google Scholar
  62. Wright, J.T., S.A. Dworjanyn, C.N. Rogers, P.D. Steinberg, J.E. Williamson, and A.G.B. Poore. 2005. Density-dependent sea urchin grazing: Differential removal of species changes in community composition and alternative community states. Marine Ecology Progress Series 298: 143–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BioSciencesThe University of MelbourneParkvilleAustralia
  2. 2.Centre For Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental SciencesDeakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations