Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 977–993 | Cite as

Suspended-Sediment Impacts on Light-Limited Productivity in the Delaware Estuary

  • Jacqueline M. McSweeney
  • Robert J. Chant
  • John L. Wilkin
  • Christopher K. Sommerfield
Article

Abstract

The Delaware Estuary has a history of high anthropogenic nutrient loadings but has been classified as a high-nutrient, low-growth system due to persistent light limitation caused by turbidity. While the biogeochemical implications of light limitation in turbid estuaries have been well-studied, there has been minimal effort focused on the connectivity between hydrodynamics, sediment dynamics, and light limitation. Our understanding of sediment dynamics in the Delaware Estuary has advanced significantly in the last decade, and this study describes the impact of spatiotemporal variability of the estuarine turbidity maximum (ETM) on light-limited productivity. This analysis uses data from eight along-estuary cruises from March, June, September, and December 2010 and 2011 to evaluate the impact of the turbidity maximum on production. Whereas the movement of the ETM is controlled primarily by river discharge, the structure of the ETM is modulated by stratification, which varies with both river discharge and spring-neap conditions. We observe that the ETM’s location and structure control spatial patterns of light availability. To evaluate the relative contributions of river discharge and spring-neap variability to the location of phytoplankton blooms, we develop an idealized two-dimensional Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) numerical model. We conclude that high river flows and neap tides can drive stratification that is strong enough to prevent sediment from being resuspended into the surface layer, thus providing light conditions favorable for primary production. This study sheds light on the role of stratification in controlling sediment resuspension and promoting production, highlighting the potential limitations of biogeochemical models that neglect sediment processes.

Keywords

Sediment Light-limited productivity Turbid estuaries Spatiotemporal variability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Eli Hunter, Maria Aristizábal, Anna Hermes, and the R/V Hugh Sharp crew for their dedication to the field campaign. Special thanks are due to Aboozar Tabatabai and Alex López for their helpful feedback regarding the model development. We appreciate feedback from two anonymous reviewers, whose suggestions significantly improved the manuscript. Data collection was funded through National Science Foundation grants OCE-0928567 and OCE-0825833 to R. Chant and OCE-0928496 to C. Sommerfield. This material is also based upon work supported by the Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences at Rutgers University and the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under grant no. DGE-0937373. The data collected in this study and the model output can be accessed at http://tds.marine.rutgers.edu/thredds/roms/catalog.html or by contacting Jacqueline McSweeney at jmcsween@marine.rutgers.edu.

References

  1. Aristizábal, M., and Chant, R. 2013. A numerical study of salt fluxes in Delaware Bay Estuary, Journal of Physical Oceanography.Google Scholar
  2. Aristizábal, M., and R. Chant. 2014. Mechanisms Driving Stratification in Delaware Bay Estuary. Ocean Dynamics 64: 1615–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arndt, S., J.P. Vanderborght, and P. Regnier. 2007. Diatom growth response to physical forcing in a macrotidal estuary: coupling hydrodynamics, sediment transport, and biogeochemistry. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 112.Google Scholar
  4. Beardsley, R.C., and W.C. Boicourt. 1981. On estuarine and continental-shelf circulation in the Middle Atlantic Bight. Evolution of physical oceanography 198-233.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, R.B., J.H. Sharp, T.M. Church, and J.M. Tramontano. 1983. Optical properties, suspended sediments, and chemistry associated with the turbidity maxima of the Delaware Estuary. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40: s172–s179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Biggs, R.B., and E.L. Beasley. 1988. Bottom and suspended sediments in the Delaware River and Estuary. Ecology and Restoration of the Delaware River Basin 116-131.Google Scholar
  7. Burchard, H., R.D. Hetland, E. Schulz, and H.M. Schuttelaars. 2011. Drivers of residual estuarine circulation in tidally energetic estuaries: Straight and irrotational channels with parabolic cross section. Journal of Physical Oceanography 41: 548–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cloern, J.E. 1991. Tidal stirring and phytoplankton bloom dynamics in an estuary. Journal of marine research 49: 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cook, T.L., C.K. Sommerfield, and K.-C. Wong. 2007. Observations of tidal and springtime sediment transport in the upper Delaware Estuary, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 72: 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Swart, H., H. Schuttelaars, and S. Talke. 2009. Initial growth of phytoplankton in turbid estuaries: A simple model. Continental Shelf Research 29: 136–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Desmit, X., J.-P. Vanderborght, P. Regnier, and R. Wollast. 2005. Control of phytoplankton production by physical forcing in a strongly tidal, well-mixed estuary. Biogeosciences 2: 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Devlin, M., J. Barry, D. Mills, R. Gowen, J. Foden, D. Sivyer, and P. Tett. 2008. Relationships between suspended particulate material, light attenuation and Secchi depth in UK marine waters, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 79: 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duval, D. 2013. Sedimentary response of the Delaware Estuary to tropical cyclones Irene and Lee in 2011, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  14. Fennel, K., J. Wilkin, J. Levin, J. Moisan, J. O’Reilly, and D. Haidvogel. 2006. Nitrogen cycling in the Middle Atlantic Bight: Results from a three-dimensional model and implications for the North Atlantic nitrogen budget. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 20.Google Scholar
  15. Fisher, T.R., L.W. Harding, D.W. Stanley, and L.G. Ward. 1988. Phytoplankton, nutrients, and turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 27: 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gallegos, C.L., T.E. Jordan, A.H. Hines, and D.E. Weller. 2005. Temporal variability of optical properties in a shallow, eutrophic estuary: Seasonal and interannual variability, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 64: 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ganju, N., J. Miselis, and A. Aretxabaleta. 2014. Physical and biogeochemical controls on light attenuation in a eutrophic, back-barrier estuary. Biogeosciences 11: 7193–7205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garvine, R.W., R.K. McCarthy, and K.-C. Wong. 1992. The axial salinity distribution in the Delaware estuary and its weak response to river discharge, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 35: 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gibbs, R.J., L. Konwar, and A. Terchunian. 1983. Size of flocs suspended in Delaware Bay. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 40: s102–s104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haidvogel, D.B., H.G. Arango, K. Hedstrom, A. Beckmann, P. Malanotte-Rizzoli, and A.F. Shchepetkin. 2000. Model evaluation experiments in the North Atlantic Basin: simulations in nonlinear terrain-following coordinates. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans 32: 239–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hansen, D.V., and M. Rattray. 1965. Gravitational circulation in straits and estuaries. Journal of Marine Research 23.Google Scholar
  22. Hermes, A. L. 2013. Spatial and seasonal particulate organic carbon cycling within the Delaware estuary, assessed using biomarker and stable carbon isotopic approaches, Rutgers University-Graduate School-New Brunswick.Google Scholar
  23. Janzen, C.D., and K.C. Wong. 2002. Wind-forced dynamics at the estuary-shelf interface of a large coastal plain estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012) 107 .2-1-2-12Google Scholar
  24. Ketchum, B. H. 1952. The distribution of salinity in the estuary of the Delaware River, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.Google Scholar
  25. Kineke, G., and R. Sternberg. 1992. Measurements of high concentration suspended sediments using the optical backscatterance sensor. Marine Geology 108: 253–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawson, S., P. Wiberg, K. McGlathery, and D. Fugate. 2007. Wind-driven sediment suspension controls light availability in a shallow coastal lagoon. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacCready, P., and W.R. Geyer. 2010. Advances in estuarine physics. Annual Review of Marine Science 2: 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malone, T., L. Crocker, S. Pike, and B. Wendler. 1988. Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary, Marine ecology progress series. Oldendorf 48: 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mansue, L. J., and Commings, A. B. 1974. Sediment transport by streams draining into the Delaware Estuary, US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  30. Marchesiello, P., J.C. McWilliams, and A. Shchepetkin. 2001. Open boundary conditions for long-term integration of regional oceanic models. Ocean modelling 3: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. May, C.L., J.R. Koseff, L.V. Lucas, J.E. Cloern, and D.H. Schoellhamer. 2003. Effects of spatial and temporal variability of turbidity on phytoplankton blooms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 254: 111–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McSweeney, J.M., R. Chant, and C.K. Sommerfield. 2016. Lateral Variability of Sediment Transport in the Delaware Estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 121: 725–744. doi: 10.1002/2015JC010974.Google Scholar
  33. Monismith, S.G., W. Kimmerer, J.R. Burau, and M.T. Stacey. 2002. Structure and flow-induced variability of the subtidal salinity field in northern San Francisco Bay. Journal of Physical Oceanography 32: 3003–3019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nash, D. B. 1994. Effective sediment-transporting discharge from magnitude-frequency analysis, The Journal of Geology, 79-95.Google Scholar
  35. Neiheisel, J. 1973. Source of detrital heavy minerals in estuaries of the Atlantic Coastal Plain.Google Scholar
  36. Orlanski, I. 1976. A simple boundary condition for unbounded hyperbolic flows. Journal of computational physics 21: 251–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pennock, J.R. 1985. Chlorophyll distributions in the Delaware estuary: regulation by light-limitation, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 21: 711–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pennock, J.R., and J.H. Sharp. 1986. Phytoplankton production in the Delaware Estuary: temporal and spatial variability. Marine Ecology Progress Series 34: 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pennock, J.R. 1987. Temporal and spatial variability in phytoplankton ammonium and nitrate uptake in the Delaware Estuary, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 24: 841–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pennock, J.R., and J.H. Sharp. 1994. Temporal alternation between light- and nutrient-limitation of phytoplankton production in a coastal plain estuary, Marine ecology progress series. Oldendorf 111: 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ralston, D.K., W.R. Geyer, and J.C. Warner. 2012. Bathymetric controls on sediment transport in the Hudson River estuary: Lateral asymmetry and frontal trapping. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012) 117.Google Scholar
  42. Scully, M.E., and C.T. Friedrichs. 2007. Sediment pumping by tidal asymmetry in a partially mixed estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012) 112.Google Scholar
  43. Sharp, J.H., C.H. Culberson, and T.M. Church. 1982. The chemistry of the Delaware estuary. General considerations. Limnology and Oceanography 27: 1015–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sharp, J.H., J.R. Pennock, T.M. Church, J.M. Tramontano, and L.A. Cifuentes. 1984. The estuarine interaction of nutrients, organics, and metals: A case study in the Delaware Estuary, in: The Estuary as a Filter, 241–258. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sharp, J.H., L.A. Cifuentes, R.B. Coffin, J.R. Pennock, and K.-C. Wong. 1986. The influence of river variability on the circulation, chemistry, and microbiology of the Delaware Estuary. Estuaries 9: 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sharp, J.H., K. Yoshiyama, A.E. Parker, M.C. Schwartz, S.E. Curless, A.Y. Beauregard, J.E. Ossolinski, and A.R. Davis. 2009. A biogeochemical view of estuarine eutrophication: Seasonal and spatial trends and correlations in the Delaware Estuary. Estuaries and coasts 32: 1023–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shchepetkin, A.F., and J.C. McWilliams. 2005. The regional oceanic modeling system (ROMS): a split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modelling 9: 347–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simpson, J.H., J. Brown, J. Matthews, and G. Allen. 1990. Tidal straining, density currents, and stirring in the control of estuarine stratification. Estuaries 13: 125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sommerfield, C. K., and Madsen, J. A. 2004. Sedimentological and Geophysical Survey of the Upper Delaware Estuary: Final Report to the Delaware River Basin Commission, University of Delaware Sea Grant Publication, 126 pp.Google Scholar
  50. Sommerfield, C.K., and K.C. Wong. 2011. Mechanisms of sediment flux and turbidity maintenance in the Delaware Estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans (1978–2012) 116.Google Scholar
  51. Stacey, M.T., J.R. Burau, and S.G. Monismith. 2001. Creation of residual flows in a partially stratified estuary. J. Geophys. Res 106: 013–017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stross, R.G., and R.C. Sokol. 1989. Runoff and flocculation modify underwater light environment of the Hudson River estuary, Estuarine. Coastal and Shelf Science 29: 305–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Umlauf, L., and H. Burchard. 2003. A generic length-scale equation for geophysical turbulence models. Journal of Marine Research 61: 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. US Census. 2010. Population Change for Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas in the United States and Puerto Rico, http://www.census.gov/population/www/cen2010/cph-t/cph-t-5.html.
  55. Warner, J.C., C.R. Sherwood, R.P. Signell, C.K. Harris, and H.G. Arango. 2008. Development of a three-dimensional, regional, coupled wave, current, and sediment-transport model. Computers & Geosciences 34: 1284–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weil, C. B. 1977. Sediments, structural framework, and evolution of Delaware Bay, a transgressive estuarine delta, Sea Grant Technical Report.Google Scholar
  57. Wofsy, S. 1983. A simple model to predict extinction coefficients and phytoplankton biomass in eutrophic waters. Limnology and Oceanography 28: 1144–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yoshiyama, K., and J.H. Sharp. 2006. Phytoplankton response to nutrient enrichment in an urbanized estuary: Apparent inhibition of primary production by overeutrophication. Limnology and Oceanography 51: 424–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jacqueline M. McSweeney
    • 1
  • Robert J. Chant
    • 1
  • John L. Wilkin
    • 1
  • Christopher K. Sommerfield
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Marine and Coastal Sciences, RutgersThe State University of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA
  2. 2.School of Marine Science and PolicyUniversity of DelawareLewesUSA

Personalised recommendations