Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 40, Issue 4, pp 917–929 | Cite as

Salinity Variability and Water Exchange in Interconnected Estuaries

  • Yuntao Wang
  • Renato M. CastelaoEmail author
  • Daniela Di Iorio


A high-resolution coastal ocean model is used to investigate salinity variability and water exchange in a complex coastal system off the southern U.S. characterized by three adjacent sounds that are interconnected by a network of channels, creeks, and intertidal areas. Model results are generally highly correlated with observations from the Georgia Coastal Ecosystem Long Term Ecological Research (GCE-LTER) program, revealing a high degree of salinity variability at the Altamaha River and Doboy Sound, decreasing sharply toward Sapelo Sound. A Lagrangian particle tracking method is used to investigate local residence time and connectivity in the system. Local residence time is highly variable, increasing with distance from the Altamaha River and decreasing with river flow, revealing that discharge plays a dominant role on transport processes and estuary-shelf exchange. The Altamaha River and Doboy Sound are connected to each other in all seasons, with exchange occurring both via coastal and estuarine pathways. While particles released at the Altamaha and Doboy rarely reach Sapelo Sound, particles released at Sapelo Sound and the creeks surrounding its main channel can reach the entire estuarine system.


Residence time Connectivity FVCOM Exchange 



We thank two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful and constructive suggestions. We gratefully acknowledge support by the National Science Foundation through grant OCE 1632090 and the Georgia Coastal Ecosystems Long Term Ecological Research program (GCE-LTER, OCE-1237140). Additional support was provided by an Institutional Grant (NA100AR4170098) to the Georgia Sea Grant College Program from the National Sea Grant Office, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), U.S. Department of Commerce and by grant award NA11NOS4190113 to the Georgia Department of Natural Resources (DNR) from the Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM), NOAA. All views, opinions, statements, findings, conclusions, and recommendations are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of NSF, the Georgia Sea Grant college Program, DNR, OCRM, or NOAA.


  1. Aikman, F.A., and L.W.J. Lanerolle. 2004. Report on the National Ocean Service Workshop on Residence/Flushing Times in Bays and Estuaries. NOAA Office of Coast Survey, Silver Spring, MD.
  2. Alber, M., and J.E. Sheldon. 1999a. Use of a data-specific method to examine variability in the flushing times of Georgia estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 49: 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alber, M., and J.E. Sheldon. 1999b. Trends in salinities and flushing times of Georgia estuaries. In Proceedings of the 1999 Georgia Water Resources Conference, ed. K.J. Hatcher, 528–531. Athens: University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  4. Alpine, A.E., and J.E. Cloern. 1992. Trophic interactions and direct physical effects control phytoplankton biomass and production in an estuary. Limnol. Oceanography 37. doi: 10.4319/lo.1992.37.5.0946.Google Scholar
  5. Atkinson, L., T. Lee, J. Blanton, and W. Chandler. 1983. Climatology of the southeastern United States continental shelf waters. Journal of Geophysical Research 88: 4705–4718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Austin, J.A., and J.A. Barth. 2002. Variation in the position of the upwelling front on the Oregon shelf. Journal of Geophysical Research 107(C11): 3180. doi: 10.1029/2001JC000858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanton, J.O., and L.P. Atkinson. 1983. Transport and fate of river discharge on the continental shelf of the southeastern United States. Journal of Geophysical Research 88: 4730–4738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blanton, B.O., A. Aretxabaleta, F.E. Werner, and H.E. Seim. 2003. Monthly climatology of the continental shelf waters of the South Atlantic Bight. J. Geophys. Res., Oceans (1978–2012) 108(C8): 3264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bumpus, D. 1973. A description of the circulation on the continental shelf of the east coast of the United States. Progress in Oceanography 6: 111–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, C., G. Cowles, and R.C. Beardsley. 2006a. An unstructured grid, finite-volume coastal ocean model: FVCOM user manual, 2nd ed.,SMAST/UMASSD Tech. Rep. 06-0602, 315. New Bedford, MA: School for Marine Science and Technology, University of Massachusetts-Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, C., R.C. Beardsley, and G. Cowles. 2006b. An unstructured grid, finite-volume coastal ocean model (FVCOM) system: Special Issue entitled “Advances in Computational Oceanography”. Oceanography 19(1): 78–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen, C., H. Huang, R.C. Beardsley, H. Liu, Q. Xu, and G. Cowles. 2007. A finite-volume numerical approach for coastal ocean circulation studies: comparisons with finite-difference models. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: C03018. doi: 10.1029/2006JC003485.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, C., J. Qi, C. Li, R.C. Beardsley, H. Lin, R. Walker, and K. Gates. 2008. Complexity of the flooding/drying process in an estuarine tidal-creek salt-marsh system: an application of FVCOM. Journal of Geophysical Research 113: C07052.Google Scholar
  14. Church, T.M. 1986. Biogeochemical factors influencing the residence time of microconstituents in a large tidal estuary, Delaware Bay. Marine Chemistry 18: 393–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Brauwere, A., B. de Brye, S. Blaise, and E. Deleersnijder. 2011. Residence time, exposure time and connectivity in the Scheldt Estuary. J. Mar. Sys. 84: 85–95. doi: 10.1016/j.jmarsys.2010.10.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Iorio, D., and R.M. Castelao. 2013. The dynamical response of salinity to freshwater discharge and wind forcing in adjacent estuaries on the Georgia coast. Oceanography 26(3): 44–51. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2013.44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Di Iorio, D., and K.R. Kang. 2007. Variations of turbulent flow with river discharge in the Altamaha River Estuary, Georgia. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: C05016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dronkers, J., and J.T.F. Zimmerman. 1982. Some principles of mixing in tidal lagoons. Oceanologica Acta, 107–117. Bordeaux, France: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Coastal Lagoons 9–14 September, 1981.Google Scholar
  19. Duarte, A.A.L.S., and J.M.P. Vieira. 2009. Effect of tidal regime on estuarine residence time spatial variation. In Energy, environment, ecosystems, development and landscape architecture, ed. N. Mastorakis, C. Helmis, C.D. Papageorgiou, C.A. Bulucea, and T. Panagopoulos, 240–245. WSEAS Press.Google Scholar
  20. Egbert, G.D., and S.Y. Erofeeva. 2002. Efficient inverse modeling of barotropic ocean tides. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology 19: 183–204. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(2002)019<0183:EIMOBO>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fanning, J. L. (2003), Water use in Georgia, 2000; and trends, 1950–2000. Proceedings of 2003 Georgia Water Resources Conference, Univ. of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  22. Geyer, W.R. 1997. Influence of wind on dynamics and flushing of shallow estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 44: 713–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geyer, W.R., and R. Signell. 1992. A reassessment of the role of tidal dispersion in estuaries and bays. Estuaries 15: 97–108. doi: 10.2307/1352684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee, T.N., and D.A. Brooks. 1979. Initial observations of current, temperature and coastal sea level response to atmospheric and Gulf Stream forcing on the Georgia shelf. Geophysical Research Letters 6: 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lemagie, E.P., and J.A. Lerczak. 2015. A comparison of bulk estuarine turnover timescales to particle tracking timescales using a model of the Yaquina Bay Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 38: 1797–1814. doi: 10.1007/s12237-014-9915-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Medeiros, P.M., M. Seidel, T. Dittmar, W.B. Whitman, and M.A. Moran. 2015. Drought-induced variability in dissolved organic matter compostion in a marsh-dominated estuary. Geophysical Research Letters 42(15): 6446–6453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mellor, G.L., and T. Yamada. 1982. Development of a turbulent closure model for geophysical fluid problems. Reviews of Geophysics 20: 851–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Menzel, D.W. 1993. Ocean processes: U.S. southeast continental shelf. A summary of research conducted in the South Atlantic Bight under the Auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy from 1977 to 1991, Publ. DOE/OSTl-11674, 112, Off. of Sci. and Tech. Inf., U.S. Dep. of Energy, Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  29. Monsen, N., J.E. Cloern, and L.V. Lucas. 2002. A comment on the use of flushing time, residence time, and age as transport time scales. Limnology and Oceanography 47: 1545–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, W.S. 1996. Large groundwater inputs to coastal waters revealed by 226Ra enrichments. Nature 380.Google Scholar
  31. Moore, W.S. 2010. The effect of submarine groundwater discharge on the ocean. Annual Review of Marine Science 2: 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pietrafesa, L.J., J.O. Blanton, J.D. Wang, V.H. Kourafalou, T.N. Lee, and K.A. Bush. 1985. The tidal regime in the South Atlantic Bights. In Oceanography of the southeastern U.S. continental shelf, ed. L.P. Atkinson, D.W. Menzel, and K.A. Bush, 63–76. Washington, D. C: AGU.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ralston, D.K., W.R. Geyer, and J.A. Lerczak. 2010. Structure, variability, and salt flux in a strongly forced salt wedge estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research 115: C06005. doi: 10.1029/2009JC005806.Google Scholar
  34. Rasmussen, B., and A. Josefson. 2002. Consistent estimates for the residence times of micro-tidal estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 54: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheldon, J.E., and M. Alber. 2002. A comparison of residence time calculations using simple compartment models of the Altamaha River estuary, Georgia. Estuaries and Coasts 25: 1304–1317. doi: 10.1007/bf02692226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheldon, J.E., and M. Alber. 2005. Comparing transport times through salinity zones in the Ogeechee and Altamaha river estuaries using squeezebox. In Proc 2005 Georgia Water Res Conf, ed. K.J. Hatcher. Athens: The University of Georgia.Google Scholar
  37. Sheldon, J.E., and A.B. Burd. 2014. Alternating effects of climate drivers on Altamaha River discharge to coastal Georgia, USA. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 772–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tebeau, P.A., and T.N. Lee. 1979. Wind induced circulation on the Georgia shelf, (winter 1976/77) RSMAS Tech Rep. 79003. Miami, Fla: Univ. of Miami.Google Scholar
  39. Traynum, S., and R. Styles. 2008. Exchange flow between two estuaries connected by a shallow tidal channel. J. Coastal Res. 24(5): 1260–1268. doi: 10.2112/07-0840r.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weber, A.H., and J.O. Blanton. 1980. Monthly mean wind fields for the South Atlantic Bight. Journal of Physical Oceanography 10(8): 1256–1263. doi: 10.1175/1520-0485(1980)010<1256:MMWFFT>2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao, L., C. Chen, J. Vallino, C. Hopkinson, R.C. Beardsley, H. Lin, and J. Lerczak. 2010. Wetland-estuarine-shelf interactions in the Plum Island Sound and Merrimack River in the Massachusetts coast. Journal of Geophysical Research 115: C10039. doi: 10.1029/2009JC006085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuntao Wang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Renato M. Castelao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniela Di Iorio
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Marine SciencesUniversity of GeorgiaAthensUSA
  2. 2.NOAA Fisheries Office of Science and TechnologySilver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations