Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Models and Public Stakeholders in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed

  • Published:
Estuaries and Coasts Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Chesapeake Bay is not only North America's largest estuary, but it is also home to one of most comprehensive computational modeling efforts that seeks to study and integrate a very large range of the complex socio-ecological dynamics within its watershed. Known as the Chesapeake Bay Modeling System (CBMS), this suite of models are invaluable to scientists, environmental policymakers, resource managers, and local government and community leaders, all of whom are engaged in efforts to reduce the negative impacts of population growth and development in the watershed on the ecosystems and living resources of the Chesapeake Bay. Until recently, the results of the CBMS were used to guide voluntary efforts to reduce nutrient and sediment runoff into the Chesapeake Bay. However, the results are now being used to guide and evaluate the implementation of Watershed Implementation Plans at the state and county levels, which in turn are based on CBMS estimates of total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) for these sub-watershed regions. The use of the CBMS for these regulatory efforts has also increased the number of public stakeholders who are now able to directly inquire about the how the CBMS works and raise questions about its ability to accurately represent their land use decisions and practices. This "going public" of the CBMS has raised many societal and cultural issues, including the articulation of local expert and scientific knowledge, and modelers, scientists, policymakers, and resource managers are now realizing the need to understand more of the human dimensions arising from the translation and implementation of the CBMS. A multidisciplinary approach is needed to understand these rapidly emerging societal and cultural dimensions of the expanded use of the CBMS. In this paper, we draw upon our collective experience as social and natural scientists, with modeling experience, to describe a range of social, economic, political, and cultural issues that have emerged as a result of the CBMS being used to support mandatory nutrient reduction regulations (TMDL).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atran, S., D.L. Medin, and N.O. Ross. 2005. The cultural mind: environmental decision making and cultural modeling within and across populations. Psychological Review 112(4): 744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Band, L., K. Campbell, R. Kinerson, K. Reckhow, and C. Welty. 2005. Review of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Modeling Effort. STAC 05-004, Chesapeake Bay Program's Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee, Edgewater, MD. pp. 9.

  • Band, L., T. Dillaha, C. Duffy, K. Reckhow, and C. Welty. 2008. Chesapeake Bay Watershed Model phase five review. STAC 08-003. Chesapeake Bay Program's Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee, Edgewater, MD. pp. 11.

  • Boesch, D.F., R.B. Brinsfield, and R.E. Magnien. 2001. Chesapeake Bay eutrophication. Journal of Environmental Quality 30: 303–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch, D. F, and J. Greer. 2003. Chesapeake futures: Choices for the 21st century. Chesapeake Research Consortium.

  • Boesch, D.F., and E. Goldman. 2009. The evolution of ecosystem-based management of the Chesapeake Bay over three decades. In Ecosystem-based management for the oceans, ed. K. McLeod and H. Leslie, 268–293. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, M.T., and S. Ravi Rajan. 2007. Signals and noise. Mass-media coverage of climate change in the USA and the UK. EMBO Reports 8(3): 207–211.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Breitburg, D.L. 1992. Episodic hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay. Interacting effects of recruitment, behavior, and physical disturbance. Ecological Monographs 62: 525–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breitburg, D.L., D.W. Hondorp, L.A. Davias, and Robert J. Diaz. 2009. Hypoxia, nitrogen, and fisheries: integrating effects across local and global landscapes. Annual Review of Marine Science 1: 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAST. 2012. About CAST. Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool. http://www.casttool.org/About.aspx.

  • CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 1983. 1983 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. Chesapeake Bay Program.

  • CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 1987. 1987 Chesapeake Bay Agreement. Chesapeake Bay Program.

  • CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 1992. Chesapeake Bay Agreement 1992 Amendments. Chesapeake Bay Program.

  • CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 1999. Joint Tributary Strategy Statement. Chesapeake Executive Council Directive No. 93-1. 2 pp (http://www.chesapeakebay.net/content/publications/cbp_12501.pdf).

  • CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 2000. Chesapeake 2000. Chesapeake Bay Program.

  • CBP (Chesapeake Bay Program). 2012c. Progress toward healthy waters: 2009-11 Milestones to reduce nitrogen & phosphorus. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/documents/18445/part_ii_-_progress_toward_healthy_waters.2009-11_milestones_final_progress.final.pdf

  • Chesapeake Stat. 2012. Water Quality: TMDL Tracking. Chesapeake Stat. http://stat.chesapeakebay.net/?q=node/130&quicktabs_10=3.

  • Christel, D., W. Kempton, and J. Harris. 2001. The effects of values and cultural models on policy: An anthropological approach to environmental policy in Tampa Bay. University of Delaware, College of Marine Studies.

  • Christie, P. 2011. Creating space for interdisciplinary marine and coastal research: five dilemmas and suggested resolutions. Environmental Conservation 38(2): 172–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claggett, P. 2012. Current land-change modeling in support of the Chesapeake Bay Program. Abstract, presentation, Chesapeake Community Modeling Program Chesapeake Modeling Symposium '12, Annapolis, MD.

  • Clayton, Chris. 2012. Farm bureau wants Chesapeake Bay ruling. DTN: The Progressive Farmer. http://www.dtnprogressivefarmer.com/dtnag/view/blog/getBlog.do;jsessionid=075F3D14DADA901245971A5E0CC46F3C.agfreejvm2?blogHandle=policy&blogEntryId=8a82c0bc33b7544601353046ebbc0ee7. Accessed 6-30-2012.

  • Committee on Environment and Natural Resources. 2010. Scientific assessment of hypoxia in U.S. coastal waters. Interagency Working Group on Harmful Algal Blooms, Hypoxia, and Human Health of the Joint Subcommittee on Ocean Science and Technology. Washington, DC. pp. 154.

  • Constantini, M., S.A. Ludsin, D.M. Mason, X. Zhang, W.C. Boicourt, and S.B. Brandt. 2008. Effect of hypoxia on habitat quality of striped bass (Morone saxatilis) in Chesapeake Bay. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65(5): 989–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, M. 1999. Cultural models of forests and ecological change on the Appalachian Plateau, 1750-1840. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Georgia.

  • D’Andrade, Roy G. 1995. The development of cognitive anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dauer, D.M., A.J. Rodi Jr., and J.A. Ranasinghe. 1992. Effects of low dissolved oxygen events on the macrobenthos of the lower Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 15: 384–391.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, S.G., J.G. Merwin Jr., J. Capper, G. Power, and F.R. Shivers Jr. 1997. Chesapeake waters: four centuries of controversy, concern, and legislation, 2nd ed. Centreville: Tidewater Publishers. pp. 272.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 1995. Cost analysis for nonpoint source control strategies in the Chesapeake Basin. EPA 903-R-95-0005, Annapolis, MD. pp. 6.

  • EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2003. Technical support document for identification of Chesapeake Bay designated uses and attainability. EPA Number: 903-R-03-004, Edgewater, MD.

  • Falk, J.M., F.L. Darby, and W. Kempton. 2000. Understanding mid-Atlantic residents’ concerns, attitudes, and perceptions about harmful algal blooms-Pfiesteria piscicida. Sea Grant: University of Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Michael. 2006. Science, technology and society. Theory, Culture & Society 23(2–3): 172–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Michael. 2009. Anthropological futures. Durham: Duke University Press Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, R.K., D.C. Hinkle, and W.M. Kemp. 2011. Spatial patterns in water quality associated with submersed plant beds. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 961–972.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, Edward J., Olga Amsterdamska, Michael E. Lynch, Judy Wajcman, and Wiebe E. Bijker. 2007. The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd edn. The MIT Press.

  • Hagy, J.D., W.R. Boynton, C.W. Keefe, and K.V. Wood. 2004. Hypoxia in Chesapeake Bay, 1950–2001: Long-term change in relation to nutrient loading and river flow. Estuaries and Coasts 27: 643–658.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, K.L., and T.A. Thoman. 1984. The nursery role of seagrass meadows in the upper and lower reaches of the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 7: 70–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich, Stefan. 2009. Alien ocean: anthropological voyages in microbial seas. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, Dorothy, and Naomi Quinn. 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC.

  • Jaworski, N.A., D.W. Lear, and J.A. Aalto. 1972. Nutrient management in the Potomac estuary. In Nutrients and eutrophication, ed. G.E. Likens, 246–273. Lawrence, KS: ASLO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B.H., Kim, K.W., Heath, R.H., Butler, H.L., Hsieh, B.B., 1991. Development and verification of a three-dimensional numerical hydro- dynamic, salinity, and temperature model of the Chesapeake Bay. Tech- nical Report HL-91-7. US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, MS.

  • Kemp, W.M., W.R. Boynton, J.E. Adolf, D.F. Boesch, W.C. Boicourt, G. Brush, J.C. Cornwell, T.R. Fisher, P.M. Gilbert, J.D. Hagy, L.W. Harding, E.D. Houde, D.G. Kimmel, W.D. Miller, R.I.E. Newell, M.R. Roman, E.M. Smith, and J.C. Stevenson. 2005. Eutrophication of Chesapeake Bay: historical trends and ecological interactions. Marine Ecology Progress Series 303: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, Willett M., James S. Boster, and Jennifer A. Hartley. 1996. Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W., and J. Falk. 2000. Cultural models of Pfiesteria: toward cultivating more appropriate risk perceptions. Coastal Management 28: 273–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, M.X., and H.M. Miller. 2005. Response of a benthic suspension feeder (Crassostrea virginica Gmelin) to three centuries of anthropogenic eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 62: 679–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1996. The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knuuttila, T., and A. Voutilainen. 2003. A parser as an epistemic artifact: a material view on models. Philosophy of Science :1484–1495.

  • Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of nature: how to bring the sciences into democracy. Trans. Catherine Porter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, John. 2002. Aircraft stories: decentering the object in technoscience. Durham: Duke University Press Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LimnoTech. 2010. Comparison of draft load estimates for cultivated cropland in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Ann Arbor, MI.

  • Lipton, D.W. 1999. Pfiesteria’s economic impact on seafood industry sales and recreational fishing. In Proceedings of the conference, economics of policy options for nutrient management and Pfiesteria, ed. B.L. Gardner and L. Koch, 35–38. College Park: Center for Agricultural and Natural Resource Policy, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludsin, S.A., X. Zhang, S.B. Brandt, M.R. Roman, W.C. Boicourt, D.M. Mason, and M. Costantini. 2009. Hypoxia-avoidance by planktivorous fish in Chesapeake Bay: implications for food web interactions and fish recruitment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 381: S121–S131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magnien, R.E. 2001. The dynamics of science, perception, and policy during the outbreak of Pfiesteria in the Chesapeake Bay. Bioscience 51: 843–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, E. 2005. Interdisciplinarity ‘in the making’: modeling infectious diseases. Perspectives on Science 13(4): 531–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, Robert King. 1979. The sociology of science: theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Millett Granger. 2002. Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Mary S., and Margaret Morrison. 1999. Models as mediators: perspectives on natural and social science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. G., B. Fischhoff, A. Bostrom and C. Atman. 2002. Risk communication: a mental models approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Murphy, R.R., W.M. Kemp, and W.P. Ball. 2011. Long-term trends in Chesapeake Bay seasonal hypoxia, stratification, and nutrient loading. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 1293–1309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Najjar, R., C.R. Pyke, M.B. Adams, D. Breitburg, C. Hershner, W.M. Kemp, R. Howarth, M.R. Mulholland, M. Paolisso, D. Secor, K. Sellner, D. Wardrop, and R. Wood. 2010. Potential climate-change impacts on the Chesapeake Bay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 86: 1–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council). 2011. Achieving nutrient and sediment reduction goals in the Chesapeake Bay: an evaluation of program strategies and implementation, 258. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Officer, C.B., R.B. Biggs, J.L. Taft, L.E. Cronin, M.A. Tyler, and W.R. Boynton. 1984. Chesapeake Bay anoxia: origin, development, and significance. Science 223: 22–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes, N. 1998. Evaluation (not validation) of quantitative models. Environmental Health Perspectives 106(Suppl 6): 1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman, R.W. and G.R. Abbe. 1995. Post-settlement factors affecting oyster recruitment in Chesapeake Bay, USA. In Changes in fluxes in estuaries: implications from science to management, eds. K. Dyer and R.J. Orth. Olsen and Olsen, 335-340. Fredensborg, Denmark.

  • Paolisso, Michael. 2002. Blue crabs and controversy on the Chesapeake Bay: a cultural model for understanding watermen’s reasoning about blue crab management. Human Organization 61(3): 226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso, Michael. 2006. Chesapeake environmentalism: rethinking culture to strengthen restoration and resource management. Chesapeake Perspectives Monographs, Maryland Sea Grant College.

  • Paolisso, Michael. 2007. Taste the traditions: crabs, crab cakes and the Chesapeake Bay blue crab fishery. American Anthropologist 109(4): 654–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso, Michael, and E. Chambers. 2001. Culture, politics, and toxic dinoflagellate blooms: the anthropology of Pfiesteria. Human Organization 60(1): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso, Michael, and N. Dery. 2010. A cultural model assessment of oyster restoration alternatives for the Chesapeake Bay. Human Organization 69(2): 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso, Michael, N. Dery, and Stan Herman. 2006. Restoration of the Chesapeake Bay using a non-native oyster: ecological and fishery considerations. Human Organization 65(3): 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso, Michael, and R.S. Maloney. 2000. Recognizing farmer environmentalism: nutrient runoff and toxic dinoflagellate blooms in the Chesapeake Bay region. Human Organization 59(2): 209–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolisso, M., E. Van Dolah, T.W. Hartley, L.A. Wainger, J. Pease, D. Lipton, S. Julius. 2011. Integrating Social Science Research into Chesapeake Bay Restoration. STAC 11-05. STAC.

  • Paolisso, Michael, Priscilla Weeks, and Jane Packard. 2013. A cultural and applied analysis of land conservation. Human Organization 74(1): 12–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. University of Chicago Press.

  • Pfeffer, M.J., J.W. Schelhas, and L.A. Day. 2001. Forest conservation, value conflict, and interest formation in a Honduran National Park*. Rural Sociology 66(3): 382–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, C., G. Pontius, D. Parker, J. Kittle, and B.C. Pijanowski. 2008. Chesapeake Bay Land Change Modeling Technical Review. Chesapeake Bay Program's Scientific & Technical Advisory Committee, Edgewater, MD. pp. 26.

  • Ross, Norbert Otto. 2003. Culture and cognition: implications for theory and method. Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Sellner, K.G., and D.C. Brownlee. 1990. Dinoflagellate–microzooplankton interactions in Chesapeake Bay. In Toxic marine phytoplankton, ed. E. Granéli, B. Sundström, L. Edler, and D.M. Anderson, 221–226. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, Sergio. 2009. An introduction to science and technology studies, 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Sheng, Y.P., 1986. A three-dimensional mathematical model of coastal, estuarine and lake currents using a boundary fitted grid, Rep. No. 585, ARAR Group of Titan Systems, Princeton, N.J.

  • STAC. 2011. Review of the LimnoTech report, “Comparison of load estimates for cultivated cropland in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Edgewater: Chesapeake Bay Program Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, Isabelle. 1997. Power and invention: situating science. University of Minnesota Press.

  • Tango, P., W. Butler, R. Lacouture, D. Goshorn, R. Magnien, B. Michael, S. Hall, K. Brohawn, R. Wittman, and W. Beatty. 2002. An unprecedented bloom of Dinophysis acuminate in Chesapeake Bay. In Harmful algae 2002. FL Fish & Wildlife Conserv. Comm., FL Inst. of Oceanography, IOC of UNESCO, eds. K.A. Steidinger, J.H. Landsberg, C.R. Tomas, and G.A. Vargo, 358–360. Florida: St. Petersburg.

  • Tango, P., W. Butler, R. Lacouture, D. Goshorn, R. Magnien, B. Michael, S. Hall, K. Browhawn, R. Wittman and W. Beatty. 2004. An unprecedented bloom of Dinophysis acuminata in Chesapeake Bay. In Proceedings of Harmful Algae 2002 Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission, Florida Institute of Oceanography, and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO (2004), eds. K.A. Steidinger, J.H. Landsberg, C.R. Tomas, G.A. Vargo and St. Petersberg, 358–360.

  • Tango, P.J., and W. Butler. 2008. Cyanotoxins in tidal waters of Chesapeake Bay. NE Naturalist 15: 403–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twilley, R.R., W.M. Kemp, K.W. Staver, J.C. Stevenson, and W.R. Boynton. 1985. Nutrient enrichment of estuarine submersed vascular plant communities. I. Algal growth and effects on production of plants and associated communities. Marine Ecology Progress Series 23: 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verity, P.A. 1987. Factors driving changes in the pelagic trophic structure of estuaries, with implications for Chesapeake Bay. In Perspectives on the Chesapeake Bay: advances in estuarine sciences, eds. M.P. Lynch and E.C. Krome, 35-56. CRC Publ. No. 127, Edgewater, MD.

  • Voinov, A., and F. Bousquet. 2010. Modeling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.V., Chapman, R.S., 1995. Application of vertical turbulence closure schemes in the Chesapeake Bay circulation model: a comparative study. ASCE Estuarine and coastal modeling, 283e297.

  • Xu, J., S.Y. Chao, R.R. Hood, H.V. Wang, and W.C. Boicourt. 2002. Assimilating high-resolution salinity data into a model of a partially mixed estuary. Journal of Geophysical Research 107(C7): 3074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to G. Shenk and the Chesapeake Bay Modeling System team at the Chesapeake Bay Program for their assistance in providing model system details and graphics for the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Maryland, College Park, 20742, MD, USA

    M. Paolisso & J. Trombley

  2. University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge, 21613, MD, USA

    R. R. Hood

  3. Chesapeake Research Consortium, Edgewater, MD, USA

    K. G. Sellner

Authors
  1. M. Paolisso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Trombley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. R. Hood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K. G. Sellner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Paolisso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paolisso, M., Trombley, J., Hood, R.R. et al. Environmental Models and Public Stakeholders in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed. Estuaries and Coasts 38 (Suppl 1), 97–113 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9650-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9650-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation