Abstract
A Delaware Bay, USA, standardized survey of spawning horseshoe crabs, Limulus polyphemus, was carried out in 1999 − 2013 through a citizen science network. Previous trend analyses of the data were at the state (DE or NJ) or bay-wide levels. Here, an alternative mixed-model regression analysis was used to estimate trends in female and male spawning densities at the beach level (n = 26) with the objective of inferring their causes. For females, there was no overall trend and no single explanation applies to the temporal and spatial patterns in their densities. Individual beaches that initially had higher densities tended to experience a decrease, while beaches that initially had lower densities tended to experience an increase. As a result, densities of spawning females at the end of the study period were relatively similar among beaches, suggesting a redistribution of females among the beaches over the study period. For males, there was a positive overall trend in spawning abundance from 1999 to 2013, and this increase occurred broadly among beaches. Moreover, the beaches with below-average initial male density tended to have the greatest increases. Possible explanations for these patterns include harvest reduction, sampling artifact, habitat change, density-dependent habitat selection, or mate selection. The broad and significant increase in male spawning density, which occurred after enactment of harvest controls, is consistent with the harvest reduction explanation, but there is no single explanation for the temporal or spatial pattern in female densities. These results highlight the continued value of a citizen-science-based spawning survey in understanding horseshoe crab ecology and conservation.






References
Anderson, L.I., and C.N. Shuster Jr. 2003. Throughout geologic time: Where have they lived? In The American Horseshoe Crab, ed. C.N. Shuster Jr., R.B. Barlow, and H.J. Brockman, 189–223. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Avissar, N.G. 2006. Modeling potential impacts of beach replenishment on horseshoe crab nesting habitat suitability. Coastal Management 34: 427–441.
Barlow Jr., R.B., M.K. Powers, H. Howard, and L. Kass. 1986. Migration of Limulus for mating: Relation to lunar phase, tide height, and sunlight. Biological Bulletin 171: 310–329.
Berkson, J., and C.N. Shuster Jr. 1999. The horseshoe crab: The battle for a true multiple-use resource. Fisheries 24: 6–10.
Biber, E. 2013. The challenge of collecting and using environmental monitoring data. Ecology and Society 18: 68.
Bonney, R., C.B. Cooper, J. Dickinson, S. Kelling, T. Phillips, K.V. Rosenberg, and J. Shirk. 2009. Citizen science: A developing tool for expanding science knowledge and scientific literacy. BioScience 59: 977–984.
Botton, M.L., R.E. Loveland, and T.R. Jacobsen. 1988. Beach erosion and geochemical factors: Influence on spawning success of horseshoe crabs Limulus polyphemus in Delaware Bay. Marine Biology 99: 325–332.
Brockmann, H.J. 1990. Mating behavior of horseshoe crabs, Limulus polyphemus. Behavior 114: 206–220.
Brockmann, H.J., and M.D. Smith. 2009. Reproductive competition and sexual selection in horseshoe crabs. In Biology and conservation of horseshoe crabs, ed. J.T. Tanacredi, M.L. Botton, and D.R. Smith, 199–221. New York: Springer.
Burnham, K.P., and D.R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd ed. New York: Springer.
Castro, G., and J.P. Myers. 1993. Shorebird predation on eggs of horseshoe crabs during spring stopover on Delaware Bay. Auk 110: 927–930.
Conrad, C.C., and K.G. Hilchey. 2011. A review of citizen science and community-based environmental monitoring: Issues and opportunities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 176: 273–291.
Dickinson, J.L., B. Zuckerberg, and D.N. Bonter. 2010. Citizen science as an ecological research tool: Challenges and benefits. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41: 149–172.
Jackson, N.L., K.F. Nordstrom, and D.R. Smith. 2002. Geomorphic—biotic interactions on beach foreshores in estuaries. Journal of Coastal Research 36: 414–424.
Jackson, N.L., K.F. Nordstrom, and D.R. Smith. 2005. Influence of waves and horseshoe crab spawning on beach morphology and sediment grain‐size characteristics on a sandy estuarine beach. Sedimentology 52: 1097–1108.
Jackson, N.L., D.R. Smith, and K.F. Nordstrom. 2008. Physical and chemical changes in the foreshore of an estuarine beach: Implications for viability and development of horseshoe crab Limulus polyphemus eggs. Marine Ecology Progress Series 355: 209–218.
Lucas, J.R., R.D. Howard, and J.G. Palmer. 1996. Callers and satellites: Chorus behaviour in anurans as a stochastic dynamic game. Animal Behaviour 51: 501–518.
McCullagh, P., and J.A. Nelder. 1989. Generalized linear models, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Chapman & Hall.
Myers, J.P. 1986. Sex and gluttony on Delaware Bay. Natural History 95: 68–77.
Niles, L.J., J. Bart, H.P. Sitters, A.D. Dey, K.E. Clark, P.W. Atkinson, A.J. Baker, K.A. Bennett, K.S. Kalasz, N.A. Clark, J. Clark, S. Gillings, A.S. Gates, P.M. Gonzalez, D.E. Hernandez, C.D.T. Minton, R.I. Guy Morrison, R.R. Porter, R.K. Ross, and C.R. Veitch. 2009. Effects of horseshoe crab harvest in Delaware Bay on Red Knots: Are harvest restrictions working? Bioscience 59: 153–164.
Penn, D., and H.J. Brockmann. 1994. Nest-site selection in the horseshoe-crab, Limulus polyphemus. Biological Bulletin 187: 373–384.
Pinheiro, J.C., and D.M. Bates. 2000. Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
Rosenzweig, M.L. 1991. Habitat selection and population interactions: The search for mechanism. American Naturalist 137: S5–S28.
Schwab, R.L., and H.J. Brockmann. 2007. The role of visual and chemical cues in the mating decisions of satellite male horseshoe crabs, Limulus polyphemus. Animal Behaviour 74: 837–846.
Shuster Jr., C.N., and M.L. Botton. 1985. A contribution to the population biology of horseshoe crabs, Limulus polyphemus (L.), in Delaware Bay. Estuaries 8: 363–372.
Shuster Jr., C.N., R.B. Barlow, and H.J. Brockmann (eds.). 2003. The American horseshoe crab. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Smith, D.R. 2007. Effect of horseshoe crab spawning density on nest disturbance and exhumation of eggs: A simulation study. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 287–295.
Smith, D.R., and S.F. Michels. 2006. Seeing the elephant: Importance of spatial and temporal coverage in a large-scale volunteer-based program to monitor horseshoe crabs. Fisheries 31: 485–491.
Smith, D.R., P.S. Pooler, R.E. Loveland, M.L. Botton, S.F. Michels, R.G. Weber, and D.B. Carter. 2002a. Horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) reproductive activity on Delaware Bay Beaches: Interactions with beach characteristics. Journal of Coastal Research 18: 730–740.
Smith, D.R., P.S. Pooler, B.L. Swan, S.F. Michels, W.R. Hall, P.J. Himchak, and M.J. Millard. 2002b. Spatial and temporal distribution of horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus) spawning in Delaware Bay: Implications for monitoring. Estuaries 25: 115–125.
Smith, D.R., M.J. Millard, and R.H. Carmichael. 2009. Comparative status and assessment of Limulus polyphemus with emphasis on the New England and Delaware Bay populations. In Biology and conservation of horseshoe crabs, ed. J.T. Tanacredi, M.L. Botton, and D.R. Smith, 361–386. New York: Springer.
Smith, D.R., L.J. Brousseau, M.T. Mandt, and M.J. Millard. 2010. Age and sex specific migration timing and frequency of horseshoe crab spawning in Delaware Bay: Insights from a large-scale radio telemetry array. Current Zoology 56: 563–574.
Smith, D.R., N.L. Jackson, K.F. Nordstrom, and R.G. Weber. 2011. Beach characteristics mitigate effects of onshore wind on horseshoe crab spawning: Implications for matching with shorebird migration in Delaware Bay. Animal Conservation 14: 575–584.
Sweka, J.A., D.R. Smith, and M.J. Millard. 2007. An age-structured population model for horseshoe crabs in the Delaware Bay area to assess harvest and egg availability for shorebirds. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 277–286.
Tanacredi, J.T., M.L. Botton, and D.R. Smith (eds.). 2009. Biology and conservation of horseshoe crabs. New York: Springer.
Tulloch, A.I., H.P. Possingham, L.N. Joseph, J. Szabo, and T.G. Martin. 2013. Realising the full potential of citizen science monitoring programs. Biological Conservation 165: 128–138.
Weber, R.G., and D.B. Carter. 2009. Distribution and development of Limulus egg clusters on intertidal beaches in Delaware Bay. In Biology and conservation of horseshoe crabs, ed. J.T. Tanacredi, M.L. Botton, and D.R. Smith, 249–266. New York: Springer.
Widener, J.W., and R.B. Barlow. 1999. Decline of a horseshoe crab population on Cape Cod. Biological Bulletin 197: 300–302.
Zimmerman, J., S. Michels, D. Smith, and S. Bennett. 2013. Horseshoe crab spawning activity in Delaware Bay: 1999–2012. Report to the ASMFC Horseshoe Crab Technical Committee. Arlington: Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission.
Acknowledgments
We thank the many individuals and organizations involved in the Delaware Bay spawning survey, including Benjie Swan, Bill Hall, Sherry Bennett, Stewart Michels, Jordan Zimmerman, Glenn Gauvry, Mike Oates, Delaware Coastal Program and the Delaware National Estuarine Research Reserve (DNERR), Audubon, The Nature Conservancy, the Slaughter Beach crew, Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and US Fish and Wildlife Service. We thank Ken Gerow for suggesting the mixed-model approach. We appreciate comments from Jane Brockmann, Benjie Swan, Conor McGowan, and Penelope Pooler on early drafts of the paper. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Wayne S Gardner
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Smith, D.R., Robinson, T.J. Horseshoe Crab Spawning Activity in Delaware Bay, USA, After Harvest Reduction: A Mixed-Model Analysis. Estuaries and Coasts 38, 2345–2354 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-9961-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-015-9961-3
