Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Causes and barriers to increases in economic freedom

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Review of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate the causes of increases in economic freedom by examining a cross section of countries from 1990 to 2010 and examining factors that have previously been associated with increases in freedom alongside other factors which have been found to be important for growth. We find that higher initial GNI per capita is associated with larger subsequent increases in economic freedom and countries are less likely to improve their freedom the higher their initial level of freedom, energy exports, and ethnolinguistic fractionalization. When we test subsamples, we find that little explains changes in freedom in countries with high levels of initial freedom, initially high incomes, and that did not receive foreign aid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. La Porta et al. (2008) found this relationship also hold holds for Scandinavian and German based legal systems.

  2. The countries used in our sample are: Albania, Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Botswana, Brazil, Bulgaria, Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Congo, Costa Rica, Cote d’Ivoire, Cyprus, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Finland, France, Gabon, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hong Kong, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Kenya, South Korea, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Namibia, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, The Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Senegal, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tanzania, Togo, Trinidad & Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. Due to unavailable data we omitted the countries Bahrain, Oman, Kuwait, Iran, and Democratic Republic of the Congo when we tested for ethnolinguistic fractionalization. We omitted Iceland, South Korea, Cyprus, Malta, Benin, Hong Kong, and Democratic Republic of the Congo due to data unavailability for executive constraint. We omitted Haiti, Kuwait, and Jamaica when we tested for the logarithm of the initial GNI per capita.

  3. We also used a correlation matrix to test the relationship between our independent variables. The correlation between the Initial level of economic freedom and logarithm of Initial GNI per capita was 0.74. The correlation between deep inflationary and growth crises variables was 0.72. The correlation between Aid and the logarithm of initial GNI per capita was −0.6. The correlation between Medium Growth Crises and initial economic freedom was −0.53. All other correlations between variables were less than 0.5.

  4. We also tested the effect of religious affiliation on the change in economic freedom by using binary variables to represent if the majority of a nation’s population considered themselves Christians, Muslims, or Buddhists We found that religious affiliation did not provide significant explanatory power.

References

  • Alesina A, Drazen A (1991) Why are stabilizations delayed? Am Econ Rev 81:1170–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali A, Isse H (2003) Determinants of economic corruption: a cross-country comparison. Cato J 22:449–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer PT (1991) The development frontier. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer PT (2000) From subsistence to exchange and other essays. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burnside C, Dollar D (2000) Aid, Policies and Growth. Am Econ Rev 90:847–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busse M, Groning S (2013) the resource curse revisited: governance and natural resources. Public Choice 154:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell N, Snyder T (2012) Economic growth, economic freedom, and the resource curse. J Priv Enterp 28:23–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula R (2011) Economic growth, ten forms of economic freedom, and political stability: an empirical study using panel data, 2003–2007. J Priv Enterp 26:61–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula R, Clark JR (2012) Lessons from the experience of OECD nations on macroeconomic growth and economic freedom. Int Rev Econ 59:231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cebula R, Mixon F (2014) The roles of economic freedom and regulatory quality in creating a favorable environment for investment in energy R&D, infrastructure, and capacity. Am J Econ Sociol 73:299–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark JR, Lawson R, Nowrasteh A, Powell B, Murphy R (2015) Does immigration impact institutions? Public Choice 163:321–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne C, Ryan M (2009) With friends like these, who needs enemies? Aiding the world’s worst dictators. Indep Rev 14:26–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov S, Montalvo J, Reynal-Querol M (2008) The curse of aid. J Econ Growth 13:169–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W (2001) The elusive quest for growth economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W (2003) Can foreign aid buy growth? J Econ Perspect 17:23–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W (2006) The white man’s burden: why the west’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Penguin Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Levine R (1997) Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Quart J Econ 112:1203–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Ritzen J, Woolcock M (2003) Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Econ Polit 18:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton S, Walker A (1997) Income, growth, and economic freedom. Am Econ Rev 87:328–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehring K (2013) Who benefits from economic freedom? Unraveling the effect of economic freedom on subjective well-being. World Dev 50:74–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Shleifer A (2002) Legal origins. Quart J Econ 117:1193–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2004) Do institutions cause growth? J Econ Growth 9:271–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubel H (1998) Economic freedom and human welfare: some empirical findings. Cato J 18:287–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwartney J, Lawson R, Holcombe R (1997) Economic freedom and the environment for economic growth. J Inst Theor Econ 155:643–663

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall J (2015) Institutional convergence: exit or voice? Working paper. http://www.be.wvu.edu/phd_economics/pdf/15-40.pdf

  • Hall J, Lawson R (2014) Economic freedom of the world: an accounting of the literature. Contemp Econ Policy 32:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall J, Stansel D, Tarabar D (2015) Economic freedom studies at the state level: a survey. Working paper. http://be.wvu.edu/phd_economics/pdf/15-07.pdf

  • Hayek F (1960) The constitution of liberty. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman J, Knack S (2008) Foreign aid and market-liberalizing reform. Economica 75:524–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckelman J, Knack S (2009) Aid, economic freedom, and growth. Contemp Econ Policy 27:46–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs R (1987) Crisis and Leviathan critical episodes in the growth of American government. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodler R (2007) Rent seeking and aid effectiveness. Int Tax Public Financ 14:525–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isham J, Woolcock M, Pritchett L, Busby G (2005) The varieties of resource experience: natural resource export structures and the political economy of economic growth. World Bank Econ Rev 19:141–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koeberle S (2003) Should policy-based lending still involve conditionality? World Bank Res Obs 18:249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Organ 15:222–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-De-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (2002) Investor protection and corporate valuation. J Financ 57:1147–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. J Econ Lit 46:285–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal D (1987) The political economy of economic liberalization. World Bank Econ Rev 1:273–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney P (2001) The common law and economic growth: Hayek might be right. J Legal Stud 30(2):503–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan C, Shleifer A (2005) Conscription as regulation. Am Law Econ Rev 7:85–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambi M, Rajhi T (2013) Banking, contract enforcement, and economic growth. Int Rev Econ 60:83–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nattinger M, Hall J (2012) Legal origins and state economic freedom. J Econ Econ Educ Res 13:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly C, Powell B (2015) War and the growth of government. Eur J Polit Econ 40:31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitlik H, Wirth S (2003) Do crises promote the extent of economic liberalization? An empirical test. Eur J Polit Econ 19:565–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell B, Ryan M (2006) Does development aid lead to economic freedom? J Priv Enterp 21:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs J, Warner A (1999) The big rush, natural resource booms and growth. J Dev Econ 59:43–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala-i-Martin X, Subramanian A (2013) Addressing the natural resource curse: an illustration from Nigeria. J Afr Econ 22:570–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70:65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez I (1998) Official assistance, economic freedom, and policy change: is foreign aid like champagne? Cato J 18:275–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson C (2010) Exploring the failure of foreign aid: the role of incentives and information. Rev Aust Econ 23:17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young A, Sheehan K (2014) Foreign aid, institutional quality, and growth. Eur J Polit Econ 36:195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young AT, Bologna J (2015) Crises and government: some empirical evidence. Contemp Econ Policy 34(2):234–249. doi:10.1111/coep.12154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Audrey Redford, Kathleen Sheehan, and the participants at the Free Market Institute’s seminar series for helpful comments on earlier drafts and the John Templeton Foundation for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond J. March.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was funded by the John Templeton Foundation ($10,000).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

March, R.J., Lyford, C. & Powell, B. Causes and barriers to increases in economic freedom. Int Rev Econ 64, 87–103 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-016-0263-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-016-0263-2

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation