Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Palm Harvest Impacts in North-Western South America

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tropical forests harbor thousands of useful plants that are harvested and used in subsistence economies or traded in local, regional or international markets. The effect on the ecosystem is little known, and the forests resilience is badly understood. Palms are the most useful group of plants in tropical American forests. This paper introduces a cross-disciplinary study of the effects of harvesting palm products from the tropical forests in north-western South America. The size of the resource is estimated through palm community studies in the different forest formations that determines the number of species and individuals of all palm species. The genetic structure of useful palm species is studied to determine how much harvesting of the species contributes to genetic erosion of its populations, and whether extraction can be made without harm. Almost all palm species are used in rural communities for subsistence purposes Quantitative ethno-botanical research in different forest types have identified thousands of different ways of using palms for food, construction, tool-making, etc. Although most palms are used by the person harvesting them, many are sold on local markets as fruits, fiber, tools, construction materials etc., and a few have reached larger markets, including international markets. Palm populations are managed in various ways of which some are sustainable and others are destructive. National level mechanisms that governs extraction, trade and commercialization of palm products, are used to identify positive and negative policies in relation to resilience of ecosystems.

Resumen

Los bosques tropicales albergan miles de plantas útiles usadas en economías de subsistencia o comercializadas en mercados locales, regionales e internacionales. El efecto de la cosecha de estos productos sobre el ecosistema y la adaptabilidad del mismo son poco conocidos. En los bosques tropicales americanos, las palmas forman el grupo de plantas con más usos. Este artículo presenta un estudio interdisciplinario de los efectos de la cosecha de productos derivados de palmas en los bosques tropicales noroccidentales de América del Sur. Se estima el tamaño del recurso a través de estudios de la comunidades de palmas para determinar el número de especies e individuos de palmas en las diferentes formaciones forestales. Se estudia la estructura genética de palmas útiles para cuantificar el impacto la cosecha en la erosión genética de sus poblaciones y para determinar si se puede cosechar sin detrimento de las mismas. Estudios etnobotánicos cuantitativos en diferentes tipos de bosques han identificado, literalmente, miles de usos diferentes de palmas como alimento, para construcción, elaboración de herramientas, etc. La mayoría de las palmas son usadas por la misma persona que las cosecha. Sin embargo, muchos productos de palmas (frutos, fibras, herramientas, y materiales para construcción) son comercializados en mercados locales y regionales. Algunos productos como el palmito y el marfil vegetal llegan a mercados nacionales y internacionales. El manejo de las poblaciones de palmas útiles varía desde manejo sostenible hasta sistemas que involucran la destrucción de la palma. Se utilizan los mecanismos legales que gobiernan la extracción y comercialización de productos derivados de palmas en los países estudiados, paraidentificar las políticas con impacto positivo o negativo sobre la adaptabilidad del ecosistema.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Literature Cited

  • Baez, S. & H. Balslev. 2007. Edge effects on palm diversity in rain forest fragments in western Ecuador. Biodiversity & Conservation 16: 2201–2211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balslev, H., C. Grández, N. Y. Paniagua Zambrana, A. L. Møller & S. Lykke Hansen. 2008. Palmas (Arecaceae) útiles en los alrededores de Iquitos, Amazonía Peruana. Revista Peruana de Biología 15(supl. 1): 121–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———, F. Kahn, B. Millan, J.-C. Svenning, T. Kristiansen, D. Pedersen & W. Eiserhardt. 2011. Species diversity and growth forms in tropical American palm communities. The Botanical Review. Accepted.

  • ———, T. R. Knudsen, A. Byg, M. Kronborg & C. Grandez. 2010. Traditional knowledge, use, and management of Aphandra natalia (Arecaceae) in Amazonian Peru. Economic Botany 64: 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal, R., C. Torres, N. García, C. Isaza, J. Navarro, M. I. Vallejo, G. Galeano & H. Balslev. 2011 Palm management in South America. The Botanical Review. Accepted

  • Bjorholm, S., J.-C. Svenning, W. J. Baker, F. Skov & H. Balslev. 2006. Historical legacies in the geographic diversity patterns of New World palm (Arecaceae) subfamilies. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodmer, R. E., P. E. Puertas, J. E. García, D. R. Dias & C. Reyes. 1999. Game animals, palms, and people of the flooded forests: Management considerations for the Pacaya-Samiria national reserve, Peru. Advances in Economic Botany 13: 217–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boom, B. M. 1988. The Chácobo indians and their palms. Advances in Economic Botany 6: 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgtoft Pedersen, H. & H. Balslev. 1992. The economic botany of Ecuadorian palms. Pp 173–191. In: M. Plotkin & L. Famolare (eds). Sustainable harvest and marketing of rain forest products. Island, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brokamp, G., N. Valderrama, M. Mittelbach, C. A. Grández R., A. S. Barfod & M. Weigend. 2011. Trade in palm products in north-western South America. The Botanical Review. Accepted.

  • Brooks, T. M., R. A. Mittermeier, C. G. Mittermeier, G. A. B. da Fonseca, A. B. Rylands, W. R. Konstant, P. Flick, J. Pilgrim, S. Oldfield, G. Magin & C. Hilton-Taylor. 2002. Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conservation Biology 16: 909–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burney, D. A. & T. F. Flannery. 2005. Fifty millennia of catastrophic extinctions after human contact. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 20: 395–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S. R., E. M. Bennett & G. D. Peterson. 2006. Scenarios for ecosystem services: An overview. Ecology and Society 11(1): 29 [on line].

    Google Scholar 

  • Cincotta, R., J. Wilsnewski & R. Engelman. 2000. Human population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature 404: 990–992.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, C. R. 1999. 1492 and the loss of crop genetic resources. I. The relation between domestication and human population decline. II. Crop biogeography at contact. Economic Botany 53: 188–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couvreur, T. L. P., N. Billotte, A.-M. Risterucci, C. Lara, Y. Vigouroux, B. Ludeña, J.-L. Pham & J.-C. Pintaud. 2006. Close genetic proximity between cultivated and wild Bactris gasipaes Kunth revealed by microsatellite markers in western Ecuador. Genetic Resources & Crop Evolution 53: 1361–1373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. G., C. D. L. Orme, V. Olson, G. H. Thomas, S. G. Ross, T. Ding, P. C. Rasmussen, A. J. Stattersfield, P. M. Bennett, T. M. Blackburn, I. P. F. Owens & K. J. Gaston. 2006. Human impacts and the global distribution of extinction risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 273: 2127–2133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. R. & A. H. Ehrlich. 1992. The value of biodiversity. Ambio 21: 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjeldså, J., M. D. Álvarez, J. M. Lazcano & B. León. 2005. Illicit crops and armed conflict as constraints on biodiversity conservation in the Andes region. Ambio 34: 205–211.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, C. F. & M. S. Ashton. 2000. Harvesting impact and economic value of Geonoma deversa, Arecaceae, an understory palm used for roof thatching in the Peruvian Amazon. Economic Botany 54: 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C. & L. Gunderson. 2006. Facing global change through social-ecological research. Ecology and Society 11(2): 43 [on line].

    Google Scholar 

  • _______, S. Carpenter, T. Elmqvist, L. Gunderson, C. S. Holling & B. Walker. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: Building adaptive capacity in a World of transformations. Ambio 31: 437–440.

  • Frost, P., B. Campbell, G. Medina & L. Usongo. 2006. Landscape-scale approaches for integrated natural resource management in tropical forest landscapes. Ecology and Society 11(2): 30 [on line].

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, M. 1980. Pp 280. The fishes and the forest. Explorations in Amazonian natural history. University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagmann, J., E. Chuma, K. Murwira, M. Connolly & P. Ficarelli. 2002. Success factors in integrated natural resource management R&D: Lessons from practise. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 29 [on line].

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. B., A. B. Anderson & B. May. 1988. The subsidy for nature: Shifting cultivation, successional palm forests, and rural development. Human Organization 47: 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holm Jensen, O. & H. Balslev. 1995. Ethnobotany of the fiber palm Astrocaryum chambira (Arecaceae) in Amazonian Ecuador. Economic Botany 49: 309–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, F. 1987. The distribution of palms as a function of local topography in Amazonian terra-firme forests. Experientia 43: 251–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— & J.-J. Granville. 1992. Palms in forest ecosystems of Amazonia. Springer, Berlin.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kusters, K., R. Achdiawan, B. Belcher & M. Ruiz-Pérez. 2006. Balancing development and conservation? An assessment of livelihood and environmental outcomes of nontimber forest products trade in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Ecology and Society 11(2): 20 [on line].

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvist, L. P. & G. Nebel. 2001. A review of Peruvian flood plain forests: Ecosystems, inhabitants and resource use. Forest Ecology & Management 150: 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F., T. E. Lovejoy, H. L. Vasconcelos, E. M. Bruna, R. K. Didham, P. C. Stouffer, C. Gascon, R. O. Bierregaard, S. G. Laurance & E. Sampaio. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: A 22-year investigation. Conservation Biology 16: 605–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, A. J., D. Boshier, M. Ward, C. F. E. Bacles & C. Navarro. 2005. Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation; reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity 95: 255–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Macía , M. J., P. J. Armesilla, R. Cámara-Leret, N. Paniagua-Zambrana, S. Villalba, H. Balslev & M. Pardo-de-Santayana. 2011. Palm uses in northwestern South America: a quantitative review. The Botanical Review. Accepted

  • ——— & J.-C. Svenning. 2005. Oliogarchic dominance in western Amazonian plant communities. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21: 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MA). 2003. Ecosystems and their services. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. a. multiscale assessment. b. current state and trends. c. scenarios. d. policy responses. 2006. Ecosystems and human well-being. Our human planet: summary for decision makers. Island Press, Washington, D.C.

  • Montúfar, R. 2007. Structure morphologique, génétique et écologique de Oenocarpus bataua (Arecaceae): Perspectives pour la valorisation durable d’une ressource forestière néotropicale. Thèse, Ecole Nationale Supérieure Agronomique de Montpellier.

  • _________, F. Anthelme, J.-C. Pintaud & H. Balslev. 2011.. Disturbance and resilience in tropical American palm populations and communities. The Botanical Review. Accepted

  • ———, C. Mariac, J.-L. Pham & J.-C. Pintaud. 2007. Isolation of 23 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the Neotropical palm Oenocarpus bataua Martius (Arecaceae). Molecular Ecology Notes 7: 75–78.

  • ——— & J.-C. Pintaud. 2006 Variation in species composition, abundance and microhabitat preferences among western Amazonian terra firme palm communities. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 151: 127–140.

  • Morcote-Ríos, G. & R. Bernal. 2001. Remains of palms (Palmae) at archaeological sites in the New World: A review. The Botanical Review 67: 309–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. C., E. Bennett, A. A. Berhe, K. Cassmman, R. DeFries, T. Dietz, A. Dobermann, A. Dobson, A. Janetos, M. Levy, D. Marco, N. Nakicenovic, B. O’Neill, R. Norgaard, G. Petschel-Held, D. Ojima, P. Pingali, R. Watson & M. Zurek. 2006. Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: An overview. Ecology and Society 11(2): 29 [on line].

    Google Scholar 

  • Normand, S., J. Voormisto, J.-C. Svenning, C. Grández & H. Balslev. 2006. Geographic and environmental controls of palm beta diversity in paleo-riverine terrace forests in Amazonian Peru. Plant Ecology 186: 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orme, C. D. L., R. G. Davies, M. Burgess, F. Eigenbrod, N. Pickup, V. A. Olson, A. J. Webster, T.-S. Ding, P. C. Rasmussen, R. S. Ridgely, A. J. Stattersfield, P. M. Bennett, T. M. Blackburn, K. J. Gaston & I. P. F. Owens. 2005. Global hotspots of species richness are not congruent with endemism or threat. Nature 436: 1016–1019.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paniagua Zambrana, N. Y., A. Byg, J.-C. Svenning, M. Moraes, C. Grández & H. Balslev. 2007. Diversity of palm uses in the western Amazon. Biodiversity and Conservation 16: 2771–2787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, C. M. & E. J. Hammond. 1990. Fruits from the flooded forests of Peruvian Amazonia: Yield estimates for natural populations of three promising species. Advances in Economic Botany 8: 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, A. C. 1999. Twelve thousand years of human-environmental interaction in the Amazon floodplain. Advances in Economic Botany 13: 371–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shone, B. M. & J. L. Caviglia-Harris. 2006. Quantifying and comparing the value of non-timber forest products in the Amazon. Ecological Economics 58: 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosnowska, J. & H. Balslev. 2009. American palm-ethnomedicine: A meta-analysis. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 5: 43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., J. Fargione, B. Wolff, C. D’Antonio, A. Dobson, R. Howarth, D. Schindler, W. H. Schlesinger, D. Simberloff & D. Swackhamer. 2001. Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change. Science 292(5515): 281–284.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Torre, L. de la, R. Valencia, C. Altamirana & H. Munk Ravnborg. 2011. Legal and administrative regulation of palms and other NTFPs in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and Bolivia. The Botanical Review. Accepted.

  • Vormisto, J., J.-C. Svenning, P. Hall & H. Balslev. 2004. Diversity and dominance in palm (Arecaceae) communities in the western Amazon basin. Journal of Ecology 92: 577–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., C. S. Holling, S. R. Carpenter & A. Kinzig. 2004. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society 9(2): 5 [on line].

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, G.-R., E. Post, P. Convey, A. Menzel, C. Parmesan, T. J. C. Beebee, J.-M. Fromentin, O. Hoegh-Guldberg & F. Bairlein. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climatic change. Nature 416: 389–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, K. J., L. Gillson & T. M. Brncic. 2004. How “virgin” is virgin rainforest? Science 304(5669): 402–403.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The hard work of the PALMS work-package coordinators and their colleagues to produce the six chapters following this introduction is greatly appreciated. I am especially grateful to Lars Peter Kvist, who worked on the original grant proposal on which this introductory chapter is based. The project Palm Harvest Impacts on Tropical Forests (PALMS) is funded by the European Communities 7th Framework Program through contract no. 213631.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henrik Balslev.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balslev, H. Palm Harvest Impacts in North-Western South America. Bot. Rev. 77, 370–380 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-011-9083-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-011-9083-y

Keywords

Palabras Clave