Skip to main content
Log in

Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany

  • Review
  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethnobotany has evolved from a discipline that largely documented the diversity of plant use by local people to one focused on understanding how and why people select plants for a wide range of uses. This progress has been in response to a repeated call for theory-inspired and hypothesis-driven research to improve the rigor of the discipline. Despite improvements, recent ethnobotanical research has overemphasized the use of quantitative ethnobotany indices and statistical methods borrowed from ecology, yet underemphasized the development and integration of a strong theoretical foundation. To advance the field of ethnobotany as a hypothesis-driven, theoretically inspired discipline, it is important to first synthesize the existing theoretical lines of research. We review and discuss 17 major theories and hypotheses in ethnobotany that can be used as a starting point for developing research questions that advance our understanding of people–plant interactions. For each theory or major hypothesis, we identify its primary predictions and testable hypotheses and then discuss how these predictions have been tested. Developing research to test these predictions will make significant contributions to the field of ethnobotany and create the critical mass of primary literature necessary to develop meta-analyses and to advance new theories in ethnobotany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Aarssen, L. W. 1997. On the progress of ecology. Oikos 80:177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albuquerque, U. P. 2006. Re-examining hypotheses concerning the use and knowledge of medicinal plants a study in the Caatinga vegetation of NE Brazil. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 2:(30): 1-10

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Quantitative ethnobotany or quantification in ethnobotany? Ethnobotany Research and Applications 7:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., and R. F. de Oliveira. 2007. Is the use-impact on native Caatinga species in Brazil reduced by the high species richness of medicinal plants? Journal of Ethnopharmacology 113:156–170.

  • ———., and Hanazaki N.. 2009. Commentary: Five problems in current ethnobotanical research—And some suggestions for strengthening them. Human Ecology 37:653–661.

  • ———., and R. F. P. Lucena. 2005. Can apparency affect the use of plants by local people in tropical forests? Interciencia 30:506–511.

  • ———., G. T. Soldati, S. S. Sieber, M. A. Ramos, J. C. De Sá, and L. C. De Souza. 2011. The use of plants in the medical system of the Fulni-ô people NE Brazil. A perspective on age and gender. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 133: 866–873.

  • ———., M. A. Ramos, and J. G. Melo. 2012. New strategies for drug discovery in tropical forests based on ethnobotanical and chemical ecological studies. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 140:197–201.

  • Alencar, N. L., T.A.des Araujo, E. L. C. de Amorim, U. P. Albuquerque, T. Antonio, D. S. Araújo, E. Lúcia, et al. 2009. Can the apparency hypothesis explain the selection of medicinal plants in an area of Caatinga vegetation? A chemical perspective. Acta Botanica Brasilica 23:911–911.

  • Alencar, N. L., T. A. de Sousa Araújo, E. L. C. Amorim, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2010. The inclusion and selection of medicinal plants in traditional pharmacopoeias—Evidence in support of the diversification hypothesis. Economic Botany 64:68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alencar, N. L., F. R. Santoro, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2014. What is the role of exotic medicinal plants in local medical systems? A study from the perspective of utilitarian redundancy. Brazilian Journal of Pharmacognosy 24:506–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexiades, M. N. 1996. Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: A field manual. Bronx, New York: The New York Botanical Garden

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, C. D. F. C. B. R., T. C. de Lima e Silva, E. L. C. de Amorim, M. B. D. S. Maia, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2005. Life strategy and chemical composition as predictors of the selection of medicinal plants from the Caatinga Northeast Brazil. Journal of Arid Environments 62:127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, C. D. F. C. B. R., D. L. de Vasconcelos Cabral, C. C. B. Rangel de Almeida, E. L. Cavalcanti de Amorim, J. M. de Araújo, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2012. Comparative study of the antimicrobial activity of native and exotic plants from the Caatinga and Atlantic Forest selected through an ethnobotanical survey. Pharmaceutical Biology 50:201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amiguet, V. T., J. T. Arnason, P. Maquin, V. Cal, P. Sánchez-Vindas, and L. P. Alvarez. 2006. A regression analysis of Q’eqchi’ Maya medicinal plants from southern Belize. Economic Botany 60:24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S. 1998. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: Cognitive universals and cultural particulars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (04): 547–569.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balick, M. 1996. Transforming ethnobotany for the new millennium. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 83 (10): 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begossi, A. 1996. Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: Diversity indices. Economic Botany 50:280–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B. C. 2005. Ethnobotany education, opportunities, and needs in the US. Ethnobotany Research & Applications 3:113–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, B. C.. 2007. Doctrine of signatures: An explanation of medicinal plant discovery or dissemination of knowledge? Economic Botany 61:246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., and C. E. Husby. 2008. Patterns of medicinal plant use: An examination of the Ecuadorian Shuar medicinal flora using contingency table and binomial analyses. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 116:422–430.

  • ———., and G. T. Prance. 2000. Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopoeia of northern South America. Economic Botany 1:90–102.

  • Berlin B. 1973. Folk systematics in relation to biological classification and nomenclature. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4:259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., D. E. Breedlove, and P.H. Raven. 1973. General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. American Anthropologist 75 (1): 214–242.

  • Bhagwat, S. A., and C. Rutte. 2006. Sacred groves: Potential for biodiversity management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 4:519–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. S. 1986. Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist 88:428–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, R., S.-L. Mathez-Stiefel, S. Lachmuth, I. Hensen, and S. Rist. 2013. Knowledge and valuation of Andean agroforestry species: The role of sex, age, and migration among members of a rural community in Bolivia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9:83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. H. 1977. Folk botanical life-forms: Their universality and growth. American Anthropologist 79(2): 317–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C.H. 2000. Folk classification: an introduction. Pages 65–68 In Minnis P.E. ed Ethnobotany: A reader.Norman, University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceuterick, M., I. Vandebroek, B. Torry, and A. Pieroni. 2008. Cross-cultural adaptation in urban ethnobotany: The Colombian folk pharmacopoeia in London. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 120:342–359.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Charnov, E. L. 1976. Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. Theoretical Population Biology 9(2):129–136.

  • Coe, M. A., and McKenna, D. J. 2017. The therapeutic potential of Ayahuasca. Pages 123–137. In D. Camfield, E. McIntyre, and J. Sarris. Evidence-based herbal and nutritional treatments for anxiety in psychiatric disorders. New York: Springer International Publishing.

  • Colding, J., and C. Folke. 1997. The relations among threatened species, their protection, and taboos. Conservation Ecology 1(1):6. http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art6/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colding, J., and C. Folke. 2001. Social taboos: “Invisible” systems of local resources management and biological conservation. Ecological Applications 11:584–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, P. D., J. J. P. Bryant, and F. S. Chapin. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coley, P. D., M. V Heller, R. Aizprua, B. Araúz, N. Flores, M. Correa, M. Gupta, et al. 2003. Using ecological criteria to design plant collection strategies for drug discovery. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 1:421–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, H. C. 1954. The relation of Hanunóo culture to the plant world. PhD dissertation, Yale University.

  • Cristancho, S., and J. Vining. 2004. Culturally defined keystone species. Human Ecology Review 11:153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crona, B., and Ö. Bodin. 2006. What you know is who you know? Communication patterns among resource users as a prerequisite for co-management. Ecology and Society 11:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dafni, A., and E. Lev. 2002. The doctrine of signatures in present-day Israel. Economic Botany 56:328–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lucena, R. F. P., P. M. de Medeiros, E. de L. Araújo, A. G. C. Alves, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2012. The ecological apparency hypothesis and the importance of useful plants in rural communities from Northeastern Brazil: An assessment based on use value. Journal of Environmental Management 96:106–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira Trindade, M. R., J. G. Jardim, A. Casas, N. M. Guerra, and R. F. P. de Lucena. 2015. Availability and use of woody plant resources in two areas of Caatinga in Northeastern Brazil. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 14:313–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-Reviriego, I., L. González-Segura, Á. Fernández-Llamazares, P. L. Howard, J. L. Molina, and V. Reyes-García. 2016. Social organization influences the exchange and species richness of medicinal plants in Amazonian homegardens. Ecology and Society 21:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endara, M.-J., and P. D. Coley. 2011. The resource availability hypothesis revisited: A meta-analysis. Functional Ecology 25:389–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estomba, D., A. Ladio, and M. Lozada. 2006. Medicinal wild plant knowledge and gathering patterns in a Mapuche community from North-western Patagonia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 103:109–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etkin, N. L. 1988. Ethnopharmacology: Biobehavioral approaches in the anthropological study of indigenous medicines. Annual Review of Anthropology 17:23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeny, P. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defense. Pages 1–40 in J. Wallace and R. Mansell, eds. Recent advances in phytochemistry (Vol. 10). New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, F. S., U. P. Albuquerque, H. D. M. Coutinho, W. O. Almeida, and R. R. N. Alves. 2012. The trade in medicinal animals in northeastern Brazil. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine: eCAM, 2012, 126938. http://doi.org/10.1155/2012/126938.

  • Ford, R. I. 1978. The nature and status of ethnobotany, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. and O.G Gaoue. 2017. Alkaloid-poor plant families, Poaceae and Cyperaceae, are over-utilized for medicine in Hawaiian pharmacopoeia. Economic Botany 71(2): 123–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franco, F. M., B. A. A. Ghani, and S. Hidayati. 2014. Biocultural importance of the Tanying [Koompassia excelsa Becc. Taub.] tree for the Berawan of Loagan Bunut, Sarawak, Malaysia. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 13:63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furusawa, T. 2009. Changing ethnobotanical knowledge of the Roviana people, Solomon Islands: Quantitative approaches to its correlation with modernization. Human Ecology 37:147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, G. 2000. Forest use at the Pacific coast of Choco, Colombia: A quantitative approach. Economic Botany 54:358–376.

  • Gandolfo, E. S., and N. Hanazaki. 2014. Distribution of local plant knowledge in a recently urbanized area Campeche District, Florianopolis. Urban Ecosystems17(3): 775–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi, A., and N. Turner. 2004. Cultural keystone species: Implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecology and Society 9(3): 1. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art1/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavin, M. C. 2009. Conservation implications of rainforest use patterns: Mature forests provide more resources but secondary forests supply more medicine. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:1275–1282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonçalves, P. H. S., U. P. Albuquerque, and P. M. Medeiros. 2016. The most commonly available woody plant species are the most useful for human populations: A meta-analysis. Ecological Applications 26:2238–2253.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazaki, N., D. F. Herbst, M. S. Marques, and I. Vandebroek. 2013. Evidence of the shifting baseline syndrome in ethnobotanical research. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9:75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, B., and T. Gallaher. 2007. Importance indices in ethnobotany. Ethnobotany Research and Applications 5:201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofisi, C., M. Hofisi, and S. Mago. 2014. Critiquing interviewing as a data collection method. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 5:60–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A. 2011. Use of network centrality measures to explain individual levels of herbal remedy cultural competence among the Yucatec Maya in Tabi, Mexico. Field Methods 23:307–328.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hunn, E. 1975. Folk biology: A frontier of cognitive anthropology. Reviews in Anthropology, 2(2), 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jernigan, K. 2012. Plants with histories: The changing ethnobotany of Iquito speakers of the Peruvian Amazon. Economic Botany 66:46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns, T. 1986. Chemical selection in Andean domesticated tubers as a model for the acquisition of empirical plant knowledge. Pages 266–288, In: N. L. Etkin, ed. Plants used in indigenous medicine and diet: Biobehavioral approaches, South Salem, New York: Redgrave Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapur, S. K., A. K. Shahi, Y. K. Sarin, and D. E. Moerman. 1992. The medicinal flora of Majouri-kirchi forests (Jammu and Kashmir State), India. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 36:87–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kawa, N. C., C. McCarty, and C. R. Clement. 2013. Manioc varietal diversity, social networks, and distribution constraints in rural Amazonia. Current Anthropology 54:764–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs, C. J. 2000. Hypothesis testing in ecology. In: Boitani, L. and Fuller, T., Research techniques in animal ecology, Pages 1–14, New York: Columbia University Press.

  • Kursar, T., and T. Capson. 1999. Ecologically guided bioprospecting in Panama. Pharmaceutical Biology 37:114–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladio, A. H. 2001. The maintenance of wild edible plant gathering in a Mapuche community of Patagonia. Economic Botany 55:243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, A., O. L. Phillips, A. R. Ismodes, M. Lopez, S. Rose, D. Wood, and A. J. Farfan. 2005. Local values for harvested forest plants in Madre de Dios, Peru: Towards a more contextualised interpretation of quantitative ethnobotanical data. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:45–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J. H. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology? Oikos 84:177–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonti, M., O. Sticher, and M. Heinrich. 2002. Medicinal plants of the Popoluca, Mexico: Organoleptic properties as indigenous selection criteria. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 81:307–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquet, P. A., A. P. Allen, J. H. Brown, J. A. Dunne, B. J. Enquist, J. F. Gillooly, P. A. Gowaty, et al. 2014. On theory in ecology. BioScience 64:701–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, G. J. 2007. Ethnobotany: A methods manual. Earthscan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathez-Stiefel, S. L., R. Brandt, S. Lachmuth, and S. Rist. 2012. Are the young less knowledgeable? Local knowledge of natural remedies and its transformations in the Andean Highlands. Human Ecology 40:909–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarter, J., and M. C. Gavin. 2015. Assessing variation and diversity of ethnomedical knowledge: A case study from Malekula Island, Vanuatu. Economic Botany 69(3): 251–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClatchey, W. C., A. Paul, T. Flaster, and V. McClatchey. 1999. An evaluation of educational trends in economic and ethnobotany. Ethnobotany Educational Publication Series 1:1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClatchey, W. C., G. E. Wagner, K. Hall, and P. Harrison. 2013. Vision and change for undergraduate ethnobiology education in the USA: Recommended curriculum assessment guidelines. Open Science Network in Ethnobiology, Fort Worth, Botanical Research Institute of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCune, L. M., and T. Johns. 2007. Antioxidant activity relates to plant part, life form and growing condition in some diabetes remedies. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 112:461–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D. R. 1977. Food taboos: A primitive environmental protection agency (South America). Anthropos 734–748.

  • McKey, D. 1974. Adaptive patterns in alkaloid physiology. American Naturalist 108:305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillen, H. 2012. Ethnobotanical knowledge transmission and evolution: The case of medicinal markets in Tanga, Tanzania. Economic Botany 66:121–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., and S. Atran. 2004. The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review 111(4): 960–983.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. 1979. Symbols and selectivity: A statistical analysis of native American medical ethnobotany. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 1:111–119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moerman, D. E. 1991. The medicinal flora of native North America: An analysis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 31:1–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. An analysis of the food plants and drug plants of native North America. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 52:1–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Meaning, medicine, and the placebo effect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———., and G. F. Estabrook. 2003. Native Americans’ choice of species for medicinal use is dependent on plant family: Confirmation with meta-significance analysis. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 87:51–59.

  • Müller-Schwarze, N. K. 2006. Antes and hoy día: Plant knowledge and categorization as adaptations to life in Panama in the twenty-first century. Economic Botany 60:321–334.

  • Nascimento, V. T., R. F. P. Lucena, M. I. S. Maciel, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2013. Knowledge and use of wild food plants in areas of dry seasonal forests in Brazil. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 52:317–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nascimento, A. L. B., W. S. F. Júnior, M. A. Ramos, P. M. de Medeiros, G. T. Soldati, F. R. Santoro, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2015. Utilitarian redundancy: Conceptualization and potential applications in ethnobiological research. In: U. P. Albuquerque, P. M. de Medeiros, and A. Casas, eds. Evolutionary ethnobiology, Pages 121–130, New York: Springer International Publishing.

  • Paine, R. T. 1969. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. American Naturalist 103:91–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, G., and E. R. Pianka. 1997. Animal foraging: Past, present and future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 12: 360–364.

  • Pfeiffer, J. M., and R. J. Butz. 2005. Assessing cultural and ecological variation in ethnobotanical research: The importance of gender. Journal of Ethnobiology 25:240–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O., and A. H. Gentry 1993a. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional hypothesis testing in quantitative ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47:33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O., and A. H. Gentry. 1993b. The useful plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical hypotheses tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47:15–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platten, S., and T. Henfrey. 2009. The cultural keystone concept: Insights from ecological anthropology. Human Ecology 37:491–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poot-Pool W.S., van der Wal H., Flores-Guido S. Pat-Fernández, J.M. and L. Esparza-Olguín. 2015. Home garden agrobiodiversity differentiates along a rural-peri-urban gradient in Campeche, México. Economic Botany 69(3): 203–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T., K. Aiona, M. J. Balick, B. C. Bennett, K. Bridges, D. A. Burney, L. P. Burney, et al. 2007. Ethnobotany, the science of survival: A declaration from Kaua’i. Economic Botany 61:1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. F., and A. E. Dunham. 1983. On hypothesis testing in ecology and evolution. American Naturalist 122:602–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quiroz, D., and T. van Andel. 2015. Evidence of a link between taboos and sacrifices and resource scarcity of ritual plants. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 11:5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rea, A. M. 1981. Resource utilization and food taboos of Sonoran desert peoples. Journal of Ethnobiology 1:69–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García V., V. Vadez, T. Huanca, W. Leonard, and T. McDade. 2007. Economic development and local ecological knowledge: a deadlock? Data from a native Amazonian society. Human Ecology 35:371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V., M. Guèze, A. C. Luz, J. Paneque-Gálvez, M. J. Macía, M. Orta-Martínez, J. Pino, et al. 2013a. Evidence of traditional knowledge loss among a contemporary indigenous society. Evolution and Human Behavior 34:249–257.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-García, V., J. L. Molina, L. Calvet-Mir, L. Aceituno-Mata, J. J. Lastra, R. Ontillera, M. Parada, et al. 2013b. “Tertius gaudens”: germplasm exchange networks and agroecological knowledge among home gardeners in the Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 9:53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, D. F., and R. G. Cates. 1976. Toward a general theory of plant antiherbivore chemistry. In: J. Wallace and R. Mansell, eds. Recent advances in phytochemistry. Pages 168–213. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salick, J. Alcorn E. Anderson J. et. al., 2003. Intellectual Imperatives in Ethnobiology: NSF Biocomplexity Workshop Report (Report), St. Louis, Missouri Botanical Garden.

  • Santos, F. S., U. P. Albuquerque, L. Martins, A. L. Silva, A. L. B. Nascimento, and J. M. Monteiro. 2014. An ethnopharmacological assessment of the use of plants against parasitic diseases in humans and animals. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 155:1332–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saslis-Lagoudakis, C. H., J. A. Hawkins, S. J. Greenhill, C. A. Pendry, M. F. Watson, W. Tuladhar-Douglas, S. R. Baral, et al. 2014. The evolution of traditional knowledge: Environment shapes medicinal plant use in Nepal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:20132768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sih, A., and B. Christensen. 2001. Optimal diet theory: When does it work, and when and why does it fail? Animal Behaviour 61:379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A., and M. Wishnie. 2000. Conservation and subsistence in small-scale societies. Annual Review of Anthropology 29(1): 493–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sogbohossou, O.E., Achigan-Dako, E.G., Komlan, F.A. and A. Ahanchede. 2015. Diversity and differential utilization of Amaranthus spp. along the urban-rural continuum of southern Benin. Economic Botany 69(1): 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldati, G. T., and U. P. Albuquerque. 2012. A new application for the optimal foraging theory: The extraction of medicinal plants. Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2012:364564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Souto, T., and T. Ticktin. 2012. Understanding interrelationships among predictors (age, gender, and origin) of local ecological knowledge. Economic Botany 66:149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srithi, K., H. Balslev, P. Wangpakapattanawong, P. Srisanga, and C. Trisonthi. 2009. Medicinal plant knowledge and its erosion among the Mien (Yao) in northern Thailand. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 123:335–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stamp, N. 2003. Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. The Quarterly Review of Biology 39:258–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepp, J. R. 2004. The role of weeds as sources of pharmaceuticals. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 92(2): 163–166.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stepp, J. R. and D. E. Moerman. 2001. The importance of weeds in ethnopharmacology. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 75:19–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tardío, J., and M. Pardo-De-Santayana. 2008. Cultural importance indices: A comparative analysis based on the useful wild plants of southern Cantabria (northern Spain). Economic Botany 62:24–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, E., I. Vandebroek, S. Sanca, and P. Van Damme. 2009. Cultural significance of medicinal plant families and species among Quechua farmers in Apillapampa, Bolivia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 122:60–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ticktin, T. 2004. The ecological implications of harvesting non-timber forest products. Journal of Applied Ecology 41:11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Avilez, W., P. M. de Medeiros, and U. P. Albuquerque. 2016. Effect of gender on the knowledge of medicinal plants: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2016. Article ID 6592363.

  • Turner, N. J. 1973. Plant taxonomic systems and ethnobotany of three contemporary Indian groups of the Pacific Northwest (Haida, Bella Coola, and Lillooet), PhD Dissertation, University of British Columbia.

  • Turner, N. J. 1988. “The importance of a rose”: Evaluating the cultural significance of plants in Thompson and Lillooet Interior Salish. American Anthropologist 90:272–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. General plant categories in Thompson (Nlaka’pamux) and Lillooet (Stl’atl’imx), two Interior Salish languages of British Columbia. In: Minnis P.E. ed Ethnobotany: A reader. Pages 69–87. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.

  • Vandebroek, I., and M. J. Balick. 2012. Globalization and loss of plant knowledge: Challenging the paradigm. PLoS ONE 7:e37643.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Voeks, R. A. 2004. Disturbance pharmacopoeias: Medicine and myth from the humid tropics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 94:868–888.

  • Voeks, R. A. 2007. Are women reservoirs of traditional plant knowledge? Gender, ethnobotany and globalization in northeast Brazil. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 28:7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———., and A. Leony. 2004. Forgetting the forest: Assessing medicinal plant erosion in eastern Brazil. Economic Botany 58:94–106.

  • Walker, B. H. 1992. Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conservation Biology 6:18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Weiner, J. 1995. On the practice of ecology. Journal of Ecology 83:153–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yessoufou, K., B. H. Daru, and A. M. Muasya. 2015. Phylogenetic exploration of commonly used medicinal plants in South Africa. Molecular Ecology Resources 15:405–413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zangerl, A. R., and C. E. Rutledge. 1996. The probability of attack and patterns of constitutive and induced defense: A test of optimal defense theory. American Naturalist 147:599–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarger, R. K., and J. R. Stepp. 2004. Persistence of botanical knowledge among Tzeltal Maya children. Current Anthropology 45:413–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper is inspired by discussion with two generations of undergraduate students in the Theory and Methods in Ethnobotany (BOT 440) course taught by the lead author at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa whose questions and insights shaped this paper. We are grateful to Bob Voeks, Ulysses Albuquerque, and Tamara Ticktin for the comments and insightful discussion on the earlier versions of this manuscript and to two anonymous reviewers for the valuable comments on the manuscript. OGG is supported by a startup grant from the College of Natural Sciences at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OGG conceived of the idea for the paper, outlined and structured its content, drafted the introduction and discussion, and coordinated the overall process. MAC, MB, GH, and BCS drafted the sections on specific theories or major hypotheses. HM contributed primarily to the introduction and discussion with an emphasis on anthropological perspectives and contributions. All authors contributed to the final revision of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orou G. Gaoue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gaoue, O.G., Coe, M.A., Bond, M. et al. Theories and Major Hypotheses in Ethnobotany. Econ Bot 71, 269–287 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9389-8

Key Words

Navigation