Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Queer Ethnobotany

  • Viewpoint
  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a field of study, ethnobotany is known for its interdisciplinary nature, drawing from a range of subjects, such as botany, anthropology, chemistry, ecology, and others. Though ethnobotany is broad and diverse, it does—on occasion—fall short when examining specific theoretical orientations and their applications within the discipline. In addition to this, there are many other forms of theoretical orientation—especially from the social sciences—that may hold great value for ethnobotany; some of these hold extra promise as a result of their inherent connection to themes of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) that have become increasingly acknowledged for their importance in academia in recent years. One such theoretical orientation is queer theory. The following paper provides a brief historical and epistemological overview of queer theory, and proposes a need for the development and practice of queer ethnobotany. Not only does queer theory stand to make ethnobotany a more diverse and accepting field, but it also has the potential to contribute to expanding upon the theoretical toolkit ethnobotanists may draw on in the classroom, the field, and beyond.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

A note on citations

In some cases, citations represent direct use of ideas as one would expect in a typical scientific paper, though in others, this is not the case. Investigations of queer theory in ethnobotany have not been previously carried out, and as such it is important not to understand these references as direct uses of content from the sources, but to instead note that those cited were influential in the development of my own mental process in the creation of these ideas and applications.

References

  • Albuquerque, U. P., R. R. N. Alves, and R. F. R. do Carmo. 2024. Is there a neocolonial stance in ethnobiology? Ethnobiology and Conservation 13: 6. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2024-01-13.06-1-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldieri, E. 2018. On the State of Contemporary Queer Theory: A review of Mari Ruti, The Ethics of Opting Out: Queer Theory’s Defiant Subjects. Postmodern Culture 28: 3. https://doi.org/10.1353/pmc.2018.0025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, B. 2003. Querying queer theory again (or queer theory as drag performance). Journal of Homosexuality 45(2-4): 349-352.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, S. 2015. Generative Motion: Queer Ecology and Avatar. Journal of Popular Culture 48(2): 341-354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellanes, J. A., and M. Hendricks. 2021. Teaching Ethnic-Specific Coursework: Practical Suggestions for Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Within the Classroom. Teaching of Psychology 49(4): 369-375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argüello, T. M. 2016. Fetishizing the health sciences: Queer theory as an intervention. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services 28(3): 231-244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, M., R. W. Kimmerer, and J. Vergun. 2007. Education and research opportunities for traditional ecological knowledge. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5(4): W12-W14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arons, W. 2012. Queer Ecology / Contemporary Plays. Theatre Journal 64(4): 565-582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendl, R., A. Fleischmann, and C. Walenta. 2008. Diversity management discourse meets queer theory. Gender in Management 23(6): 382-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, C. 2011. How to Queer the Past Without Sex: Queer Theory, Feminisms and the Archaeology of Identity. Archaeologies 7(1): 75-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolnick, D. A., R. W. A. Smith, and A. Fuentes. 2019. How Academic Diversity Is Transforming Scientific Knowledge in Biological Anthropology. American Anthropologist 121(2): 464-496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, K. 2006. Challenging queer geographies. Antipode 38(5): 885-893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. 1993. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “sex.” New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, D. L. 2014. Postqueer? Examining Tensions Between LGBT Studies and Queer Theory: A Review of LBGT Studies and Queer Theory. Journal of LGBT Youth 11(1): 95-100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, C. 2012. Grizzly love: The queer ecology of Timothy Treadwell. GLQ 18(4): 507-528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, M. A., S. Boynes, L. A. Jerome-Majewska, and K. S. Topp. 2022. The imperative for scientific societies to change the face of academia: Recommendations for immediate action. Anatomical Record 305(4): 1019-1031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y. K. 2005. Through Queers’ Eyes: Critical educational ethnography in queer studies. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies 27(2): 171-208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockayne, D. G., and L. Richardson. 2017. A queer theory of software studies: software theories, queer studies. Gender, Place and Culture 24(11): 1587-1594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C. J. 1997. Punks, Bulldaggers, and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics. GLQ 3: 437-465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosey, F. 2022. Deferring Resistance When Teaching Queer Theory at Historically Black Colleges and Universities. Research Issues in Contemporary Education 7(2): 90-102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowdy, J. 2017. Queer undergrowth: Weeds and sexuality in the architecture of the garden. Architecture and Culture 5(3): 423-433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859. On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or, the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. London: John Murray.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dei, G. J. S., and A. Adhami. 2022. Coming to Know and Knowing Differently: Implications of Educational Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly 58(5): 780-809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilley, P. 1999. Queer theory: Under construction? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 12(5): 457-472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. 2019. The (Un)Natural Archive. Imaginations: Journal of Cross-Cultural Image Studies/revue d’études interculturelle de l’image 10: 1. https://doi.org/10.17742/image.cr.10.1.4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson-Schroth, L., and J. Mitchell. 2009. Queering queer theory, or why bisexuality matters. Journal of Bisexuality 9(3-4): 297-315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng, J. 2022. Toward Queer Climate Justice. Santa Barbara: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. A. 2005. Race-ing Homonormativity: Citizenship, Sociology, and Gay Identity. In: Black Queer Studies, eds. E. P. Johnson, and M. G. Henderson, 52-67. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Llamazares, Á., D. Lepofsky, K. Lertzman, C. Geralda Armstrong, E. S. Brondizio, M. C. Gavin, P. O. Lyver, G. P. Nicholas, P. Pascua, N. J. Reo, V. Reyes-García, N. J. Turner, J. Yletyinen, E. N. Anderson,W. Balée, J. Cariño, D. M. David-Chavez, C. P. Dunn, S. C. Garnett, S. Greening, S. Jackson, H. Kuhnlein, Z. Molnár, G. Odonne, G.-B. Retter, W. J. Ripple, L. Sáfián, A. Sharifian Bahraman, M. Torrents-Ticó, and M. Blaich Vaughan. 2021. Scientists’ Warning to Humanity on Threats to Indigenous and Local Knowledge Systems. Journal of Ethnobiology 41(1): 144-169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifield, S., and W. Letts. 2014. [Re]considering queer theories and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education 9: 393-407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filax, G. 2006. Politicising action research through queer theory. Educational Action Research 14(1): 139-145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. Trans. R. Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Foucault, M. 1985. The History of Sexuality, Volume 2: The Use of Pleasure. Trans. R. Hurley. New York: Pantheon Books.

  • Fox, R. 2013. Homo-work: Queering academic communication and communicating queer in Academia. Text and Performance Quarterly 33(1): 58-76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, K. 2018. Queer speciation: Or, Darwin on and off the farm. Victorian Studies 60(2): 228-235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, J. 2000. Sexualities, queer theory, and qualitative research. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research: Second Edition, eds. N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 347-365. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, J., and D. Moon. 2004. The sociology of sexualities: Queer and beyond. Annual Review of Sociology 30: 47-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandy, M. 2012. Queer ecology: Nature, sexuality, and heterotopic alliances. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 30(4): 727-747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, P. L. 2009. Bodyscapes, biology, and heteronormativity. American Anthropologist 111(4): 504-516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, G. 2010. How queer is green? Configurations 18(1-2): 73-96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, B. J. 2014. Queer indigenous entropy: Sexual circulation and the conquest narrative. Anthropology of Consciousness 25(2): 165-180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goltz, D. 2009. Investigating queer future meanings: Destructive perceptions of “the harder path.” Qualitative Inquiry 15(3): 561-586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. 2016. Anthropologists Are Talking about Queer Anthropology. Ethnos 81(2): 364-377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. I. 2007. Queer theory and sociology: Locating the subject and the self in sexuality studies. Sociological Theory 25(1): 26-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halperin, D. M. 2003. The normalization of queer theory. Journal of Homosexuality 45(2-4): 339-343.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hames-Garcia, M. 2013. What’s After Queer Theory? Queer Ethnic and Indigenous Studies. Feminist Studies 39(2): 384-404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoogeveen, D. 2016. Fish-hood: Environmental assessment, critical Indigenous studies, and posthumanism at Fish Lake (Teztan Biny), Tsilhqot’in territory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 34(2): 355-370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. 2007. Ethnobiology in Four Phases. Journal of Ethnobiology 27(1): 1-10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagose, A. 2009. Feminism’s queer theory. Feminism & Psychology 19(2): 157-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. G., and B. M. Calafell. 2012. Contesting Neoliberalism Through Critical Pedagogy, Intersectional Reflexivity, and Personal Narrative: Queer Tales of Academia. Journal of Homosexuality 59(7): 957-981.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khattar, J., P. Calvo, I. Vandebroek, C. Pandolfi, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2022. Understanding interdisciplinary perspectives of plant intelligence: Is it a matter of science, language, or subjectivity? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 18: 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13002-022-00539-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R. W. 2000. Native Knowledge for Native Ecosystems. Journal of Forestry 98(8): 4-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R. W. 2002. Weaving Traditional Ecological Knowledge into Biological Education: A Call to Action. Bioscience 52(5): 432-438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R. W. 2012. Searching for synergy: Integrating traditional and scientific ecological knowledge in environmental science education. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 2: 317-323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, N. M. P. 2022. DEI Is Not Enough. Hastings Center Report 52(3): 3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, M. 2007. Queer theory, late capitalism, and internalized homophobia. Journal of Homosexuality 52(1-2): 19-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knopp, L. 1999. Out in academia: The queer politics of one geographer’s sexualization. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 23(1): 116-123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafleur, G. 2013. Precipitous Sensations: Herman Mann’s “The Female Review” (1797), Botanical Sexuality, and the Challenge of Queer Historiography. Early American Literature 48(1): 93-123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonti, M. 2022. The relevance of quantitative ethnobotanical indices for ethnopharmacology and ethnobotany. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 288: 115008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2022.115008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lepofsky, D., C. Heckelsmiller, Á. Fernández-Llamazares, and J. Wall. 2021. Seeking a More Ethical Future for Ethnobiology Publishing: A 40-Year Perspective from Journal of Ethnobiology. Journal of Ethnobiology 41(2): 122-143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovaas, K. E., J. P. Elia, and G. A. Yep. 2007. Shifting ground(s): Surveying the contested terrain of LGBT studies and queer theory. Journal of Homosexuality 52(1-2): 1-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, D., and C. N. El-Hani. 2020. Philosophy of Ethnobiology: Understanding Knowledge Integration and Its Limitations. Journal of Ethnobiology 40(1): 3-20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, M. 2014. Inviting queer ideas into the science classroom: Studying sexuality education from a queer perspective. Cultural Studies and Science Education 9(2): 377-391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luthor, J. D. 2017. Queer Theory. The Year’s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory 25(1): 231-251.

  • Manalansan, M. F. 2016. Queer anthropology: An Introduction. Cultural Anthropology 31(4): 595-597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, J. M. 2003. Racisms, heterosexisms, and identities: A semiotic phenomenology of self-understanding. Journal of Homosexuality 45(2-4): 109-127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mattheis, A., D. C. R. De Arellano, and J. B. Yoder. 2020. A Model of Queer STEM Identity in the Workplace. Journal of Homosexuality 67(13): 1839-1863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McAlvay, A. C., C. G. Armstrong, J. Baker, L. Black Elk, S. Bosco, N. Hanazaki, L. Joseph, T. Eulalia Martínez-Cruz, M. Nesbitt, M. A. Palmer, W. Cocta, P. De Almeida, J. Anderson, Z. Asfaw, I. T. Borokini, J. Cano-Contreras, S. Hoyte, M. Hudson, A. H. Ladio, G. Odonne, S. Peter, J. Rashford, J. Wall, S. Wolverton, and I. Vandebroek. 2021. Ethnobiology Phase VI: Decolonizing Institutions, Projects, and Scholarship. Journal of Ethnobiology 41(2): 170-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, A. 1999. “Resistance is hopeless”: Assimilating queer Theory. Social Semiotics 9(2): 235-249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. L. 2019. Queer theory. Year’s Work in Critical and Cultural Theory 27(1): 82-99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minton, H. L. 1997. Queer theory: Historical roots and Implications for Psychology. Theory & Psychology 7(3): 337-353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgensen, S. L. 2012. Theorising Gender, Sexuality and Settler Colonialism: An Introduction. Settler Colonial Studies 2(2): 2-22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. 2010. Guest column: Queer ecology. PMLA 125(2): 273-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins, J. 2020. Queer Ecology: Shared Horizons after Disturbance. Italianist 40(2): 229-243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, K. 2019. Queer Procreation. Qui Parle 28(1): 137-166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, J. 2002. (Queer) Theory and the Universal Alternative. Diacritics 32(2): 2-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, J. M., and R. J. Butz. 2005. Assessing Cultural and Ecological Variation in Ethnobiological Research: The Importance of Gender. Journal of Ethnobiology 25(2): 240-278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phaka, F. M. 2020. Environmental science investigations of folk taxonomy and other forms of indigenous knowledge. South African Journal of Science 116(1-2): 17-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poiani, A. 2010. Animal Homosexuality: A Biosocial Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polewhele, R. 1800. The Unsex’d Females. New York: W. M. Cobbett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigney, L. -I. 1999. Internationalization of an Indigenous Anticolonial Cultural Critique of Research Methodologies: A Guide to Indigenist Research Methodology and Its Principles. Wicazo Sa Review 14(2): 109-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodemeyer, L. M. 2017. Husserl and queer theory. Continental Philosophy Review 50(3): 311-334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooke, A. 2009. Queer in the field: On emotions, temporality, and performativity in ethnography. Journal of Lesbian Studies 13(2): 149-160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roughgarden, J. 2013. Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People, 1st ed. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, K. 2000. Queer theory and feminism. Women’s Studies 29(2): 195-216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandilands, C. 2017. Fear of a queer plant? GLQ 23(3): 419-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandilands, C. 2002. Lesbian Separatist Communities and the Experience of Nature: Toward a Queer Ecology. Organization & Environment 15(2): 131-163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharrón-Del Río, M. R. 2020. Intersectionality Is Not a Choice: Reflections of a Queer Scholar of Color on Teaching, Writing, and Belonging in LGBTQ Studies and Academia. Journal of Homosexuality 67(3): 294-304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schiebinger, L. 1993. Nature’s Body: Gender in the Making of Modern Science. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. 1996. Queer theory/sociology. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, S. 1994. Queer Pedagogy / Queer-ing Sociology. Critical Sociology 20(3): 169-176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, M. 2004. Overlaps and contradictions between queer theory and disability studies. Disability & Society 19(7): 769-783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Showden, C. R. 2012. Theorising maybe: A feminist/queer theory convergence. Feminist Theory 13(1): 3-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silverschanz, P., L. M. Cortina, J. Konik, and V. J. Magley. 2008. Slurs, snubs, and queer jokes: Incidence and impact of heterosexist harassment in academia. Sex Roles 58(3-4): 179-191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, V., and P. L. Vasey. 2006. Homosexual Behaviour in Animals: An Evolutionary Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talburt, S. 1999. Open secrets and problems of queer ethnography: Readings from a religious studies classroom. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 12(5): 525-539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R., L. Lucero, A. Owens, and B. Cahill. 2022. Hanging Out with Kids Who Accept Them for Who They Are: Using Queer Theory to Understand How Youth Challenge Norms and Explore Identities. Multicultural Education Review 14(1): 64-80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandebroek, I., A. Pieroni, J. R. Stepp, N. Hanazaki, A. Ladio, R. R. N. Alves, D. Picking, R. Delgoda, A. Maroyi, T. van Andel, C. L. Quave, N. Y. Paniagua-Zambrana, R. W. Bussmann, G. Odonne, A. M. Abbasi, U. P. Albuquerque, J. Baker, S. Kutz, S. Timsina, M. Shigeta, T. P. R. Oliveira, J. A. Hurrell, P. M. Arenas, J. P. Puentes, J. Hugé, Y. Yeşil, L. J. Pierre, T. M. Olango, and F. Dahdouh-Guebas. 2020. Reshaping the future of ethnobiology research after the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Plants 6(7): 723-730.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. 1999. The Trouble with Normal: Sex Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. 1991. Introduction: Fear of a Queer Planet. Social Text 29: 3-17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, K. 2005. Queer theory. Group Analysis 38(1): 67-81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilcox, M. M. 2007. Outlaws or in-laws? Queer theory, LGBT studies, and religious studies. Journal of Homosexuality 52(1-2): 73-100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, J. 2018. Species: The Evolution of the Idea. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, S. 2013. Ethnobiology 5: Interdisciplinarity in an Era of Rapid Environmental Change. Ethnobiology Letters 4: 21-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolverton, S., J. M. Nolan, and W. Ahmed. 2014. Ethnobiology, Political Ecology, and Conservation. Journal of Ethnobiology 34(2): 125-152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyndham, F. S., D. Lepofsky, and S. Tiffany. 2011. Taking Stock in Ethnobiology: Where do We Come From? What are We? Where are We Going? Journal of Ethnobiology 31(1): 110-127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yep, G. A. 2003. The violence of heteronormativity in communication studies: Notes on injury, healing, and queer world-making. Journal of Homosexuality 45(2-4): 11-59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Dr. Ina Vandebroek for her help in handling and revising this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada

    Karsten Fatur

Authors
  1. Karsten Fatur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The work of this paper was presented (in a significantly abridged form) at the 2023 Joint Conference of the Society for Economic Botany and Society of Ethnobiology in Atlanta, USA under the title of “Pontification in the Pansy Patch: Applications of queer theory in ethnobotany.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Fatur.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

N/A.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatur, K. Queer Ethnobotany. Econ Bot (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-024-09605-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-024-09605-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation