Advertisement

International Review of Economics

, Volume 61, Issue 2, pp 115–125 | Cite as

Open issues in happiness research

  • Bruno S. FreyEmail author
  • Jana Gallus
  • Lasse Steiner
Research Article

Abstract

Happiness research is one of the most vivid and fruitful parts of modern economics. The focus is on empirical findings. In contrast, theoretical work has been rather neglected. The paper deals with three areas needing more analytical work: the choice or imposition of comparison or reference groups; and the extent, speed and symmetry of adaptation to positive and negative shocks on happiness. In both areas, theoretical propositions are derived which can in the future be empirically tested. The third area relates to the political economy of happiness. Many governments intend to take the happiness index as a criterion of how successful their policies are. As a consequence, survey respondents get an incentive to misrepresent their happiness level, and governments to manipulate the aggregate happiness indicator in their favor. A country’s constitution must induce governments to carefully observe human rights, democracy, the decentralization of political decision making, and market institutions and provide people with the possibility to acquire a good education and find a suitable job.

Keywords

Happiness Life satisfaction Reference group Adaptation Policy 

JEL Classification

A13 D64 

References

  1. Abdel-Khalek AM (2006) Measuring happiness with a single-item scale. Soc Behav Personal 34:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Becchetti L, Pelloni A (2013) What are we learning from the life satisfaction literature? Int Rev Econ 60:113–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benesch C, Frey BS, Stutzer A (2010) TV channels, self-control and happiness. BE J Econ Anal Policy 10:1–33Google Scholar
  4. Card D, Mas A, Moretti E, Saez E (2012) Inequality at work: the effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction. AER 102:2981–3003Google Scholar
  5. Clark AE (2003) Unemployment as a social norm: psychological evidence from panel data. J Labor Econ 21:323–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark AE, Senik C (2010) Who compares to whom? The anatomy of income comparisons in Europe. Econ J 120:573–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark AE, Diener E, Georgellis Y, Lucas RE (2008) Lags and leads in life satisfaction: a test of the baseline hypothesis. Econ J 118:222–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Danner DD, Snowdon DA, Friesen WV (2001) Positive emotions in early life and longevity: findings from the nun study. J Personal Soc Psychol 80:804–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Neve JE, Oswald A (2012) Estimating the influence of life satisfaction and positive affect on later income using sibling fixed effects. PNAS 109:19953–19958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deaton A (2008) Income, health and wellbeing around the world: evidence from the Gallup World Poll. J Econ Perspect 22:53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dolan P, Peasgood T, White M (2008) Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the economic literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. J Econ Psychol 29:94–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frey BS, Gallus J (2012) Happiness policy and economic development. Int J Happiness Dev 1:102–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frey BS, Gallus J (2013a) Subjective well-being and policy. Topoi 32(2):207–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frey BS, Gallus J (2013b) Political economy of happiness. Appl Econ 45:4205–4211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frey BS, Steiner L (2012) Glücksforschung: Eine empirische Analyse. AStA 6:9–25Google Scholar
  16. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2002) What can economists learn from happiness research? J Econ Lit 40:402–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2005a) Happiness research: state and prospects. Rev Soc Econ 63:207–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2005b) Does the political process mitigate or accentuate individual biases due to mispredicting future utility? In: McCaffey E, Slemrod J (eds) Behavioral public finance: toward a new agenda. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 1–44Google Scholar
  19. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2009) Should national happiness be maximized? In: Dutt AK, Radcliff B (eds) Happiness, economics and politics: towards a multi-disciplinary approach. Edward Elgar, Northampton, pp 301–323Google Scholar
  20. Frey BS, Stutzer A (2012) The use of happiness research for public policy. Soc Choice Welf 38:659–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frey BS, Luechinger S, Stutzer A (2009) The life satisfaction approach to valuing public goods: the case of terrorism. Public Choice 138:317–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gardner J, Oswald AJ (2007) Money and mental wellbeing: a longitudinal study of medium-sized lottery wins. J Health Econ 26:49–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kahneman D (2003) Objective happiness. In: Kahneman D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, pp 3–25Google Scholar
  24. Luttmer EFP (2005) Neighbors as negatives: relative earnings and well-being. QJE 120:963–1002Google Scholar
  25. McCloskey DN, Ziliak ST (1996) The standard error of regressions. J Econ Lit 34:97–114Google Scholar
  26. Odermatt R, Stutzer A (2013) Smoking bans, cigarette prices and life satisfaction. IZA Discussion Paper 7177Google Scholar
  27. Oswald AJ, Powdthavee N (2008) Does happiness adapt? A longitudinal study of disability with implications for economists and judges. J Public Econ 92:1061–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Senik C (2005) Income distribution and well-being: what can we learn from subjective data? J Econ Surv 19:43–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2008) Economic growth and subjective well-being: Reassessing the Easterlin paradox. Brookings Pap Econ Act 39:1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stevenson B, Wolfers J (2013) Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? NBER Working Paper 18992Google Scholar
  31. Stroebe M, van Son M, Stroebe W, Kleber R, Schut H, van den Bout J (2000) On the classification and diagnosis of pathological grief. Clin Psychol Rev 20:57–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stutzer A (2009) Happiness when temptation overwhelms willpower. In: Dutt AK, Radcliff B (eds) Happiness, economics, and politics: toward a multi-disciplinary approach. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 97–126 Google Scholar
  33. Stutzer A, Frey BS (2010) Recent advances in the economics of individual subjective well-being. Soc Res 77:679–714Google Scholar
  34. Veenhoven R (2003) Hedonism and happiness. J Happiness Stud 4:437–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Winkelmann R (2012) Conspicuous consumption and satisfaction. J Econ Psychol 33:183–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ziliak ST, McCloskey DN (2008) The cult of statistical significance: how the standard error costs us jobs, justice, and lives. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zeppelin UniversityFriedrichshafenGermany
  2. 2.Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA)ZurichSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ZurichZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations