Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 37, Supplement 1, pp 91–110 | Cite as

Fortnightly Tidal Modulations Affect Net Community Production in a Mesotidal Estuary

  • Nicholas J. Nidzieko
  • Joseph A. Needoba
  • Stephen G. Monismith
  • Kenneth S. Johnson
Article

Abstract

Optical in situ chemical sensors enable sampling intervals and durations that rival acoustic techniques used for measuring currents. Coupling these high-frequency biogeochemical and physical measurements in estuaries to address ecosystem-scale questions, however, is still comparatively novel. This study investigated how tides affect ecosystem metabolism in a mesotidal estuary in central California (Elkhorn Slough). Dissolved oxygen measurements were used to estimate the terms in a control volume budget for a tidal creek/marsh complex at tidal timescales over several weeks. Respiration rates were 1.6 to 7.3 g O2 m−2 day−1; net community production approached 20 g O2 m−2 day−1. We found that aquatic NCP integrated throughout the creek complex varied significantly over the spring-neap cycle. The intertidal contribution to aquatic metabolism was net heterotrophic during spring tides and generally in balance during neap tides because spring-tide marsh inundation was limited to nighttime, and therefore the marsh could not contribute any primary production to the water column. At the estuary scale, the fortnightly export of oxygen from the main channel to the intertidal was largely balanced by an advective flux up-estuary.

Keywords

Biogeochemical cycling Elkhorn Slough Tides Air-sea gas exchange Primary production Ecosystem metabolism Estuarine mixing Net community production 

References

  1. Aanderraa Data Instruments. 2007. TD 218 operating manual: oxygen optode 3830, 3835, 3930, 3975,4130, 4175, 16th edn. Bergen: Aanderraa Data Instruments.Google Scholar
  2. Antlfinger, A.E., and E. Dunn. 1979. Seasonal patterns of CO2 and water vapor exchange of three salt marsh succulents. Oecologia, 43(3): 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnold, K.E., and S.N. Murray. 1980. Relationships between irradiance and photosynthesis for marine benthic green algae (Chlorophyta) of differing morphologies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 43(2): 183–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banas, N.S., and B.M. Hickey. 2005. Mapping exchange and residence time in amodel ofWillapa Bay, Washington, a branching, macrotidal estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 110(C11): C11011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, N., and K. Bruland. 2000. Diel biogeochemical cycling in a hyperventilating shallow estuarine environment. Estuaries and Coasts 23(2): 177–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berg, P., and M. Huettel. 2008. Integrated benthic exchange dynamics. Oceanography 21(4): 164–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant, L., C. Lorrai, D. McGinnis, A. Brand, A. Wüest, and J. Littlea. 2010. Variable sediment oxygen uptake in response to dynamic forcing. Limnology & Oceanography 55(2): 950–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caffrey, J. 2004. Factors controlling net ecosystem metabolism in US estuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 27(1): 90–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caffrey, J. M., M. Brown, W. Tyler, and M. Silberstein (eds.) 2002a. Changes in a California estuary: a profile of Elkhorn Slough. Moss Landing: Elkhorn Slough Foundation.Google Scholar
  10. Caffrey, J.M., N. Harrington, and B. Ward. 2002b. Biogeochemical processes in a small California estuary. 1. Benthic fluxes and pore water constituents reflect high nutrient freshwater inputs. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 233: 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai, W.-J. 2011. Estuarine and coastal ocean carbon paradox: CO2 sinks or sites of terrestrial carbon incineration? Annual Review of Marine Science 3: 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheek, A.O. 2011. Diel hypoxia alters fitness in growth-limited estuarine fish (Fundulus grandis). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 409(1): 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cheek, A.O., C.A. Landry, S.L. Steele, and S. Manning. 2009. Diel hypoxia in marsh creeks impairs the reproductive capacity of estuarine fish populations. Marine Ecology Progress Series 392: 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cloern, J.E. 1991. Tidal stirring and phytoplankton bloom dynamics in an estuary. Journal of Marine Research 49(1): 203–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corbett, D. 2010. Resuspension and estuarine nutrient cycling: insights from the Neuse River Estuary. Biogeosciences 7(10): 3289–3300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Avanzo, C., and J.N. Kremer. 1994. Diel oxygen dynamics and anoxic events in an eutrophic estuary of Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Estuaries 17(1): 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dettmann, E.H. 2001. Effect of water residence time on annual export and denitrification of nitrogen in estuaries: a model analysis. Estuaries 24(4): 481–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dodds, W.K., and J.J. Cole. 2007. Expanding the concept of trophic state in aquatic ecosystems: it’s not just the autotrophs. Aquatic Sciences 69(4): 427–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Farris, C.N., and C.A. Oviatt. 1999. Changes in metabolic rates under fluctuating salinity regimes for two subtidal estuarine habitats. Estuaries 22(1): 126–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer, H.B., E.J. List, R.C.Y. Koh, J. Imberger, and N.H. Brooks. 1979. Mixing in inland and coastal waters. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  21. Gazeau, F., et al. 2005. Net ecosystem metabolism in a micro-tidal estuary (Randers Fjord, Denmark): evaluation of methods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 301: 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geyer, W.R. 1993. Three-dimensional tidal flow around headlands. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 98(C1): 955–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Geyer, W.R., J.H. Trowbridge, and M.M. Bowen. 2000. The dynamics of a partially mixed estuary. Journal of Physical Oceanography 30(8): 2035–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammond, D., et al. 1985. Benthic fluxes in San Francisco Bay. Hydrobiologia 129(1): 69–90. doi:10.1007/BF00048688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Howarth, R., A. Sharpley, and D. Walker. 2002. Sources of nutrient pollution to coastal waters in the United States: implications for achieving coastal water quality goals. Estuaries and Coasts 25(4): 656–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Howarth, R.W., et al. 2013. Metabolism of a nitrogen-enriched coastal marine lagoon during the summertime. Biogeochemistry doi:10.1007/s10533-013-9901-x.Google Scholar
  27. Hughes, B. 2009. Synthesis for management of eutrophication issues in Elkhorn Slough. Tech. Rep. 1, Elkhorn Slough Technical Report Series.Google Scholar
  28. Hughes, B., J. Haskins, K. Wasson, and E. Watson. 2011. Identifying factors that influence expression of eutrophication in a central California estuary. Marine Ecology Progress Series. doi:10.3354/meps09295.Google Scholar
  29. Jannasch, H.W., L.J. Coletti, K.S. Johnson, S.E. Fitzwater, J.A. Needoba, and J. Plant. 2008. The Land/Ocean Biogeochemical Observatory: a robust networked mooring system for continuously monitoring complex biogeochemical cycles in estuaries. Limnology & Oceanography-Methods 6: 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jay, D.A., W.R. Geyer, R.J. Uncles, J. Vallino, J. Largier, and W.R. Boynton. 1997. A review of recent developments in estuarine scalar flux estimation. Estuaries 20(2): 262–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnson, K.S., and L.J. Coletti. 2002. In situ ultraviolet spectrophotometry for high resolution and long-term monitoring of nitrate, bromide and bisulfide in the ocean. Deep-Sea Research Part I-Oceanographic Research Papers 49(7): 1291–1305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnson, K.S., J.A. Needoba, S.C. Riser, and W.J. Showers. 2007. Chemical sensor networks for the aquatic environment. Chemical Reviews 107: 623–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jorgensen, B., and N. Revsbech. 1985. Diffusive boundary layers and the oxygen uptake of sediments and detritus. Limnology & Oceanography 30(1): 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kemp,W., andW. Boynton. 1980. Influence of biological and physical processes on dissolved oxygen dynamics in an estuarine system: implications for measurement of community metabolism. Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science 11(4): 407–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemp, W., E. Smith, M. Marvin-DiPasquale, and W. Boynton. 1997. Organic carbon balance and net ecosystem metabolism in Chesapeake Bay. Marine Ecology Progress Series 150(1): 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kemp, W., J. Testa, D. Conley, D. Gilbert, and J. Hagy. 2009. Temporal responses of coastal hypoxia to nutrient loading and physical controls. Biogeosciences 6(12): 2985–3008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kundu, P., and I. Cohen. 2002. Fluid mechanics. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Lesen, A.E. 2006. Sediment organic matter composition and dynamics in San Francisco Bay, California, USA: seasonal variation and interactions between water column chlorophyll and the benthos. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 66(3): 501–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lucas, L., J. Koseff, S. Monismith, J. Cloern, and J. Thompson. 1999. Processes governing phytoplankton blooms in estuaries. II: the role of horizontal transport. Marine Ecology-Progress Series 187: 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. MacCready, P., and W.R. Geyer. 2010. Advances in estuarine physics. Annual Review of Marine Science 2(1): 35–58. doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120308-081015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malzone, C. 1999. Tidal scour and its relation to erosion and sediment transport in Elkhorn Slough. M.S. thesis, Department of Geology, San Jose State University.Google Scholar
  42. McLaughlin, K., and M. Sutula 2008. Developing nutrient numeric endpoints for California estuaries: an implementation plan. Tech. Rep. Technical Report 540, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project, Costa Mesa.Google Scholar
  43. Migné, A., N. Spilmont, and D. Davoult. 2004. In situ measurements of benthic primary production during emersion: seasonal variations and annual production in the Bay of Somme (eastern English Channel, France). Continental Shelf Research 24(13): 1437–1449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. National Ocean Service. 2000. Tide and current glossary. Silver Spring: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services.Google Scholar
  45. Needoba, J.A., T.D. Peterson, and K.S. Johnson. 2012. Method for the quantification of aquatic primary production and net ecosystem metabolism using in situ dissolved oxygen sensors. In S.M. Tiquia-Arashiro (ed.) Molecular biological technologies for ocean sensing. Springer protocols handbooks, (pp. 73–101). New York: Humana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nidzieko, N.J. 2009. Dynamics of a seasonally low-inflow estuary: circulation and dispersion in Elkhorn Slough, California. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  47. Nidzieko, N.J., and S.G. Monismith. 2013. Contrasting seasonal and fortnightly variations in the circulation of a seasonally-inverse estuary, Elkhorn Slough, California. Estuaries and Coasts 36(1): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s12237-012-9548-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nixon, S.W., and C.A. Oviatt. 1973. Ecology of a NewEngland Salt Marsh. Ecological Monographs 43(4): 463–498. doi:10.2307/1942303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nixon, S., et al. 1996. The fate of nitrogen and phosphorus at the land-sea margin of the North Atlantic Ocean. Biogeochemistry 35(1): 141–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nunes Vaz, R.A., G.W. Lennon, and J.R.D. Samarasinghe. 1989. The negative role of turbulence in estuarine mass-transport. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 28(4): 361–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. O’Connor, B, and M Hondzo. 2008. Dissolved oxygen transfer to sediments by sweep and eject motions in aquatic environments. Limnology & Oceanography 53(2): 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Odum, H. 1956. Primary production in flowing waters. Limnology & Oceanography 1(2): 102–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pearcy, RW, and SL Ustin. 1984. Effects of salinity on growth and photosynthesis of three California tidal marsh species. Oecologia 62(1): 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Porter, E, M Owens, and J Cornwell. 2006. Effect of sediment manipulation on the biogeochemistry of experimental sediment systems. Journal of Coastal Research 22: 1539–1551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Porter, E, R Mason, and L Sanford. 2010. Effect of tidal resuspension on benthic-pelagic coupling in an experimental ecosystem study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 413: 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ralston, DK, and MT Stacey. 2005. Longitudinal dispersion and lateral circulation in the intertidal zone. Journal of Geophysical Research-Oceans 110(C7): c07015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ro, KS, and PG Hunt. 2006. A new unified equation for wind-driven surficial oxygen transfer into stationary water bodies. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers 49(5): 1615–1622.Google Scholar
  58. Shaffer, G, and C Onuf. 1983. An analysis of factors influencing the primary production of the benthic microflora in a southern California lagoon. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 17(1): 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, R. 1997. Stratification-induced lateral dispersion of a density anomaly. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 353: 0022–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, S, and J Hollibaugh. 1993. Coastal metabolism and the oceanic organic carbon balance. Reviews of Geophysics 31(1): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Staehr, P, J Testa, W Kemp, J Cole, K Sand-Jensen, and S Smith. 2012. The metabolism of aquatic ecosystems: history, applications, and future challenges. Aquatic Sciences 74: 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Statham, P.J. 2012. Nutrients in estuaries—an overview and the potential impacts of climate change. Science of the Total Environment 434: 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Swaney, D.P., R.W. Howarth, and T.J. Butler. 1999. A novel approach for estimating ecosystem production and respiration in estuaries: application to the oligohaline and mesohaline Hudson River. Limnology & Oceanography 44(6): 1509–1521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Testa, J., and W. Kemp. 2008. Variability of biogeochemical processes and physical transport in a partially stratified estuary: a box-modeling analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 356: 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tobias, C.R., J. Bohlke, and J.W. Harvey. 2007. The oxygen-18 isotope approach for measuring aquatic metabolism in high productivity waters. Limnology & Oceanography 52(4): 1439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tyler, R.M., D.C. Brady, and T.E. Targett. 2009. Temporal and spatial dynamics of diel-cycling hypoxia in estuarine tributaries. Estuaries and Coasts 32(1): 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wankel, S., C. Kendall, and A. Paytan. 2009. Using nitrate dual isotopic composition (δ15N and δ18O) as a tool for exploring sources and cycling of nitrate in an estuarine system: Elkhorn Slough, California. Journal of Geophysical Research 114(G1): G01011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilke, C.R., and P. Chang. 1955. Correlation of diffusion coefficients in dilute solutions. AIChE Journal 1(2): 264–270. doi:10.1002/aic.690010222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zedler, J.B., T. Winfield, and P. Williams. 1980. Salt marsh productivity with natural and altered tidal circulation. Oecologia 44(2): 236–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zimmerman, J.T.F. 1986. The tidal whirlpool—a review of horizontal dispersion by tidal and residual currents. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research 20(2–3): 133–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zimmerman, R.C., A. Cabello-Pasini, and R. S. Alberte. 1994. Modeling daily production of aquatic macrophytes from irradiance measurements: a comparative analysis. Marine Ecology Progress Series 114: 275–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas J. Nidzieko
    • 1
  • Joseph A. Needoba
    • 2
  • Stephen G. Monismith
    • 3
  • Kenneth S. Johnson
    • 4
  1. 1.Horn Point LaboratoryUniversity of Maryland Center for Environmental ScienceCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Institute of Environmental HealthOregon Health & Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  3. 3.Department of Civil & Environmental EngineeringStanford UniversityStanfordUSA
  4. 4.Monterey Bay Aquarium Research InstituteMoss LandingUSA

Personalised recommendations