Skip to main content
Log in

Distinguised Economic Botanist Award

  • SPECIAL REPORT
  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Appadurai, A. ed. 1986. The social life of things. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balick, M.J. 1994. Ethnobotany, drug development and biodiversity conservation—Exploring the linkages. In: Ethnobotany and the search for new drugs, eds. G.D. Chadwick and J. Marsh, 4–18. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boster, J. 1985. Selection for perceptual distinctiveness: Evidence from Aguaruna cultivars. Economic Botany 39:310–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Exchange of varieties and information between Aguaruna manioc cultivators. American Anthropologist 88:428–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvet-Mir, L. and M. Salpeteur. 2016. Humans, plants, and networks: A critical review. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 7:107–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, F.E.M. 1995. Economic botany data collection standard. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. 1958. Raffia cloth distributions in the Lele economy. Africa 28:109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, M., L. Rival and D. McKey. 2000. Perception and management of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) diversity among Makushi amerindians of Guyana (South America). Journal of Ethnobiology 20:239–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, R. 1996. Putting plants in their place: Anthropological approaches to understanding the ethnobotanical knowledge of rainforest populations. In: Tropical rainforest research - current issues, eds. D.S. Edwards, W.E. Booth and S.C. Choy, 457–465 Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Processing Metroxylon sagu (ARECACEAE) as a technological complex: A case study from south central Seram, Indonesia. Economic Botany 58:601–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Local knowledge and management of sago palm (Metroxylon sagu Rottboell) diversity in south central Seram, Maluku, Eastern Indonesia. Journal of Ethnobiology 26:83–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007a. Plots, typologies and ethnoecology: Local and scientific understandings of forest diversity on Seram. In: Global vs local knowledge, ed. P. Sillitoe, 41–74. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. Introduction. In: Modern crises and traditional strategies: Local ecological knowledge in island Southeast Asia, ed. R. Ellen, 1–45. Oxford: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Is there a role for ontologies in understanding plant knowledge systems? Journal of Ethnobiology 36:10–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Is there a connection between object diversity and aesthetic sensibility?: A comparison between biological domesticates and material culture. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 82:308–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. and R. Komaromi 2013. Social exchange and vegetative propagation: An untold story of British potted plants. Anthropology Today 29:3–7.

  • ———. and S. Platten. 2011. The social life of seeds: The role of networks of relationships in the dispersal and cultural selection of plant germplasm. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute (N.S.) 17:563–84.

  • ———. and R.K. Puri 2016. Conceptualising ‘core’ medicinal floras: A comparative and methodological study of phytomedical resources in related Indonesian populations. Conservation and Society 14:345–358.

  • ———., H.L. Soselisa and A. P. Wulandari 2012. The biocultural history of Manihot esculenta in the Moluccan islands of eastern Indonesia: Assessing the evidence for the movement and selection of cassava germplasm. Journal of Ethnobiology 32:157–184.

  • Harris, M. 1969. The rise of anthropological theory: A history of theories of culture. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iskandar, J. and R. Ellen 1999. In situ conservation of rice landraces among the Baduy of West Java. Journal of Ethnobiology 19:97–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. 1979. The !Kung San: Men and women and work in a foraging society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Jones, K. 2017. Introduction: people and plants. Environment and Society: Advances in Research 7:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, D. and G.E. Williams 1966: Some procedures and results in the study of native categories: Tzeltal firewood. American Anthropologist 68:389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. W. 1986. Sweetness and power. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. 1993. Economic values and the natural world. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, R.A. 1984. Pigs for the ancestors. 2nd ed. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rival, L. ed. 1998. The social life of trees. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone age economics. Chicago and New York: Aldine-Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shigeta, M. 1996. Creating landrace diversity: the case of the Ari people and ensete (Ensete ventricosum) in Ethiopia. In: Redefining nature: Ecology, culture and domestication, eds. R.F. Ellen and K. Fukui, 233–268. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K.S. 1991. Managing diversity in potato and maize fields of the Peruvian Andes. Journal of Ethnobiology 11:23–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Distinguised Economic Botanist Award. Econ Bot 71, 201–208 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9387-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-017-9387-x

Navigation