Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 613–628 | Cite as

Effects of Nonnative Eurasian Watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum, on Nekton Habitat Quality in a Louisiana Oligohaline Estuary

  • Scott B. AlfordEmail author
  • Lawrence P. Rozas


Submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) provides critical habitat for estuarine nekton in the Gulf of Mexico, but habitat quality of SAV beds may change when nonnative species, such as Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum), become established. We compared the habitat value of Myriophyllum with another common native SAV (Ruppia maritima) by using field collections to document shifts in nekton community structure and a field experiment to compare growth rates of commercially important juvenile white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus). Similar communities were collected from both SAV species, though nekton abundance scaled with SAV biomass. The habitat quality provided by Myriophyllum for white shrimp appeared to meet or exceed that of Ruppia, with densities and growth rates of shrimp in Myriophyllum (2.2 ± 0.47 m−2, 1.0 ± 0.07 mm TL day−1, 25.7 ± 2.98 mg day−1) higher than in Ruppia (1.0 ± 0.36 m−2, 0.6 ± 0.09 mm TL day−1, 11.6 ± 2.04 mg day−1). Though differences were detected between SAV species, other factors, such as hypoxia and interspecific competition, likely contributed to the differences we documented between these habitat types in shrimp densities and growth. Our study provides an example of a nonnative habitat-forming species providing a viable alternative to native habitat. This result contradicts the paradigm of negative effects associated with nonnative species following their introduction into an ecosystem.


Nonnative species Submerged aquatic vegetation Nursery habitat quality Community structure Growth experiment Myriophyllum spicatum 



We thank M. Mace, J. Thompson, C. Fontenot, and T. Sullivan from the University of Louisiana at Lafayette (ULL) as well as T. Carruthers from the Water Institute of the Gulf and K. Darnell from the University of Southern Mississippi for their help with the field work. We thank T. Vincent and the Paul J. Rainey Wildlife Refuge for granting permission to conduct this study on the refuge and help identifying the study site. We thank D. L. Felder, P. L. Leberg, and S. M. Duke-Sylvester from ULL for their input in the design and analysis of this study in fulfillment of ULL’s Master of Science program.


This project was funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC), a teaching assistantship from the ULL Department of Biology, and the Rockefeller Wildlife Scholarship (

Supplementary material

12237_2018_513_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (326 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 326 kb)


