Vegetation Response to Prescribed Fire in Mid-Atlantic Brackish Marshes
- 411 Downloads
Prescribed fire management generally stimulates plant biomass production in coastal marsh systems. This study was conducted to understand the interactive effects of the mechanisms of fire on vegetation production. The effects of canopy removal and ash deposition on biomass production were investigated in two manipulative experiments at the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, Dorchester County, MD. On non-burned sites, canopy removal increased biomass production above and belowground (40 and 260 %, respectively), while ash deposition showed no effect on production. On burned sites, post-burn canopy replacement decreased biomass production above and belowground (41 and 40 %, respectively). Production increased more in response to canopy removal at sites dominated by Schoenoplectus americanus than at sites dominated by Spartina patens and Distichlis spicata. Canopy removal was the dominant mechanism through which fire affected biomass production in this study. If increased biomass production is a desirable outcome, prescribed fire programs may benefit by maximizing canopy removal.
KeywordsCoastal tidal marsh Prescribed fire Biomass production Marsh management Schoenoplectus americanus Spartina patens Distichlis spicata
We would like to thank the Maryland Sea Grant for funding this project (Award Number NA10OAR4170072). We would also like to thank the staff at the Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge, especially Suzanne Baird, Bill Giese, Matt Whitbeck, Leticia Melendez, and Nate Carle, for their continuous suggestions, support, assistance, and collaboration on the study. We are appreciative of the field and lab work help received from members of the Soil and Water Geospatial Analysis Lab (SAWGAL) at the University of Maryland especially George Geatz, Michele Miller, Asia Vinnikova, Amanda Garzio-Hadzick, Emily Hutchins, Becca Mead, Miriam Meyers, and Joey Schlosnagle. We would also like to thank Pat Megonigal of Smithsonian Environmental Research Center and Don Cahoon, Glenn Guntenspergen, and Jim Lynch of USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center for collaborating and sharing data for comparison throughout the study.
- Allan, P.F. 1950. Ecological bases for land use planning in Gulf coast marshlands. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 5(57–62): 85.Google Scholar
- Bickford, W.A. 2011. Plant productivity and competitive response to prescribed fire in Mid-Atlantic brackish marshes. M.S. Thesis. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
- Bickford, W.A., A.H. Baldwin, B.A. Needelman, and R.R. Weil. 2012. Canopy disturbance alters competitive outcomes between two brackish marsh plant species. Aquatic Botany. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.05.006.
- Cahoon, D.R., M.A. Ford, and P.F. Hensel. 2004. Ecogeomorphology of Spartina patens-dominated tidal marshes: soil organic matter accumulation, marsh elevation dynamics, and disturbance. In The ecogeomorphology of tidal marshes, coastal estuarine studies, vol. 59, eds. S. Fagherazzi, M. Marani, and L.K. Blum, 247–266. American Geophysical Union.Google Scholar
- Cahoon, D.R., G. Guntenspergen, S. Baird, J. Nagel, P. Hensel, J. Lynch, D. Bishara, P. Brennan, J. Jones, and C. Otto. 2010. Do annual prescribed fires enhance or slow the loss of coastal marsh habitat at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge? Final project report (JFSP Number: 06-2-1-35). March 31, 2010. Beltsville, MD.Google Scholar
- Cartwright, B.W. 1942. Regulated burning as a marsh management technique. Transcripts of the North American Wildlife Conference 7: 257–263.Google Scholar
- Chabreck, R.H. 1981. Effect of burn date on regrowth of Scirpus olneyi and Spartina patens. Proceedings of annual conference, Southeastern Association Fish Wildlife Agencies. 35: 201–210.Google Scholar
- Gabrey, S.W., A.D. Afton, and B.C. Wilson. 2001. Effects of structural marsh management and winter burning on plant and bird communities during summer in the Gulf Coast Chenier Plain. Wildlife Society Bulletin 29: 218–231.Google Scholar
- Geatz, G.W. 2012. Nutrient levels and organic matter decomposition in response to prescribed burns in Mid-Atlantic coastal marshes. M.S. Thesis. University of Maryland.Google Scholar
- Hoffpauer, C.M. 1968. Burning for coastal marsh management. In Proceedings of the marsh and estuary management symposium, ed. J.D. Newsom, 134–139. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University.Google Scholar
- Nyman, J.A., and R.H. Chabreck. 1995. Fire in coastal marshes: history and recent concerns. In Proceedings of the 19 th Tall Timbers Fire Ecology Conference—Fire in Wetlands: a management perspective, ed. S.I. Cerulean and R.T. Engstrom, 135–141. Tallahassee: Tall Timbers Research, Inc.Google Scholar
- O’Neil, T. 1949. The muskrat in the Louisiana coastal marshes. New Orleans: Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.Google Scholar
- Pendleton, E., and J.C. Stevenson. 1983. Investigating marsh losses at Blackwater National Wildlife Refuge. Final Report to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Tidewater Administration of Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Annapolis, MD.Google Scholar
- Sipple, W.S. 1979. A review of the biology, ecology, and management of Scirpus olneyi. Vol. II: a synthesis of selected references. Wetland Publication No. 4, 85 p. Annapolis: Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Water Resources Administration, Wetlands Permit Division.Google Scholar
- Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web soil survey. Available online at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/ accessed 11/06/2010
- Stevenson, J.C., M.S. Kearney, and K.L. Sundburg. 2000. The health and long term stability of natural and restored marshes in the Chesapeake Bay. In Concepts and controversies in tidal marsh ecology, ed. M.P. Weinstein and D.A. Kreeger, 709–735. Dordrect: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
- USDA, NRCS. 2011. The PLANTS Database (http://plants.usda.gov, 4 April 2011). National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA 70874–4490 USA.