Experiments with By-Catch Reduction Devices to Exclude Diamondback Terrapins and Retain Blue Crabs

Abstract

Experiments were completed in SE Virginia during June–July 2014 and 2015 to examine the responses of blue crabs (Callinectes sapidus) and diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) to commercial-style crab pots modified in visual and other ways that might attract and retain crabs while excluding terrapins as by-catch. In a seawater tank, far fewer crabs entered crab pots fitted with red plastic by-catch reduction devices (BRDs), relative to pots without BRDs. Crab retention times, however, were significantly longer in pots fitted with red BRDs. In a second experiment, fewer terrapins entered crab pots with funnels painted red relative to black. From a field pilot study, the legal crab catch from pots with red BRDs was similar to pots without BRDs, and terrapin by-catch was reduced. Relative to those treatments, fewer crabs and more terrapins were captured in pots with orange BRDs and blue BRDs, and in pots with a magnetic field directed into the funnel openings. Based on these results, a final field trial yielded comparable crab catch from 15 pots without BRDs and 15 pots fitted with red plastic BRDs. Of a by-catch of 68 terrapins, 58 were from pots without BRDs. The structure and color of BRDs can exclude most terrapins; because crab retention rates are high, the net effect of BRDs on crab catch is relatively minor, even though fewer crabs may enter pots fitted with BRDs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Baldwin, J., and S. Johnsen. 2009. The importance of color in mate choice of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Journal of Experimental Biology 212: 3762–3768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baldwin, J., and S. Johnsen. 2012. The male blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, uses both chromatic and achromatic cues during mate choice. Journal of Experimental Biology 215: 1184–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bilkovic, D.M., K.J. Havens, D.M. Stanhope, and K.T. Angstadt. 2012. Use of fully biodegradable panels to reduce derelict pot threats to marine fauna. Conservation Biology 26: 957–966.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bilkovic, D.M., K. Havens, D. Stanhope, and K. Angstadt. 2014. Derelict fishing gear in Chesapeake Bay, Virginia: spatial patterns and implications for marine fauna. Marine Pollution Bulletin 80: 114–123.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bishop, J.M. 1983. Incidental capture of diamondback terrapin by crab pots. Estuaries 6: 426–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brothers, J.R., and K.J. Lohmann. 2015. Evidence for geomagnetic imprinting and magnetic navigation in the natal homing of sea turtles. Current Biology 25: 392–396.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Butler, J.A., and G.L. Heinrich. 2007. The effectiveness of bycatch reduction devices on crab pots at reducing capture and mortality of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) in Florida. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Butler, J.A., G.L. Heinrich, and R.A. Seigel. 2006. Third workshop on the ecology, status and conservation of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin): results and recommendations. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 5: 331–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chambers, R.M., and J.C. Maerz. 2017. Terrapin bycatch in blue crab fisheries. In Ecology and conservation of the diamond-backed terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin), ed. W.M. Roosenburg and V.S. Kennedy, Chapter 16 ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Coleman, A.T., T. Wibbels, K. Marion, D. Nelson, and J. Dindo. 2011. Effect of bycatch reduction devices (BRDs) on the capture of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) in crab pots in an Alabama salt marsh. Journal of the Alabama Academy of Science 82: 145–157.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dominy, A.E. 2015. Modeling underwater visual ability and varied color expression in the diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) in relation to potential mate preference by females. PhD dissertation, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA

  12. Dorcas, M.E., J.D. Willson, and J.W. Gibbons. 2007. Crab trapping causes population decline and demographic changes in diamondback terrapins over two decades. Biological Conservation 137: 334–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grosse, A.M., J.D. Dijk, K.L. Holcomb, and J.C. Maerz. 2009. Diamondback terrapin mortality in crab pots in a Georgia tidal marsh. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 8: 98–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guillory, V., and P. Prejean. 1998. Effect of a terrapin excluder device on blue crab, Callinectes sapidus, trap catches. Marine Fisheries Review 60: 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harden, L.A., and A.S. Williard. 2012. Using a spatially-explicit landscape risk model to investigate bycatch risk of terrapins in crab pots. Marine Ecology Progress Series 467: 207–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hart, K.M., and L.B. Crowder. 2011. Mitigating by-catch of diamondback terrapins in crab pots. Journal of Wildlife Management 75 (2): 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Havens, K.J., D.M. Bilkovic, D. Stanhope, K. Angstadt, and C. Hershner. 2008. The effects of derelict blue crab traps on marine organisms in the lower York River, Virginia. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 28: 1194–1200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Havens, K.J., D.M. Bilkovic, D. Stanhope, and K. Angstadt. 2011. Fishery failure, unemployed commercial fishers, and lost blue crab pots: an unexpected success story. Environmental Science & Policy 14: 445–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoyle, M.E., and J.W. Gibbons. 2000. Use of a marked population of diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) to determine impacts of recreational crab pots. Chelonian Conservation and Biology 3: 735–737.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McKee, R.K., K.K. Cecala, and M.E. Dorcas. 2015. Behavioural interactions of diamondback terrapins with crab pots demonstrate that bycatch reduction devices reduce entrapment. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems. doi: 10.1002/aqc.2587.

  21. Miller, T.J., M.J. Wilbert, A.R. Colton, G.R. Davis, A. Sharov, R.N. Lipcius, G.M. Ralph, E.G. Johnson, and A.G. Kaufman. 2011. Stock assessment of the blue crab in Chesapeake Bay. Final report to NOAA Chesapeake Bay Office, Annapolis, MD

  22. Morris, A.S., S.M. Wilson, E.F. Dever, and R.M. Chambers. 2011. A test of bycatch reduction devices on commercial crab pots in a tidal marsh creek in Virginia. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 386–390.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rook, M.A., R.N. Lipcius, B.M. Bronner, and R.M. Chambers, R. M. 2010. Bycatch reduction device conserves diamondback terrapin without affecting catch of blue crab. Marine Ecology Progress Series 409: 171–179.

  24. Roosenburg, W.M. 2004. The impact of crab pot fisheries on terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) populations: Where are we and where do we need to go. In Conservation and ecology of turtles of the mid-Atlantic region: a symposium, 22–30. Salt Lake City, UT.

  25. Roosenburg, W.M., and J.P. Green. 2000. Impact of a bycatch reduction device on diamondback terrapin and blue crab capture in crab pots. Ecological Applications 10: 882–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roosenburg, W.M., W. Cresko, M.M. Modesitte, and M.B. Robbins. 1997. Diamondback terrapin (Malaclemys terrapin) mortality in crab pots. Conservation Biology 11: 1166–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sturdivant, S.K., and K.L. Clark. 2011. An evaluation of the effects of blue crab (Callinectes sapidus) behavior on the efficacy of crab pots as a tool for estimating population abundance. Fishery Bulletin 109: 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Upperman, A.J., T.M. Russell, and R.M. Chambers. 2014. The influence of recreational crabbing regulations on diamondback terrapin by-catch. Northeastern Naturalist 21: 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wood, R.C. 1997. The impact of commercial crab traps on northern diamondback terrapins, Malaclemys terrapin terrapin. In Proceedings: conservation, restoration, and management of tortoises and turtles-an international conference, 21–27. New York: New York Turtle and Tortoise Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a National Fish and Wildlife Foundation Grant 718361-712685 to VIMS, by the William & Mary Committee on Sustainability, and by the W&M Environmental Science and Policy Program. Thanks to S. Belfit for volunteer support and to the Yorktown Naval Weapons Station for logistical support and access to field sites. This study benefitted from discussions with J. Baldwin and A. Dominy and was permitted by VA DGIF and W&M IACUC.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randolph M. Chambers.

Additional information

Communicated by Judy Grassle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Corso, A.D., Huettenmoser, J.C., Trani, O.R. et al. Experiments with By-Catch Reduction Devices to Exclude Diamondback Terrapins and Retain Blue Crabs. Estuaries and Coasts 40, 1516–1522 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-017-0223-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Blue crab
  • Diamondback terrapin
  • By-catch reduction device
  • Crab pot
  • Fisheries management