  1. Airoldi, L., D. Balata, and M.W. Beck. 2008. The gray zone: relationships between habitat loss and marine diversity and their applications in conservation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 366 (1-2): 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford, S.B. 2018. Effects of Nonnative Eurasian watermilfoil, Myriophyllum spicatum, on nekton habitat quality in a Louisiana Oligohaline Estuary, MS Thesis, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Louisiana USA.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, R., and T.J. Minello. 2010. Growth and mortality of juvenile white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus in a marsh pond. Marine Ecology Progress Series 41: 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baker, R., M. Fujiwara, and T.J. Minello. 2014. Juvenile growth and mortality effects on white shrimp Litopenaeus setiferus population dynamics in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fisheries Research 155: 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltz, D.M., and R.F. Jones. 2003. Temporal and spatial patterns of microhabitat use by fishes and decapod crustaceans in a Louisiana estuary. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 132 (4): 662–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, M.W., K.L. Heck, K.W. Able, D.L. Childers, D.B. Eggleston, B.M. Gillanders, B. Halpern, C.G. Hays, K. Hoshino, T.J. Minello, R.J. Orth, P.F. Sheridan, and M.R. Weinstein. 2001. The identification, conservation, and management of estuarine and marine nurseries for fish and invertebrates. Bioscience 51 (8): 633–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beseres, J.J., and R.J. Feller. 2007. Changes in the spatial distribution of subtidal macrobenthos due to predation by white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus). Estuaries and Coasts 30 (4): 591–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanco-Martínez, Z., and R. Pérez-Castañeda. 2017. Does the relative value of submerged aquatic vegetation for penaeid shrimp vary with proximity to a tidal inlet? Preliminary evidence from a subtropical coastal lagoon. Marine and Freshwater Research 68 (3): 581–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boylen, C.W., L.W. Eichler, and J.D. Madsen. 1999. Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian watermilfoil. Hydrobiologia 415: 207–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, B.J., R.J. Mitchell, and S.A. Graham. 2002. Competition for pollination between an invasive species (purple loosestrife) and a native congener. Ecology 83 (8): 2328–2336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buchan, L.A., and D.K. Padilla. 2000. Predicting the likelihood of Eurasian watermilfoil presence in lakes, a macrophyte monitoring tool. Ecological Applications 10 (5): 1442–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Canion, C.R., and K.L. Heck Jr. 2009. Effect of habitat complexity on predation success: re-evaluating the current paradigm in seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 393: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carter, J., A.L. Foote, and A. Johnson-Randall. 1999. Modeling the effects of nutria (Myocastor coypus) on wetland loss. Wetlands 19 (1): 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Castellanos, D.L., and L.P. Rozas. 2001. Nekton use of submerged aquatic vegetation, marsh and shallow unvegetated bottom in the Atchafalaya River Delta, a Louisiana tidal freshwater ecosystem. Estuaries 24: 184–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chaplin, G.I., and J.F. Valentine. 2009. Macroinvertebrate production in the submerged aquatic vegetation of the Mobile-Tensaw Delta: effects of an exotic species at the base of an estuarine food web. Estuaries and Coasts 32 (2): 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cheruvelil, K.S., P.A. Soranno, J.D. Madsen, and M.J. Roberson. 2002. Plant architecture and epiphytic macroinvertebrate communities: the role of an exotic dissected macrophyte. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 21 (2): 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Clark, R.D., J.D. Christensen, M.E. Monaco, P.A. Caldwell, G.A. Matthews, and T.J. Minello. 2004. A habitat-use model to determine essential fish habitat for juvenile brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) in Galveston Bay, Texas. Fishery Bulletin 102: 264–277.Google Scholar
  18. Clarke, K.R., and R.H. Green. 1988. Statistical design and analysis for a ‘biological effects’ study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 46: 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Corona, A., L.A. Soto, and A.J. Sánchez. 2000. Epibenthic amphipod abundance and predation efficiency of the pink shrimp Farfantepenaeus duorarum (Burkenroad, 1939) in habitats with different physical complexity in a tropical estuarine system. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 253 (1): 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crooks, J.A. 2002. Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97 (2): 153–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duffy, K.C., and D.M. Baltz. 1998. Comparison of fish assemblages associated with native and exotic submerged macrophytes in the Lake Ponchartrain estuary, USA. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 223 (2): 199–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ehrenfeld, J.G. 2010. Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41 (1): 59–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fridley, J.D., J.J. Stachowicz, S. Naeem, D.F. Sax, E.W. Seabloom, M.D. Smith, T.J. Stohlgren, D. Tilman, and B.V. Holle. 2007. The invasion paradox: reconciling pattern and process in species invasions. Ecology 88 (1): 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fry, B. 2008. Open bays as nurseries for Louisiana brown shrimp. Estuaries and Coasts 31 (4): 776–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fry, B., D.M. Baltz, M.C. Benfield, J.W. Fleeger, A. Gace, H.L. Haas, and Z.J. Quiñones-Rivera. 2003. Stable isotope indicators of movement and residency for brown shrimp (Farfantepenaeus aztecus) in coastal Louisiana marshscapes. Estuaries 26 (1): 82–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gotceitas, V., and P. Colgan. 1989. Predator foraging success and habitat complexity: quantitative test of the threshold hypothesis. Oecologia 80 (2): 158–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrington, R., and E.S. Harrington. 1982. Effects on fishes and their forage organisms of impounding a Florida salt marsh to prevent breeding by salt marsh mosquitoes. Bulletin of Marine Science 32: 523–531.Google Scholar
  28. Heck, K.L., and R.J. Orth. 1980. Structural components of eelgrass (Zostera marina) meadows in the lower Chesapeake Bay—decapod Crustacea. Estuaries and Coasts 3 (4): 289–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Heck, K.L., and T.A. Thoman. 1984. The nursery role of seagrass meadows in the upper and lower reaches of the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries and Coasts 7 (1): 70–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heck, K.L., G. Hays, and R.J. Orth. 2003. Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Marine Ecology Progress Series 253: 123–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hillmann, E.R., K.E. DeMarco, and M. La Peyre. 2016. Establishing a baseline of estuarine submerged aquatic vegetation resources across salinity zones within coastal areas of the northern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies 3: 25–32.Google Scholar
  32. Hitch, A.T., K.M. Purcell, S.B. Martin, P.L. Klerks, and P.L. Leberg. 2011. Interactions of salinity, marsh fragmentation and submerged aquatic vegetation on resident nekton assemblages of coastal marsh ponds. Estuaries and Coasts 34 (3): 653–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holthuis, L.B. 1952. A general revision of the Palaemonidae (crustacean decapod Natantia) of the Americas. II. The subfamily Palaemonidae. Occasional papers of the Allan Hancock Foundation 12: 1–396.Google Scholar
  34. Howe, J.C., and R.K. Wallace. 2000. Relative abundance of postlarval and juvenile penaeid shrimps in submerged aquatic vegetation and emergent marsh habitats. Gulf of Mexico Science 2: 130–137.Google Scholar
  35. Jones, C.G., J.H. Lawton, and M. Shachak. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69 (3): 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kanouse, S., M.K. La Peyre, and J.A. Nyman. 2006. Nekton use of Ruppia maritima and nonvegetated bottom habitat types within brackish marsh ponds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 327: 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kantrud, H.A. 1991. Wigeongrass (Ruppia maritima L.): a literature review. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Fish and Wildlife Research 10: 1–58.Google Scholar
  38. Kauffman, T.C., C.W. Martin, and J.F. Valentine. 2018. Hydrological alteration exacerbates the negative impacts of invasive Eurasian milfoil Myriophyllum spicatum by creating hypoxic conditions in a northern Gulf of Mexico estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series 592: 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. King, S.P., and P. Sheridan. 2006. Nekton of new seagrass habitats colonizing a subsided salt marsh in Galveston Bay, Texas. Estuaries and Coasts 29 (2): 286–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. La Peyre, M.K., and J. Gordon. 2012. Nekton density patterns and hurricane recovery in submerged aquatic vegetation, and along non-vegetated natural and created edge habitats. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 98: 108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. La Peyre, M.K., B. Gossman, and J.A. Nyman. 2007. Assessing functional equivalency of nekton habitat in enhanced habitats: comparison of terraced and unterraced marsh ponds. Estuaries and Coasts 30 (3): 526–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Loneragan, N.R., R.A. Kenyon, D.J. Staples, I.R. Poiner, and C.A. Conacher. 1998. The influence of seagrass type on the distribution and abundance of postlarval and juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus esculentus and P. semisulcatus) in the western Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 228 (2): 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loneragan, N., M. Haywood, D. Heales, R. Kenyon, R. Pendrey, and D. Vance. 2001. Estimating the influence of prawn stocking density and seagrass type on the growth of juvenile tiger prawns (Penaeus semisulcatus): results from field experiments in small enclosures. Marine Biology 139: 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mace, M.M., III, and L.P. Rozas. 2017. Population dynamics and secondary production of juvenile white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) along an estuarine salinity gradient. Fishery Bulletin 115: 74–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Madsen, J.D., J.W. Sutherland, J.A. Bloomfield, L.W. Eichler, and C.W. Boylen. 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 29: 94–99.Google Scholar
  46. Markert, A., A. Wehrmann, and I. Kröncke. 2010. Recently established Crassostrea-reefs versus native Mystilus-beds: differences in ecosystem engineering affects the macrofaunal communities (Wadden Sea of Lower Saxony, southern German bight). Biological Invasions 12 (1): 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Martin, C.W., and J.F. Valentine. 2011. Impacts of a habitat-forming exotic species on estuarine structure and function: an experimental assessment of Eurasian milfoil. Estuaries and Coasts 34 (2): 364–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McCall, D.D., and C.F. Rakocinski. 2007. Grass shrimp (Palaemonetes spp.) play a pivotal trophic role in enhancing Ruppia maritima. Ecology 88 (3): 618–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McTigue, T.A., and R.J. Zimmerman. 1991. Carnivory vs herbivory in juvenile Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus) and Penaeus aztecus (Ives). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 151 (1): 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McTigue, T.A., and R.J. Zimmerman. 1998. The use of infauna by juvenile Penaeus aztecus Ives and Penaeus setiferus (Linnaeus). Estuaries 21 (1): 160–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Merino, J.H., J. Carter, and S.L. Merino. 2009. Mesohaline submerged aquatic vegetation survey along the US Gulf of Mexico coast, 2001 and 2002: a salinity gradient approach. Gulf of Mexico Science 27: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Minello, T.J. 1993. Chronographic tethering: a technique for measuring prey survival time and testing predation pressure in aquatic habitats. Marine Ecology Progress Series 101: 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Minello, T.J. 1999. Nekton densities in shallow estuarine habitats of Texas and Louisiana and the identification of essential fish habitat. American Fisheries Society Symposium 22: 43–75.Google Scholar
  54. Minello, T.J., D.W. Able, M.P. Weinstein, and C.G. Hays. 2003. Salt marshes as nurseries for nekton: testing hypotheses on density, growth and survival through meta-analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 246: 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Orth, R.J., and J. Van Montfrans. 1987. Utilization of a seagrass meadow and tidal marsh creek by blue crabs Callinectes sapidus. I. Seasonal and annual variations in abundance with emphasis on post-settlement juveniles. Marine Ecology Progress Series 41: 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Orth, R.J., T.J. Carruthers, W.C. Dennison, C.M. Duarte, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck Jr., A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, W.J. Kenworthy, S. Olyarnik, and F.T. Short. 2006. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56 (12): 987–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Palmer, T.A., and P.A. Montagna. 2015. Impacts of droughts and low flows on estuarine water quality and benthic fauna. Hydrobiologia 753 (1): 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pérez-Castañeda, R., and O. Defeo. 2005. Growth and mortality of transient shrimp populations (Farfantepenaeus spp.) in a coastal lagoon of Mexico: role of the environment and density-dependence. ICES Journal of Marine Science 62 (1): 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pérez-Castañeda, R., Z. Blanco-Martínez, J.G. Sánchez-Martínez, J.L. Rábago-Castro, G. Aguirre-Guzmán, and M. de la Luz Vázquez-Sauceda. 2010. Distribution of Farfantepenaeus aztecus and F. duorarum on submerged aquatic vegetation habitats along a subtropical coastal lagoon (Laguna Madre, Mexico). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 90 (03): 445–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Perret, W.S., and C.W. Caillouet Jr. 1974. Abundance and size of fishes taken by trawling in Vermilion Baym Louisiana. Bulletin of Marine Science 24: 52–75.Google Scholar
  61. Pollack, J.B., C.P. Buzzelli, and R.J. Feller. 2009. The predatory role of white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus) in seasonal declines of subtidal macrobenthos. Hydrobiologia 627 (1): 117–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rodriguez, L.F. 2006. Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biological Invasions 8 (4): 927–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rosas, C., L. Ocampo, G. Gaxiola, A. Sánchez, and L.A. Soto. 1999. Effect of salinity on survival, growth, and oxygen consumption of postlarvae (PL10-PL21) of Litopenaeus setiferus. Journal of Crustacean Biology 19 (2): 244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 1997. Estimating densities of small fishes and decapod crustaceans in shallow estuarine habitats: a review of sampling design with focus on gears selection. Estuaries 20 (1): 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 1998. Nekton use of salt marsh, seagrass, and nonvegetated habitats in a South Texas (USA) estuary. Bulletin of Marine Science 63: 481–501.Google Scholar
  66. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2006. Nekton use of Vallisneria americana Michx. (wild celery) beds and adjacent habitats in coastal Louisiana. Estuaries and Coasts 29 (2): 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2009. Using nekton growth as a metric for assessing habitat restoration by marsh terracing. Marine Ecology Progress Series 394: 179–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2010. Nekton density patterns in tidal ponds and adjacent wetlands related to pond size and salinity. Estuaries and Coasts 33 (3): 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2011. Variation in penaeid shrimp growth rates along an estuarine salinity gradient: implications for managing river diversions. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 397 (2): 196–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rozas, L.P., C.W. Martin, and J.F. Valentine. 2013. Effects of reduced hydrological connectivity on the nursery use of shallow estuarine habitats within a river delta. Marine Ecology Progress Series 492: 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Rozas, L.P., T.J. Minello, and M.S. Miles. 2014. Effect of deepwater horizon oil on growth rates of juvenile penaeid shrimps. Estuaries and Coasts 37 (6): 1403–1414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruiz, G.M., J.T. Carlton, E.D. Grosholz, and A.H. Hines. 1997. Global invasions of marine and estuarine habitats by non-indigenous species: mechanisms, extent, and consequences. American Zoologist 37 (6): 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Salo, P., E. Korpimäki, P.B. Banks, M. Nordström, and C.R. Dickman. 2007. Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 274 (1615): 1237–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sasser, C.E., J.M. Visser, E. Mouton, J. Linscombe, and S.B. Hartley. 2014. Vegetation types in coastal Louisiana in 2013: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3290.Google Scholar
  75. Schmidt, A.L., M. Coll, and H.K. Lotze. 2017. Regional-scale differences in eutrophication effects on eelgrass-associated (Zostera marina) macrofauna. Estuaries and Coasts 40 (4): 1096–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schultz, R., and E. Dibble. 2012. Effects of invasive macrophytes on freshwater fish and macroinvertebrate communities: the role of invasive plant traits. Hydrobiologia 684 (1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Seitz, R.D., R.N. Lipcius, and M.S. Seebo. 2005. Food availability and growth of the blue crab in seagrass and unvegetated nurseries of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 319 (1-2): 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sheaves, M., R. Baker, I. Nagelkerken, and R.M. Connolly. 2015. True value of estuarine and coastal nurseries for fish: incorporating complexity and dynamics. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (2): 401–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sheridan, P., and T.J. Minello. 2003. Nekton use of different habitat types in seagrass beds of lower Laguna Madre, Texas. Bulletin of Marine Science 72: 37–61.Google Scholar
  80. Smith, C.S., and J.W. Barko. 1990. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. Journal of Aquatic Plant Management 28: 55–64.Google Scholar
  81. Sousa, R., J.L. Gutiérrez, and D.C. Aldridge. 2009. Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers. Biological Invasions 11 (10): 2367–2385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taylor, M.D., B. Fry, A. Becker, and N. Moltschaniwskyj. 2017. Recruitment and connectivity influence the role of seagrass as a penaeid nursery habitat in a wave dominated estuary. Science of the Total Environment 584: 622–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Valinoti, C.E., C.K. Ho, and A.R. Armitage. 2011. Native and exotic submerged aquatic vegetation provide different nutritional and refuge values for macroinvertebrates. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 409 (1-2): 42–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Virnstein, R.W., and R.K. Howard. 1987. Motile epifauna of marine macrophytes in the Indian River Lagoon, Florida. I. Comparisons among three species of seagrasses from adjacent beds. Bulletin of Marine Science 41: 1–12.Google Scholar
  85. Weinstein, M.P., and H.A. Brooks. 1983. Comparative ecology of nekton residing in a tidal creek and adjacent seagrass meadow: community composition and structure. Marine Ecology Progress Series 12: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zimmerman, R.J., T.J. Minello, and G. Zamora Jr. 1984. Selection of vegetated habitat by brown shrimp, Penaeus aztecus, in a Galveston Bay salt marsh. Fishery Bulletin 82: 325–336.Google Scholar
  87. Zimmerman, R.J., T.J. Minello, and L.P. Rozas. 2000. Salt marsh linkages to productivity of penaeid shrimps and blue crabs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. In Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology, eds. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 293–314.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Louisiana at LafayetteLafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Nature Coast Biological StationUniversity of FloridaCedar KeyUSA
  3. 3.NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service/SEFSCEstuarine Habitats and Coastal Fisheries CenterLafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations