Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of Terra Firme Forest by Caicubi Caboclos, Middle Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazil. A Quantitative Study

  • Published:
Economic Botany Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Use of Terra Firme Forest by Caicubi Caboclos, Middle Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazil. A Quantitative Study. An ethnobotanical study was carried out with caboclos from the village of Caicubi, Roraima State, Brazil. This village is located between the Rio Negro and Rio Branco. The data were collected in 1 ha of terra firme forest and involved caboclo knowledge of the tree species with individuals dbh ≥ 10 cm. A total of 11 informants between 34 to 74 years of age were interviewed. The caboclos used 185 (98%) of the 189 species analyzed. The family with the highest use value for the community was Arecaceae. The species with the highest use value was Bertholletia excelsa. Arecaceae, Lecythidaceae, and Sapotaceae showed a wide variety of uses. The uses were grouped into eight categories; those with the highest use values were firewood, technology, and construction. The mean use value for species was 1.6. The most intensely used resources in the forest were wood, leaves, spines, and exudates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Alexiades, M. 1996. Collecting Ethnobotanical Data: An Introduction to Basic Concepts and Techniques. Pages 353–394 in Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanical Research: A Field Manual. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.

  • Balée, W. 1986. Análise Preliminar de Inventário Florestal e a Etnobotânica Ka’apor (Maranhão). Boletim Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi 2(2):141–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________. 1987. A Etnobotânica Quantitativa dos Índios Tembé (Rio Gurupi, Pará)1. Boletim Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi 3(1):29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boom, B. M. 1988. The Chácabo Indians and their Palms. Advances in Economic Botany 6:91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________. 1989. Use of Plant Resources by the Chácabo. Advances in Economic Botany 7:78–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________. 1990. Useful Plants of the Panare Indians of the Venezuelam Guyana. Advances in Economic Botany 8:57–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos, M. T. and Ehringhaus C. 2003. Plant Virtues in the Eyes of the Beholders: A Comparison of Known Palm Uses among Indigenous and Folk Communities of Southwestern Amazônia. Economic Botany 57(3):324–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano, G. 2000. Forest Use at the Pacific Coast of Chocó, Colombia: A Quantitative Approach. Economic Botany 54(3):358–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • German, L. 2001. Cap 7: Formas Tradicionais de Exploração e Conservação das Florestas. Pages 221–253 in A. A. Oliveira and D. Daly, eds., Florestas do Rio Negro. The New York Botanical Garden, New York

  • Milliken, W., R. P. Miller, S. R. Pollard, and E. V. Wandelli. 1992. The Ethnobotany of the Waimiri Atroari Indians of Brazil. Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, U.K.

  • Parker, E. P. 1989. A Neglected Human Resource in Amazonia: The Amazon Caboclo. Advances in Economic Botany 7:249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz y Miño, G., H. Baslev, and V. Renato. 1995. Useful Lianas of the Siona-Secoya Indians from Amazonian Ecuador. Economic Botany 49(3)269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, O. 1996. Some Quantitative Methods for Analyzing Ethnobotanical Knowledge. Pages 171–197 in M. Alexiades, Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanica Research: A Field Manual. Chapter 9. New York Botanical Garden, New York.

  • ________ and A. H. Gentry 1993a. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: I. Statistical Hypotheses Tests with a New Quantitative Technique. Economic Botany 47(1):15–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________ and A. H. Gentry. 1993b. The Useful Plants of Tambopata, Peru: II. Additional Hypothesis Testing in Quantitative Ethnobotany. Economic Botany 47(1):33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________, A. H Gentry, C. Reynel, P. Wilkin, and C. Gálvez-Durand. 1994. Quantitative Ethnobotany and Amazonian Conservation. Conservation Biology 8(1):225–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinedo-Vazquez, M., D. Zarin, P. Jipp, and J. Chota-Inuma. 1990. Use Value of Tree Species in a Communal Forest Reserve in Northeast Peru. Conservation Biology 4(4):405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prance, G. T. 1972. An Ethnobotanical Comparison of Four Tribes of Amazonian Indians. Acta Amazônica 2(2):7–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ________. 1995. Ethnobotany Today and in the Future. Pages 60–71 in R. E. Schultes and S. Reis, ed., Ethnobotany: Evolution of a Discipline. Timber Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • ________, W. Baleé, B. M. Boom, and L. R. Carneiro. 1987 Quantitative Ethnobotany and the Case for Conservation in Amazônia. Conservation Biology 1(4):296–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo, F. P., F. B. L. B. Vianna, M. P. Rufino, P .L. Mesquita, and V. Macedo. 2005. Povos Indígenas no Brasil. http://www.sociambiental.org/pib/portugues/linguas/linger.shtm#t2

  • Soler-Alarcon, J. G. and A. L. Peixoto. 2007. Florística e Fitossociologia de um trecho de Floresta de Terra Firme em Caracaraí, Roraima, Brasil. Boletim Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi V.2(2).

  • Vicentini, A. 1999. Lauraceae. Pages 150–179 in J. E. L. S. Ribeiro, M. J. G. Hopkins, A. Vicentini, C. A. Sothers, M. A. S. Costa, J. M. Brito, M. A. D. Souza, L. H. P. Martins, L. G. Lohmann, P. A. C. L. Assunção, E. C. Pereira, C. F. Silva, M. R. Mesquita, and L. C. Procópio, Flora da Reserva Ducke. Guia de Identificação das Plantas Vasculares de uma Floresta de Terra-Firme na Amazônia Central. INPA-DFID, Manaus, AM, Brazil.

  • Zent, S. 1996. Behavioral Orientations towards Ethnobotanical Quantification. Pages 199–223 in M. Alexiades, Selected Guidelines for Ethnobotanica Research: A Field Manual. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.

Download references

Acknowlegments

We thank the Instituto Caiuá for financial support of field work, especially Walo Leuzinger; the community of Caicubi village for giving us shelter, especially Ernane Fontes Barbosa for his help and dedication in the field; Pedrinho Jazinto Ogasti (Wilson), José dos Santos (Passarinho), Juzelino Ferreira da Silva, Duacir de Melos das Cahagas (Gavião), Elio Brasão (Gary), Arlindo Mendes da Costa, Elizabeth Araújo da Costa, Plinia de Melo, Alberto Cerrão dos Santos (Mutum), and Esteban Brás Monteiro. Thanks to C.A. Cid Ferreira for support at the INPA herbarium and P. Assunção for helping to identify specimens at the INPA herbarium; specialists A. Vicentini, D. Daly, J. E. Ribeiro, and M. Hopkins for identifying species belonging to their families; D. Araujo for reviewing an early version of this paper; and the staff of the Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro for being so helpful. This research was supported by a grant from Capes (scholarship) and CNPq (research).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Gabriel Soler Alarcón.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soler Alarcón, J.G., Luna Peixoto, A. Use of Terra Firme Forest by Caicubi Caboclos, Middle Rio Negro, Amazonas, Brazil. A Quantitative Study. Econ Bot 62, 60–73 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9001-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12231-007-9001-8

Keywords

Navigation