Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 41, Issue 1, pp 280–292 | Cite as

The First Hop: Use of Beaufort Sea Deltas by Hatch-Year Semipalmated Sandpipers

  • Roy T. ChurchwellEmail author
  • Steve Kendall
  • Stephen C. Brown
  • Arny L. Blanchard
  • Tuula E. Hollmen
  • Abby N. Powell
Article

Abstract

River deltas along Alaska’s Beaufort Sea coast are used by hatch-year semipalmated sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) after leaving their terrestrial natal sites, but the drivers of their use of these stopover sites on the first “hop” of fall migration are unknown. We quantified sandpiper temporal distribution and abundance as related to food resources at three river deltas during the beginning of their fall migration (post-breeding period) to compare the habitat quality among these deltas. We conducted population counts, sampled invertebrates, and captured birds to collect blood samples from individuals for triglyceride and stable isotope analyses to determine fattening rates and diet. Patterns of sandpiper and invertebrate abundance were complex and varied among deltas and within seasons. River deltas were used by sandpipers from late July to late August, and peak sandpiper counts ranged from 1000 to 4000 individuals, of which 98% were hatch-year semipalmated sandpipers. Isotopic signatures from blood plasma samples indicated that birds switched from a diet of upland tundra to delta invertebrate taxa as the migration season progressed, suggesting a dependence on delta invertebrates. Despite differences in diet among deltas, we found no differences in fattening rates of juvenile sandpipers as indicated by triglyceride levels. The number of sandpipers was positively associated with abundance of Amphipoda and Oligochaeta at the Jago and Okpilak-Hulahula deltas; an isotopic mixing model indicated that sandpipers consumed Amphipoda and Oligochaeta at Jago, mostly Chironomidae at Okpilak-Hulahula and Spionidae at Canning. Regardless of the difference in sandpiper diets at the Beaufort Sea deltas, their similar fattening rates throughout the season indicate that all of these stopover sites provide a critical food resource for hatch-year sandpipers beginning their first migration.

Keywords

Calidris pusilla Fall migration Stopover Alaska Invertebrates Stable isotope Triglyceride 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Study collaboration and funding were provided in part by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management, Environmental Studies Program under Cooperative Agreement Number M11AC00006. The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, US Fish and Wildlife Service Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Arctic Landscape Conservation Cooperative, US Geological Survey Alaska Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Institute of Arctic Biology, and Manomet Conservation Sciences provided additional funding and logistical support. Bureau of Ocean and Energy Management required approval of the final manuscript before submission or publication. We thank the many dedicated field technicians who helped collect samples. We had lab support from the Mark Wipfli aquatic invertebrate lab, Alaska Stable Isotope Facility, and the Alaska Sealife Center. We are also thankful to the Kaktovik Inupiat Corporation for letting us conduct research on their lands and the people of the village of Kaktovik for their help and friendship. We thank Dan Ruthrauff, Jim Lovvorn, Shiway Wang, and one anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful reviews of this manuscript. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. This study was performed under the auspices of University of Alaska, Fairbanks IACUC approval #148889.

References

  1. ACIA. 2004. Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alerstam, T., and Å. Lindström. 1990. Optimal bird migration: the relative importance of time, energy, and safety. In Bird Migration: the Physiology and Ecophysiology, ed. E. Gwinner. NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, S.A., A. Keith, C.L. Gratto-Trevor, and A.W. Diamond. 1996. Conventional and isotopic determinations of shorebird diets at an inland stopover: the importance of invertebrates and Potamogeton pectinatus tubers. Canadian Journal of Zoology 1068: 1057–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Augustin, J.C., J.W. Grubaugh, and M.R. Marshall. 1999. Validating macroinvertebrate assumptions of the shorebird management model for the lower Mississippi valley. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27: 552–558.Google Scholar
  5. Baker, M.C. 1977. Shorebird food habits in the eastern Canadian Arctic. The Condor 79: 56–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beauchamp, G., and G. Ruxton. 2008. Disentangling risk dilution and collective detection in the antipredator vigilance of semipalmated sandpipers in flocks. Animal Behaviour 75: 1837–1842. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.12.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beauchamp, G., M. Belisle, and L.-A. Giraldeau. 1997. Influence of conspecific attraction on the spatial influence of learning foragers in a patchy habitat. Journal of Animal Ecology 66: 671–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, S., J.R. Bart, R.B. Lanctot, J.J.A. Johnson, S. Kendall, and D. Payer. 2007. Shorebird abundance and distribution on the coastal plain of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. The Condor 109: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, S., S. Kendall, R. Churchwell, A. Taylor, and A.-M. Benson. 2012. Relative shorebird densities at coastal sites in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Waterbirds 35: 546–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buehler, D.M., and T. Piersma. 2008. Travelling on a budget: predictions and ecological evidence for bottlenecks in the annual cycle of long-distance migrants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 363: 247–266. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caut, S., E. Angulo, and F. Courchamp. 2009. Variation in discrimination factors (Δ 15 N and Δ 13 C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction. Journal of Applied Ecology 46: 443–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01620.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Churchwell, R.T., S.J. Kendall, A.L. Blanchard, K.H. Dunton, and A.N. Powell. 2015. Natural disturbance shapes benthic intertidal macroinvertebrate communities of high latitude river deltas. Estuaries and Coasts. 39: 798–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Connors, P.G., and R.W. Risebrough. 1977. Shorebird dependence on arctic littoral habitats. Volume 3: 402–524 Environmental Assessment of the Alaskan Continental Shelf (Annual Reports of Principal Investigators). Anchorage: Outer-continental Shelf Environmental Assessment Program.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, C.A., and L.M. Smith. 2001. Foraging strategies and niche dynamics of coexisting shorebirds at stopover sites in the southern Great Plains. The Auk 118: 484–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dunton, K.H., S.V. Schonberg, and L.W. Cooper. 2012. Food web structure of the Alaskan nearshore shelf and estuarine lagoons of the Beaufort Sea. Estuaries and Coasts 35: 416–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Galbraith, H., R. Jones, R. Park, J. Clough, S. Herrod-Julius, B. Harrington, and G. Page. 2002. Global climate change and sea level rise: possible losses of intertidal habitat for shorebirds. Waterbirds 25: 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner, W.S., T.F. Nalepa, W.A. Frez, E.A. Cichocki, and P.F. Landrum. 1985. Seasonal patterns in lipid content of Lake Michigan macroinvertebrates. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42: 1827–1832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gates, H.R., R.B. Lanctot, and A.N. Powell. 2013. High renesting rates in arctic-breeding Dunlin (Calidris alpina): a clutch-removal experiment. The Auk 130: 372–380. doi: 10.1525/auk.2013.12052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guglielmo, C.G., P.D. O’Hara, and T.D. Williams. 2002. Extrinsic and intrinsic sources of variation in plasma lipid metabolites of free-living western sandpipers (Calidris mauri). The Auk 119: 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hicklin, P.W., and P.C. Smith. 1984. Selection of foraging sites and invertebrate prey by migrant Semipalmated Sandpipers, Calidris pusilla (Pallas), in Minas Basin, Bay of Fundy. Canadian Journal of Zoology 62: 2201–2210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill, B.L. 2012. Factors affecting survival of arctic-breeding Dunlin (Calidris alpina arcticola) adults and chicks. M.S. Thesis, University of Alaska Fairbanks. Fairbanks, AK, USA.Google Scholar
  22. Hobson, K.A., and R.G. Clark. 1993. Turnover of 13C in cellular and plasma fractions of blood: implications for nondestructive sampling in avian dietary studies. The Auk 110: 638–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kraan, C., J.A. van Gils, B. Spaans, A. Dekinga, A.I. Bijleveld, M. van Roomen, R. Kleefstra, and T. Piersma. 2009. Landscape-scale experiment demonstrates that Wadden Sea intertidal flats are used to capacity by molluscivore migrant shorebirds. Journal of Animal Ecology 78: 1259–1268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuwae, T., E. Miyoshi, S. Hosokawa, K. Ichimi, J. Hosoya, T. Amano, T. Moriya, M. Kondoh, R.C. Ydenberg, and R.W. Elner. 2012. Variable and complex food web structures revealed by exploring missing trophic links between birds and biofilm. Ecology Letters 15: 347–356. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01744.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuznetsova, A., P.B. Brockhoff, and R.H.B. Christensen. 2013. Package lmerTest. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/lmerTest.pdf.
  26. Lindström, Å., M. Klaassen, T. Piersma, N. Holmgren, and L. Wennerberg. 2002. Fuel stoes of juvenile waders on autumn migration in high arctic Canada. Ardea 90: 93–101.Google Scholar
  27. Lyons, J.E., J.A. Callazo, and G. Herring. 2015. Testing assumptions for conservation of migratory shorebirds and coastal managed wetlands. Wetlands Ecology Management: 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11273-015-9477-4.
  28. Macdonald, E.C., M.G. Ginn, and D.J. Hamilton. 2012. Variability in foraging behavior and implications for diet breadth among Semipalmated Sandpipers staging in the Upper Bay of Fundy. The Condor 114: 135–144. doi: 10.1525/cond.2012.100246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maillet, D., and J.M. Weber. 2006. Performance-enhancing role of dietary fatty acids in a long-distance migrant shorebird: the semipalmated sandpiper. Journal of Experimental Biology 209: 2686–2695. doi: 10.1242/jeb.02299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mars, J.C., and D.W. Houseknecht. 2007. Quantitative remote sensing study indicates doubling of coastal erosion rate in the past 50 years along a segment of the Arctic coast of Alaska. Geology 35: 583–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marsh, P., and T. Schmidty. 1993. Influence of a Beaufort Sea storm surge on channel levels in the Mackenzie Delta. Arctic 46: 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin, P.D. 1983. Bird use of arctic tundra habitats at Canning River Delta, Alaska. M.S. Thesis. University of Alaska, Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA.Google Scholar
  33. McWilliams, S.R., S.B. Kearney, and W.H. Karasov. 2002. Diet preferences of warblers for specific fatty acids in relation to nutritional requirements and digestive capabilities. Journal of Avian Biology 33: 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mitchel, D.W., and J.W. Grubaugh. 2005. Impacts of shorebirds on macroinvertebrates in the lower Mississippi alluvial valley. American Midland Naturalist 154: 188–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moitoret, C.S. 1983. Bird use of arctic coastal shorelines at Canning River Delta, Alaska. Master’s Thesis. University of Alaska Fairbanks.Google Scholar
  36. Nolan, M., R. Churchwell, J. Adams, J. McClelland, K.D. Tape, S. Kendall, A. Powell, K. Dunton, D. Payer, and P. Martin. 2011. Predicting the impact of glacier loss on fish, birds, floodplains, and estuaries in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. In Observing, Studying, and Managing for Change, ed. C.N. Medley, G. Patterson, and M.J. Parker, 49–54. Reston: US Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5169.Google Scholar
  37. Norton, D., and G. Weller. 1984. The Beaufort Sea: background, history, and perspective. In The Alaskan Beaufort Sea: Ecosystems and Environments, ed. P.W. Barnes, D.M. Schell, and E. Reimnitz, 3–22. Orlando: Academic Press, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ogden, L.J.E., K.A. Hobson, and D.B. Lank. 2004. Blood isotopic ( δ13C and δ15N ) turnover and diet-tissue fractionation factors in captive Dunlin (Calidris alpina pacifica). The Auk 121: 170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pierce, B.J., and S.R. McWilliams. 2014. The fat of the matter: how dietary fatty acids can affect exercise performance. Integrative and Comparative Biology 54: 903–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pierce, B.J., S.R. McWilliams, T.P. O’Connor, A.R. Place, and C.G. Guglielmo. 2005. Effect of dietary fatty acid composition on depot fat and exercise performance in a migrating songbird, the red-eyed vireo. Journal of Experimental Biology 208: 1277–1285. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pierce, B.J., S.R. McWilliams, and S. Url. 2011. Seasonal changes in composition of lipid stores in migratory birds: causes and consequences. The Condor 107: 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Piersma, T. 1987. Hop, skip, or jump? Constraints on migration of arctic waders by feeding, fattening, and flight speed. Limosa 60: 184–185.Google Scholar
  43. Pisaric, M.F.J., J.R. Thienpont, S.V. Kokelj, H. Nesbitt, T.C. Lantz, S. Solomon, and J.P. Smol. 2011. Impacts of a recent storm surge on an Arctic delta ecosystem examined in the context of the last millennium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108: 8960–8965. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018527108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Post, D.M., C.A. Layman, D.A. Arrington, G. Takimoto, J. Quattrochi, and C.G. Montaña. 2007. Getting to the fat of the matter: models, methods and assumptions for dealing with lipids in stable isotope analyses. Oecologia 152: 179–189. doi: 10.1007/s00442-006-0630x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Proshutinsky, A., V. Pavlov, and R.H. Bourke. 2001. Sea level rise in the Arctic Ocean. Geophysical Research Letters 28: 2237–2240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quinn, J.T., and D.J. Hamilton. 2012. Variation in diet of Semipalmated Sandpipers (Calidris pusilla) during stopover in the upper Bay of Fundy, Canada. Canadian Journal of Zoology 1190: 1181–1190. doi: 10.1139/Z2012-086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. R Development Core Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
  48. Semmens, B., and E. Ward. 2014. MixSIAR. Retrieved from http://conserver.iugo-cafe.org/user/brice.semmens/MixSIAR.
  49. Skagen, S.K., and F.L. Knopf. 1994. Residency patterns of migrating sandpipers at a midcontinental stopover. The Condor 96: 949–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Skagen, S.K., and H.D. Oman. 1996. Dietary flexibility of shorebirds in the western hemisphere. Canadian Field Naturalist 110: 419–444.Google Scholar
  51. Solomon, S. 2005. Spatial and temporal variability of shoreline change in the Beaufort-Mackenzie region, Northwest Territories, Canada. Geo-Marine Letters 25: 127–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steimle, F.W., and R.J. Terranova. 1985. Energy equivalents of marine organisms from the continental shelf of the temperate northwest Atlantic. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Science 6: 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor, A.R., A.N. Powell, D.A. Nigro, and S.J. Kendall. 2010. Distribution and community characteristics of staging shorebirds on the northern coast of Alaska. Arctic 63: 451–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor, A.R., R.B. Lanctot, A.N. Powell, S.J. Kendall, and D.A. Nigro. 2011. Residence time and movements of postbreeding shorebirds on the northern coast of Alaska. The Condor 113: 779–794. doi: 10.1525/cond.2011.100083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tulp, I., and H. Schekkerman. 2008. Has prey availability for arctic birds advanced with climate change? Hindcasting the abundance of tundra arthropods using weather and seasonal variation. Arctic 61: 48–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Turcotte, Y., J.-F. Lamarre, and J. Bêty. 2013. Staging ecology of semipalmated plover (Charadrius semipalmatus) and semipalmated sandpiper (Calidris pusilla) juveniles in the St. Lawrence River Estuary during fall migration. Canadian Journal of Zoology 91: 802–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Vermaire, J.C., M.F.J. Pisaric, J.R. Thienpont, C.J. Courtney-Mustaphi, S.V. Kokelj, and J.P. Smol. 2013. Arctic climate warming and sea ice declines lead to increased storm surge activity. Geophysical Research Letters 40: 1386–1390. doi: 10.1002/grl.50191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Warnock, N. 2010. Stopping vs. staging: the difference between a hop and a jump. Journal of Avian Biology 41: 621–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-048X.2010.05155.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wauchope, H.S., J.D. Shaw, Ø. Varpe, E.G. Lappo, D. Boertmann, R.B. Lanctot, and R.A. Fuller. 2016. Rapid climate-driven loss of breeding habitat for Arctic migratory birds. Global Change Biology Doi. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13404.
  60. Williams, T.D., C.G. Guglielmo, O. Egeler, and C.J. Martyniuk. 1999. Plasma lipid metabolites provide information on mass change over several days in captive Western Sandpipers. The Auk 116: 994–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wissing, T.E., and A.D. Hasler. 1971. Intraseasonal change in caloric content of some freshwater invertebrates. Ecology 52: 371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ydenberg, R.C., R.W. Butler, D.B. Lank, C.G. Guglielmo, M. Lemon, and N. Wolf. 2002. Trade-offs, condition dependence and stopover site selection by migrating sandpipers. Journal of Avian Biology 33: 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation (outside the USA) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy T. Churchwell
    • 1
    Email author
  • Steve Kendall
    • 2
  • Stephen C. Brown
    • 3
  • Arny L. Blanchard
    • 4
  • Tuula E. Hollmen
    • 5
  • Abby N. Powell
    • 1
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Biology and WildlifeUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Hakalau Forest National Wildlife Refuge, US Fish & Wildlife ServiceHiloUSA
  3. 3.Manomet Center for Conservation ScienceManometUSA
  4. 4.School of Fisheries and Ocean SciencesUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  5. 5.Alaska Sealife CenterInstitute of Marine Science, University of Alaska FairbanksSewardUSA
  6. 6.US Geological Survey, Alaska Cooperative Fish & Wildlife Research UnitInstitute of Arctic Biology, University of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  7. 7.US Geological Survey, Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research UnitUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations