Advertisement

Estuaries and Coasts

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 351–363 | Cite as

Modeling Trophic Structure and Energy Flows in a Coastal Artificial Ecosystem Using Mass-Balance Ecopath Model

  • Shannan Xu
  • Zuozhi Chen
  • Shiyu Li
  • Peimin He
Article

Abstract

Using a large-scale enclosed sea area in northern Hangzhou Bay as a case study, the trophic interactions, energy flows, and ecosystem properties of a coastal artificial ecosystem were analyzed by ecotrophic modeling using Ecopath with Ecosim software (EwE, 5.1 version). The model consists of 13 functional groups: piscivorous fish, benthic-feeding fish, zooplanktivorous fish, herbivorous fish, crabs, shrimp, mollusca, infauna, carnivorous zooplankton, herbivorous zooplankton, macrophytes, phytoplankton, and detritus. Input information for the model was gathered from published and unpublished reports and from our own estimates during the period 2006–2007. Results show that the food web in the enclosed sea area was dominated by a detritus pathway. The trophic levels of the groups varied from 1.00 for primary producers and detritus to 3.90 for piscivorous fish in the coastal artificial system. Using network analysis, the system network was mapped into a linear food chain, and five discrete trophic levels were found with a mean transfer efficiency of 9.8% from detritus and 9.4% from primary producer within the ecosystem. The geometric mean of the trophic transfer efficiencies was 9.6%. Detritus contributed 57% of the total energy flux, and the other 43% came from primary producers. The ecosystem maturity indices—total primary production/total respiration, Finn’s cycling index, and ascendancy—were 2.56, 25.0%, and 31.0%, respectively, showing that the coastal artificial system is at developmental stage according to Odum’s theory of ecosystem development. Generally, this is the first trophic model of a large-scale artificial sea enclosure in China and provides some useful insights into the structure and functioning of the system.

Keywords

Ecopath model Trophic structure Energy transfer Trophic level Detrital flows Artificial ecosystem 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the CDMCJS for the use of the data and unpublished information incorporated in this study. This study was supported by the Bioremediation Engineering Program of City Beach in Jinshan District, Shanghai; China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (no. 20090460825); Open Project Program of the Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ecology, and Quality Control, Ministry of Agriculture, South China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences (no. 2008B1204); Open Project Program of the Key Laboratory of Marine Bio-resources Sustainable Utilization, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (no. LMB091009); and the Special Project of the Social Commonwealth Research of the National Science Research Institute (no. 2010ZD01). Furthermore, we are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.

References

  1. Ahlstrom, E.H., and J.R. Thrailkill. 1960. Plankton volume loss with time of preservation. CalCOFI Report 9: 57–73.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, K.R. 1971. Relation between production and biomass. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 28: 1573–1581.Google Scholar
  3. Baird, D., and R.E. Ulanowicz. 1989. The seasonal dynamics of the Chesapeake Bay ecosystem. Ecological Monography 59: 329–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, Z.Z., Y.S. Qiu, X.P. Jia, and S.N. Xu. 2008. Using an ecosystem modeling approach to explore possible ecosystem impacts of fishing in the Beibu Gulf, northern South China Sea. Ecosystems 11: 1318–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christensen, V. 1995. Ecosystem maturity-towards quantification. Ecological Modelling 77: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, V., and D. Pauly eds. 1993. Trophic models of aquatic ecosystems. ICLARM Conference Proceedings 26: 390.Google Scholar
  7. Christensen, V., and D. Pauly. 1995. Fish production, catches and the carrying capacity of the world oceans. Naga 18: 34–40.Google Scholar
  8. Christensen, V., and C.J. Walters. 2004. Ecopath with Ecosim: methods, capabilities, and limitation. Ecological Modelling 172: 109–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen, V., C.J. Walters, and D. Pauly. 2000. ECOPATH with ECOSIM, Version 5, Help system©. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Fisheries Centre.Google Scholar
  10. Christian, R.R., E. Forés, F. Comin, P. Viaroli, M. Naldi, and I. Ferrari. 1996. Nitrogen cycling networks of coastal ecosystems: influence of trophic status and primary producer form. Ecological Modelling 87: 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Day, J., C. Hall, W. Kemp, and A. Yáñez-Arancibia. 1989. Estuarine ecology. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  12. De Jonge, V.N., M. Elliott, and E. Orive. 2002. Causes, historical development, effects and future challenges of a common environmental problem: eutrophication. Hydrobiologia 475(476): 1–19.Google Scholar
  13. Erftemeijer, P.L.A., R. Osinga, and A.E. Mars. 1993. Primary production of seagrass beds in South Sulawesi (Indonesia): a comparison of habitats, methods and species. Aquatic Botany 46: 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Essington, T.E. 2007. Evaluating the sensitivity of a trophic mass-balance model (Ecopath) to imprecise data inputs. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 628–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finn, J.T. 1976. Measures of ecosystem structure and function derived from analysis flows. Journal of Theoretical Biology 56: 363–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Froese, R., and D. Pauly. eds. 2004. Fish Base. World Wide Web electronic publication. http://www.fishbase.org. Version June 2004.
  17. Graf, G. 1992. Benthic-pelagic coupling: a benthic view. Oceanography and Marine Biology. Annual Review 30: 149–190.Google Scholar
  18. Leontief, W. 1951. The structure of American economy, 1919–1939. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Li, Y., Z.H. Wang, and S.Y. Zhang. 2007. A preliminary approach on the ecosystem model of the artificial reef in Shengsi. Marine Fisheries 29: 226–234. in Chinese, with English abstract.Google Scholar
  20. Lin, H.J., K.T. Shao, J.S. Hwang, W.T. Lo, I.J. Cheng, and L.H. Lee. 2004. A trophic model for Kuosheng Bay in northern Taiwan. Journal of Marine Science and Technology 12: 424–432.Google Scholar
  21. Lindeman, R.L. 1942. The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology. Ecology 23: 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, Z.L., X.R. Ning, and L. Cai. 2001. Primary productivity and standing stock of the phytoplankton in the Hangzhou Bay to the Zhoushan Fishing Ground during autumn. Acta Oceanologica Sinica 23: 48–53. in Chinese, with English abstract.Google Scholar
  23. MacLennan, D., and E.J. Simmonds. 1992. Fisheries acoustics, 325. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Manickchand-Heileman, S., J. Mendoza-Hill, A.L. Kong, and F. Arocha. 2004. A trophic model for exploring possible ecosystem impacts of fishing in the Gulf of Paria, between Venezuela and Trinidad. Ecological Modeling 172: 307–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morissette, L., M.O. Hammill, and C. Savenkoff. 2006. The trophic role of marine mammals in the northern Gulf of St Lawrence. Marine Mammal Science 22: 74–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Neori, A., T. Chopin, M. Troell, A.H. Buschmann, G.P. Kraemer, C. Halling, M. Shpigel, and C. Yarish. 2004. Integrated aquaculture: rationale, evolution and state of the art emphasizing seaweed biofiltration in modern mariculture. Aquaculture 231: 361–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Odum, E.P. 1969. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164: 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Odum, E.P. 1971. Fundamental of ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  29. Odum, W.E., and E.J. Heald. 1975. The detritus-based food web of an estuarine mangrove community. In Estuarine research, ed. L.E. Cronin, 265–286. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ortiz, M., and M. Wolff. 2002. Trophic models of four benthic communities in Tongoy Bay (Chile): comparative analysis and preliminary assessment of management strategies. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 268: 205–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parsons, T.R., Y. Maita, and C.M. Lalli. 1984. A manual of chemical and biological methods for seawater analysis. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  32. Pauly, D., and V. Christensen. 1995. Primary production required to sustain global fisheries. Nature 374: 255–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pauly, D., V. Christensen, and V. Sambilay. 1990. Some features of fish food consumption estimates used by ecosystem modelers. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea CM 1990/G 17: 9.Google Scholar
  34. Ryther, J.H. 1969. Photosynthesis and fish production in the sea. Science 166: 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. S.E.P.A.C (State Environmental Protection Administration of China). 2002. Seawater quality standard, 132–136. Beijing: Science Press. in Chinese.Google Scholar
  36. Shen, X.Q., Q. Yuan, Y.L. Wang, and M. Jiang. 2003. Study on assessment of eco-environmental quality in fishery waters near the Changjiang River estuary and Hangzhou Bay. Journal of Fisheries of China 27(suppl): 76–81. in Chinese, with English abstract.Google Scholar
  37. State Oceanic Administration of China (SOAC), 2005. The China Marine Environment Bulletin in 2004. Available at http://www.soa.gov.cn/hygb/2004hyhj (in Chinese).
  38. Tong, L., Q. Tang, and D. Pauly. 2000. A preliminary approach on mass balance ecopath model of the Bohai Sea. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology 11: 435–440. in Chinese, with English abstract.Google Scholar
  39. Troell, M., C. Halling, A. Neori, T. Chopin, A.H. Buschmann, N. Kautsky, and C. Yarish. 2003. Integrated mariculture: asking the right questions. Aquaculture 226: 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ulanowicz, R.E. 1986. Growth and development: ecosystem phenomenology. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  41. Ulanowicz, R.E., and C.J. Puccia. 1990. Mixed trophic impacts in ecosystem. Coenoses 5: 7–16.Google Scholar
  42. Xu, S.N. 2008. The bioremediation of eutrophic coastal sea areas by seaweed cultivation. Ph.D. thesis. Shanghai Ocean University (in Chinese, with English abstract).Google Scholar
  43. Xu, S.N., and P.M. He. 2006. Analysis of phenomena for frequent occurrence of red tides and bioremediation by seaweed cultivation. Journal of Fisheries of China 30(4): 554–561. in Chinese, with English abstract.Google Scholar
  44. Yan, L., T.X. Cheng, H.R. Ye, X.Y. Zhen, and H.N. Kong. 2008. Study on the purification of landscape water by multi-stage artificial ecosystem. Technology of Water Treatment 34(4): 26–30. in Chinese, with English abstract.Google Scholar
  45. Yuan, D., Y. Yi, A. Yakupitiyage, K. Fitzimmons, and J.S. Diana. 2010. Effects of addition of red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) at different densities and sizes on production, water quality and nutrient recovery of intensive culture of white shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) in cement tanks. Aquaculture 298: 226–238.Google Scholar
  46. Zhang, J., and Z. He. 1991. Handbook of investigation on the fishery and natural resources of Inland waters, 12–169. Beijing: Agriculture Press. in Chinese.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Coastal and Estuarine Research Federation 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Mariculture, Ecology and Quality Control, Ministry of AgricultureSouth China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery SciencesGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.College of Fisheries and Life ScienceShanghai Ocean UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations