Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 651–661 | Cite as

Contrasting Decadal-Scale Changes in Elevation and Vegetation in Two Long Island Sound Salt Marshes

  • J. C. Carey
  • K. B. Raposa
  • C. Wigand
  • R. S. Warren


Northeastern US salt marshes face multiple co-stressors, including accelerating rates of relative sea level rise (RSLR), elevated nutrient inputs, and low sediment supplies. In order to evaluate how marsh surface elevations respond to such factors, we used surface elevation tables (SETs) and surface elevation pins to measure changes in marsh surface elevation in two eastern Long Island Sound salt marshes, Barn Island and Mamacoke marshes. We compare marsh elevation change at these two systems with recent rates of RSLR and find evidence of differences between the two sites; Barn Island is maintaining its historic rate of elevation gain (2.3 ± 0.24 mm year−1 from 2003 to 2013) and is no longer keeping pace with RSLR, while Mamacoke shows evidence of a recent increase in rates (4.2 ± 0.52 mm year−1 from 1994 to 2014) to maintain its elevation relative to sea level. In addition to data on short-term elevation responses at these marshes, both sites have unusually long and detailed data on historic vegetation species composition extending back more than half a century. Over this study period, vegetation patterns track elevation change relative to sea levels, with the Barn Island plant community shifting towards those plants that are found at lower elevations and the Mamacoke vegetation patterns showing little change in plant composition. We hypothesize that the apparent contrasting trend in marsh elevation at the sites is due to differences in sediment availability, salinity, and elevation capital. Together, these two systems provide critical insight into the relationships between marsh elevation, high marsh plant community, and changing hydroperiods. Our results highlight that not all marshes in Southern New England may be responding to accelerated rates of RSLR in the same manner.


Salt marsh Surface elevation change Sea level rise Sediment supply Salinity 



We thank the editors of Estuaries and Coasts for publishing this thematic issue related to the pressures faced by salt marsh ecosystems in Southern New England. JCC thanks J. Tang for allowing her time to work on this manuscript. The authors thank Elizabeth Watson for sample analysis, Nels Barrett and Ron Rozsa for significant contributions to establishment and measurement of the Barn Island SETs, and William R. Funk for help in the 2014 sampling at Mamacoke. SET and related work at Barn Island was supported by the State of Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection, Office of Long Island Sound Programs through Long Island Sound License Plate Program Contract: PSA 2002-20332. The Department’s Wildlife Unit manages the Barn Island Wildlife Management Area and provided access and significant technical assistance. The Connecticut College Arboretum gave access and logistical support for work on the Mamacoke Marsh.


  1. Bellet, L. 1999. Impacts of relative sea level rise on Connecticut tidal marsh vegetation patterns and microrelief. New London: MA thesis, Connecticut College Department of Botany.Google Scholar
  2. Bernhardt, E., J. Barber, J. Pippen, L. Taneva, J. Andrews, and W. Schlesinger. 2006. Long-term effects of free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on soil respiration. Biogeochemistry 77: 91–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boon, J.D. 2012. Evidence of sea level acceleration at U.S. and Canadian tide stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research 28(6): 1437–1445.Google Scholar
  4. Bricker-Urso, S., S.W. Nixon, J.K. Cochran, D.J. Hirschberg, and C. Hunt. 1989. Accretion rates and sediment accumulation in Rhode Island salt marshes. Estuaries 12: 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cahoon, D.R. 2006. A review of major storm impacts on coastal wetland elevations. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 889–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahoon, D.R., and G.R. Guntenspergen. 2010. Climate change, sea-level rise, and coastal wetlands. National Wetlands Newsletter 32: 8–12.Google Scholar
  7. Cahoon, D.R., J.C. Lynch, B.C. Perez, B. Segura, R.D. Holland, C. Stelly, G. Stephenson, and P. Hensel. 2002. High-precision measurements of wetland sediment elevation: II. The rod surface elevation table. Journal of Sedimentary Research 72: 734–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman, V. 1940. Succession on the New England salt marshes. Ecology 21: 279–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craft, C. 2007. Freshwater input structures soil properties, vertical accretion, and nutrient accumulation of Georgia and US tidal marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 52: 1220–1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deegan, L.A., D.S. Johnson, R.S. Warren, B.J. Peterson, J.W. Fleeger, S. Fagherazzi, and W.M. Wollheim. 2012. Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature 490: 388–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Donnelly, J.P., and M.D. Bertness. 2001. Rapid shoreward encroachment of salt marsh cordgrass in response to accelerated sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98: 14218–14223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Floyd, D.A., and J.E. Anderson. 1987. A comparison of three methods for estimating plant cover. The Journal of Ecology 75: 221–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Giblin, A.E., and R.W. Howarth. 1984. Porewater evidence for a dynamic sedimentary iron cycle in salt marshes. Limnology and Oceanography 29: 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hatton, R.S., R.D. DeLaune, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1983. Sedimentation, accretion, and subsidence in marshes of Barataria Basin, Louisiana. Limnology and Oceanography 28: 494–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Howes, B.L., J.W.H. Dacey, and G.M. King. 1984. Carbon flow through oxygen and sulfate reduction pathways in salt marsh sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 29: 1037–1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. King, G.M., M. Klug, R. Wiegert, and A. Chalmers. 1982. Relation of soil water movement and sulfide concentration to Spartina alterniflora production in a Georgia salt marsh. Science 218: 61–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirwan, M.L., G.R. Guntenspergen, A. D’Alpaos, J.T. Morris, S.M. Mudd, and S. Temmerman. 2010. Limits on the adaptability of coastal marshes to rising sea level. Geophysical Research Letters 37: L23401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirwan, M.L., and S.M. Mudd. 2012. Response of salt-marsh carbon accumulation to climate change. Nature 489: 550–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Koch, M.S., and I. Mendelssohn. 1989. Sulphide as a soil phytotoxin: differential responses in two marsh species. The Journal of Ecology 77: 565–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Koch, M.S., I.A. Mendelssohn, and K.L. McKee. 1990. Mechanism for the hydrogen sulfide‐induced growth limitation in wetland macrophytes. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 399–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kuhn, N.L., I.A. Mendelssohn, and D.J. Reed. 1999. Altered hydrology effects on Louisiana salt marsh function. Wetlands 19: 617–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Langley, J.A., K.L. McKee, D.R. Cahoon, J.A. Cherry, J.P. Megonigal, and C.B. Field. 2009. Elevated CO2 stimulates marsh elevation gain, counterbalancing sea-level rise. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 6182–6186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lefor, M.W., W.C. Kennard, and D.L. Civco. 1987. Relationships of salt-marsh plant distributions to tidal levels in Connecticut, USA. Environmental Management 11: 61–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller, W.R., and F.E. Egler. 1950. Vegetation of the Wequetequock-Pawcatuck tidal-marshes, Connecticut. Ecological Monographs 20: 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris, J.T., J. Edwards, S. Crooks, and E. Reyes. 2012. Assessment of carbon sequestration potential in coastal wetlands. In Recarbonization of the biosphere, 517–531. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Morris, J.T., P.V. Sundareshwar, C.T. Nietch, B. Kjerfve, and D.R. Cahoon. 2002. Responses of coastal wetlands to rising sea level. Ecology 83: 2869–2877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mudd, S.M. 2011. The life and death of salt marshes in response to anthropogenic disturbance of sediment supply. Geology 39: 511–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nicholls, R.J., and A. Cazenave. 2010. Sea-level rise and its impact on coastal zones. Science 328: 1517–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Niering, W.A. 1961. Tidal marshes: their use in scientific research. Connecticut’s coastal marshes, a vanishing resource. In Connecticut Arboretum Bulletin, vol. 12, 3–7. New London: Connecticut College.Google Scholar
  30. Niering, W.A., and R.S. Warren. 1980. Vegetation patterns and processes in New England salt marshes. BioScience 30: 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NOAA Service Assessment. 2012. Hurricane Irene, August 21-30, 2011. Silver Springs, MD.
  32. Norby, R.J., and Y. Luo. 2004. Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2 and global warming in a multi‐factor world. New Phytologist 162: 281–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nuttle, W.K., H.F. Hemond, and K.D. Stolzenbach. 1990. Mechanisms of water storage in salt marsh sediments: the importance of dilation. Hydrological Processes 4(1): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nyman, J.A., R.D. Delaune, and W.H. Patrick Jr. 1990. Wetland soil formation in the rapidly subsiding Mississippi River Deltaic Plain: mineral and organic matter relationships. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 31: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Orson, R.A., and B.L. Howes. 1992. Salt marsh development studies at Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts: influence of geomorphology on long-term plant community structure. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 35: 453–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Orson, R.A., R.S. Warren, and W.A. Niering. 1998. Interpreting sea level rise and rates of vertical marsh accretion in a Southern New England tidal salt marsh. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 47: 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paquette, C.H., K.L. Sundberg, R.M. Boumans, and G.L. Chmura. 2004. Changes in saltmarsh surface elevation due to variability in evapotranspiration and tidal flooding. Estuaries 27: 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raposa, K.B., R.L.J. Weber, M.C. Ekberg, and W. Ferguson. 2015. Vegetation dynamics in Rhode Island salt marshes during a period of accelerating sea level rise and extreme sea events. Esuaries and Coasts. doi: 10.1007/s12237-015-0018-4.Google Scholar
  39. Redfield, A.C. 1972. Development of a New England salt marsh. Ecological Monographs 42: 201–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roman, C.T., N.A. Jaworski, F.T. Short, S. Findlay, and R.S. Warren. 2000. Estuaries of the Northeastern United States: habitat and land use signatures. Estuaries 23: 743–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sallenger, A.H., K.S. Doran, and P.A. Howd. 2012. Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic Coast of North America. Nature Climate Change 2: 884–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sinicrope, T.L., P.G. Hine, R.S. Warren and W.A. Niering. 1990. Restoration of an impounded marsh in New England. Estuaries 13(1): 25–30.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, S.M., and S. Warren. 2007. Determining ground surface topography in tidal marshes using watermarks. Journal of Coastal Research 23: 265–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Steever, E.Z. 1972. Productivity and vegetation studies of a tidal salt marsh in Stonington, Connecticut: Cottrell Marsh. New London: MA thesis, Connecticut College Department of Botany.Google Scholar
  45. Stevenson, J.C., L.G. Ward, and M.S. Kearney. 1986. Vertical accretion in marshes with varying rates of sea level rise. In Estuarine variability, ed. D.A. Wolfe, 241. Waltham: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sundby, B., C. Vale, M. Caetano, and G.W. Luther Iii. 2003. Redox chemistry in the root zone of a salt marsh sediment in the Tagus Estuary, Portugal. Aquatic Geochemistry 9: 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Turner, R.E., J.J. Baustian, E.M. Swenson, and J.S. Spicer. 2006. Wetland sedimentation from hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Science 314: 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner, R.E., E.M. Swenson, C.S. Milan, and J.M. Lee. 2007. Hurricane signals in salt marsh sediments: inorganic sources and soil volume. Limnology and Oceanography 52: 1231–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Valiela, I., J.M. Teal, and N.Y. Persson. 1976. Production and dynamics of experimentally enriched salt marsh vegetation: belowground biomass. Limnology and Oceanography 21: 245–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warren, R.S., and W.A. Niering. 1993. Vegetation change on a northeast tidal marsh: interaction of sea-level rise and marsh accretion. Ecology 74(1): 96–103.Google Scholar
  51. Watson, E., A. Oczkowski, C. Wigand, A. Hanson, E. Davey, S. Crosby, R. Johnson, and H. Andrews. 2014. Nutrient enrichment and precipitation changes do not enhance resiliency of salt marshes to sea level rise in the Northeastern US. Climatic Change 125: 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weston, N. 2013. Declining sediments and rising seas: an unfortunate convergence for tidal wetlands. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wigand, C., C.T. Roman, E. Davey, M. Stolt, R. Johnson, A. Hanson, E.B. Watson, S.B. Moran, D.R. Cahoon, and J.C. Lynch. 2014. Below the disappearing marshes of an urban estuary: historic nitrogen trends and soil structure. Ecological Applications 24: 633–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Carey
    • 1
  • K. B. Raposa
    • 2
  • C. Wigand
    • 3
  • R. S. Warren
    • 4
  1. 1.The Ecosystems CenterMarine Biological LaboratoryWoods HoleUSA
  2. 2.Narragansett Bay National Estuarine Research ReservePrudence IslandUSA
  3. 3.ORD-NHEERLU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyNarragansettUSA
  4. 4.Department of BotanyConnecticut CollegeNew LondonUSA

Personalised recommendations