How the Distribution of Anthropogenic Nitrogen Has Changed in Narragansett Bay (RI, USA) Following Major Reductions in Nutrient Loads
Over the past decade, nitrogen (N) loads to Narragansett Bay have decreased by more than 50%. These reductions were, in large part, the direct result of multiple wastewater treatment facility upgrades to tertiary treatment, a process which employs N removal. Here, we document ecosystem response to the N reductions and assess how the distribution of sewage N in Narragansett Bay has changed from before, during, and shortly after the upgrades. While others have observed clear responses when data were considered annually, our seasonal and regional comparisons of pre- and post-tertiary treatment dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) concentrations and Secchi depth data, from bay-wide surveys conducted periodically from the early 1970s through 2016, resulted in only a few subtle differences. Thus, we sought to use stable isotope data to assess how sewage N is incorporated into the ecology of the Bay and how its distribution may have changed after the upgrades. The nitrogen (δ15N) and carbon (δ13C) stable isotope measurements of particulate matter served as a proxy for phytoplankton, while macroalgae served as short-term integrators of water column bio-available N, and hard clams (Mercenaria mercenaria) as integrators of water column production. In contrast to other estuarine stable isotope studies that have observed an increased influence of isotopically lower marine N when sewage N is reduced, the opposite has occurred in Narragansett Bay. The tertiary treatment upgrades have increased the effluent δ15N values by at least 2‰. The plants and animals throughout Narragansett Bay have similarly increased by 1–2‰, on average. In contrast, the δ13C values measured in particulate matter and hard clams have declined by about the same amount. The δ15N results indicated that, even after the N reductions, sewage N still plays an important role in supporting primary and secondary production throughout the bay. However, the δ13C suggests that overall net production in Narragansett Bay has decreased. In the 5 years after the major wastewater treatment facilities came on-line for nutrient removal, oligotrophication has begun but sewage remains the dominant source of N to Narragansett Bay.
KeywordsStable isotope δ15N Eutrophication Sewage treatment plant Wastewater treatment facility Tertiary treatment Ecosystem response Oligotrophication
The late coastal ecologist Scott Nixon was fond of saying that the wise studied lakes, the less-wise studied rivers, where water flowed in one direction, and only the most foolish studied estuaries where water moved in all directions, changing over the course of a day. This has never been truer when trying to assess the impacts of oligotrophication. We would like to thank the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management for providing hard clams to us for more than a decade. We would also like to thank Mike Charpentier for creating Fig. 1, Steve Granger for the assistance in the field during those first collections in the mid-2000s, and to Scott Nixon and Candace Oviatt for all of the valuable data that they have collected, and information and wisdom that they have provided, over the years. Thanks to Lindsey Fields for measuring the DIN concentrations and Rebecca Robinson for the support to C. Schmidt. We are grateful to Carol Thornber and Lindsay Green of the University of Rhode Island for their help with identifying macroalgae. This manuscript has been improved by input from Roxanne Johnson, Rose Martin, and Brenda Rashleigh. This is ORD tracking number ORD-023673. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views or polices of the US Environmental Protection Agency, NEIWPCC, nor of the McLaughlin Research Corporation. Any mention of trade names, products, or services does not imply an endorsement by the US government or the US Environmental Protection Agency. The EPA does not endorse any commercial products, services, or enterprises.
- Campbell, R.G. 1993. Studies of feeding behavior, development, and food limitation in first feeding nauplii of the copepod Acartia tonsa (Copepoda: Calanoida). Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
- Chaves, J. E. 2004. Potential use of 15N to assess nitrogen sources and fate in Narragansett Bay. Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island.Google Scholar
- Costanzo, S.D., J. Udy, B. Longstaff, and A. Jones. 2005. Using nitrogen stable isotope ratios (δ15N) of macroalgae to determine the effectiveness of sewage upgrades: Changes in the extent of sewage plumes over four years in Moreton Bay, Australia. Marine Pollution Bulletin 51 (1-4): 212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- DiMilla, P.A., 2006. Using stable nitrogen isotopes to characterize and evaluate nitrogen sources to Greenwich Bay, RI and their influence on isotopic signatures in estuarine organisms. MS Thesis, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.Google Scholar
- Fulweiler, R.W. and E.M. Heiss. 2014. (Nearly) a decade of directly measured sediment N2 fluxes: What can Narragansett Bay tell us about the global ocean nitrogen budget? 27: 184–195.Google Scholar
- Garber, J. H. 1982. 15N-Tracer and Other Laboratory Studies of Nitrogen Remineralization in Sediments and Waters from Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. Dissertation, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.Google Scholar
- Grassle, J.P. and J.F. Grassle. 1984. The utility of studying the effects of pollutants on single species populations in benthos of mesocosms and coastal ecosystems. In Concepts in marine pollution measurements, ed, H.White. Maryland Sea Grant College Park, College Park, Maryland.Google Scholar
- Kincaid, K., D. Bergondo, and K. Rosenberger. 2008. Circulation and exchange between lower Narragansett Bay and Rhode Island sound. In Science for ecosystem-based management: Narragansett Bay in the 21st century springer, ed. B. Costa-Pierce and A. Desbonet, 301–324. New York: Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Krumholz, J.S. 2012. Spatial and temporal patterns in nutrient standing stock and mass-balance in response to load reductions in a temperate estuary. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Rhode Island.Google Scholar
- Melrose, D.C., J.S. Krumholz, and M.C. McManus. 2014. Measuring changes in total phytoplankton-sized particle volume over time as a proxy for primary production and food availability in narragansett Bay, RI. Proceedings of the 34th Milford Aquaculture Seminar. Journal of Shellfish Research 33: 541–565.Google Scholar
- Narragansett Bay Estuary Program (NBEP). 2017. State of Narragansett Bay and Its Watershed. Technical Report, Providence, RI. http://nbep.org/the-state-of-our-watershed/technicalreport/. Accessed 19 December 2017.
- Nixon, S.W., B. Buckley, S. Granger, L. Harris, A. Oczkowski, R. Fulweiler, and L. Cole. 2008. Nutrient (N and P) inputs to Narragansett Bay: Past, present, and future. In Science for ecosystem-based management Narragansett Bay in the 21st century, ed. A. Desbonnet and B.A. Costa-Pierce, 101–176. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nixon, S.W., R.W. Fulweiler, B.A. Buckley, S.L. Granger, B.L. Nowicki, and K.M. Henry. 2009. The impact of changing climate on phenology, productivity, and benthic-pelagic coupling in Narragansett Bay. Estuarine, coastal, and shelf. Science 82: 1–18.Google Scholar
- Oczkowski, A., S. Nixon, K. Henry, P. DiMilla, M. Pilson, S. Granger, B. Buckley, C. Thornber, R. McKinney, and J. Chaves. 2008. Distribution and trophic importance of anthropogenic nitrogen in Narragansett Bay: An assessment using stable isotopes. Estuaries and Coasts 31 (1): 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Oczkowski, A., C.S. Thornber, E.E. Markham, R. Rossi, A. Ziegler, and S. Rinehart. 2015. Testing sample stability using four storage methods and the macroalgae Ulva and Gracilaria. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 13: 9–14.Google Scholar
- Oczkowski, A., B. Taplin, R. Pruell, A. Pimenta, R. Johnson, and J. Grear. 2018. Carbon stable isotope values in plankton and mussels reflect changes in carbonate chemistry associated with nutrient enhanced net production. Frontiers in Marine Science 5 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2018.00043.
- Oviatt, C.A., and R. Pastore. 1980. Some aspects of water quality in and pollution sources to the Providence River. Report for region 1 EPA September 1979–September 1980. Contract #68–04-1002, 02203. Boston, MA: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
- Oviatt, C., L. Smith, J. Krumholz, C. Coupland, H. Stoffel, A. Keller, M.C. McManus, and L. Reed. 2017. Managed nutrient reduction impacts on nutrient concentrations, water clarity, primary production, and hypoxia in a north temperate estuary. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 199: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pilson, M.E.Q. 1991. Aspects of Climate Around Narragansett Bay. NBP-91-64. pp. 59. http://nbep.org/publications/NBP-91-64.pdf. Accessed 19 December 2017.
- Raimonet, M., G. Guillou, F. Mornet, and P. Richard. 2013. Macroalgae δ15N values in well-mixed estuaries: Indicator of anthropogenic nitrogen input or macroalgae metabolism? Estuarine, coastal, and shelf. Science 119: 126–138.Google Scholar
- Schmidt, C.E. 2014. Investigation of nitrogen cycling using stable nitrogen and oxygen isotopes in Narragansett Bay, RI. Dissertation, University of Rhode. Island, Kingston, RI.Google Scholar
- Smith, S.V., W.J. Kimmerer, E. Laws, R.E. Brock, and T.W. Walsh. 1981. Kaneohe Bay sewage diversion experiment: Perspectives on ecosystem responses to nutritional perturbation. Pacific Science 35: 279–395.Google Scholar
- Spaulding, S.L. and C. Swanson. 2008. Circulation and transport dynamics in Narragansett Bay. In Science for ecosystem-based management Narragansett Bay in the 21st century, ed. A. Desbonnet and B.A. Costa-Pierce, 233–279. New York: Springer.Google Scholar