Economic Botany

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 363–377 | Cite as

Nutritional Content of Scots Pine Inner Bark in Northern Fennoscandia

Nutritional Content of Scots Pine Inner Bark and Ethnographic Context of its Use in Northern Fennoscandia
  • Anna–Maria Rautio
  • Gudrun Norstedt
  • Lars Östlund
Article

Nutritional Content of Scots Pine Inner Bark in Northern Fennoscandia. The overall aim of this study was to determine the nutritional benefits of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) inner bark and to position this traditional food resource within the Sami diet. We hypothesized that the nutritional and sugar content of inner bark varied annually, seasonally, with location, and even on a tree–by–tree basis. We concluded that Scots pine inner bark is an energy–rich plant food that, due to its high fibrous content, could sustain energy levels during long–term physical activity. It is also rich in minerals, primarily calcium and potassium. From historical records, we know that inner bark was harvested during early summer and we propose that this mainly depends on raised starch levels in the tree during this season. Scots pine stands and individual trees showed a large variance of soluble sugars during June, which explains the spatial patterns of bark–peeling scars in the landscape. However, nutrients and sugars alone cannot explain this spatial pattern. Rather, it is the result of many factors, such as the migratory pattern (i.e., where people were residing at the time of the inner bark harvest), the weather in a particular year (late or early summer), the availability of other food resources, and logistical reasons including processing of the inner bark.

Key Words

Forest history bark-peelings plant food culturally modified trees seasonality spatial pattern Pinus sylvestris ethnobotany 

El contenido nutricional del interior de la corteza de pino silvestre y contexto etnográfico de su uso en el norte de Fennoscandia. El objetivo general de este estudio fue determinar los beneficios nutricionales de la corteza interna del pino silvestre (Pinus sylvestris L.) y el lugar que ocupa este tradicional recurso alimenticio en la dieta del pueblo sami. Partimos de la hipótesis de que el contenido nutricional y de azúcar de la corteza interna varía cada año, e incluso de un árbol a otro, según la estación y el lugar. Nuestra conclusión es que la corteza interna del pino silvestre es un alimento vegetal que aporta una gran cantidad de energía y que podría mantener los niveles de energía durante largos períodos de actividad física debido a su alto contenido de fibra. Además, es rica en minerales, especialmente calcio y potasio. Gracias a la información que nos brindan los documentos históricos, sabemos que la corteza interna se recogía a principios del verano. Nuestra tesis es que esto se debe principalmente al hecho de que los niveles de almidón en el árbol son más elevados durante esta estación. Tanto los rodales como los árboles individuales mostraron una gran variación de azúcares solubles en junio, lo que explica los patrones espaciales relacionados con las cicatrices que se observan en la corteza de los árboles de la región. Sin embargo, los nutrientes y los azúcares no son los únicos factores que pueden explicar estos patrones espaciales. Más bien se podría decir que estos patrones espaciales son el resultado de diversos factores, como el patrón migratorio (es decir, el lugar donde vivían las personas durante la época en la que se recogía la corteza), las condiciones climáticas durante un determinado año (a comienzos o a finales del verano), la disponibilidad de otros recursos alimenticios y motivos logísticos, incluido el procesamiento de la corteza interna.

Literature Cited

  1. Argounova–Low, T. 2009. Black food: Subsistence, diet, and exchange in Yessei Yakut Society. Ethnohistory 56(3):479–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Belitz, H.-D., W. Grosch, and P. Schieberle. 2009. Food Chemistry. 4. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  3. Bergman, I., L. Östlund, and O. Zackrisson. 2004. The use of plants as regular food in ancient subarctic economies: A case study based on Sami use of Scots pine inner bark. Arctic Anthropology 41(1):1–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brand, J. C., J. B. Snow, G. Nabhan, and S. A. Trustwell. 1990. Plasma glucose and insulin responses to traditional Pima Indian meals. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 51:416–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brand–Miller, J. C. and S. H. A. Holt. 1998. Australian aboriginal plant foods: A consideration of their nutritional composition and health implications. Nutrition Research Reviews 11:5–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cordain, L., S. B. Eaton, J. Brand Miller, N. Mann, and K. Hill. 2002. The paradoxical nature of hunter–gatherer diets: Meat–based, yet non–atherogenic. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 56(1):42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dilbone, M., N. J. Turner, and P. von Aderkas. 2013. Lodgepole pine cambium (Pinus contorta Dougl. ex Loud. var latifolia Engelm. ex S. Wats): A springtime first peoples’ food in British Columbia. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 52(2):130–147.Google Scholar
  8. Eidlitz, K. 1969. Food and emergency food in the circumpolar area. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Common and Comparing Ethnography, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
  9. Eldridge, A. 1982. Cambium resources of the Pacific Northwest: An ethnographic and archaeological study. Honors thesis, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  10. Ericsson, A. 1980. Some aspects of carbohydrate dynamics in Scots pine trees (Pinus sylvestris L.). Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Plant Physiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
  11. Fellman, J. 1906. Anteckningar från min vistelse i lappmarken. [Notes from my stay in Lapland]. Part 3. Finska litteratursällskapet, Helsinki.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer, C. and W. Höll. 1991. Food reserves of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) 1. Seasonal changes in the carbohydrate and fat reserves of pine needles. Trees 5:187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ——— and ———. 1992. Food reserves of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) 2. Seasonal changes and radial distribution of carbohydrate and fat reserves in pine wood. Trees 6:147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gaertner, E. E. 1970. Breadstuff from fir (Abies balsamea). Economic Botany 24(1):69–72.Google Scholar
  15. Gottesfeld, L. M. J. 1991. The importance of bark products in the aboriginal economies of northwestern British Columbia, Canada. Economic Botany 46(2):148–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansen, L. I. and B. Olsen. 2006. Samernas historia fram till 1750. [The history of the Sami until 1750]. Liber, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  17. Helmisaari, H.-S. and T. Siltala. 1989. Variation in nutrient concentrations of Pinus sylvestris stems. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 4:443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Itkonen, T. I. 1948. Suomen lappalaisten vuoteen 1945 [Finnish Sami until 1945]. WSOY, Porvo.Google Scholar
  19. Kaipianinen, L. K. and G. I. Sofronova. 2003. The role of the transport system in the control of the source–sink relations in Pinus sylvestris. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology 50(1):125–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Karonen, M., M. Hämäläinen, R. Nieminen, K. D. Klika, J. Loponen, V. V. Ovcharenko, E. Moilanen, and K. Philaja. 2004. Phenolic extractives from the bark of Pinus sylvestris L. and their effects on inflammatory mediators nitric oxide and prostaglandine E2. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 52:7532–7540.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kähkönen, M. P., A. I. Hopia, H. J. Vuorela, J.–. P. Rauha, K. Pihlaja, T. S. Kujala, and M. Heinonen. 1999. Antioxidant activity of plant extracts containing phenolic compounds. Journal of Agricultural Food Chemistry 47:3954–3962.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Källman, S. 2006. Vilda växter som mat och medicin. [Wild plants as food and medicine], 2nd edition. Ica, Västerås, Sweden.Google Scholar
  23. Korhonen, T. 1986. Puusta syötävää. [Food from trees]. Suomen museolahti 1:65–105.Google Scholar
  24. Kozlowski, T. T. 1992. Carbohydrate sources and sinks in woody plants. The Botanical Review 58(2):107–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuhnlein, H. V. 2000. The joys and pains of sampling and analysis of traditional food of indigenous peoples. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 13:649–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kytölä, R. 1999. Kaarnikasta kalanpaistokeppiin: petsamonsaamelainen eilinen. Maa – ja Metsätalousministeriö, Kotka, Finland.Google Scholar
  27. Lantz, T. C. and N. J. Turner. 2003. Traditional phenological knowledge of aboriginal peoples in British Columbia. Journal of Ethnobiology 23(2):263–286.Google Scholar
  28. Leem, K. 1975. 1767] Beskrivelse over Finnmarkens Lapper. [Descriptions of the Lapps in Finnmark. Rosenkilde og Bagger, Copenhagen].Google Scholar
  29. Little, C. H. A. 1970. Derivation of springtime starch increase in balsam fir (Abies balsamea). Canadian Journal of Botany 48(11):1995–1999.Google Scholar
  30. Lundius, N. 1983 [1674]. Descriptio Lapponiae. In: Berättelser om samerna i 1600–talets Sverige. –Faks.–utg. av de s.k. prästrelationerna m.m. först publicerade av K. B. Wiklund 1897–1909 / med företal av Phebe Fjellström och efterskrift av Israel Ruong. Umeå, Sweden: Skytteanska samf. handlingar, nr 27.Google Scholar
  31. Lundmark, L. 1982. Uppbörd, utarmning, utveckling: det samiska fångstsamhällets övergång till rennomadism i Lule lappmark. [Levy, exhaustion and development: the Sami transition from hunter–gatherers to reindeer nomadism in the Lule parish]. Arkiv för studier i arbetarrörelsens historia, Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  32. Niklasson, M., O. Zackrisson, and L. Östlund. 1994. A dendroecological reconstruction of use by Sami of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) inner bark over the last 350 years at Sädvajaure N. Sweden. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 3:183–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Oleksyn, J., R. Zykowiak, P. Karolewski, P. B. Reich, and M. G. Tjoelker. 2000. Genetics and environmental control of seasonal carbohydrate dynamics in trees of diverse Pinus sylvestris populations. Tree Physiology 20:837–847.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Östlund, L., L. Ahlberg, O. Zackrisson, I. Bergman, and S. Arno. 2009. Bark–peeling food stress and tree–spirits—The use of pine inner–bark for food in Scandinavia and North America. Journal of Ethnobiology 29(1):94–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———, I. Bergman, and O. Zackrisson. 2003. Trees for food – a 3000 year record of subarctic plant use. Antiquity 78(300):278–286.Google Scholar
  36. ———, B. Keane, S. Arno, and R. Andersson. 2005. Culturally scarred trees in The Bob Marshall Wilderness, Montana, USA—Interpreting Native American historical forest use in a wilderness area. Natural Areas Journal 25(4):315–325.Google Scholar
  37. Pan, H. and L. N. Lundgren. 1996. Phenolics from inner bark of Pinus sylvestris. Photochemistry 42(4):1185–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parkerson, R. H. and F. W. Whitmore. 1972. A correlation of stem sugars, starch and lipid with wood formation in eastern white pine. Forest Science 18(3):178–183.Google Scholar
  39. Pomeroy, M. K., D. Siminovi, and F. Wightman. 1970. Seasonal biochemical changes in living bark and needles of red pine (Pinus resinosa) in relation to adaptation to freezing. Canadian Journal of Botany 48(5):953–967.Google Scholar
  40. Prince, P. 2001. Dating and interpreting pine cambium collection scars from two parts of the Nechako river drainage, British Columbia. Journal of Archaeological Science 28:253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Qvarnström, E. 2009. “De tycka emellertid av gammal vana att det smakar gott, och tro dessutom att det är bra för hälsan” —samiskt växtutnyttjande från 1600–talet fram till ca 1950. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden, Master thesis.Google Scholar
  42. Rautio, A.–M. In press. Sami resource utilization and site selection: Historical harvesting of inner bark in northern Sweden. Journal of Human Ecology.Google Scholar
  43. Rheen, S. 1983. [1671] En kort relation om lapparnes lefwerne och sedher…[A brief relation on the Lapp life and custom…]. In: Berättelser om samerna i 1600–talets Sverige. –Faks.–utg. av de s.k. prästrelationerna m.m. först publicerade av K. B. Wiklund 1897–1909 / med företal av Phebe Fjellström och efterskrift av Israel Ruong. Umeå: Skytteanska samf. handlingar, nr 27.Google Scholar
  44. Saaranpää, P. and W. Höll. 1989. Soluble carbohydrates of Pinus sylvestris L. sapwood and heartwood. Trees 3:138–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sandberg, H. R. 1898. Reseberättelse, afgifven på grund af en med statsanslag beviljadt af Kejs. Senaten den 27 april 1892, företagen forstlig studieresa till Inari, Utsijoki och Enontekis lappmarker. [Forest excursions in Inari, Utsjoki and Enontekis Lappmarks]. Finska forstföreningens meddelanden 15:133–203.Google Scholar
  46. Sjögren, P. and A. J. Kirchhefer. 2012. Historical legacy of the old–growth pine forest in Dividalen, northern Scandes. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 8(4):338–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stitt, M., R. M. C. Liley, R. Gerhardt, and H. W. Heldt. 1989. Metabolite levels in specific cells and subcellular compartments of plant leaves. Methods in Enzymology 174:518–552.Google Scholar
  48. Sudachkova, N. E., I. L. Milyutina, and G. P. Semenova. 2002. Influence of water deficit on contents of carbohydrates and nitrogenous compounds in Pinus sylvestris L. and Larix sibirica Ledeb. Tissues. Eurasian Journal of Forest Research 4:1–11.Google Scholar
  49. Svanberg, I. 2012. The use of wild plants as food in pre–industrial Sweden. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 81(4):317–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. ———, R. Sõukand, Ł. Łuczaj, R. Kalle, O. Zyryanova, A. Dénes, N. Papp, A. Nedelcheva, D. Šeškauskaite, I. Kołodziejska–Degórska, and V. Kolosova. 2012. Uses of tree saps in northern and eastern parts of Europe. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 81(4):343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Swetnam, T. W. 1984. Peeled ponderosa pine trees: A record of inner bark utilization by native Americans. Journal of Ethnobiology 4(2):177–190.Google Scholar
  52. Thorne, J. H. and R. M. Rainbird. 1983. An in vivo technique for the study of phloem unloading in seed coats of developing soybean seeds. Plant Physiology 72:268–271.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner, N. J., Y. Ari, F. Berkes, I. Davidson–Hunt, F. Ertug, and A. M. Miller. 2009. Cultural management of living trees: An international perspective. Journal of Ethnobiology 29(2):237–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Urbye, J. G. 1937. Barkemel som antiscorbium. [Bark–flour against scurvy]. Tidsskrift för den norske laegeförening 57:975–979.Google Scholar
  55. Zackrisson, O., L. Östlund, O. Korhonen, and I. Bergman. 2000. The ancient use of Pinus sylvestris L. (Scots pine) inner bark by Sami people in northern Sweden, related to cultural and ecological factors. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 9:99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna–Maria Rautio
    • 1
  • Gudrun Norstedt
    • 1
  • Lars Östlund
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Ecology and ManagementSwedish University of Agricultural ScienceUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations