Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 70, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Oral History Reveals Landscape Ecology in Ecuadorian Amazonia: Time Categories and Ethnobotany among Waorani People1

  • María Gabriela Zurita-BenavidesEmail author
  • Pablo Jarrín–V
  • Montserrat Rios
Article

Oral History Reveals Landscape Ecology in Ecuadorian Amazonia: Time Categories and Ethnobotany among Waorani People. Waorani oral history in Ecuadorian Amazonia reveals that traditional ecological knowledge contributes to the understanding of the natural environment of this human group. When the Waorani interpret the landscape, they identify certain elements that stand out for their cultural and practical value, as these are products of past and present settlements. The oral history and management practices, by two family clusters settled at the riverbanks of the Nushiño River, contributed to assembling an analytical tool called “Waorani time categories.” These four time categories were analyzed with floristic composition based on a matrix formed by 522 plant species collected at 12 forest patches, which either had or lacked social history. The aim of this research was to examine how Waorani oral history records the ecological dynamics of some Amazonian forest patches. The use of multivariate statistical methods made establishing differences in plant diversity, evenness, and richness between managed and unmanaged forests plots possible, thus revealing human impact at specific places in Amazonia. This research confirms that it is important to intertwine social history and landscape ecology in ethnobotany with quantitative statistical interpretation, because it permits the association of a human group with a particular forest.

Key Words

Waorani people oral history human management time category quantitative ethnobotany forest plots Amazonian landscape 

La historia oral revela la ecología del paisaje en la Amazonía ecuatoriana: categorías de tiempo y etnobotánica Waorani. La historia oral de los Waorani en la Amazonía del Ecuador revela que su conocimiento tradicional ecológico aporta a la comprensión de su entorno natural. Los Waorani cuando leen el paisaje identifican ciertos elementos que sobresalen por su valor cultural y uso, porque son producto de asentamientos de ayer y hoy. La historia oral y las prácticas de manejo de dos grupos de familias indígenas asentadas en el río Nushiño contribuyeron para construir una herramienta analítica denominada “categorías de tiempo Waorani”. Las cuatro categorías se evaluaron con un análisis de composición florística a partir de una matriz de 522 especies de plantas recolectadas en 12 parcelas de bosque con y sin historia social. El objetivo de esta investigación fue examinar la manera que la historia oral Waorani registra las dinámicas ecológicas de algunas parcelas del bosque amazónico. La utilización de métodos estadísticos multivariados permitió establecer las diferencias que existen en diversidad, equitabilidad y riqueza vegetal entre bosques manejados y no manejados, evidenciando la influencia del impacto humano en ciertos lugares de la Amazonía. La investigación confirma que en etnobotánica es importante imbricar historia social y ecología del paisaje con estadística cuantitativa, porque permite vincular un grupo humano con un determinado bosque.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first author was supported by a doctoral fellowship of the “Institut de Recherche pour le Développment (IRD-ARTS)” and a grant from the “Society des Amis du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle of France.” We are grateful to: the Waorani people who shared their traditional knowledge with us; the staff at the Herbarium of the Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador (QCA) for their taxonomical advice, especially to Hugo Romero-Saltos, Alvaro Peréz-Castañeda, and Germán Toasa; William Balée, Laura Rival, Manuel Arroyo-Kalin, and Alejandro Casas for their insightful comments to this manuscript; and Kimberly Chamberlain, Emilia Gracia, John White, Craig S. Noles, Daniela Robles, and Daniel Horlacher who provided valuable editorial contributions. In addition, we thank the useful comments from anonymous referees and the editor who helped to improve the manuscript.

Supplementary material

12231_2015_9330_MOESM1_ESM.docx (155 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 155 kb)

Literature Cited

  1. Alencar, E. F. 2010. Dinâmica territorial e mobilidade geográfica no processo de ocupação humana da Reserva de desenvolvimento sustentável Amanã - AM. Uakari 6(1):3–58.Google Scholar
  2. Balée, W. 1994. Footprints of the forest. Ka’apor ethnobotany––The historical ecology of plant utilization by an Amazonian people. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. ——— 2010. Contingent diversity on anthropic landscapes. Diversity 2:163–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ——— 2013. Cultural Forests of the Amazon. A historical ecology of people and their landscapes. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.Google Scholar
  5. Basso, E. B. 1995. The last cannibals. A South American oral history. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
  6. Bonnemaison, J. 1981. Voyage autour du territoire. L’Espace Géographique 10(4):249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabodevilla, M. A. 1994. Los Huaorani en la historia de los pueblos del Oriente. Editorial CICAME, Coca.Google Scholar
  8. Cerón, C. E. 2003. Manual de botánica sistemática, etnobótanica y métodos de estudio en el Ecuador. Herbario Alfredo Paredes (QAP), Escuela de Biología, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito.Google Scholar
  9. ——— and C. Montalvo. 1998. Etnobotánica de los Huaorani de Quehueiri-ono, Napo, Ecuador. FUNDACYT, Ediciones Abya-Yala and Herbario Alfredo Paredes (QAP), Escuela de Biología, Universidad Central del Ecuador, Quito.Google Scholar
  10. Davis, W. E. and J. A. Yost. 1983. The ethnobotany of the Waorani of Eastern Ecuador. Botanical Museum Leaflets 29(3):159–209.Google Scholar
  11. Dean, B. 2009. Urarina society, cosmology, and history in Peruvian Amazonia. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freire Betancout, B. H. 2006. Etnobotánica de las comunidades Huaorani en el noroccidente ecuatoriano. Lyonia 10(2):7–17.Google Scholar
  13. Gell, A. 2000. Time and anthropology. Pages 251–268 in P. Baert, ed., Time in contemporary intellectual thoughts. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gentry, A. H. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75(1):1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Höft, M., S. K. Barik, and A. M. Lykke. 1999. Quantitative ethnobotany. Applications of multivariate and statistical analysis in ethnobotany. People and Plants Working Paper 6. UNESCO, Paris.Google Scholar
  16. International Society of Ethnobiology. 2006. ISE Code of Ethics (with 2008 additions) (http://ethnobiology.net/code-of-ethics/).
  17. Lu, F. E. 2001. The common property regime of the Huaorani Indians of Ecuador: Implications and challenges to conservation. Human Ecology 29(4):425–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Macía, M. J. 2004. Multiplicity in palms uses by the Huaorani of Amazonian Ecuador. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 144(2):149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marques, A. C. 2013. Founders, ancestors, and enemies: Memory, family, time, and space in the Pernambuco sertão. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(4):716–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Montúfar, R., G. Brokamp, and J. Jácome. 2013. Tagua (Phytelephas aequatorialis). Pages 187–201 in R. Valencia, R. Montúfar, H. Navarrete, and H. Balslev, eds., Palmas ecuatorianas: Biología y uso sostenible. Publicaciones del Herbario QCA, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.Google Scholar
  21. Oksanen, J., F. G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, M. H. H. Stevens, and H. Wagner. 2014. Vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.2-0 (http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan).
  22. Posey, D. A. 2002. Environmental and social implications of pre- and post-contact situations on Brazilian Indians. Pages 26–32 in K. Plenderleith, ed., Kayapó ethnoecology and culture. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  23. Puig, H. 2001. La Forêt Tropicale Humide. Berlin, Paris.Google Scholar
  24. Qin, F., Y. Zhao, Q. Li, and M. T. Cai. 2015. Modern pollen assemblages from surface lake sediments in northwestern China and their importance as indicators of vegetation and climate. Science China Earth Sciences 58(9):1633–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. R Core Team. 2014. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna (http://www.R-project.org/).
  26. Reeve, M. E. 1988. Cauchu Uras: Lowland Quichua histories of the Amazon rubber boom. Pages 19–34 in J. D. Hill, ed., Rethinking history and myth: Indigenous South American perspectives on the past. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  27. Rios, M., M. J. Koziol, H. Borgtoft Pedersen, and G. Granda, eds. 2007. Plantas útiles del Ecuador: Aplicaciones, retos y perspectivas/Useful plants of Ecuador: Applications, challenges and perspectives. Ediciones Abya-Yala, Quito.Google Scholar
  28. Rival, L. 2002. Trekking through history. The historical ecological series. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. ——— 2009. Towards an understanding of the Huaorani ways of knowing and naming plants. Pages 47–69 in M. N. Alexiades, ed., Mobility and migration in Indigenous Amazonia. Contemporary ethnoecological perspectives. Berghahn Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Thornton, T. F. 2008. Being and place among the Tlingit. University of Washington Press, Seattle and London.Google Scholar
  31. Yost, J. A. 1981. Twenty years of contact: The mechanisms of change in Wao (“Auca”) culture. Pages 677–704 in N. E. Whitten, ed., Cultural transformations and ethnicity in modern Ecuador. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  32. Zent, S. and E. L. Zent. 2006. Más allá de la demarcación de tierras indígenas: Comparando y contrastando las etnocartografías de agricultores y cazadores recolectores. Antropológica 105–106:67–98.Google Scholar
  33. Zurita Benavides, M. G. 2014. Du «temps du tapir» à nos jours: Les marques du temps dans le paysage. Perspectives de deux villages Waorani sur les relations entre les espaces forestiers et le temps en Amazonie équatorienne. Ph.D. thesis in ethnoecology, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • María Gabriela Zurita-Benavides
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Pablo Jarrín–V
    • 2
  • Montserrat Rios
    • 3
  1. 1.Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Département Hommes, Natures, Sociétés, UMR 208 – IRD/MNHN – Patrimoines Locaux et GouvernanceParisFrance
  2. 2.Universidad Regional Amazónica IKIAMTenaEcuador
  3. 3.Institute for Tropical Ecology and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations