Advertisement

International Review of Economics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 29–45 | Cite as

The rise and fall of monopolistic competition revolution

  • Lefteris Tsoulfidis
Article
  • 223 Downloads

Abstract

The widespread idea among economists is that monopolistic or imperfect competition is a set of realistic models that were invented in the 1930s and their purpose was to fill the gap between the polar and, at the same time, hypothetical models of perfect competition and pure monopoly. The main argument of this paper is that the monopolistic competition revolution set in motion a reaction—partly driven by methodological considerations, partly ideological—that ultimately led to the restoration of perfect competition, as the benchmark for evaluating market outcomes. In the end, monopolistic competition eclipsed, and perfect competition from the fridges of economic analysis that was up until the 1920s was placed to the very core of microeconomic model-building.

Keywords

Sraffa Perfect competition Monopolistic competition 

JEL Classification

B20 B21 B51 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Dimitris Paitaridis and Aris Papageorgiou for their helpful comments.

References

  1. Berle A, Means G (1932) The modern corporation and private property. Harcourt, Brace and World, New York (1968)Google Scholar
  2. Bishop R (1964) Monopolistic competition after thirty years: the impact on the general theory. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 54:33–43Google Scholar
  3. Blaug M (1978) Economic theory in retrospect. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Blitch C (1983) Alyn A. Young: a curious case of professional neglect. Hist Polit Econ 15:1–24Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlin E (1933) The theory of monopolistic competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (8th edition 1962) Google Scholar
  6. Chamberlin E (1952) Full cost and monopolistic competition. Econ J 62:318–325 reprinted in Chamberlin (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamberlin E (1982) Towards a more general theory of value. Greenwood Press, WestportGoogle Scholar
  8. Chandler A (1977) The visible hand. Belknap Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  9. Cournot A (1838) Researches into the mathematical principles of the theory of wealth. A. M. Kelley, New York (translated in 1960)Google Scholar
  10. Dilorenzo T, High J (1988) Antitrust and competition, historically considered. Econ Inquiry 26:423–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dupuit J (1844) On the measurement of the utility of public works. Translated In: Arrow K, Scitovsky T (eds) Readings in welfare economics. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood IL (1969)Google Scholar
  12. Edgeworth F (1881) Mathematical physics. Kegan Paul & Co, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Friedman M (1941) Review of monopolistic competition and general equilibrium Theory by R. Triffin. J Farm Econ 23:389–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Friedman M (1953) The methodology of positive economics. Chicago University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  15. Hall R, Hitch C (1939) Price theory and business behaviour. Oxford Econ Pap 2:12–45Google Scholar
  16. Harberger A (1954) Monopoly and resource allocation. Amer Econ Rev 44:77–87Google Scholar
  17. Hart N (2003) Marshall’s dilemma: equilibrium versus evolution. J Econ Issues 37:1139–1160Google Scholar
  18. Kaldor N (1980) Collected economic essays, I. Essays on value and distribution. Holmes & Meier, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Knight F (1921) Risk uncertainty and profits. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  20. Leibenstein H (1966) Allocative efficiency vs ‘X-efficiency’. Amer Econ Rev 56:392–415Google Scholar
  21. Marcuzzo MC (2001) Sraffa and Cambridge economics, 1928–1931. In: Cozzi T, Marchionatti R (eds) P. Sraffa’s political economy. A centenary estimate. Routledge, London, pp 81–99Google Scholar
  22. Marshall A (1890) Principles of economics, 8th edn. Macmillan, London (1920)Google Scholar
  23. Penrose E (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Reinwald T (1977) The genesis of Chamberlin’s monopolistic competition theory. Hist Polit Econ 9:522–534Google Scholar
  25. Robinson J (1933) The economics of imperfect competition. MacMillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Samuelsom P (1967) The monopolistic competition revolution. In: Kuenne R (ed) Monopolistic competition theory: studies in impact. Wiley, New York. Reprinted in Merton R (ed) Collected scientific papers of Paul Samuelson, vol III. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)Google Scholar
  27. Scherer F, Ross D (1990) Industrial market structure and economic performance. Houghton Mifflin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  28. Schumpeter J (1954) History of economic analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartzman D (1960) The burden of monopoly. J Polit Economy 68:727–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shackle G (1967) Years of high theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Sraffa P (1925) Sulle relazioni fra costo e quantità prodotta. Annali di Economia 2:277–328 English translation by Roncaglia A. and Eatwell JGoogle Scholar
  32. Sraffa P (1926) The laws of returns under competitive conditions. Econ J 36:535–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sraffa P (1930) A criticism—a rejoinder. Econ J 40:89–93Google Scholar
  34. Stigler G (1937) A generalization of the theory of imperfect competition. J Farm Econ 19:707–717Google Scholar
  35. Stigler G ([1942], 1966) The theory of price. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Stigler G (1949) Monopolistic competition in retrospect. Reprinted in The Organization of industry. Chicago University Press, Chicago (1983)Google Scholar
  37. Stigler G (1957) Perfect competition historically contemplated. J Polit Econ 65:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Triffin R (1941) Monopolistic competition and general equilibrium theory. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MacedoniaThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations