The Functions and Values of Fringing Salt Marshes in Northern New England, USA
- 529 Downloads
We compared the functions and values of fringing salt marshes to those of meadow marshes along the southern Maine/New Hampshire coast. Differences included soil organic matter content, plant species richness, and percent cover of high and low-marsh species. More sediment was trapped per unit area in fringing marshes than in meadow marshes, but this difference was not significant. Similarities included aboveground and belowground peak season biomass and the ability to dampen wave energy. Both marsh types reduced the height of waves coming onto the marsh surface by 63% only 7 m into the marsh. Fringing marshes are diverse in terms of their physical characteristics (width, length, slope, elevation, soils). Despite their small size, they are valuable components of estuaries, performing many ecological functions to the same degree as nearby meadow marshes. More effort should be made to include them in regional efforts to conserve and restore coastal habitats.
KeywordsFringe marsh Meadow marsh Vegetation Gulf of Maine
We thank Thomas Lee, William B. Bowden, and Michelle Dionne for their advice during this project. Thanks also to the many field and laboratory assistants from the Jackson Estuarine Laboratory and the University of New England. Special thanks to Ryan Davis, Jeff Gaeckle, and Blaine Kopp for their support and critique. Funding for this project came from the University of New England, University of New Hampshire, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, grant or cooperative agreement no. NA77OR0235. This is Jackson Estuarine Laboratory contribution number 475.
- Bryan, R.R., M. Dionne, R.A. Cook, J. Jones, and A. Goodspeed. 1997. Maine citizens guide to evaluating, restoring, and managing tidal marshes. Falmouth: Maine Audubon Society.Google Scholar
- Cook, R.A., A.J. Lindley Stone, and A.P. Amman. 1993. Method for the evaluation and inventory of vegetated tidal marshes in New Hampshire. Concord: Audubon Society of New Hampshire.Google Scholar
- Denny, M.W. 1988. Biology and the mechanics of the wave-swept environment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Leonard, L. 1997. Controls of sediment transport and deposition in an incised mainland marsh basin, southeastern North Carolina. Wetlands 17(2): 263–274.Google Scholar
- Lyons, J., J. Ahern, J. McClelland, and I. Valiela. 1995. Macrophyte abundances in Waquoit Bay estuaries subject to different nutrient loads and the potential role of fringing salt marsh in groundwater nitrogen interception. Biological Bulletin 189: 255–256.Google Scholar
- Magurran, A.C. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Moeller, I., T. Spencer, and J.R. French. 1996. Wind wave attenuation over salt marsh surfaces: Preliminary results from Norfolk, England. Journal of Coastal Research 12: 1009–1016.Google Scholar
- Teal, J.M. 1986. The ecology of regularly flooded salt marshes of New England: A community profile. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Report No. 85 (7.4).Google Scholar
- Taylor, P.H. 2008. Salt marshes in the Gulf of Maine: Human impacts, habitat restoration and long-term change analysis. Gulf of Maine Council on the Marine Environment. www.gulfofmaine.org. IV + 42 pp.